Comparison of inhalation inductions with xenon and sevoflurane

Background: Xenon is an odorless gas with low blood-gas solubility coefficient and without occupational and environmental hazards. This investigation was performed to evaluate the speed of induction, and respiratory and cardiovascular reactions to inhalation induction with xenon compared to an equianesthetic concentration of sevoflurane.
Results: Compared to equianesthetic sevoflurane, xenon produced a faster induction of anesthesia (14759 versus 71221 s, respectively) with smaller decreases in respiratory rate, tidal volume and minute ventilation. Both agents showed comparable cardiovascular stability and oxygen saturation during induction. One patient in the sevoflurane group had breath-holding and movements of extremities and another had only breath-holding. No patients in the xenon group experienced any complications.
Conclusion: Xenon produced a faster induction of anesthesia without any complications than sevoflurane. Xenon had smaller decreases in tidal volume and respiratory rate during induction than sevoflurane. Xenon might offer an alternative to sevoflurane for an inhalation induction.
Method Twenty-four adult ASA 1–2 patients premedicated with 0.05 mg/kg of midazolam were instructed to take vital capacity breaths of 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of either xenon or sevoflurane until they lost consciousness. Induction time, total ventilatory volume, tidal volume, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, end-tidal MAC fraction, cardiovascular parameters and oxygen saturation were recorded. The patients were interviewed on the following day to evaluate their acceptability rating of the inhalation inductions.     

Uptake and biotransformation of sevof lurane in humans: A comparative study of sevof lurane with halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane

Study Objective: To compare the volatile anesthetic sevoflurane with halothane, enfurane, and isof urane on the uptake and biotransformation in humans.

Design: Prospective pharmacokinetic study of sevofurane administration in human subjects.

Setting: Inpatient surgery clinic at a university medical center.

Patients: Thirty-two Japanese patients, free of systemic diseases, undergoing minor elective surgery with endotracheal general anesthesia.

Interventions: The patients were assigned randomly to one of four groups: halothane, enflurane, isofurane, or sevofurane. One of the four volatile anesthetics being investigated [equivalent to 1.1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC): halothane, 0.85%; enfurane, 1.85%; isofurane, 1.27%; and sevofurane, 1.88%; in inspired concentrations throughout the first hour of anesthesia] was administered for 60 minutes.

Measurements and Main Results: In all patients, serum and urinary fluoride concentrations were measured. The concentrations of all gases were measured separately with a mass spectrometer. The cumulative uptake of each anesthetic agent during a certain period was calculated as an integration of the uptake rate per minute. The results for one-hour inhalation of sevofurane (1.1 MAC) showed an uptake (corrected for body surface area and MAC) of 490 ml/m²/MAC and estimated degradation rate of 3.3%. For purposes of comparison, similar studies of halothane (uptake, 653 ml/m²/MAC; degradation rate 15.7%), enfurane (1150 ml/m²/MAC; 1.3%), and isofurane (439 ml/m²/MAC; 0.6%) were also conducted. Sevofurane had a peak serum inorganic fluoride concentration of 19.3 μmol/L, and no abnormality in hepatic or renal functions was observed in any of the subjects during the two weeks postoperatively.

Conclusions: Accurate determinations of uptake and degradation rate for sevoflurane and three other volatile anesthetics in Japanese patients were obtained. These findings have established that, despite its relatively large MAC *1.71%), sevoflurane has a small uptake due to its low solubility. However, the degradation rade was shown to be as high as 3.3%, resulting in a higher serum fluoride concentration than seen after administration of isoflurane, halothane, and (possibly) enflurane.     

A comparison of postoperative respiratory complications associated with the use of desflurane and sevoflurane: a single-centre cohort study

Sevoflurane and desflurane are the most commonly used volatile anaesthetics for maintenance of anaesthesia. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between choice of volatile anaesthetic and early postoperative respiratory complications, and to address a critical knowledge gap in safety outcomes between these two commonly used agents. We performed a retrospective analysis of adult (non-cardiac surgery) patients who received sevoflurane or desflurane for the maintenance of general anaesthesia at our institution between 2005 and 2018. We evaluated the association between desflurane exposure (when compared with sevoflurane) and the primary outcome of postoperative respiratory complications, defined by early post-extubation desaturation (S_pO₂ < 90%) or re-intubation within 7 days postoperatively. Multivariable regression analyses were performed and adjusted for confounding factors, including patient, anaesthetic and surgical factors. Propensity matched, interaction and sub-group analyses were performed to assess outcomes in high-risk groups: morbidly obese (BMI > 35 kg.m⁻²); elderly (age > 65 years); and high risk of respiratory complications as well as the primary outcome at 24 h. Desflurane was used for 23,830 patients and sevoflurane for 84,608 patients. Patients exposed to desflurane did not demonstrate a reduced risk of postoperative respiratory complications when compared with sevoflurane (adjusted odds ratio 0.99, 95%CI 0.94–1.04, p = 0.598). These findings were consistent across all sub-groups of high-risk patients and in the propensity score matched cohort. In summary, desflurane use was not associated with reduced postoperative respiratory complications when compared with sevoflurane. In the context of environmental and cost concerns with volatile anaesthetic agents, our study provides important data to support organisational decisions regarding the use of desflurane.     

Airway irritation produced by volatile anaesthetics during brief inhalation: comparison of halothane,enflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane

Eleven male volunteers were studied to compare the airway irritation produced by the four anaesthetic agents: halothane, enflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane at two concentrations, equivalent to one and two MAC. Tidal volume, respiratory frequency and functional residual capacity changes induced by 15 sec inhalation of the anaesthetics were measured using respiratory inductive plethysmograph. Appearance of the cough reflex was also observed. The order of subjective airway irritation was evaluated by the volunteers. Inhalation of the anaesthetic agents induced a decrease in tidal volume, increase in respiratory frequency and decrease in functional residual capacity. Significant changes were considered to have occurred if tidal volume and respiratory frequency changed by more than 30% from the resting values for at least ten seconds, or if functional residual capacity changed by more than 30% of the value at resting tidal volume, for at least ten seconds. Each change was induced most frequently by isoflurane followed by enflurane, halothane and, least frequently, by sevoflurane. The orders of appearance of the cough reflex and of subjective airway irritation were similar. Sevoflurane did not elicit a cough reflex. It is concluded that sevoflurane was the least irritant anaesthetic and is considered to be the most suitable for inhalational induction of anaesthesia. Sept volontaires du sexe masculin font partie dune étude visant à comparer les ejfets irritants de quatre agents anesthésiques sur les voies respiratoires: l’halothane, l’enflurane, l’ isoflurane et le sévoflurane, à deux concentration qui équivalent soit à MAC 1, soit à MAC 2. On mesure les changements de volume courant, de fréquence respiratoire et de capacité résiduelle fonctionnelle à l’aide d’un pléthysmographie à induction. On note l’apparition du réflexe de toux. De plus, on évalue le degré subjectif d’irritation éprouvé par les sujets. L’inhalation d’agents anesthésiques cause une baisse du volume courant, une augmentation de la fréquence respiratoire et une diminution de la capacité résiduelle fonctionnelle. On considère significatifs les changements de volume courant et de fréquence respiratoire de plus de 30% des valeurs de repos pour au moins dix secondes, les changements de capacité résiduelle fonctionnelle de plus de 30% de sa valeur au volume courant de repos pour au moins dix secondes. Les changements sont initiés principalement par l’isoflurane, suivi par l’enflurane, l’halothane et moins fréquemment par le sévoflurane. L’ordre d’apparition du réflexe de toux et de l’impression subjective d’irritation des voies aériennes est identique. Le sévoflurane ne provoque pas de réflexe de toux. On conclut que le sévoflurane est le moins irritant des anesthesiques et qu’on peut le considerer comme celui qui convient le mieux à l’induction de l’anesthésie par inhalation.     

安氟醚和七氟醚对腹部手术机体耗氧量的影响

对比安氟醚、七氟醚两种吸入麻醉药在腹部手术麻醉期间对机体耗氧量（ＶＯ２）的影响。方法选择择期腹部手术病３０例,ＡＳＡⅠ－Ⅱ级,随机分为安氟醚（Ｅ）组和七氟醚（Ｓ）组。记录手术开始前、麻醉吸醚后５ｍｉｎ及手术开始后３０、６０、９０、１２０、１５０ｍｉｎ时的吸入一呼出氧浓度差,分钟通气量,计算ＶＯ２。同时记录呼气末ＣＯ２浓度（Ｅ－ＴＣＯ２）,平均动脉压（ＭＡＰ）、心率（ＨＲ）,体温（Ｔ）,最低肺泡有效     

七氟醚注入法紧闭麻醉

目的　设计注入法七氟醚紧闭麻醉的投药方案。方法　选择 2 2ASAⅡ～Ⅲ级择期胸部及上腹部手术病人 ,芬太尼 1.5 μg·kg-1,异丙酚 2mg·kg-1静脉快速诱导行气管插管。氧气流量 0 18～ 0 31·min-1,微量注射泵将七氟醚注入麻醉环路吸气支 ,维持成人呼气末靶浓度为 2 %、儿童 2 2 %。依据麻醉药药代动力学模型模拟值外推的公式计算出各时段的七氟醚注入量。结果　实测成人靶浓度中位数为 1 9% ,第 10～ 90百分点为 1 7%～ 2 2 %。预测偏性中位数为 - 6 .2 8% ;第 10～ 90百分点为 - 2 0 %～ 5 %。实施误差中位数为 13 71% ,第 10～ 90百分点为 5 %～ 2 0 %。麻醉期间偏性平均值为 - 3.5 1% ,95 %可信限为 - 2 3.5 2 %～ 16 .49%。平均值与 0比较无统计学差异 (P >0 0 5 )。结论　药代动力学模型模拟值外推的公式计算出各时段的七氟醚注入量可迅速达到并维持较稳定的呼气末靶浓度。不需要复杂地计算和频繁更变注入速率 ,仅利用微量注射泵和通用的麻醉机即可获得满意的麻醉效果。     

A comparison of sevoflurane with halothane,enflurane, and isoflurane on bronchoconstriction caused by histamine

This study was conducted to assess the effect of sevoflurane on lung resistance and compliance, and its responsiveness to histamine. We studied eight dogs to compare the effect of sevoflurane, isoflurane, enflurane, and halothane on bronchoconstriction caused by histamine. Baseline values of pulmonary resistance (R_L) and dynamic pulmonary compliance (C_dyn) were measured prior to administration of histamine. Histamine (2, 4, and 8 μg · kg⁻¹) were administered iv, and the values of R_L and C_dyn at the time of peak effect were recorded. Under 1 or 2 MAC anaesthesia, sevoflurane as well as the other three anaesthetics had no bronchoactive effects. The four anaesthetics, including sevoflurane, demonstrated inhibitory effect on increases in R_L and decreases in C_dyn caused by histamine. At 1 MAC anaesthesia, % changes in R_L caused by 2, 4, or 8 μg · kg⁻¹ of histamine were 38 ± 11, 85 ± 21, or 132 ± 24% (mean ± SE) for halothane, and 65 ± 11, 132 ± 15, or 172 ± 19% for sevoflurane, respectively. Sevoflurane was less effective than halothane in preventing increases in R_L. In preventing decreases in C_dyn, sevoflurane was less effective than halothane only at 8 μg · kg⁻¹ of histamine under 1 and 2 MAC anaesthesia. There was no difference in attenuating effect on changes in R_L and C_dyn between sevoflurane and isoflurane or enflurane. We concluded that sevoflurane was less potent than halothane in attenuating changes in R_L and C_dyn in response to iv histamine. Cette étude a été réalisée dans le but d’évaluer les effets du sévoflurane sur la résistance et la compliance pulmonaires en réponse à l’histamine. Les effets du sévoflurane, de l’isoflurane, de l’enflurane et de l’halothane sur la bronchoconstriction induite par l’histamine sont comparés sur huit chiens. Avant l’administration d’histamine, on mesure les valeurs initiales de la résistance (R_L) et de la compliance dynamique (C_dyn) pulmonaires. L’histamine (2, 4, 8 μg · kg⁻¹) est administrée par la voie veineuse et les valeurs maximales de la R_L et de la C_dyn sont enregistrées. Les quatre anesthésiques, dont le sévoflurane inhibent l’augmentation de la R_L et la diminution de la C_dyn provoquées par l’histamine. A MAC 1 d’anesthésie, les pourcentages de changement de R_L produits par 2, 4, ou 8 μg · kg⁻¹ d’histamine sont respectivement de 38 ± 11, 85 ± 21, ou 132 ± 24% (moyenne + SD) pour l’halothane, et de 65 ± 11, 132 ± 15, ou 172 ± 19% pour le sévoflurane. Le sévoflurane est moins efficace que l’halothane pour prévenir les augmentations de R_L. Le sévoflurane est moins efficace pour prevenir la diminution de C_dyn mais seulement à 8 μg · kg⁻¹ d’histamine sous anesthésie à MAC 1 et 2. Le sévoflurane, l’halothane et l’isoflurane ne sont pas de différents pour amortir les changements de R_L et C_dyn. Nous concluons que le sévoflurane est moins puissant que l’halothane pour diminuer la réponse à l’histamine de la R_L et de la C_dyn.     

Mivacurium-induced neuromuscular blockade during sevoflurane and halothane anaesthesia in children

The neuromuscular blocking effects of mivacurium during sevoflurane or halothane anaesthesia was studied in 38 paediatric patients aged 1–12 yr. All received premedication with midazolam, 0.5 mg · kg⁻¹ po and an inhalational induction with up to 3 MAC of either agent in 70% N₂O and O₂. The ulnar nerve was stimulated at the wrist by a train-of-four stimulus every ten seconds and the force of adduction of the thumb recorded with a Myotrace force transducer. Anaesthesia was maintained with a one MAC end-tidal equivalent of either volatile agent for five minutes before patients received mivacurium (0.2 mg · kg⁻¹) iv. The onset of maximal blockade occurred in 2.4 ± 1.26 (mean ± SD) min with halothane and 1.8 ± 0.54 min with sevoflurane (NS). Four patients failed to achieve 100% block (3 halothane, 1 sevoflurane). The times from injection to 5, 75, and 95% recovery during sevoflurane (9.8 ± 2.6, 19.5 ± 4.4, and 24.2 ± 4.8 min) were greater than during halothane anaesthesia (7.2 ± 2.2, 15.0 ± 4.0, 19.2 ± 4.9 min, respectively (P < 0.005). All patients demonstrated complete spontaneous recovery of neuromuscular function (T₁ > 95%, T₄/T₁ > 75%) during the surgery which lasted 24–63 min. All patients showed clinical signs of full recovery of neuromuscular blockade (i.e., headlift, gag, or cough). Pharmacological reversal was not required. It is concluded that following a single intubating dose of mivacurium, the time to maximum relaxation was not different during halothane and sevoflurane anaesthesia; recovery times to 5, 75 and 95% twitch height were longer during sevoflurane anaesthesia and neuromuscular reversal was not necessary. L’activité neurobloquante du mivacurium pendant l’anesthésie au sévoflurane ou à l’halothane fait l’objet de cette étude réalisée chez 38 enfants de 1 à 12 ans. Tous ont été prémédiqués au midazolam 0,5 mg · kg⁻¹ et l’anesthésie est induite avec un agent volatil jusqu’à MAC 3 de l’un des agents dans du N₂O à 70%. Le nerf cubital était stimulé au poignet au train de quatre aux dix seconds et la force de l’adduction du pouce mesurée avec un transducteur de force Myotrace. L’anesthésie était entretenue avec l’équivalent MAC I d’un des deux agents volatils pendant cinq minutes avant l’administration de mivacurium (0,2 mg · kg⁻¹). Le début du bloc maximum est survenu dans 2,4 ± 1,26 (moyenne ± SD) min avec l’halothane et 1,8 ± 0,54 min avec le sévoflurane (NS). Quatre patients n’ont pas été bloqués à 100% (trois avec l’halothane, un avec le sévoflurane). L’intervalle séparant l’injection à 5; 75, et 95% de la récupération pendant l’anesthésie au sévoflurane (9,8 ± 2,6, 19,5 ± 4,4 et 24,2 ± 4,8 min) a été plus long que pendant l’anesthésie à l’halothane (7,2 ± 2,2, 15,0 ± 4,0, 19,2 ± 4,9 min, respectivement (P < 0,005). An moniteur, chez tous les patients, la fonction neuromusculaire a récupéré spontanément (T₁ > 95%, T₄/T₁ > 75%) au cours de la chirurgie qui a duré de 24–63 min. Tous les patients montraient aussi les signes cliniques d’une récupération complète (par ex., levée de la tête, réflexe pharyngé ou toux). Aucun antagoniste pharmacologique n’a été requis. Il est conclu que le délai jusqu’à la relaxation maximum après une seule dose d’intubation de mivacurium ne diffère pas entre l’anesthésie à l’halothane et l’anesthésie au sévoflurane; les délais de retour à 5, 75 et 95% de la hauteur du twitch sont plus longs pendant l’anesthésie au sévoflurane et il n’est pas nécessaire d’antagoniser le bloc neuromusculaire.

---

Supported in part by a grant from Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, Illinois.     

A review of recovery from sevoflurane anaesthesia: comparisons with isoflurane and propofol including meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane has a lower blood:gas partition coefficient than isoflurane and thus should be associated with a more rapid recovery from anaesthesia. METHODS: A review and meta-analysis were employed to examine the recovery profiles of adult patients following anaesthesia, comparing sevoflurane to isoflurane and sevoflurane to propofol. RESULTS: There were significant differences in times to several recovery events that favoured sevoflurane to isoflurane anaesthesia, including time to emergence, response to commands, extubation, and orientation. Likewise, there were significant differences in times to the same recovery events following anaesthesia with sevoflurane versus propofol. There were no differences in time to recovery room discharge when comparing sevoflurane to isoflurane or propofol. CONCLUSION: The observed differences between sevoflurane and isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia support the postulate that the use of sevoflurane is associated with a more rapid recovery from anaesthesia than either isoflurane or propofol.