Presbycusis, or age-related hearing loss (ARHL), is a major public health issue. About half the phenotypic variance has been attributed to genetic factors. Here, we assessed the contribution to
presbycusis of ultrarare pathogenic variants, considered indicative of Mendelian forms. We focused on severe
presbycusis without environmental or comorbidity risk factors and studied multiplex family age-related hearing loss (mARHL) and simplex/sporadic age-related hearing loss (sARHL) cases and controls with normal hearing by whole-exome sequencing. Ultrarare variants (allele frequency [AF] < 0.0001) of 35 genes responsible for autosomal dominant early-onset forms of deafness, predicted to be pathogenic, were detected in 25.7% of mARHL and 22.7% of sARHL cases vs. 7.5% of controls (
P = 0.001); half were previously unknown (AF < 0.000002).
MYO6,
MYO7A,
PTPRQ, and
TECTA variants were present in 8.9% of ARHL cases but less than 1% of controls. Evidence for a causal role of variants in
presbycusis was provided by pathogenicity prediction programs, documented haploinsufficiency, three-dimensional structure/function analyses, cell biology experiments, and reported early effects. We also established
Tmc1N321I/+ mice, carrying the
TMC1:p.(Asn327Ile) variant detected in an mARHL case, as a mouse model for a monogenic form of
presbycusis. Deafness gene variants can thus result in a continuum of auditory phenotypes. Our findings demonstrate that the genetics of
presbycusis is shaped by not only well-studied polygenic risk factors of small effect size revealed by common variants but also, ultrarare variants likely resulting in monogenic forms, thereby paving the way for treatment with emerging inner ear gene therapy.Age-related hearing loss (ARHL), also known as
presbycusis, is the most prevalent sensory impairment in the adult population and is 1 of the top 10 health conditions most frequently associated with disability in the elderly. According to the World Health Organization, 320 million people worldwide aged 65 and over currently suffer from hearing disability (
1). Presbycusis is a progressive late-onset hearing impairment that begins after the age of 40 and mostly affects the perception of high-frequency sounds (
2). Individuals initially encounter difficulties following conversations in noisy environments and localizing sound sources spatially, until they can no longer understand speech even in quiet environments (
3). This disability leads to social isolation and desocialization, profoundly altering quality of life (
4). Individuals face the threat of depression and cognitive decline (
5,
6), resulting in a progressive loss of autonomy. There is growing evidence to suggest that hearing loss in and after middle age is the main modifiable risk factor for dementia (
7).Patient management is currently based on prostheses—hearing aids and cochlear implants—which restore hearing to an acceptable level for understanding speech in relatively quiet environments, in most individuals (
8). However, these devices are not very effective in noisy environments (
9).Presbycusis was long thought to be a natural and inevitable consequence of aging, but like other aging processes, it actually depends on genetic and environmental factors and their interactions (
10). Various environmental factors, such as noise overexposure, the use of ototoxic drugs and solvents, and smoking, have been identified as risk factors, as have several comorbid conditions, such as diabetes and hypertension (
11,
12). The most prevalent environmental cause is noise overexposure, the impact of which is steadily increasing with the proportion of the world’s population living in overcrowded cities and inadequate controls over sound intensity, extending to recreational settings (
13). Environmental factors are thought to account for about half the phenotypic variance of
presbycusis (
10). Heritability indices of 0.35 to 0.70 have been reported in studies based on hearing thresholds in twins (
14), families (
15,
16), or individuals with self-reported hearing impairment (
17).Genetic traits and diseases represent a continuum, with the effect size of the variants involved being inversely related to the frequency of the disease-causing variant (
18,
19). The spectrum ranges from monogenic diseases (attributable to one extremely rare variant with a very large effect size—100% penetrance), via near-Mendelian traits due to variants with incomplete penetrance, and conditions due to moderately rare variants of intermediate effect size to highly polygenic traits (hundreds of common variants involved, each having a very small effect size) (
20). Genetic analyses have implicated several genes in
presbycusis. Association studies have been performed with candidate genes selected on the basis of a putative or demonstrated role of the encoded proteins in the cochlea. For example, given the well-established role of oxidative stress induced by overexposure to noise, associations have been highlighted between
presbycusis and null alleles or single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of certain genes involved in redox homeostasis, such as
GSTT1,
GSTM1 (
21,
22),
NAT2 (
21,
23,
24),
CYP1A1 (
21), and
UCP2 (
21). Similarly, the observation that women have better hearing than men, at least until menopause, led to the discovery of an association between
ESRRG and ARHL in women (
25). Association studies have also been conducted with genes responsible for early-adulthood deafness displaying autosomal dominant inheritance, autosomal dominant deafness (DFNA) forms of deafness, or congenital hearing impairment displaying autosomal recessive inheritance, autosomal recessive deafness (DFNB) forms of deafness. Indicative associations have been reported with
KCNQ4 (DFNA2) (
26),
GRHL2 (DFNA28) (
27,
28),
ILDR1 (DFNB42), and
EYA4 (DFNA10) (
29). Pangenomic association studies were then performed in large cohorts of sporadic cases of
presbycusis (
30,
31). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed, assuming that
presbycusis, as a common disorder, would probably involve common variants (minor allele frequency [AF] > 5%) with a small effect size. GWAS detected significant associations (
P ≤ 5 × 10
−8) between
presbycusis and SNPs close to
ISG20/ACAN (
29),
PCDH20 (
32),
ARHGEF28 (
30), and
SLC28A3 (
32) and SNPs within
TRIOBP (
29),
SIK3 (
33),
NID2 (
30),
CLRN2 (
30),
ARHGEF28 (
30),
EYA4 (
30), and very recently,
ILDR1 (
30,
31). Furthermore, in a large GWAS study based on the UK Biobank (including data for more than 250,000 individuals between the ages of 40 and 69 y), 36 new loci were reported to be significantly associated with self-reported hearing difficulties or with the use of hearing aids (
30). A recent analysis conducted and replicated in about 10,000 affected individuals identified associations with four additional genes (
31). These candidate
presbycusis-predisposing (CPP) genes were mostly identified on the basis of associations of ARHL with intragenic (mostly intronic) SNPs or SNPs located in close proximity to the gene. Finally, next-generation sequencing has identified monoallelic mutations predicted to be deleterious in
NHERF1,
SPATC1L (
34,
35), and
MYO6 (DFNB37) (
36) in a few sporadic and familial cases of
presbycusis. It has also been suggested that mutations affecting micro ribonucleic acids (miRNAs) (
37,
38) and the mitochondrial genome (
39,
40) are involved in
presbycusis. Together, these studies suggest that
presbycusis has a large polygenic component, involving many common genetic variants of small effect size, whereas a few reports have described monogenic or monogenic-like components involving very rare variants with a large effect size.Studies of common small-effect size variants are generally poorly efficient for achieving a mechanistic understanding of pathogenesis (
41) unlike approaches based on large-effect size variants underlying Mendelian transmission. Furthermore, rapid progress has been made toward the development of inner ear gene therapy approaches, which are particularly suitable for treating monogenic forms of hearing impairment. We therefore investigated ultrarare variants as potential large-effect determinants likely to underlie monogenic forms of
presbycusis. We used an approach focusing on severe ARHL with no identifiable risk factors or comorbidities. We selected variants in silico, based on both existing functional annotations and standard case–control comparisons of whole-exome sequencing (WES) (
42) data, combined with various in silico and experimental functional tests to gain additional evidence of pathogenicity.
相似文献