Follicular lymphoma cell lines,an in vitro model for antigenic selection and cytokine-mediated growth regulation of germinal centre B cells

In the periphery, B cells differentiate in germinal centres (GCs) of secondary lymphoid organs. Isolated GC cells die quickly in vitro by apoptosis. Therefore, cell lines originating from follicular lymphomas, which are the malignant counterparts of GC B cells, would provide a stable in vitro model to study the immunobiology of GC B cells. We have established three novel human follicular lymphoma cell lines that were characterized with special reference to immunophenotypic features, response to B-cell receptor (BCR) triggering, response to cytokines and cytokine mRNA expression. One of the cell lines, HF-1A3, has a phenotype of a centrocyte. It expresses surface immunoglobulin G (sIgG) and dies by apoptosis following BCR cross-linking. Co-stimulation with interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-15 or interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) rescues HF-1A3 cells from BCR-induced apoptosis. The second cell line, HF-28, also represents phenotypically an IgG+ centrocyte. Ligation of its BCR leads to the cell-cycle arrest at G1 instead of apoptosis. HF-28 cells express both CD45RA and RO isoforms, which is unusual in B lymphocytes apart from plasma cells, thus suggesting a transition to plasma cell phenotype. The third cell line, HF-4.9, which phenotypically represents an sIgM+ centroblast, responds by proliferation to BCR cross-linking. These cell lines offer a unique in vitro model to study antigenic selection and cytokine-mediated growth regulation of human GC B cells.     

Array-based comparative genomic hybridisation identifies high frequency of cryptic chromosomal rearrangements in patients with syndromic autism spectrum disorders

Background

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) refer to a broader group of neurobiological conditions, pervasive developmental disorders. They are characterised by a symptomatic triad associated with qualitative changes in social interactions, defect in communication abilities, and repetitive and stereotyped interests and activities. ASD is prevalent in 1 to 3 per 1000 people. Despite several arguments for a strong genetic contribution, the molecular basis of a most cases remains unexplained. About 5% of patients with autism have a chromosome abnormality visible with cytogenetic methods. The most frequent are 15q11–q13 duplication, 2q37 and 22q13.3 deletions. Many other chromosomal imbalances have been described. However, most of them remain undetectable using routine karyotype analysis, thus impeding diagnosis and genetic counselling.

Methods and results

29 patients presenting with syndromic ASD were investigated using a DNA microarray constructed from large insert clones spaced at approximately 1 Mb intervals across the genome. Eight clinically relevant rearrangements were identified in 8 (27.5%) patients: six deletions and two duplications. Altered segments ranged in size from 1.4 to 16 Mb (2–19 clones). No recurrent abnormality was identified.

Conclusion

These results clearly show that array comparative genomic hybridisation should be considered to be an essential aspect of the genetic analysis of patients with syndromic ASD. Moreover, besides their importance for diagnosis and genetic counselling, they may allow the delineation of new contiguous gene syndromes associated with ASD. Finally, the detailed molecular analysis of the rearranged regions may pave the way for the identification of new ASD genes.Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) belong to the group of pervasive developmental disorders (PDD). According to the Diagnostic statistical manual for mental disorders—fourth edition (DSM IV) classification,¹ ASD are characterised by impairments in communication, social skills and restricted or stereotyped pattern of behaviours and interests. A diagnosis within the autism spectrum requires one or more symptoms in each of the three areas of impairment. The prevalence of ASD is estimated at about 1/1000 to 3/1000.^2,3 ASD are heterogeneous conditions which can be either isolated or syndromic—that is, associated with other clinical features such as facial dysmorphism, limb or visceral malformations, and growth abnormalities.A total of 10–20% of ASD cases are due to known medical conditions involving chromosomal imbalances, genetic disorders (X fragile syndrome and tuberous sclerosis)⁴ or environmental factors (valproate⁵ and rubella). The other cases remain unexplained. Twin and familial studies have documented a higher concordance rate in monozygotic twins (90%) than in dizygotic twins (4.5%),^6,7,8 and a 75‐fold greater risk to siblings in idiopathic patients than in the general population.^9,10 Collectively, these studies support the involvement of numerous genes in autistic disorders.About 1.7–4.8% of people with ASD have chromosome abnormalities. Almost all chromosomes have been involved, including unbalanced translocations, inversions, rings, and interstitial or terminal deletions and duplications.^11,12,13,14 The rare chromosome abnormalities that have been reported on more than one occasion are duplication of 15q,¹⁵ deletions of 18q,^16,17 Xp,^18,19 2q37,²⁰ 22q13^21,22 and the sex chromosome aneuploidies 47,XYY^23,24 and 45,X/46,XY.^25,26 This diversity of loci suggests that studying chromosomal aberrations in relationship to autism will require efficient and highly sensitive tools. In addition to the importance for diagnosis, identification of chromosomal imbalances in patients with ASD may also be instrumental for cloning disease‐causing genes. Analysis of Xp22.3 deletion has indeed allowed the identification of the NLGN4 gene.²⁷Recent technological developments, such as array‐based comparative genomic hybridisation (array‐CGH),^28,29,30 allow the investigation of the human genome at a resolution that is 5–10 times higher than that of routine chromosome analysis by karyotyping.^29,31,32,33 Array‐CGH has been used successfully for analysis of tumour samples and cell lines, and for high‐resolution analysis of patients with mental retardation and congenital anomalies.^{34,35,36,37,38}Here, we report the application of genomewide array‐CGH, at 1 Mb resolution, to the study of 29 patients with syndromic ASD. In addition to their clinical relevance, our results emphasise the importance of chromosomal imbalance in the aetiology of syndromic ASD and may help the identification of new genes involved in autistic disorders.     

Totally implantable venous access ports: frequency of complications and analysis of bacterial contamination after ablation

Totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAP) are valuable medical devices for long-term intravenous treatment such as parenteral nutrition, cancer chemotherapy or antiviral therapy. Implantation and use of these devices are each associated with infectious or mechanical complications. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To determine the frequency of complications and to analyze bacterial contamination of different parts of TIVAP (tip, septum, internal lumen of the port). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical charts of patients, which TIVAP was removed between April 20th to December 31st 2003, were retrospectively reviewed. Infectious complications (local and septicemic) and non-infectious complications (i.e. obstruction, thrombosis, drug extravasation...) were defined using clinical and/or microbiological criteria. Quantitative culture from different parts of the TIVAP was performed. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients (age 57 +/- 14-years-old, 94.3% cancers) were included, corresponding to 57,018 catheter-days: 39.1% had one or more non-infectious complications (density incidence: 0.86 for 1000 catheter-days). Among the 49 complications, obstruction, thrombosis, extravasations and malposition accounted for 30.6%, 30.6% 4.1% and 6% of cases. Twenty-one patients (19.1%) had an infectious complication: 11 were local and 14 were systemic (density incidence 0.43 for 1000 catheter-days). Bacteria responsible for TIVAP-associated bacteraemia were coagulase negative staphylococci (N = 2), Staphylococcus aureus susceptible to methicilline (N = 3), micrococci (N = 1), corynebacteria (N = 1) or Gram-negative bacilli (N = 8). Comparison of quantitative culture of the different parts of TIVAP with a threshold at 10(3) CFU/ml showed that culture of tip, septum and port has a sensitivity of 47.6% 57.1% and 61.9 %, respectively and a specificity of 100% 92.1% and 92.1%, respectively for the diagnosis of TIVAP infection. CONCLUSION: Complications associated to TIVAP are frequent but incidence that we have reported is comparable with previous studies. Analysis of internal lumen of the port is the most sensitive method for the diagnosis of TIVAP-associated infections.