Case of cutaneous Scedosporium apiospermum infection successfully treated with voriconazole

We report a case of cutaneous infection due to Scedosporium apiospermum in a 75-year-old immunocompromised male patient who had received long-term corticosteroid and immunosuppressant therapy for the treatment of nephrotic syndrome. The patient came to our department complaining of erythema with a number of pustules on the dorsal surface of the right hand. S. apiospermum was identified from a culture taken from the pus. After unsuccessful treatment with topical ketoconazole, oral itraconazole and oral terbinafine, the lesion quickly resolved with the daily administration of 400 mg voriconazole. No recurrence was observed despite discontinuation of voriconazole due to drug-induced hepatitis. Voriconazole holds out the promise of an effective treatment for invasive Scedosporium infection.     

In vitro activity of voriconazole against Mexican oral yeast isolates

Oral candidiasis is the most prevalent complication in HIV‐infected and AIDS patients. Topical antifungal treatment is useful for the initial episodes of oral candidiasis, but most patients suffer more than one episode and fluconazole or itraconazole can help in the management, and voriconazole may represent a useful alternative agent for the treatment of recalcitrant oral and oesophageal candidiasis. The aim of this research was to study the in vitro activity of voriconazole and fluconazole against Mexican oral isolates of clinically relevant yeast. The in vitro susceptibility of 187 oral yeast isolates from HIV‐infected and healthy Mexicans was determined for fluconazole and voriconazole by the M44‐A disc diffusion method. At 24 h, fluconazole was active against 179 of 187 isolates (95.7 %). Moreover, a 100% susceptibility to voriconazole was observed. Voriconazole and fluconazole are highly active in vitro against oral yeast isolates. This study provides baseline data on susceptibilities to both antifungal agents in Mexico.     

伏立康唑血药浓度监测在儿童血液病的临床应用

目的：探讨伏立康唑血药浓度在监测儿童血液病临床治疗中的作用。方法：收集2019年2月至2020年8月接受伏立康唑治疗的62例血液病患儿的临床资料,应用高效液相色谱法测定伏立康唑谷浓度。根据伏立康唑剂量将患儿分为3组,分别为<4.0 mg/kg组,4.0~6.0 mg/kg组,＞6.0 mg/kg组,比较其临床特点。结果：总体血药浓度达标率为57.5%。伏立康唑剂量＞6.0 mg/kg组患儿的年龄、体质量、身高明显低于其他两组。联用糖皮质激素降低伏立康唑浓度,而合用美罗培南升高伏立康唑浓度。伏立康唑肝损伤发生率为12.3%,肝功能异常患儿的伏立康唑血药浓度与肝功能正常的患儿比较差异无统计学意义。结论：血液病儿童伏立康唑血药浓度达标率低。小龄儿更易出现伏立康唑浓度偏低,需更大的体质量剂量达到治疗浓度。临床中合并用药时会影响伏立康唑浓度,伏立康唑血药浓度监测有利于指导血液病儿童个体化用药。     

In vitro susceptibility of the seven Malassezia species to ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine

Fifty-five strains, either authentic or ex-type, of seven Malassezia species were investigated for in vitro susceptibility to various concentrations (0.03-64.0 microg/mL) of three azole drugs, ketoconazole, voriconazole and itraconazole, as well as the allylamine terbinafine, using the agar dilution method. All strains of the seven Malassezia species were susceptible to the three azole drugs at low concentrations. M. furfur, M. sympodialis, M. slooffiae, M. pachydermatis, M. globosa, M. obtusa and M. restricta were most sensitive to ketoconazole and itraconazole, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from < or = 0.03 to 0.125 microg/mL. The recently introduced antifungal, voriconazole, was also very effective, with MIC80 values < or = 0.03 microg/mL for 80% of strains. MICs of terbinafine against the seven Malassezia species ranged from voriconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine. Strains of M. furfur, M. globosa and M. obtusa were more tolerant to terbinafine than the remaining Malassezia species; M. sympodialis was highly susceptible. M. furfur strains tested with terbinafine ranged from highly susceptible to relatively resistant. Correct identification of Malassezia species could facilitate selection of appropriate antifungal therapy.     

Antifungal prophylaxis among allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: current issues and new agents

Invasive candidiasis and invasive mold infections cause significant morbidity and mortality in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant population, in particular in recipients of allografts. The introduction of a variety of new antifungal compounds over the past decade has focused attention on prophylactic strategies as a means to decrease the burden of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Until recently, fluconazole has been the standard agent for prophylaxis before and after engraftment. In 2005, the echinocandin micafungin received US FDA approval for prophylaxis against IFIs in stem cell transplant recipients during the neutropenic period prior to engraftment. In patients with substantial risk for invasive mold infection, many centers now use a mold-active antifungal agent (e.g., a triazole such as itraconazole, voriconazole or posaconazole, or an echinocandin) as prophylaxis after engraftment. Several recent studies have highlighted the efficacy of these newer agents in preventing IFIs in these highly immunocompromised patients. This review will discuss current issues in IFI and new agents available for prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.     

Systematic review on the first line treatment of amphotericin B in critically ill adults with candidemia or invasive candidiasis

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Invasive candidiasis is the most common fungal infection affecting critically ill adults. International guidelines provide differing recommendations for first-line antifungal therapy, with echinocandins considered first-line in the majority. Amphotericin B has broad activity and low minimum inhibitory concentration resistance patterns across most Candida species and guidance away from its use should be supported by the available evidence.

Areas Covered: A systematic literature review was conducted from August to September 2017 to determine whether treatment with echinocandins or other available drugs, namely voriconazole, confers a therapeutic or survival benefit over amphotericin B in critically ill adults with invasive candidiasis. Inclusion criteria were: (1) studies describing critically ill adults with invasive candidiasis, (2) studies describing therapeutic benefit or survival as an outcome, and (3) studies comparing amphotericin B, deoxycholate or lipid preparations, with any newer antifungal agent. Eight studies were included in the final review, incorporating 2352 unique patients. No difference in treatment efficacy or mortality outcomes in critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis receiving an amphotericin B formulation compared with those receiving an echinocandin or voriconazole was shown.

Expert Commentary: We conclude that in the existing literature, there is no evidence that choice between echinocandins, voriconazole, or amphotericin B formulations as first-line therapy for critically ill adults with invasive candidiasis is associated with a therapeutic or survival benefit. Clinicians must therefore consider other factors in the selection of first-line therapy     

Fungal infections of the skin and nail: new treatment options

Knowledge of the currently available antifungal agents, along with clinical, microbiologic and histopathologic methods, can help the medical professional optimally manage skin and nail fungal infections. With regards to treatment of fungal disease of the skin or nail, there are a variety of systemic antifungal agents, including several newer agents that have different formulations, tolerability, adverse effect profiles and spectrum of activity. This review will highlight the clinically important fungal infections of the skin and nail and describe the activity and role of antifungal treatment.     

Multicentre surveillance study on feasibility,safety and efficacy of antifungal combination therapy for proven or probable invasive fungal diseases in haematological patients: the SEIFEM real‐life combo study

This multicentre observational study evaluated the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of antifungal combination therapy (combo) as treatment of proven or probable invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in patients with haematological malignancies. Between January 2005 and January 2010, 84 cases of IFDs (39 proven and 45 probable) treated with combo were collected in 20 Hematological Italian Centres, in patients who underwent chemotherapy or allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological diseases. Median age of patients was 34 years (range 1–73) and 37% had less than 18 years. Acute leukaemia was the most common underlying haematological disease (68/84; 81%). The phase of treatment was as follows: first induction in 21/84 (25%), consolidation phase in 18/84 (21%) and reinduction/salvage in 45/84 (54%). The main site of infection was lung with or without other sites. The principal fungal pathogens were as follows: Aspergillus sp. 68 cases (81%), Candida sp. six cases (8%), Zygomycetes four cases (5%) and Fusarium sp. four cases (5%). The most used combo was caspofungin+voriconazole 35/84 (42%), caspofungin + liposomal amphotericin B (L‐AmB) 20/84 (24%) and L‐AmB+voriconazole 15/84 (18%). The median duration of combo was 19 days (range 3–180). The overall response rate (ORR) was 73% (61/84 responders) without significant differences between the combo regimens. The most important factor that significantly influenced the response was granulocyte (PMN) recovery (P 0.009). Only one patient discontinued therapy (voriconazole‐related neurotoxicity) and 22% experienced mild and reversible adverse events (hypokalaemia, ALT/AST increase and creatinine increase). The IFDs‐attributable mortality was 17%. This study indicates that combo was both well tolerated and effective in haematological patients. The most used combo regimens were caspofungin + voriconazole (ORR 80%) and caspofungin + L‐AmB (ORR 70%). The ORR was 73% and the mortality IFD related was 17%. PMN recovery during combo predicts a favourable outcome. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00906633.     

The effects of antifungal therapy on severe asthma with fungal sensitization and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis

Background and objective:   Very little is known about the response rates to or appropriateness of treatment for patients with allergic fungal diseases of the lung. This study assessed the effect of antifungal therapy in patients with severe asthma with fungal sensitization (SAFS) and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA).
Methods:   A retrospective cohort study of 33 adult patients who fulfilled the criteria for either SAFS ( n  = 22) or ABPA ( n  = 11) was conducted. All patients had received antifungal therapy for at least 6 months. The primary study end point was the effect of antifungal therapy on patients' lung function.
Results:   Overall, total IgE values and radioallergosorbent test (RAST) for A. fumigatus markedly decreased after 6 months of therapy in both SAFS and ABPA patients ( P  = 0.004 and P  = 0.005, respectively). Reduction was seen in the eosinophil count ( P  = 0.037), dose of oral steroids ( P  = 0.043) and courses of systemic steroids required ( P  = 0.041). Lung function also improved ( P  = 0.016). Four of 10 patients discontinued oral steroids after 6 months of therapy. Reduction in IgE levels ( P  = 0.015) and RAST for A. fumigatus was also observed ( P  = 0.006) for those patients treated for at least 1 year with antifungal drugs.
Conclusions:   Both ABPA and SAFS patients benefited from oral antifungal therapy. The antifungal therapy may act by reducing the antigenic load, interacting with corticosteroids or by a direct immunological effect.