Comparing the efficacy of integrative body-mind-spirit intervention with cognitive behavioral therapy in patient-caregiver parallel groups for lung cancer patients using a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Purposes/objectives: This paper reports the comparative efficacies of integrative body-mind-spirit intervention (I-BMS) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in patient-caregiver parallel groups for Chinese patients with lung cancer.

Design: Randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Methods: One hundred and fifty-seven patient-caregiver dyads with no marked functional impairment were randomized into one of the two interventions with eight weekly patient-caregiver parallel groups. Assessments were conducted at baseline, within one, eight- and sixteen-weeks post-intervention. Effects of treatment group across time were analyzed by multilevel modeling.

Findings: CBT led to greater reduction in emotional vulnerability than I-BMS. I-BMS resulted in greater increase in overall QoL and spiritual self-care, and more reduction in depression than CBT. Patients in both interventions experienced improvement in physical, emotional and spiritual, except social, domains of QoL.

Conclusion: I-BMS was more efficacious for diverse domains of QoL, and CBT was more effective for emotional well-being, despite the relatively small between-group effect sizes.

Implications for psychosocial providers/policy: (1) With the expanding repertoire of psychosocial interventions for families facing lung cancer, it has become imperative to investigate the comparative efficacies of empirically supported and culturally adapted interventions. (2) Our findings show that I-BMS was more effective for diverse domains of QoL, while CBT was more efficacious with emotional well-being, although both interventions led to significant improvements in physical, emotional and spiritual domains of patient QoL. (3) Patient-caregiver parallel groups have been shown to be effective for enhancing QoL of Chinese lung cancer patients. (4) Care professionals are encouraged to dispense interventions based on the idiosyncratic needs and preferences of the patients to maximize the treatment effects.     

Diagnostic value of copeptin combined with hypersensitive cardiac troponin T detection in early acute myocardial infarction: A protocol of randomized double-blind diagnostic trial

Background:The sensitivity and specificity of the routine detection of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in early diagnosis are not high, which can not meet the clinical needs. Copeptin combined with hypersensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) is a new detection scheme, and its value in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is still unclear. Accordingly, the aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of copeptin combined with hypersensitive troponin T detection in early acute myocardial infarction.Methods:This is a prospective, randomized; double-blind diagnostic trial to investigate the diagnostic value of copeptin combined with hypersensitive troponin T detection in early acute myocardial infarction. Approved by the clinical research ethics of our hospital. Patients were randomly divided into one of 2 test protocols: (A) copeptin combined with hs-cTnT group and (B) cardiac troponin I (cTnI) group. Patients, doctors, nurses, inspectors, and data-gathering assistants were blinded to group allocation. We will focus on the sensitivity comparison of the 2 detection methods at different time periods and the sensitivity and specificity comparison of the two detection methods. Data were analyzed using the statistical software package SPSS version 25.0 (Chicago, IL).Discussion:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of copeptin combined with hypersensitive cardiac troponin T detection in early acute myocardial infarction. The results of this study will establish clinical evidence for the detection of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.Ethics and dissemination:Private information from individuals will not be published. This systematic review also does not involve endangering participant rights. Ethical approval was not required. The results may be published in a peer-reviewed journal or disseminated at relevant conferences.OSF Registration number:DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6TE5Z.     

Increased physical activity improves sleep and mood outcomes in inactive people with insomnia: a randomized controlled trial

While high levels of activity and exercise training have been associated with improvements in sleep quality, minimum levels of activity likely to improve sleep outcomes have not been explored. A two‐armed parallel randomized controlled trial (N=41; 30 females) was designed to assess whether increasing physical activity to the level recommended in public health guidelines can improve sleep quality among inactive adults meeting research diagnostic criteria for insomnia. The intervention consisted of a monitored program of ≥150 min of moderate‐ to vigorous‐intensity physical activity per week, for 6 months. The principal end‐point was the Insomnia Severity Index at 6 months post‐baseline. Secondary outcomes included measures of mood, fatigue and daytime sleepiness. Activity and light exposure were monitored throughout the trial using accelerometry and actigraphy. At 6 months post‐baseline, the physical activity group showed significantly reduced insomnia symptom severity (F_8,26 = 5.16, P = 0.03), with an average reduction of four points on the Insomnia Severity Index; and significantly reduced depression and anxiety scores (F_6,28 = 5.61, P = 0.02; and F_6,28 = 4.41, P = 0.05, respectively). All of the changes were independent of daily light exposure. Daytime fatigue showed no significant effect of the intervention (F_8,26 = 1.84, P = 0.18). Adherence and retention were high. Internationally recommended minimum levels of physical activity improve daytime and night‐time symptoms of chronic insomnia independent of daily light exposure levels.     

Probiotics in functional bowel disorders

Functional bowel disorders (FBDs) are the most common gastrointestinal (GI) disorders seen by gastroenterologists and primary care physicians. The disorders affect patients functioning and quality of life (QOL) and are associated with significant healthcare burden. The current theory regarding the development of FBDs suggests brain-gut axis dysfunctions associated abnormal GI motility and sensation. Recent data suggest that alterations in the intestinal microbiota may have a role in the pathogenesis of FBDs; or at least have the potential to affect intestinal functions that are thought to be relevant to the development of functional GI symptoms. This has led to growing interest of healthcare providers and patients in targeting the intestinal microbiota for the treatment of FBDs. In this article we discuss the potential role probiotic interventions in the treatment of FBDs. We review the evidence from pre-clinical and clinical studies and discuss the current recommendations for the use of probiotics for FBDs in clinical practice.