Transient Lower Esophageal Sphincter Relaxations and Gastroesophageal Reflux Episodes in Healthy Subjects and GERD Patients During 24 Hours

Still little is known about the 24-hr pattern of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs), particularly in patients with GERD. The aim of our study was to evaluate the 24-hr esophageal and LES motor pattern and esophageal pH and to identify the relationship between TLESRs and gastroesophageal reflux in healthy subjects and in GERD patients. Ten healthy subjects and nine patients with esophagitis (grade I–II) underwent a 24-hr pH manometric recording by means of a portable electronic device. The recording aimed at identifying the temporal relationships between reflux episodes and LES motor events. The GERD patients showed a greater number of either reflux episodes or TLESRs during the 24 hr as compared to controls. While most refluxes occurred during TLESRs in both groups, a small percentage of TLESRs was followed by reflux episodes in healthy people, with only a slight increase in GERD patients. In conclusion, although representing an important motor pattern during gastroesophageal reflux both in healthy subjects and in patients with GERD, TLESR could probably be considered one of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux more than the primary cause of reflux episodes.     

Impedance detected abnormal bolus transit in patients with normal esophageal manometry. Sensitive indicator of esophageal functional abnormality?

SUMMARY. When used in combination with manometry, multichannel intraluminal impedance better characterizes the established manometric abnormalities into those with and without associated transit defects. However, the significance of the finding of normal manometry and abnormal impedance is not known. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical relevance of abnormal impedance associated with normal manometry during esophageal function testing in patients with a variety of esophageal symptoms. All patients referred for esophageal function testing during a 27‐month period underwent combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry studies including 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows in supine position. From 576 patients with normal esophageal body manometry we identified 158 patients (27%) with abnormal impedance. The primary symptom in these 158 patients was compared to that in 146 consecutive patients with normal manometry and normal impedance selected from the original 576 patients. Abnormal bolus transit was found with viscous, liquid and both type swallows in 60%, 19% and 21% of the patients respectively. Of patients with abnormal bolus transit, 23% presented with dysphagia compared to 10% of normal transit patients (p = 0.0035). In conclusion, abnormal impedance even in patients with normal manometry may be a sensitive indicator of esophageal functional abnormality as represented by the symptom of dysphagia in these patients. Abnormal transit was more frequently identified with viscous than liquid swallows. Prospective studies to further clarify impedance detected transit defects in patients with normal manometry and the role of viscous swallows in diagnostic testing are warranted.     

Prevalence of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: can results from specialized centers be generalized?

Recent studies suggest a high prevalence of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) in patients referred to specialized centers for sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM). Whether these results can be generalized to other centers is unknown. From September 1998 to April 2000, patients undergoing SOM were prospectively identified. Patients were classified as having either biliary or pancreatic SOD, according to the modified Milwaukee classification, and underwent SOM of either the biliary or pancreatic sphincter based on clinical history. SOD was diagnosed when the mean basal sphincter pressure was >40 mm Hg. Standard cholangiography and/or pancreatography were performed following manometry. Fifty-one patients were studied (43 women, median age 46 years, range 7–74 years). Prior to SOM, patients were classified by the modified Milwaukee classification as biliary type I in 1 patient, type II in 8, and type III in 20; pancreatic type I in 4 patients, type II in 14, and type III in 3; and biliary type III and pancreatic type III in 1 patient. Indications for SOM included abdominal pain in 35 patients (69%), recurrent idiopathic pancreatitis in 12 (24%), chronic pancreatitis in 3 (7%), and acute pancreatitis in 1 (2%). Overall, 30 patients (59%; 95% CI 41.1–76.9%) were found to have SOD; abnormal biliary sphincter pressure in 16 of 29 patients (55%) undergoing biliary manometry, and abnormal pancreatic sphincter pressures in 14 of 21 patients (67%) undergoing pancreatic sphincter manometry, and abnormal biliary and pancreatic sphincter pressures in 1. SOD was diagnosed in 1 biliary type I patient (100%), 4 type II patients (50%), and 11 type III patients (52.4%) with a mean pressures of 92, 47, and 80 mm Hg, respectively. SOD was identified in 4 pancreatic type I patients (100%), 7 type II patients (50%), and 3 type III patients (100%) with mean sphincter pressures of 83 mm Hg, 96 mm Hg, and 102 mm Hg, respectively. In conclusion, the prevalence of SOD in patients with suspected biliary disease was 55%, suspected pancreatic disease 66%, yielding an overall prevalence of SOD of 59%. These results confirm the high prevalence of SOD in patients referred for SOM.     

Ineffective oesophageal motility： Manometric subsets exhibit different symptom profiles

AIM： To compare the demographic and clinical features of different manometric subsets of ineffective oesophageal motility （IOM; defined as ≥ 30% wet swallows with distal contractile amplitude 〈 30 mmHg）, and to determine whether the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux differs between IOM subsets.
METHODS： Clinical characteristics of manometric subsets were determined in 100 IOM patients （73 female, median age 58 years） and compared to those of 100 age-and gender-matched patient controls with oesophageal symptoms, but normal manometry. Supine oesophageal manometry was performed with an eight-channel DentSleeve water-perfused catheter, and an ambulatory pH study assessed gastrooesophageal reflux.
RESULTS： Patients in the IOM subset featuring a majority of low-amplitude simultaneous contractions （LASC） experienced less heartburn （prevalence 26%）, but more dysphagia （57%） than those in the IOM subset featuring low-amplitude propagated contractions （LAP; heartburn 70%, dysphagia 24%; both P ≤ 0.01）. LASC patients also experienced less heartburn and more dysphagia than patient controls （heartburn 68%, dysphagia 11%; both P 〈 0.001）. The prevalence of heartburn and dysphagia in IOM patients featuring a majority of non-transmitted sequences （NT） was 54% （P = 0.04 vs LASC） and 36% （P 〈 0.01 vs controls）, respectively. No differences in age and gender distribution, chest pain prevalence, acid exposure time （AET） and symptom/reflux association existed between IOM subsets, or between subsets and controls.
CONCLUSION： IOM patients with LASC exhibit a different symptom profile to those with LAP, but do not differ in gastro-oesophageal reflux prevalence. These findings raise the possibility of different pathophysiological mechanisms in IOM subsets, which warrants further investigation.     

Cough during therapeutic thoracentesis: Friend or foe?

We report intriguing preliminary observations on the effect of cough on pleural pressure changes during therapeutic thoracentesis. We found that cough‐related elevation of pleural pressure persisted even when the cough had stopped. Thus, we hypothesize that cough during therapeutic thoracentesis may have a beneficial effect preventing the excessive drop in pleural pressure. The true role of cough‐related elevation of pleural pressure is unknown, but it seems to be an interesting subject for further research.     

Variation in Clinical,Manometric and Endosonographic Findings in Anterior Chronic Anal Fissure: A Prospective Study

Nearly all chronic anal fissures occur in the posterior midline of the anal canal. However, some of them are in the anterior midline and are rarely double or in the lateral anal walls. The aim of this study was to determine if the clinical, manometric and endosonographic characteristics in patients with chronic anal fissure varied according to topography of the fissure. The patients included in this prospective study were divided according to a fissure site in posterior midline location (Group A, n = 84) and anterior midline location (Group B, n = 30). No differences were found regarding clinical data except that anterior fissures were more common in females. Mean maximal anal resting pressure and internal anal sphincter thickness was higher in Group A. However, these differences were not statistically significant. We found correlation between mean maximal anal resting pressure and internal anal sphincter thickness in patients suffering from anterior chronic anal fissure.     

肠易激综合征便秘型和功能性便秘结、直肠肛门动力学研究

目的 研究肠易激综合征(IBS)便秘型和功能性便秘患者结肠、直肠动力,直肠感觉功能.方法 对IBS便秘型患者52例和功能性便秘患者48例进行肛门直肠测压检查,并做结肠传输试验.同时选择正常健康人作对照组.结果 IBS便秘型组和功能性便秘组与对照组间直肠静息压、肛管静息压和肛门括约肌最大缩榨压比较均未见明显差异.IBS便秘型组初感阈值及排便阈值(75.00±34.04 ml,117.31±37.60 ml)较正常对照(97.14±20.54 ml,138.57±19.94 ml)明显降低.功能性便秘组排便阈值及最大耐受阈值(187.92 ±68.62 ml,252.5±93.40ml)较正常对照组(138.57±19.94 ml,181.43±18.34 ml)明显升高.IBS便秘型组各项感觉阈值较功能性便秘组均明显降低.功能性便秘组较IBS便秘型组患者结肠传输试验符合出口梗阻的比例高,但无统计学差异.结论 IBS便秘型直肠感觉过敏,功能性便秘直肠感觉迟钝.     

Esophageal motility in patients with sliding hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis

OBJECTIVE: To study the radiographic and esophageal motility changes that are characteristic of patients with both sliding hiatus hernia (HH) and reflux esophagitis. METHODS: Thirty patients were diagnosed with HH by using gastroscopy. These patients were divided into two groups according to the severity of their esophagitis: group HH1 (grades A and B, n= 18); group HH2 (grades C and D, n= 12). Sliding HH was confirmed by barium meal examination. Radiographic techniques were used to test for spasms and strictures, the coarseness of the mucosa, and to study the types of reflux and clearance. Esophageal pH (24‐h), lower esophageal sphincter pressure and the frequency and amplitude of esophageal peristalsis during reflux were also studied. RESULTS: Radiography revealed that the mucosa was coarse in all cases. Eighty percent of patients had sucking reflux and 36.7% had passive clearance. The percentages of total, supine and upright acid exposure times were greater in patients with HH than those in the controls (P < 0.01), but the difference between the HH1 and HH2 groups was not significant. Lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure was less in the HH group than that in the control group (P < 0.05). However, there were no differences in the length of the sphincter among groups. During episodes of acid reflux, the frequency and amplitude of peristalsis, and the percentage of normal primary esophageal peristalsis were all lower in HH patients than in the controls, and the duration of peristalsis was increased relative to that of the controls (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sucking reflux and passive clearance are very important in HH. Esophageal acid exposure time does not correlate with the severity of esophagitis. Lowered lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure, decreased frequency and amplitude, and increased duration of esophageal peristalsis during the episode of reflux may play an important role in the pathogenesis of sliding HH.