Inflamación y adecuación de la hemodiálisis: ¿están los niveles de proteína C reactiva influidos por la dosis de diálisis recibida?

IntroductionChronic inflammation and the underlying cardiovascular comorbidity are still current problems in chronic hemodialysis patients. There are few studies comparing the “dialysis dose” (Kt/V) with the degree of inflammation in the patient. Our main objective was to determine whether there is a relationship between serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and the Kt/V using ionic dialysance.MethodsMulticenter cross-sectional study. A total of 536 prevalent chronic hemodialysis patients were included. CRP levels, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio were collected. Kt was obtained by ionic dialysance and urea distribution volume was calculated from the Watson's formula. The sample was divided into 2 groups, taking the median CRP as the cut-off point. Dialysis adequacy obtained in each group was compared. Finally, a logistic regression model was carried out to determine the variables with the greatest influence.ResultsMedian CRP was 4.10 mg/L (q25-q75: 1.67-10) and mean Kt/V was 1.48 ± 0.308. Kt/V was lower in the patients included in the high inflammation group (P = .01). In the multivariate logistic regression, the “high” levels of CRP were directly correlated with the Log neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (P < .001) and inversely proportional with serum albumin values (P = .014), Kt/V (P = .037) and serum iron (P < .001).ConclusionThe poorer adequacy in terms of dialysis doses (lower Kt/V values) may contribute to a higher degree of inflammation in chronic hemodialysis patients.     

Recommendations for prevention and management of COVID-19 in peritoneal dialysis patients

The World Health Organization characterized coronavirus disease (COVID-19) as a pandemic on March 11, 2020. Peritoneal dialysis patients have a weakened immune system that is associated with a high morbidity of infection. Thus, COVID-19 prevention measures and management for patients on peritoneal dialysis are urgent and critical. Based on published research on COVID-19 and previous clinical practices for similar coronavirus outbreaks, we aimed to make recommendations to manage patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.     

The prognostic relevance of histologic subtype in appendiceal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundThe aim of this population-based study was to determine the prognostic value of the histologic subtypes mucinous (MAC), non-mucinous (AC) and signet ring cell (SRCC) adenocarcinoma among patients with appendiceal cancer.Methods and materialsData from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) of patients with primary appendiceal adenocarcinomas with MAC, AC and SRCC histologic subtype, diagnosed between 2001 and 2015 were used (n = 675). To categorize patients according to the recent histopathological classification, the NCR was linked with the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA). Log-rank tests and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to estimate overall survival (OS), and the cox proportional hazards model was run to identify prognostic factors.ResultsAC was the most frequently encountered histologic subtype (50.9%), followed by MAC (35.8%) and SRCC (13.3%). In locoregional disease, histologic subtype was not a prognostic factor for OS with 5-year survival rates for patients with AC, MAC and SRCC of 60.0%, 60.5% and 69.6% respectively (p = 0.68). Metastatic disease was more common in SRCC (53.8%) than in MAC (38.8%) and AC (23.4%) (p < 0.0001). Median OS for patients with metastatic disease was 12.6, 27.7 and 18.2 months in AC, MAC and SRCC respectively (p < 0.005). MAC was associated with higher survival compared to AC (HR 0.48, 95%CI 0.34–0.69). In subanalyses, MAC was only a positive prognostic factor compared to AC in patients with peritoneal metastases (HR 0.42, 95%CI 0.28–0.62).ConclusionHistologic subtype had no prognostic relevance in locoregional or systemic metastatic disease in appendiceal adenocarcinoma. In peritoneal metastases, mucinous histologic subtype was a favorable prognostic factor, compared to non-mucinous and signet ring cell subtype.     

Use of hyperthermia versus normothermia during intraperitoneal chemoperfusion with oxaliplatin for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis: A propensity score matched analysis

BackgroundHyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with oxaliplatin (OX) is increasingly used in the treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). However, the additional benefit of hyperthermia remains clinically unproven, while it may aggravate postoperative morbidity. Here, we report the correlation of perfusion temperature with postoperative morbidity during clinical HIPEC with OX.Patients and methodsPatients who underwent hyperthermic (41 °C, HT) or normothermic (37 °C, NT) chemoperfusion with OX for colorectal PC were identified from a prospectively kept database of HIPEC cases and matched for baseline characteristics using propensity score (PS) analysis. The groups were compared to assess the impact of perfusion temperature on morbidity. Morbidity was graded using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI).ResultsOut of 612 patients, 146 patients met the inclusion criteria and from these patients, 45 HT patients were matched with 45 NT patients. Baseline variables were comparable between the PS matched groups. Overall mortality was 0.7% and major morbidity (CD ≥ 3) occurred in 35,6% of patients. There were no significant differences between the HT and NT cohorts in mortality, major morbidity (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.49, p = 0.36), anastomotic leakage (13.8% versus 11.1%, p = 1.0), hemorrhagic complications, or systemic toxicity. A trend of increased wound infections was observed in the hyperthermia group (13.3% versus 4.4%, P = 0.27).ConclusionsCompared to NT, the use of HT during HIPEC with OX does not aggravate postoperative mortality or morbidity in a high-volume center.     

Oxaliplatin use in pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is safe and effective: A multicenter study

IntroductionPressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new drug delivery method used in patients with peritoneal cancer (PC) of primary or secondary origin. Intraperitoneal use of oxaliplatin raises concerns about toxicity, especially abdominal pain. The objective of this study was to assess the tolerance of PIPAC with oxaliplatin (PIPAC-Ox) in a large cohort of patients and to identify the risk factors for high grade toxicity, discontinuation of treatment and impaired survival.Material and methodsThis retrospective cohort study included all consecutive patients treated with PIPAC-Ox (92 mg/m²) in five centers specialized in the treatment of PC. The procedure was repeated every 6 weeks. Outcomes of interest were Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), symptoms and survival (Kaplan-Meier). Univariate risk factors were included in a multinominal regression model to control for bias.ResultsOverall, 251 PIPAC-Ox treatments were performed in 101 patients (45 female) having unresectable PC of various origins: 66 colorectal, 15 gastric, 5 ovarian, 3 mesothelioma, 2 pseudomyxoma, 10 other malignancies (biliary, pancreatic, endocrine) respectively. The median PCI was 19 (IQR: 10–28). Postoperative abdominal pain was present in 23 patients. Out of the 9 patients with grade 3 abdominal pain, only 3 needed a change of PIPAC drug. CTCAE 4.0 toxicity grade 4 or higher was encountered in 16(15.9%) patients. The patients had a mean of 2.5 procedures/patient (SD = 1.5). 50 subjects presented with symptom improvement.ConclusionsOxaliplatin-based PIPAC appears to be a safe treatment that offers good symptom control and promising survival for patients with advanced peritoneal disease.     

Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy with one minute of electrostatic precipitation (ePIPAC) is feasible,but the histological tumor response in peritoneal metastasis is insufficient

IntroductionElectrostatic precipitation Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (ePIPAC) has shown superior penetration depth and tissue uptake compared to standard PIPAC. We investigated the feasibility and objective tumor response to ePIPAC with 1 min of precipitation in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM).Materials and methodsPatients with PM from various abdominal cancers were included in an amendment to the ongoing prospective PIPAC-OPC2 trial. Colorectal and appendiceal PM were treated with oxaliplatin, patients with PM from other primaries were treated with a combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin. Three ePIPAC procedures were planned in each patient including repeated peritoneal biopsies for response evaluation. After emission to the peritoneal cavity, the aerosolized chemotherapeutics were precipitated for 1 min followed by immediate exsufflation and abdominal closure. Histological regression from the first to the third ePIPAC was evaluated according to the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS) and compared to data from the PIPAC-OPC1 trial. Complications and toxicities were recorded according to Dindo-Clavien and CTCAE.ResultsSixty-five ePIPAC procedures were performed in 33 patients (median 2, range 1–6). Ten patients were eligible for response evaluation based on biopsies from the first and third ePIPAC procedure. Four patients had disease progression, four patients had regressive disease, and two patients had stable disease according to PRGS. No life threatening adverse reactions and no mortality was observed following ePIPAC.ConclusionOne minute ePIPAC was feasible and safe, but the histological tumor response was insufficient compared to standard PIPAC directed therapy with 30 min passive diffusion time.     

The impact of chronic kidney disease on lower extremity bypass outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia

Objective

Patient selection for open lower extremity revascularization in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a clinical challenge. This study investigates the impact of CKD on early graft failure, postoperative complications, and mortality in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass for critical limb ischemia.

Influencia de la concentración de calcio en el líquido de hemodiálisis sobre el control de la tensión arterial

Background

Hypertension is a highly prevalent disorder among patients undergoing haemodialysis. It contributes to greater cardiovascular risk and must be controlled. However, despite dietary measures, haemodialysis regimen optimisation and pharmacological treatment, some patients in our units continue to maintain high blood pressure levels. The objective of the study is to demonstrate that reducing calcium in dialysis fluid can help treat hypertension patients undergoing haemodialysis.

17岁男童反复腹痛、腹腔积液伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多

17岁男童，因腹痛、腹泻伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多3年，加重3 d入院。3年前患儿因进食“老酸奶”后出现腹痛、腹泻，彩超示大量腹腔积液，血常规、骨髓细胞形态学检查、腹水组织学检查可见大量嗜酸性粒细胞；3 d前因腹痛、腹泻再次入院，胃肠镜检查胃角见嗜酸性粒细胞浸润，确诊为嗜酸细胞性胃肠疾病（嗜酸细胞性胃肠炎），给予糖皮质激素及饮食规避治疗后好转，随访1年未反复。对于因腹痛、腹泻等消化道症状就诊的患儿，如伴外周血嗜酸性粒细胞增多，需考虑嗜酸细胞性胃肠疾病的可能，内镜活检胃肠道组织中见嗜酸性粒细胞浸润且计数异常为诊断的关键。 ［引用格式:中国当代儿科杂志，2021，23（11）：1169-1173］