不同波形低频率电刺激对小鼠海马电点燃癫痫的作用比较

目的观察比较不同脉冲波形的低频率电刺激对海马电点燃癫痫模型小鼠的作用差异。方法采用电点燃刺激法建立小鼠癫痫模型, 观察正弦波、单相方波、双相方波低频率电刺激对模型小鼠癫痫行为发作及后放电持续时间的影响, 并比较不同时间点给予正弦波低频率电刺激的抗癫痫作用。结果与对照组比较, 正弦波低频率电刺激30 s能降低小鼠海马电点燃癫痫发作等级(2.85 ± 0.27 vs 4.75 ±0.12, P < 0.05)、减少大发作概率(53.6% vs 96.5%, P < 0.01) 和缩短后放电持续时间[(16.22 ± 1.69) s vs (30.29 ± 1.12) s, P < 0.01], 而单相方波和双相方波低频率电刺激30 s没有明显的抗癫痫作用。常用的单相方波低频率电刺激15 min能降低小鼠海马电点燃发作等级(3.58 ± 0.16, P < 0.05)、减少大发作概率(66.7%, P < 0.01);但对海马后放电持续时间及大发作持续时间无影响(均 P>0.05)。此外, 电点燃刺激前预先给予或结束后3 s内给予正弦波低频率电刺激具有明显的抗癫痫作用( P < 0.05或 P < 0.01), 而电点燃刺激结束10 s给予正弦波低频率电刺激则无上述抗癫痫作用。 结论低频率电刺激抗癫痫作用受波形参数的影响, 其中正弦波低频率电刺激能有效抑制小鼠海马电点燃癫痫的发作。     

Surgical Technique Notes of Arterial Vascular Reconstruction During Kidney Transplantation: Personal Experience and Literature Review

Background

Arterial vascular anomalies in patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT) are correlated with a higher incidence of early surgical complications, potentially causing graft loss. Arterial reconstruction allows patients to overcome these surgical challenges, thus minimizing the risk of poor outcomes. The aim of the present study is to retrospectively investigate the safety and effectiveness of the multiple arterial reconstruction technique with a Teflon patch in case of an unavailable aortic patch: to do so, surgical complications, graft function, and patient survival were evaluated.

高压氧治疗对局灶性脑梗死大鼠的神经保护作用

目的 观察单次9 h高压氧（hyp erbaric oxygen，HBO）治疗对局灶性脑梗死大鼠凋亡诱导因子 （apoptosis-inducing factor，AIF）、线粒体膜电位（mitochondrial membrane potential，MMPo）的影响，探讨 HBO治疗的神经保护作用。 方法 108只SD大鼠制作永久性大脑中动脉闭塞模型，随机分为对照组和HBO组，每组各54只。造 模成功3 h后，HBO组实行HBO干预，压力0.2 MPa持续9 h，对照组呼吸常压空气。采用Garcia评分评估 大鼠神经功能，比较两组造模后13 h、24 h和72 h神经功能改善情况，并在各时间点检测大鼠缺血半 暗带脑组织凋亡细胞数、线粒体和细胞核AIF表达及MMPo水平。 结果 ①神经功能评分：HBO组13 h（P <0.001）、24 h（P =0.04）神经功能评分改善比对照组更明显。 ②凋亡细胞数：HBO组13 h、24 h凋亡细胞数较对照组更少（均P <0.001）。③AIF在线粒体和细胞核的 表达：13 h、24 h、72 h各时间点HBO组AI F在线粒体的表达均较对照组多（均P <0.001）；各时间点HBO 组AIF在细胞核的表达均较对照组少（均P <0.001）。④MMPo：各时间点HBO组MMPo均高于对照组（均 P <0.001）。 结论 HBO治疗可改善大鼠神经功能，稳定MMPo，抑制AIF由线粒体向细胞核转移可能是其神经保 护作用的机制之一。     

缺血性脑血管病患者脑微出血相关因素及其对抗血小板单药治疗的影响分析

目的 研究缺血性脑血管病患者脑微出血（CMB）危险因素及其对抗血小板单药治疗的影响。方法 选取2018年1月至2018年6月该院神经内科接受抗血小板单药治疗的急性缺血性脑血管病患者300例为样本，入院后采集基本资料并完善相关检查，根据梯度回波T2^*加权成像（GRE-T2^*WI）检查结果将患者分为CMB组（176例）和非CMB组（124例），均给予抗血小板聚集治疗，比较两组临床资料及治疗1年内再发梗死、脑出血和病死率，分析影响CMB发病的危险因素以及CMB对抗血小板单药治疗的影响。结果 高龄、高血压、肥胖、脑卒中病史、ACI和脑白质疏松为CMB发生的危险因素（P<0.05）。CMB组和非CMB组抗血小板单药治疗期间脑出血率分别为14.20%和6.45%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。轻度组、中度组和重度组脑出血率分别为9.18%、10.64%和35.48%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。不同部位CMB患者抗血小板单药治疗期间再发脑梗死、脑出血及病死率比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 高龄、高血压、肥胖、脑卒中病史、ACI及脑白质疏松为缺血性脑血管疾病合并CMB的危险因素。CMB可导致抗血小板单药治疗期间脑出血风险增加，重度CMB者更甚。     

中医特色护理对心肌梗死后心律失常的应用效果研究

目的探讨中医特色护理联合全程优质护理对心肌梗死后心律失常的应用效果。方法收集2017年1月-2018年12月收治的心肌梗死后心律失常患者88例,随机分为试验组和对照组,各44例。对照组患者予以全程优质护理。试验组患者予以全程优质护理联合中医特色护理。比较2组患者护理满意度及心理焦虑、抑郁评分。结果干预后2组心理焦虑、抑郁评分均降低(P<0.05);与对照组相比,试验组护理满意率较高,试验组心理焦虑、抑郁评分较低(P<0.05)。结论全程优质护理联合中医特色护理在心肌梗死后心律失常患者的护理中具有积极作用,能够改善心理健康状态。     

Measuring the appropriateness of carbamazepine and valproic acid prescribing and utilization using a newly implemented online system in the Tabuk Region of Saudi Arabia

Epilepsy is a common neurologic disorder, which is efficiently treated with carbamazepine and valproic acid. Moreover, Saudi Ministry of Health implemented a new E-system for Poison Control Centers called Awtar to enhance technology utilization in ensuring patients’ satisfaction and to improve treatment outcomes. Therefore, we conducted this study to assess appropriateness of indication of requests and therapeutic levels of carbamazepine and valproic acid in Tabuk area, North West Saudi Arabia. This is a retrospective observational study conducted in Poison Control & Forensic Chemistry Center, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. Patients’ data were obtained for years 2018 and 2019. The blood levels of carbamazepine and valproic acid were measured by Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) Unit. We selected patients treated with either valproic acid or carbamazepine alone without any history of drug allergy. Data of 264 patients were extracted from Awtar E-system. Serum carbamazepine levels were within therapeutic range in 114 patients (75.50%), above-therapeutic range in 13 patients (8.61%) and sub-therapeutic levels in 24 patients (15.89%). Regarding serum valproic acid, it is within therapeutic range in 62 patients (54.87%), above-therapeutic range in 11 patients (9.73%) and sub-therapeutic levels in 40 patients (35.40%). In conclusion, this study gives information about partial appropriateness of usage of carbamazepine and low level of appropriateness of valproic acid. However, more efforts are needed to improve results of appropriateness of indication of antiepileptic drugs.