首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   186篇
  免费   11篇
  国内免费   2篇
耳鼻咽喉   2篇
儿科学   2篇
妇产科学   1篇
基础医学   14篇
口腔科学   4篇
临床医学   10篇
内科学   32篇
神经病学   4篇
特种医学   46篇
外科学   22篇
综合类   8篇
药学   13篇
肿瘤学   41篇
  2024年   1篇
  2023年   2篇
  2022年   3篇
  2021年   4篇
  2020年   3篇
  2019年   8篇
  2018年   15篇
  2017年   3篇
  2016年   2篇
  2015年   7篇
  2014年   19篇
  2013年   20篇
  2012年   11篇
  2011年   16篇
  2010年   9篇
  2009年   17篇
  2008年   16篇
  2007年   18篇
  2006年   4篇
  2005年   5篇
  2004年   3篇
  2003年   4篇
  2002年   1篇
  2001年   2篇
  2000年   1篇
  1994年   1篇
  1984年   1篇
  1983年   1篇
  1982年   1篇
  1981年   1篇
排序方式: 共有199条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
11.
Introduction Known errors in the standardized uptake value (SUV) caused by variations in subject weights W encountered can be corrected by lean body mass or body surface area (bsa) algorithms replacing W in calculations. However this is infrequently done. The aims of the work here are: quantify sensitivity to W, encourage SUV correction with an approach minimally differing from tradition, and show what improvements in the SUV coefficient of variation (cv) for a population can be expected. Methods Selected for analyses were 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) SUV data from positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (CT) scans at the University of Tennessee as well as from the literature. A weight sensitivity index was defined as −n=slope of ln(SUV/W) vs. lnW. The portion of the SUV variability due to this trend is removed by using the defined SUV}}_{n} = {Q \times W^{n} \times W_{{{\text{avg}}}} ^{{1 - n}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{Q \times W^{n} \times W_{{{\text{avg}}}} ^{{1 - n}} } {{\text{ID}}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\text{ID}}}$$" align="middle" border="0">, or a virtually equal SUV m using SUV}}_{m} = Q \times {{\left( {wW + {\left( {1 - w} \right)}W_{{{\text{avg}}}} } \right)}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\left( {wW + {\left( {1 - w} \right)}W_{{{\text{avg}}}} } \right)}} {{\text{ID}}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\text{ID}}}$$" align="middle" border="0">, with Q and ID being tissue specific-activity and injected dose. SUV}}_{n} \,or\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{SUV}}_{m} } \right)}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\left( {{\text{cv}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{SUV}}_{n} \,or\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{SUV}}_{m} } \right)}} {{\left( {{\text{cv}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{traditional}}\,{\text{SUV}}} \right)}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\left( {{\text{cv}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{traditional}}\,{\text{SUV}}} \right)}}$$" align="middle" border="0"> measures performance. Adapting to animal studies’ tradition, SUV}}_{m}$$" align="middle" border="0"> is preferred over the conventional . Results For FDG in adults from averaging over most tissues. In children, however, . Tissues have the same index if their influx constants are independent of W. Suggested, therefore, is a very simplified SUV}}_{m} = Q \times \frac{1}{2}{{\left( {W + W_{{{\text{avg}}}} } \right)}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\left( {W + W_{{{\text{avg}}}} } \right)}} {{\text{ID}}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\text{ID}}}$$" align="middle" border="0">, which is dimensionless and keeps the same population averages as traditional SUVs. It achieves SUV}}} \right)}^{2} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\left( {{\text{cv}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{SUV}}} \right)}^{2} }} \right)}^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}}$$" align="middle" border="0">. Hence, for cv’s of SUVs below ∼1/3 improvements over tradition are possible, leading to F’s<0.95. Accounting additionally for height, as in SUVbsa, gives very little improvement over the simplified approach here and gives essentially the same F’s as SUV m . Conclusions Introduced here is a weight index useful in reducing variability and further understanding the SUV. Addressing weight sensitivity is appropriate where the cv of the SUVs is below about 1/3. Proposed is the very simple approach of using an average of an adult patient’s weight and ∼70 kg for FDG SUV calculations. Unlike other approaches the dimensionless population average of SUV m s is unchanged from tradition.  相似文献   
12.
13.
3-Deazaneplanocin A (DZNep) is an attractive epigenetic anticancer agent through the inhibition of the cellular enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) protein. The purpose of this study was to improve the pharmacokinetic characteristics of DZNep in vivo through developing a unilamellar pegylated liposomal formulation encapsulating DZNep (L-DZNep). A remote-loading method in the presence of phenylboronic acid (R-w-PBA) was developed to stably encapsulating DZNep inside liposomes (encapsulation efficiency = 50.7% at molar ratio of 1:10 of drug to lipids) through forming a transient PBA-DZNep complex. The pharmacokinetics of L-DZNep was investigated in Sprague-Dawley rats. In comparison with free drug, encapsulation of the DZNep in pegylated liposomes resulted in 99.3% reduction of the plasma clearance, whereas it increased the elimination half-life from 1.1 h to 8.0 h and the area under the plasma concentration curve by 138-fold. These findings demonstrate a novel approach (R-w-PBA method) through the development of L-DZNep, which may be extensively applied for the encapsulation of hydrophilic nucleoside analogs containing vicinal hydroxyl groups and protonable amino in the pegylated liposomes. Additionally, the pegylated liposomes could effectively prolong the retention of DZNep in the systemic circulation and therefore is highly likely to increase the DZNep’s tumor localization.  相似文献   
14.
15.
PURPOSE: To develop standardized correlates of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) standard uptake value (SUV) to computed tomography (CT)-based window and levels. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nineteen patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) and CT were selected. A method of standardizing SUV within CT planning software was developed. A scale factor, determined by a sensitivity calibration of the PET scanner, converts voxel counts to activity per gram in tissue, allowing SUVs to be correlated to CT window and levels. A method of limiting interobserver variations was devised to enhance "edges" of regions of interest based on SUV thresholds. The difference in gross tumor volumes (GTVs) based on CT, PET SUV >or= 2.5, and regions of 40% maximum SUV were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean SUV was 9.3. Mean GTV volumes were 253 cc for CT, 221 cc for SUV >or= 2.5, and 97 cc for SUV40%Max. Average volume difference was -259% between >or=2.5 SUV and CT and -162% between SUV40%Max and CT. Percent difference between GTV >or= 2.5 SUV and SUV40%Max remained constant beyond SUV > 7. For SUVs 4-6, best correlation among SUV thresholds occurred at volumes near 90 cc. Mean percent change from GTVs contoured according to CT (GTV CT) was -260% for GTV2.5 and -162% for GTV40%Max. Using the SUV40%Max threshold resulted in a significant alteration of volume in 98% of patients, while the SUV2.5 threshold resulted in an alteration of volume in 58% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our method of correlating SUV to W/L thresholds permits accurate displaying of SUV in coregistered PET/CT studies. The optimal SUV thresholds to contour GTV depend on maximum tumor SUV and volume. Best correlation occurs with SUVs >6 and small volumes <100 cc. At SUVs >7, differences between the SUV threshold filters remain constant. Because of variability in volumes obtained by using SUV40%Max, we recommend using SUV >or= 2.5 for radiotherapy planning in non-small-cell lung cancer.  相似文献   
16.
17.
Objective. The usefulness of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET), whose high rate of FDG accumulation indicates high metabolism and malignant potential, has already been reported. The aims of this study were to evaluate the malignancy of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in the stomach by 18FDG-PET and to correlate the FDG uptake values with known risk factors as determined by histology after EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or endoscopic biopsy. Material and Methods. Of 29 patients with histologically proven GI-mesenchymal tumours, 21 with gastric GISTs underwent 18FDG-PET. Tumour size, mitotic index, Ki-67 labelling index (LI) and cellularity of the tumour tissue were compared with the standardized uptake value (SUV) of FDG. Results. Strong correlations were found between the SUV of FDG and EUS size, and mitotic index of EUS-FNA specimens (tumour size versus SUV, p=0.004, r=0.542; number of mitotic cells versus SUV, p=0.0078; n=21). Moreover, we examined the association between SUV and risk categories based on EUS-FNA findings using ROC curves. The cut-off values of FDG SUV were 2.2, 4.2 and 6.5 for the very low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively. Conclusions. 18FDG-PET may be used to assess malignancy of GISTs. This image modality helps us determine the management strategy for these patients and complements the information on the biological behaviour and cellular proliferation of the tumours.  相似文献   
18.
19.
20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号