术前控制营养状态评分与肝细胞癌肝切除术后预后的研究进展

肝细胞癌(HCC)是最常见的恶性肿瘤之一。尽管在早期诊断和个体化治疗方面取得了进展,但经根治性切除等治疗后,HCC患者的临床预后仍不佳,复发率高。因此,在HCC患者中识别准确可靠的预后标志物是必要的。作为一种新的免疫营养生物标志物,控制营养状态(CONUT)评分已被报道用于预测癌症患者的预后。本文将对术前CONUT评分与HCC肝切除术后预后的研究进展进行综述。     

Comment on “Outcomes of curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis”

The present letter to the editor is in response to the research “Outcomes of curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis” by Elshaarawy et al in World J Gastroenterol 2021; 13(5): 424–439. The preoperative assessment of the liver reserve function in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with cirrhosis is crucial, and there is no universal consensus on how to assess it. Based on a retrospective study, Elshaarawy et al investigated the impact of various classical clinical indicators on liver failure and the prognosis after hepatectomy in HCC patients with cirrhosis. We recommend that we should strive to explore new appraisal indicators, such as the indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min.     

控制性低中心静脉压在原发性肝癌伴肝炎后肝硬化患者腹腔镜肝切除中的应用

背景与目的:在肝脏切除手术中采用控制性低中心静脉压(CLCVP)技术可有效减少肝断面出血,然而,低中心静脉压(CVP)所产生的相对低血压和潜在低灌注可能造成不良影响,这使其推广应用受到一定程度的限制。本研究探讨CLCVP技术在原发性肝癌伴肝炎后肝硬化患者腹腔镜肝切除手术中的应用效果和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2017年4月—2019年3月在安徽医科大学第一附属医院肝胆胰外科行全腹腔镜解剖性肝切除手术的44例原发性肝癌伴肝炎后肝硬化患者临床资料,所有患者均接受同一组医生手术,其中24例患者术中采用CLCVP技术(观察组),另外20例患者术中未采用CLCVP对照组(对照组),分析并比较两组术前、术中、术后的相关临床资料。结果:两组患者术前资料包括性别、年龄、BMI、Child分级、肝硬化程度、肝肾功能指标差异均无统计学意义(均P0.05)。两组手术均顺利完成,无围手术期死亡病例。观察组术中、术后均未见低CVP相关气栓、肝肾损伤等并发症。与对照组比较,观察组术中动脉收缩压、CVP明显降低,手术时间与肝门阻断时间明显缩短、术中出血和手术输血率明显降低,但术中乳酸指标明显升高(均P0.05)。两组的术后出血、感染、胸腔积液、胆汁漏的发生率以及肝肾功能指标、拔管时间、住院时间方面均无统计学差异(均P0.05),但观察组患者术后引流量多于对照组(P0.05);两组术后复发率亦无统计学差异(P0.05)。结论:在做好术前肝功能评估和术中密切观测患者灌注指标的前提下,CLCVP技术对肝炎后肝硬化患者腹腔镜肝切除手术是安全可靠的,虽然低CVP会使机体灌注减少,机体无氧代谢增强,乳酸含量增高,但对肝肾功能及肝癌的复发无明显影响,而且较低的CVP能够有效减少术中出血量和输血量,缩短手术时长和肝门阻断时间,降低长时间缺血缺氧对肝脏的打击。总之,在无严重心、肺、脑、肾基础疾病的肝炎后肝硬化患者腹腔镜肝切除手术中,CLCVP是一种值得推荐的控制肝断面出血技术。     

Surgical Management and Outcomes of Patients with Multifocal Hepatoblastoma

ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes of patients with multifocal hepatoblastoma (HB) treated at our institution with either orthotopic liver transplant (OLTx) or hepatic resection to determine outcomes and risk factors for recurrence.BackgroundMultifocality in HB has been shown to be a significant prognostic factor for recurrence and worse outcome. The surgical management of this type of disease is complex and primarily involves OLTx to avoid leaving behind microscopic foci of disease in the remnant liver.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review on all patients <18 years of age with multifocal HB treated at our institution between 2000 and 2021. Patient demographics, operative procedure, post-operative course, pathological data, laboratory values, short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed.ResultsA total of 41 patients were identified as having complete radiologic and pathologic inclusion criteria. Twenty-three (56.1%) underwent OLTx and 18 (43.9%) underwent partial hepatectomy. Median length of follow-up across all patients was 3.1 years (IQR 1.1–6.6 years). Cohorts were similar in rates of PRETEXT designation status identified on standardized imaging re-review (p = .22). Three-year overall survival (OS) estimate was 76.8% (95% CI: 60.0%–87.3%). There was no difference in rates of recurrence or overall survival in patients who underwent either resection or OLTx (p = .54 and p = .92 respectively). Older patients (>72 months), patients with a positive porta hepatis margin, and patients with associated tumor thrombus experienced worse recurrence rates and survival. Histopathology demonstrating pleomorphic features independently associated with worse rates of recurrence.ConclusionsThrough proper patient selection, multifocal HB was adequately treated with either partial hepatectomy or OLTx with comparable outcome results. HB with pleomorphic features, increased patient age at diagnosis, involved porta hepatis margin on pathology, and the presence of associated tumor thrombus may be associated with worse outcomes regardless of the local control surgery offered.Level of EvidenceIII.     

Ki-67表达与原发性肝癌根治性切除术后行预防性肝动脉化疗栓塞患者预后的关系

目的:探讨Ki-67表达与原发性肝癌根治性切除术后行预防性TACE患者预后的关系。方法:采用回顾性队列研究,收集2014年12月—2016年1月福建医科大学孟超肝胆医院150例行原发性肝癌根治性切除术并在术后2个月内行预防性TACE患者的临床病理资料,根据术后肝癌组织病理Ki-67评分分为为低表达组(Ki-67评分≤20%,44例)和高表达组(Ki-67评分20%,106例);分析Ki-67表达量与患者临床病理因素及复发与生存的关系。结果:高表达组肿瘤多发、肿瘤包膜不完整及合并微血管癌栓患者比例明显高于低表达组(均P0.05)。Ki-67高表达与肿瘤多发、肿瘤直径大为影响无瘤生存期的独立危险因素(均P0.05);Ki-67高表达与肿瘤多发、肿瘤直径大、肿瘤包膜不完整、合并微血管癌栓为影响总生存期的独立危险因素(均P0.05);高表达组患者复发率明显高于低表达组(57.9%vs. 37.7%,χ~2=6.777,P0.05),总生存率明显低于低表达组(45.6%vs. 75.9%,χ~2=8.447,P0.05)。结论:Ki-67的表达量对肝癌根治性切除术后行预防性TACE患者的预后有显著影响,高表达者预后不良。     

基于肝实质优先离断的腹腔镜右半肝切除流程优化及应用

目的:探讨肝实质优先离断在腹腔镜右半肝切除术中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析陆军军医大学第二附属医院肝胆外科2016年10月—2017年10月所完成的20例腹腔镜右半肝切除术手术患者资料,其中10例行肝实质优先离断腹腔镜右半肝切除术(观察组),即优先进行肝实质离断,而不是先行第一肝门解剖;另外10例行常规步骤先行第一肝门解剖,再进行肝实质离断(对照组)。比较两组患者的相关临床指标。结果:两组患者基本资料差异无统计学意义(均P0.05)。两组患者均顺利完成手术。与对照组比较,观察组手术时间明显缩短[(273.0±70.4)min vs.(203.0±61.3)min,P0.05],手术出血量明显减少[(470.0±427.0)mL vs.(270.0±149.4)mL,P0.05],但术中输血量无统计学差异(P0.05)。两组术后肝功能指标、术后住院时间、并发症发生率,以及术后肿瘤复发、转移发生率均无统计学差异(均P0.05)。结论:肝实质优先离断在腹腔镜右半肝切除术中是一种安全、有效的方法。     

Comparison of anatomic and non-anatomic resections for very early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: The importance of surgical resection margin width in non-anatomic resection

BackgroundThe superiority of anatomic resection (AR) over non-anatomic resection (NAR) for very early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has remained a topic of debate. Thus, this study aimed to compare the prognosis after AR and NAR for single HCC less than 2 cm in diameter.MethodsConsecutive patients with single HCC of diameter less than 2 cm who underwent curative hepatectomy between 1997 and 2017 were included in this retrospective study.ResultsIn total, 159 patients were included in this study. Of these, 52 patients underwent AR (AR group) and 107 patients underwent NAR (NAR group). No significant differences were noted in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between the AR and NAR groups (P = 0.236 and P = 0.363, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that low preoperative platelet count and presence of satellite nodules were independent prognostic factors of RFS and OS. Wide surgical resection margin did not affect RFS (P = 0.692) in the AR group; however, in the NAR group, RFS was found to be higher with surgical resection margin widths ≥1 cm than with surgical resection margin widths <1 cm (P = 0.038).ConclusionsPrognosis was comparable between the NAR and AR groups for very early-stage HCC with well-preserved liver function. For better oncologic outcomes, surgeons should endeavor in keeping the surgical resection margin widths during NAR ≥1 cm.     

腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术与非解剖性肝切除术的前瞻性对比研究

目的探讨腹腔镜下解剖性肝切除术和非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝癌的临床疗效。 方法按照前瞻性随机对照试验选取本院2015年1月至2018年2月期间收治的106例肝癌患者进行，按照随机数字表法分为解剖组(行腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术)和非解剖组(行腹腔镜非解剖性肝切除术)各53例。采用SPSS20.0统计软件对数据进行分析，围术期指标、肝功能指标用( ±s)表示，采用独立t检验；术后并发症发生率、术后1年复发转移率和生存率组间比较用χ²检验；P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结果解剖组的手术时间明显长于非解剖组，但术中出血量、输血量明显减少，住院时间显著短于非解剖组(P<0.05)。非解剖组术后第1、3、7天血清ALT、TBIL值明显高于解剖组(P<0.05)；术后1、3天血清AST值解剖组低于非解剖组(P<0.05)。解剖组术后并发症发生率为7.5%低于非解剖组22.6%(P<0.05)。解剖组与非解剖组1年总体生存率分别为94.3%和88.6%，两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；1年无瘤生存率分别为90.6%和75.5%(P＝0.038)，两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论相对于腹腔镜非解剖性肝切除术，腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术临床疗效更好，并有效提高1年无瘤生存率，值得在临床上进一步推广应用。