Clinician Confidence About Conversations at the End of Life Is Strengthened Using the Four Habits Approach

Communicating about cancer is not easy. At a time when patients are asked to make complicated choices about treatment and to be responsible for most of their own care, communication problems are consistently presented as a barrier to satisfactory medical treatment. This article identifies problems in communication and describes interventions the multidisciplinary team can use to improve the exchange of information and feelings among patients, families, and health care providers. The specific focuses are communication at the time of diagnosis and during progressive disease and the challenges and difficulties of communicating about pain, sexual functioning, and financial problems throughout the cancer experience.     

Challenges and Potential Solutions for Recruitment and Retention of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Physicians: The National Marrow Donor Program’s System Capacity Initiative Physician Workforce Group Report

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only known curative therapy for many patients with hematologic, metabolic, and immunologic disorders. Furthermore, the use of HCT has increased with the emergence of HCT as a viable therapeutic option for older patients, those with significant comorbidities, and, with the demonstrated clinical effectiveness of alternative allogeneic donor sources, for those patients without a suitable sibling donor. The National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) estimates that by 2020, it will facilitate 10,000 transplantations per year, double the number in 2010. To understand the needs of the HCT infrastructure to facilitate this number of transplantations, the NMDP organized the System Capacity Initiative 2020, centered on 6 working groups representing a diverse group of stakeholders. The Physician Workforce Group was tasked with addressing issues relating to recruitment and retention of transplantation physicians. We report here the results of our efforts and future initiatives.     

Changes in the National Endovascular Management of Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease: An Analysis of the 2011–2019 Medicare Data

PurposeTo describe national trends in the utilization of endovascular approaches (including balloon angioplasty, atherectomy, and stent placement) for the management of femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease (PAD).Materials and MethodsThe Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary dataset containing 100% of Part B claims was interrogated for years 2011–2019. The Current Procedural Terminology codes specific for femoropopliteal angioplasty, stent placement, and atherectomy were used to create summary statistics for utilization by year, place of service (hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, and office-based laboratory), and provider specialty (cardiology, radiology, and surgery).ResultsThe use of atherectomy increased from 34,732 (33%) procedures in 2011 to 75,435 (53%) procedures in 2019, and atherectomy became the dominant treatment strategy for femoropopliteal PAD. The relative utilization of stent placement (36,793 [35%] to 28,899 [20%]) and angioplasty only (34,398 [32%] to 38,228 [27%]) decreased concomitantly from 2011 to 2019. By 2019, the use of atherectomy was twofold higher in office-based laboratories than in the outpatient hospital setting (44,767 and 20,901, respectively). Treatment strategy varied by provider specialty in 2011 when cardiologists used atherectomy most frequently (17,925 [43%]), whereas radiologists used angioplasty alone (5,928 [6%]) and surgeons stented (18,009 [37%]) most frequently. By 2019, all specialties utilized atherectomy most frequently (29,564 [59%] for cardiology, 10,912 [58%] radiology, and 33,649 [47%] surgery).ConclusionsThe national approach to endovascular management of femoropopliteal PAD has changed since 2011 toward an implant-free strategy, including a multifold increase in the use of atherectomy. Discordant rates of atherectomy use between the ambulatory hospital and office-based settings highlight the need for comparative effectiveness studies to guide management.     

Integrative pediatric pain management: Impact & implications of a novel interdisciplinary curriculum

ObjectivesObjectives of this paper are to: 1) Describe a novel interdisciplinary, integrative pain curriculum for pediatric residents. 2) Describe changes in residents’ understanding of pain epidemiology, physiology, and management; application of the biopsychosocial model in pain management; and understanding and application of non-pharmacologic approaches to pain management.Design, settingThis study was done in a pediatric residency program within an urban pediatric teaching hospital. It employed both anonymous, Likert-scale surveys administered via Qualtrics, as well as open-ended, free response questions.InterventionsWe provided a multidisciplinary pain education curriculum to pediatric residents with a focus on pain neuroscience, a history of pain management, the biopsychosocial model of care, and exposure to non-pharmacologic interventions to pain management over six hours of instruction conducted in two blocks of three hours each.Outcome measuresSelf-identified changes via survey measuring resident physician knowledge, comfort, approach, and management of pediatric pain through an interdisciplinary pain curriculum.ResultsPrior to this training, many residents were not confident in their understanding of pain neuroscience, the biopsychosocial model of care, and non-pharmacologic interventions. At completion of training, residents indicated positive changes in knowledge of, and comfort with, all of the domains taught. Ninety percent of residents indicated that the curriculum changed the way they conceptualized, approached, and/or managed pain, and reported thinking more holistically about pain management. Nearly all residents indicated they would like to have more training (98 %, N = 57) in integrative modalities.ConclusionsPediatric resident physicians are receptive to training in an interdisciplinary, integrative, pediatric pain management education intervention, and subsequently show positive changes in knowledge and comfort levels. There is a need and desire for additional pain education in resident training programs.     

A novel methodology to measure waiting times for community-based specialist care in a public healthcare system

BackgroundMonitoring waiting time (WT) in healthcare systems is essential, since long WT are associated with adverse health outcomes, reduced patient satisfaction and increased private financing.ObjectiveTo describe a methodology developed for routine national monitoring of WT for community-based non-urgent specialist appointments, in a public healthcare system.MethodsThe methodology is based on data from computerized appointment scheduling systems of all Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) in Israel. Data included first 50 available appointments for community-based specialists and actual number of visits. Five most frequent specialties: orthopedics, ophthalmology, gynecology, dermatology and otolaryngology, were included.WT offered to HMO members for non-urgent care was calculated for two scenarios: "specific" physician and "any" physician in the region. Distribution of offered WT was calculated separately for each specialty and geographical region, combined to create the nationwide distribution.ResultsThe methodology was tested on data extracted between December 2018-June 2019. Estimated national median WT for "specific" physician, ranged from 9 days (ophthalmology/gynecology) to 20 days (dermatology), with large variation between geographic regions. WT were 26–56 % shorter for "any" than for "specific" physician.ConclusionsThis novel method offers a solution for ongoing national WT measurement, using computerized scheduling systems. It integrates two scenarios for appointment scheduling and allows identification of differences between specialties and regions, setting the ground for interventions to strengthen public healthcare systems.