Adenocarcinoma and infection in a solitary hepatic cyst： A case report

Solitary non-parasitic liver cysts are being increasingly diagnosed due to the increased use of abdominal sonography. The majority of solitary liver cysts are asymptomatic; however, there are some complications which include infection, perforation, spontaneous hemorrhage, obstructive jaundice and neoplastic degeneration. In some cases a cystic liver lesion may mimic a tumor and is difficult to differentiate with standard imaging studies or fine needle aspiration cytology. Here in, we report a case of adenocarcinoma arising in a solitary hepatic cyst complicated with Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. High levels of CEA in the cyst fluid levels suggested malignancy, which was confirmed by pathology of the resected specimen.     

克唑替尼联合PC方案治疗非小细胞肺癌的临床研究

目的 探讨克唑替尼联合PC方案治疗非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效。方法 选择2016年1月—2018年12月新疆喀什地区第二人民医院治疗的64例非小细胞肺癌患者作为研究对象。用抽签法随机将患者分为对照组和观察组,每组各32例。对照组每天静脉滴入注射用培美曲塞二钠,500 mg/m²,静滴时间超过10 min,并静脉滴入卡铂注射液,AUC5静滴时间超过30 min。观察组在对照组的基础上口服克唑替尼胶囊,250 mg/次,2次/d。1个周期为21 d,两组共治疗2个周期。观察两组患者的临床疗效,同时比较两组患者治疗前后的血清癌胚抗原（CEA）、神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）、人鳞状细胞癌相关抗原（SCCAg）以及细胞角蛋白19片段（Cyfra21-1）水平和Karnofsky功能状态评分量表（KPS）评分情况。结果 治疗后,观察组总有效率为81.25%,明显高于对照组的59.37%（P<0.05）。两组治疗后的NSE、CEA、SCCAg和CYFRA21-1水平均明显降低（P<0.05）,且观察组上述肿瘤标志物水平明显低于对照组（P<0.05）。治疗后,观察组的生活质量好转率明显高于对照组,恶化率明显低于对照组（P<0.05）。结论 克唑替尼联合PC方案治疗非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效显著,能明显降低肿瘤标志物水平,提高生活质量。     

Novel serum tumor marker, RCAS1, in pancreatic diseases

AIM: As tumor markers for pancreatic carcinoma, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 have been used, but the sensitivity and specificity are not enough for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS: A novel serum tumor marker, RCAS1, was compared with two conventional serum tumor markers, CEA (highly specific for pancreatic cancer) and CA 19-9 (highly sensitive for pancreatic cancer), in 48 patients with pancreatic exocrine tumors. RESULTS: When the diagnosis of benign or malignant conditions was examined by one tumor marker, the sensitivity of RCAS1 alone (55%) was higher than that of CEA alone (27%) and the specificity of RCAS1 alone (92%) was greater than that of CA19-9 alone (78%). When examined by a combination of two markers, the sensitivity of a combination of RCAS1 and CA19-9 (95%) was superior to those of CA19-9 alone (78%), RCAS1 alone (55%, P = 0.002), CEA alone (27%) (P<0.001), RCAS1 and CEA (59%) and CA19-9 and CEA (82%). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the combination of RCAS1 and CA19-9 is highly sensitive for pancreatic carcinoma.     

Clinical significance of joint detection of serum CEA,SCCA, and bFGF in the diagnosis of lung cancer

Lung cancer is a type of malignant tumor with highest morbidity and mortality. This study tested three tumor marker levels including CEA, SCCA, and bFGF to explore their value in lung cancer diagnosis and pathological type judgment. Venous blood was extracted from lung cancer patients, lung benign lesion patients and healthy control. Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay was applied to detect serum CEA and SCCA content. ELISA was used to test serum bFGF level. Serum CEA, SCCA, and bFGF levels and positive rates were significantly higher in lung cancer group than that of lung benign disease group and health control (P < 0.05). bFGF showed higher detection sensitivity than CEA in lung cancer (P < 0.05). Three joint detection sensitivity was higher than single test (P < 0.05), while its specificity was lower (P < 0.05), and the accuracy presented no significant difference. Serum CEA and SCCA levels and positive rates were obviously higher in non-small cell lung cancer patients when compared with small cell lung cancer patients (P < 0.05), while bFGF level was similar between small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. bFGF showed higher detection rate than SCCA in small cell lung cancer (P < 0.05). Three joint detection exhibited higher positive rate in small cell lung cancer and non-small lung cancer than single test. Serum CEA, SCCA and bFGF joint detection improved detection sensitivity in lung cancer and had important reference value for pathological type deduction.     

Combination of cyst fluid CEA and CA 125 is an accurate diagnostic tool for differentiating mucinous cystic neoplasms from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

Background/objectivesDespite advances in imaging techniques, diagnosis and management of pancreatic cystic lesions still remains challenging. The objective of this study was to determine the utility of cyst fluid analysis (CEA, CA 19-9, CA 125, amylase, and cytology) in categorizing pancreatic cystic lesions, and in differentiating malignant from benign cystic lesions.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 68 patients with histologically and clinically confirmed cystic lesions was performed. Cyst fluid was obtained by surgical resection (n = 45) or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) (n = 23). Cyst fluid tumor markers and amylase were measured and compared between the cyst types.ResultsReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the tumor markers demonstrated that cyst fluid CEA provided the greatest area under ROC curve (AUC) (0.884) for differentiating mucinous versus non-mucinous cystic lesions. When a CEA cutoff value was set at 67.3 ng/ml, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosing mucinous cysts were 89.2%, 77.8%, and 84.4%, respectively. The combination of cyst fluid CEA content >67.3 ng/ml and cyst fluid CA 125 content >10.0 U/ml segregated 77.8% (14/18) of mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) from other cyst subtypes. On the other hand, no fluid marker was useful for differentiating malignant versus benign cystic lesions. Although cytology (accuracy 83.3%) more accurately diagnosed malignant cysts than CEA (accuracy 65.6%), it lacked sensitivity (35.3%).ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that cyst fluid CEA can be a helpful marker in differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous, but not malignant from benign cystic lesions. A combined CEA and CA 125 approach may help segregate MCNs from IPMNs.     

An elevated CA 19-9 is associated with invasive cancer and worse survival in IPMN

BackgroundCurrent guidelines for IPMN include an elevated serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 among the worrisome features. However, the correlation of CA 19-9 with histological malignant features and survival is unclear. Serum CEA is also currently used for preoperative management of IPMN, although its measurement is not evidence-based. Accordingly, we aimed to assess the role of these tumor markers as predictors of malignancy in IPMN.MethodsIPMN resected between 1998 and 2018 at Massachusetts General Hospital were analyzed. Clinical, pathological and survival data were collected and compared to preoperative levels of CA 19-9 and CEA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Cox regression analyses were performed considering cut-offs of 37 U/ml (CA 19-9) and 5 μg/l (CEA).ResultsAnalysis of 594 patients showed that preoperative CA 19-9 levels > 37 U/ml (n = 128) were associated with an increased likelihood of invasive carcinoma when compared to normal levels (45.3% vs. 18.0%, P < 0.001), while there was no difference with respect to high-grade dysplasia (32.9% vs 31.9%, P = 0.88). The proportion of concurrent pancreatic cancer was higher in patients with CA 19-9 > 37 U/ml (17.2% vs 4.9%, P < 0.001). An elevated CA 19-9 was also associated with worse overall and disease-free survival (HR = 1.943, P = 0.007 and HR = 2.484, P < 0.001 respectively). CEA levels did not correlate with malignancy.ConclusionIn patients with IPMN, serum CA19-9 > 37 U/ml is associated with invasive IPMN and concurrent pancreatic cancer as well as worse survival, but not with high-grade dysplasia. Serum CEA appears to have minimal utility in the management of these patients.     

华蟾素胶囊联合吡柔比星治疗晚期乳腺癌的临床研究

目的探讨华蟾素胶囊联合注射用吡柔比星治疗晚期乳腺癌的临床疗效。方法选取锦州医科大学附属第一医院在2015年10月—2017年10月接收的乳晚期腺癌患者120例作为研究对象,将所有患者随机分为对照组和治疗组,每组各60例。对照组静脉注射注射用吡柔比星50 mg/m2,1次/d;治疗组在对照组治疗的基础上口服华蟾素胶囊,4粒/次,3次/d。4周为1个疗程,两组患者均持续治疗2个疗程。观察两组患者的临床疗效,同时比较治疗前后两组患者生活质量评分、肿瘤标志物水平、副作用、复发率和生存率。结果治疗组患者客观缓解率(56.67%)显著高于对照组患者客观缓解率(46.67%),两组差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗组患者临床控制率(78.33%)显著高于对照组患者临床控制率(68.33%),两组差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后,两组患者生理状态评分、心理状态评分、躯体功能评分、社会功能评分均显著升高,两组差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);并且治疗组患者生活质量评分显著高于对照组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后,两组患者糖类抗原125(CA125)、糖类抗原153(CA153)和癌胚抗原(CEA)水平均显著降低,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);并且治疗组肿瘤标志物水平显著高于对照组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。对照组患者复发率(16.67%)显著高于治疗组患者复发率(5.00%),两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗组患者生存率(81.67%)显著高于对照组患者生存率(58.33%),两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论华蟾素胶囊联合注射用吡柔比星治疗晚期乳腺癌具有较好的临床疗效,显著改善患者生活质量,改善患者相关肿瘤标志物水平,安全性较高,值得临床推广。