We describe a general method that allows structure determination of small proteins by single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). The method is based on the availability of a target-binding
nanobody, which is then rigidly attached to two scaffolds: 1) a Fab fragment of an antibody directed against the
nanobody and 2) a
nanobody-binding protein A fragment fused to maltose binding protein and Fab-binding domains. The overall ensemble of ∼120 kDa, called Legobody, does not perturb the
nanobody–target interaction, is easily recognizable in EM images due to its unique shape, and facilitates particle alignment in cryo-EM image processing. The utility of the method is demonstrated for the KDEL receptor, a 23-kDa membrane protein, resulting in a map at 3.2-Å overall resolution with density sufficient for de novo model building, and for the 22-kDa receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, resulting in a map at 3.6-Å resolution that allows analysis of the binding interface to the
nanobody. The Legobody approach thus overcomes the current size limitations of cryo-EM analysis.Single-particle electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) has become the method of choice for the determination of protein structures. Cryo-EM analysis has several advantages over X-ray crystallography or NMR (
1), but the method becomes increasingly challenging for smaller proteins. Large molecules are relatively easy to identify in noisy low-dose images of vitrified samples and have sufficient contrast and features to determine their orientation and position for alignment and averaging. The structural analysis of small particles (∼100 kDa or less) is much more difficult. Small targets often lack recognizable shape features that can facilitate initial image alignment at low resolution. Without symmetry, small particles require optimal conditions, such as a highly homogeneous sample, rigid protein conformation, and random particle distribution in thin ice, conditions that are difficult to achieve with most samples (
2). However, structure determination of small proteins is of great interest, as most proteins have sizes below 100 kDa and ∼50% are smaller than 50 kDa, including many membrane proteins and proteins of medical importance. It is thus a major goal in the field to expand the use of cryo-EM to the routine analysis of small proteins.One approach to employ cryo-EM for small proteins is based on phase contrast methods, such as the use of Volta phase plates. This method has been used to determine the structure of streptavidin, a protein of 52 kDa, at 3.2-Å resolution (
3). However, the structure of this protein could be determined even without phase plates (
4), likely because streptavidin forms rigid tetramers and the particles display a near-perfect distribution in very thin ice, which greatly facilitates structural analysis.An alternative strategy is to make the target protein larger, either by fusing it to another protein or by using a binding partner. In either case, high rigidity of the added scaffold itself and its rigid connection to the target protein are required to facilitate particle alignment and averaging in cryo-EM images.The fusion approach has been tried with different scaffolds. For example, in a recent study, the BRIL domain was fused into a loop of a small GPCR protein by extending helices on both sides of the fusion point; the size of the scaffold was further increased by a Fab directed against the BRIL domain (
5). However, this approach is limited to proteins containing suitable α-helices; their extension has to be customized for each new target to generate a rigid connection, which is difficult to achieve without prior knowledge of the target structure.More promising is the use of a binding partner that can be selected with a screening platform, such as modified ankyrin repeat proteins (DARPins), Fab fragments of antibodies, or nanobodies. In recent studies, DARPins selected against GFP were grafted onto large scaffolds and used to visualize GFP by cryo-EM (
6,
7). However, the intrinsic conformational heterogeneity of DARPins limits their potential to achieve high-resolution structures of small proteins (
7), and so far only a few DARPins have been selected against membrane proteins. Fab fragments can be used as a fiducial marker to facilitate image alignment in cryo-EM images (
8), but they have been mainly used in X-ray crystallography. Only a few examples of their application for cryo-EM analysis have been reported (
9–
11), in part because the selection of appropriate Fabs is not trivial. In addition, the size of the Fabs (∼50 kDa) and the existence of a somewhat flexible hinge region between the two subdomains still make structural analysis challenging.Nanobodies, derived from single-chain antibodies of camelids, are also becoming popular as versatile binding partners of target proteins. Nanobodies have several attractive features. They form rigid structures that can bind to diverse shapes of target proteins, such as loops, convex surfaces, and cavities (
12). They can bind to small exposed surfaces, which may not be accessible to Fab fragments. Nanobodies can be selected from immunized camelids or from large in vitro libraries displayed by phages, yeast cells, or on ribosomes (
12,
13), and can be produced in large quantities in a fairly short time. They often lock a protein into a fixed conformation, particularly in the case of membrane proteins, and have been used extensively to determine X-ray structures. The small size of nanobodies (∼12 to 15 kDa) limits their direct application in cryo-EM, but the problem might be overcome if one could increase their size with the rigid attachment of a large scaffold. One reported approach is to fuse a scaffold into a loop of the
nanobody, generating a “megabody” (
14). However, the linker consisted of β-strands between the
nanobody and scaffold, which caused some flexibility and limited the use of the scaffold for particle alignment in cryo-EM analysis.Here, we describe a versatile method that allows cryo-EM analysis of even the smallest protein once a tightly binding
nanobody is available. The size of the
nanobody is increased to ∼120 kDa by two rigidly attached scaffolds. The overall design is reminiscent of a Lego construction, so we propose to call the scaffolds/
nanobody ensemble “Legobody.” The utility of the Legobody method is demonstrated by structures of two small proteins (22 kDa and 23 kDa) that are asymmetric monomers and have a size well below the estimated limit for direct cryo-EM single-particle analysis (∼40 kDa) (
15). The Legobody approach can easily be applied to any target protein and should greatly expand the use of cryo-EM single-particle analysis by overcoming the current size limitations.
相似文献