Adopting global tools for the advancement of pharmacy practice and workforce in Saudi Arabia

BackgroundThe continuing expansion of the pharmacist’s role necessitates continuous evaluation of current practice to identify strategies for improvements. The International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) has developed tools to support stakeholders in identifying development needs and planning advancement strategies. The aim of this research was to utilise the FIP Global Competency Framework, version 2 (GbCF v2), and FIP Development Goals (DGs) to evaluate competencies related to pharmacy practice in Saudi Arabia, and to understand the strategies needed to develop and improve the current practice.MethodsThe study involved four phases. Phase 1 involved translation of the FIP GbCF v2 into the Arabic language. Phase 2 was a consensus panel validation to establish the initial relevance of the competencies to current practice. Phase 3 included a national survey distributed to all registered pharmacists in Saudi Arabia. The final phase was conducted through mapping ‘not relevant’ competencies to FIP DGs to identify priorities.ResultsThe translation phase yielded a bilingual framework that could be utilized by pharmacists in Saudi Arabia. The initial validation phase identified 61 behavioral statements (from 124 in the GbCF v2) as ‘highly relevant’ or ‘relevant’ to pharmacy practice. Findings from the national survey identified a list of ‘not relevant’ competencies that could highlight gaps in current practice. The final mapping phase generated a list of three FIP DG priorities: DG5 (competency development), DG8 (working with others) and DG11 (impact and outcomes).ConclusionThe study indicated that competencies in the GbCF v2 were relevant to pharmacists practicing in the country. However, some competencies were perceived as ‘not relevant’ to current practice and these highlighted gaps in the current practice that need attention. Mapping ‘not relevant’ competencies to FIP DGs should be used as a starting point towards developing strategies, systems, and protocols to advance pharmacy practice in Saudi Arabia.     

Barriers to the use of patient safety information sources by community pharmacies

BackgroundWhen patient safety information is communicated across a regulatory jurisdiction or country, the potential to enhance the safety of community pharmacy practice is significant. While there currently exists a number of sources for patient safety information (e.g., websites, safety bulletins, online tools), knowledge of the barriers that may inhibit the use of such information sources within community pharmacies is limited.ObjectiveThis research explores community pharmacy manager use of Canadian patient safety information sources and the barriers that may limit the use of such sources.MethodsA qualitative research study design using semi-structured interviews was conducted with 15 community pharmacy managers in the Halifax Regional Municipality of Nova Scotia, Canada. The study explored how pharmacists access and engage a variety of information sources, including corporate intranets, websites, and tools provided by third party data base repositories. Interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsFive general barriers were identified: lack of time to access information sources and its contents; too many sources of available information; too much information not relevant to community pharmacy practice; complexity navigating online information sources; and lack of community pharmacy involvement in source design.ConclusionWhile pharmacies do use safety information sources to enhance practice safety, their ability to incorporate this information is inhibited by their general lack of time available to access and read safety information, lack of knowledge about where to get this information, and lack of tailored information for the community pharmacy context. Future initiatives should address increasing information awareness of available sources, consolidating and reducing information overload of such sources, and packaging information to better fit with pharmacists’ needs.     

The availability of pharmacists with Additional Prescribing Authorization in relation to the distribution of vulnerable populations - A cross-sectional study

BackgroundFor vulnerable patients- such as immigrants or those with low income- to benefit from pharmacists’ advanced services, such as independent prescribing, pharmacists must be accessible to these populations.ObjectivesThis research examines the geographical relationship between Alberta pharmacists with Additional Prescribing Authorization (APA) and a neighbourhood's proportion of vulnerable populations.MethodsPublicly available data were extracted from the Alberta College of Pharmacy website for active registered pharmacists' primary location of practice and APA status. Pharmacists with APA were grouped depending on the postal codes of their main self-reported place of practice. These postal codes were converted to geospatial locations and then linked to aggregated dissemination area's (ADA's) income and immigrant quintiles. The mean number of APA pharmacists per ADA was compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) between income and immigrant quintiles. The number of APA pharmacists per ADA in the highest and lowest income and immigrant quintiles was compared using negative binomial regression model.ResultsThe records of 3,742 pharmacists with 1,054 unique postal codes of practice sites were included in the study and were linked to unique ADAs (N = 527). Almost one half of all ADAs in Alberta (47.6%, n = 251) had no APA pharmacist. Income quintiles of ADAs were associated with the mean number of APA pharmacists (p < 0.001), with high income areas estimated to have 0.44 more APA pharmacists (p = 0.01). Similarly, areas with the highest quintile of recent immigrants were estimated to have 0.66 more APA pharmacists than other ADAs (p < 0.01).ConclusionsA sizable proportion of the Alberta population still does not have access to a pharmacist with APA, and those with APA seem to concentrate in areas with higher income and higher proportions of the population who are immigrants. Future research should examine the utilization of expanded scope of practice in relation to the distribution of vulnerable populations.     

Immunizations at Wisconsin Pharmacies: Results of a statewide vaccine registry analysis and pharmacist survey

BackgroundThere is currently limited data in the United States on the proportion of immunization doses given at pharmacies outside the influenza vaccine. This study aims to obtain baseline information on the percentage of vaccine doses administered at pharmacies in Wisconsin and to understand the immunization barriers for Wisconsin pharmacists, to inform interventions to increase immunization access at pharmacies.MethodsAggregated data from the Wisconsin Immunization Registry (WIR) was obtained for all vaccines administered at pharmacies to patients over the age of six from July 2017 through June 2018. In addition, a survey on attitudes towards and barriers to vaccination was sent to 2000 Wisconsin pharmacists with 236 respondents yielding a 12% response rate.ResultsWIR data demonstrates that zoster and influenza vaccines have the highest proportion of doses administered at pharmacies (39% and 20%, respectively). Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines have the lowest proportion of doses at 0.2%. Pharmacy survey shows that 86% provide immunizations. Most stock influenza vaccines (84%), whereas much fewer stock HPV vaccines (21%). The greatest immunization barriers for the pharmacy respondents include billing and reimbursement challenges and competing demands for staff.ConclusionsDespite the barriers, community pharmacies have significant potential to address vaccination gaps. Physicians, patients, and legislative bodies are generally well-accepting of pharmacists as immunizers. Pharmacists, in order to be fully utilized as immunizers, must engage in active communication with patients and be willing to collaborate with physicians. Legislative policy and health insurance reimbursement reforms are also necessary to facilitate further pharmacist participation in immunization.     

Impact on mental health of the COVID-19 outbreak among community pharmacists during the sanitary lockdown period

ObjectivesCOVID-19 outbreak can impact mental health including health care workers. The aim of this study was to assess the psychological impact of COVID-19 in French community pharmacists.Material and methodsWe carried out a postal-based survey to assess the psychological impact of COVID-19 in French owner community pharmacists based on three validated self-report questionnaires: Perceived Stress scale, Impact of Event Scale-revised and Maslach Burnout Inventory.ResultsThe sample consists of 135 community pharmacists. Twenty-three pharmacists reported significant post-traumatic stress symptoms (17%). High burnout symptoms were found in 33 (25%), 46 (34.9%) and 4 (3%) participants. Females scored higher than males for all questionnaires (P = 0.01).ConclusionsThis study is the first study which showed the psychological impact of COVID-19 in community pharmacists. Based on validated self-report questionnaires, up to 35% of pharmacists reported psychological disturbances. Interventions to promote psychological well-being of healthcare workers need to be developing.     

Factors influencing the implementation of clinical pharmacy services for hospitalized patients: A mixed-methods systematic review

BackgroundDespite the evidence of benefits, clinical pharmacy services (CPS) are not uniformly implemented across healthcare institutions. Understanding the influencing factors and identifying the domains in which they act is the first step to a successful implementation.ObjectiveTo identify the factors that affect the implementation of CPS for inpatients and to categorize them.MethodsCochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, IPA, Medline/PubMed, and Lilacs databases were researched up until January 2018. The search strategy was developed using text words or MESH terms related to the following four domains: “clinical pharmacy,” “influencing factors,” “implementation,” and “hospital.” Two reviewers selected original research articles that reported the factors influencing the implementation of CPS in hospitals, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the studies. After framework synthesis and categorization of the factors, a diagrammatic approach was used to present the results.ResultsFifty-three factors were identified in the 21 studies that were included in this review. The most cited influencing factors were uniformly distributed across the following four domains: Attitudinal, POlitical, TEChnical and Administrative (APOTECA domains). However, in terms of level (pharmacist, healthcare team, patient, institution, and national organization), the “pharmacist” group had the highest concentration of factors. “Clinical skills and knowledge” was the most frequently cited implementation factor, followed by “time to implement CPS.”ConclusionOur findings showed the multifactorial nature of CPS implementation process. We suggest that factors from all four APOTECA domains need to be fully considered and strategies need to be addressed for all five groups of interest to successfully implement CPS in hospitals. Future studies on the influence of implementation stages, interrelationships of implementing factors, and strategies to overcome barriers could accelerate the successful adoption of these services.RegistrationPROSPERO register CRD42016050140.