运用彭静山教授“一点二穴三线四面取穴法”针刺治疗难治性面瘫

彭静山教授提出“一点二穴三线四面”八字取穴法。笔者运用此八字取穴法指导针灸临床取穴治疗难治性面瘫,临床效果显著。本文列举临床典型病例,详细阐述取穴和针刺治疗方法,并对治疗机理进行论述。对于难治性面瘫,单纯毫针针刺治疗效果有一定局限性,以“一点二穴三线四面”八字取穴法为基础,取穴点以透刺连接构成线、面,以芒针联合透刺法为主要治疗方法,可强化治疗效果、提高临床效应。     

刘晓鹰教授“扶中”外治法治疗儿科疾病临床经验浅析

小儿"脾常不足",脾胃之体成而未全,脾胃之气全而未壮,脾胃不足在儿科疾病发生发展、病机转归中占有相当重要的地位。刘晓鹰教授在继承全国名老中医倪珠英学术思想基础上,提出"扶中"外治法,立法取穴方面强调时时顾护小儿中焦脾胃,采用小儿推拿、扶阳罐(含温推、温灸和温刮痧)、针刺(含腹针、揿针)等外治手段治疗儿科脾、肺、肾等系列疾病,取得满意疗效。     

丛针浅刺结合电针治疗三叉神经痛疗效观察

目的通过观察丛针浅刺结合电针治疗三叉神经痛(trigeminal neuralgia,TN)的临床疗效,明确其与卡马西平相比是否具有优势。方法将符合纳入标准的44例受试者随机分为治疗组24例和对照组20例。治疗组采用丛针浅刺结合2/100 Hz电针治疗;对照组口服卡马西平片治疗。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和简要面部疼痛概况量表(BPI-Facial),观察两组受试者治疗前、治疗2周、治疗4周和治疗结束后2个月(随访期)的疼痛变化。结果与治疗前比较,对照组治疗2周和随访期VAS评分、BPI-Facial评分明显减少(P<0.05),治疗组治疗2周、治疗4周和随访期VAS评分、BPI-Facial评分均明显减少(P<0.05)。治疗组治疗2周、治疗4周和随访期VAS评分及BPI-Facial评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论丛针浅刺结合电针治疗TN在疼痛缓解程度、疼痛对面部特定活动及日常生活影响的短时效应、长时效应和后效应上,均优于卡马西平。     

经筋刺法联合艾灸治疗阳虚型肺癌患者癌性疼痛的临床研究

目的观察经筋刺法联合艾灸治疗阳虚型肺癌患者癌性疼痛的临床疗效。方法将60例中晚期肺癌患者随机分为对照组和治疗组,每组30例。对照组予以三阶梯止痛治疗,治疗组在对照组基础上,予以经筋刺法联合艾灸治疗。两组均以4周为1个治疗周期,观察治疗后两组患者疼痛控制情况、生存质量,并对安全性进行评估。结果与治疗前相比,治疗后两组患者疼痛数字评价量表评分均呈现进行性的下降(P <0. 05)、阳虚证评分均有下降(P <0. 05)、生活质量评分各指标均有上升(P <0. 05);经治疗,治疗组与对照组相比,在疼痛数字评价量表评分、阳虚证评分以及生活质量评分等方面均有显著改善(P <0. 05)。结论经筋刺法联合艾灸能够在一定程度上缓解阳虚型肺癌患者癌性疼痛,并在改善患者阳虚症状以及生存质量方面具有积极作用。     

张力平衡针法联合电针对脑卒中足下垂患者下肢功能及日常生活能力的影响

目的:研究张力平衡针法联合电针对脑卒中足下垂患者下肢功能及日常生活能力的影响。方法:选取我院2016年1月—2019年5月收治的脑卒中足下垂患者78例,根据随机数字表法分为两组,各39例。对照组给予电针疗法,治疗组在对照组基础上给予张力平衡针法,对比两组患者治疗前后的肌张力和CSI评分、足内翻角度和足下垂角度、Barthel指数评分和FMA评分、SF-36量表评分。结果:经治疗后,两组患者肌张力评分显著升高,CSI评分显著降低(P<0.05),且治疗组改善程度较大(P<0.05);两组患者足内翻角度和足下垂角度显著低于治疗前(P<0.05),且治疗组降低程度较大(P<0.05);两组患者FMA评分和Barthel指数评分显著升高(P<0.05),且治疗组升高程度较大(P<0.05);两组患者情感功能、生理功能和社会功能评分均显著高于治疗前(P<0.05),且治疗组升高程度较大(P<0.05)。结论:采用张力平衡针法联合电针治疗脑卒中足下垂能够改善日常生活能力及下肢功能,值得在临床上推广应用。     

温针灸联合放血疗法对痤疮患者皮损程度、DLQI评分及复发率的影响

目的观察温针灸联合放血疗法对痤疮患者皮损程度、皮肤病生活质量指数(dermatology life quality index,DLQI)评分及复发率的影响。方法 120例湿热型痤疮患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组60例。对照组采用放血疗法,观察组在对照组基础上联合温针灸治疗。观察两组患者治疗前后皮损程度、DLQI评分、中医症候评分变化,比较两组的临床疗效、不良反应发生率及复发率。结果观察组总有效率显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗后皮损个数显著减少(P<0.05),且观察组皮损个数少于对照组(P<0.05),皮损减少率大于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后两组DLQI评分、中医症候评分均显著降低(P<0.05),且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗组复发率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论温针灸联合放血疗法治疗湿热型痤疮疗效佳,不良反应率低,复发率低,疗效稳定。     

A randomized clinical trial comparing non-thrust manipulation with segmental and distal dry needling on pain,disability, and rate of recovery for patients with non-specific low back pain

ABSTRACT

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the within and between-group effects of segmental and distal dry needling (DN) without needle manipulation to a semi-standardized non-thrust manipulation (NTM) targeting the symptomatic spinal level for patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).

Methods: Sixty-five patients with NSLBP were randomized to receive either DN (n = 30) or NTM (n = 35) for six sessions over 3 weeks. Outcomes collected included the oswestry disability index (ODI), patient specific functional scale (PSFS), numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), and pain pressure thresholds (PPT). At discharge, patients perceived recovery was assessed.

Results: A two-way mixed model ANOVA demonstrated that there was no group*time interaction for PSFS (p = 0.26), ODI (p = 0.57), NPRS (p = 0.69), and PPT (p = 0.51). There was significant within group effects for PSFS (3.1 [2.4, 3.8], p = 0.018), ODI (14.5% [10.0%, 19.0%], p = 0.015), NPRS (2.2 [1.5, 2.8], p = 0.009), but not for PPT (3.3 [0.5, 6.0], p = 0.20).

Discussion: The between-group effects were neither clinically nor statistically significant. The within group effects were both significant and exceeded the reported minimum clinically important differences for the outcomes tools except the PPT. DN and NTM produced comparable outcomes in this sample of patients with NSLBP.

Level of evidence: 1b     

林国华针灸治疗难治性突发性耳聋经验撷要

总结林国华教授针灸治疗难治性突发性耳聋经验,并对典型医案进行介绍。林国华教授认为本病多因少阳经气厥塞所致,提倡尽早针灸干预,治病求本,谨守"少阳暴厥"之病机,谨遵"疏解少阳,通耳开窍"之法,临证必用听宫,主取少阳经穴,辅予辨经取穴,巧施发蒙针法与气流灌耳法,妙用岭南火针疗法,必要时调气调神、加取募穴,共奏通耳复聪之效。     

Analgesic effects and hemodynamic mechanisms of perpendicular and transverse needling at Sanyinjiao (SP 6) in patients with primary dysmenorrhea: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveTo explore the analgesic effects and uterine hemodynamics of perpendicular needling (PN) and transverse needling (TN) at SP 6 in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (PD).MethodsIn this randomized controlled trial, patients with PD diagnosed with cold-dampness congealing pattern were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1 to receive PN or TN at bilateral SP 6 for 10 min. Acupuncture was performed when the menstrual pain score was over 40 mm on the first day of menstruation, as measured using the visual analog scale for pain (VAS-P). The primary outcome was average menstrual pain (VAS-P). Secondary outcomes included the pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), and systolic-diastolic peaks ratio (S/D) in uterine arteries as measured using color Doppler ultrasonography; anxiety as assessed using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR).ResultsForty-eight patients completed the study. The TN group exhibited a significant reduction in VAS-P scores (–5.71 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI): –8.78, –2.63, P = .001), RI values (–0.05, 95% CI: –0.09, –0.01, P = .015), and HAMA values (–2.50, 95% CI: –4.78, –0.22, P = .032) when compared with the PN group. No significant differences in PI, S/D, BP, or HR values were observed between the two groups (P > .05).ConclusionTN at SP 6 was superior to PN in alleviating menstrual pain and anxiety in patients with PD. This analgesic effect of TN may be due to its better ability to improve uterine arterial blood flow via decreases in RI values.