《中国海洋药物》杂志刊载论文的引文分析

采用文献计量学方法,对１９８９年－１９９３年《中国海洋药物》杂志刊载论文的引文进行了分析。结果表明,此间共刊载论文１８１篇,共有引文１３０１条,每篇论文平均引文量为７．９８条。自引率为１２．７６％,在全部引文中,期刊占６５．１０％,图书占２７．６０％,其中占７．３０％;语种分布中文占６５．７２％,英文占２９．１３％,日文占５．０７％,俄文占０．０８％。１０年文献累计利用率,中文为８３．２７％,外文     

武汉市旅店业卫生间三大卫生用品消毒前后细菌污染调查

目的了解武汉市旅店业卫生间用品的卫生状况。方法随机采样监测了武汉市１０家旅店卫生间三大卫生用品（坐便器座垫、浴池、洗面盆）消毒前后细菌污染情况。结果武汉市旅店业卫生间三大卫生用品细菌污染较严重;消毒处理后,细菌总数均值虽有降低但仍较高,并可检出大肠菌群。结论旅店卫生间清洗消毒工作不力,亟待加强     

早吸吮勤吸吮对早泌乳的影响

为了探讨产后半小时内早吸吮、勤吸吮对早泌乳的影响。选择１１６例足月妊娠孕产妇，分别在第二产程及产后半小时抽取母亲静脉血，采用放射免疫双抗法（ＤＡＲＩＡ）测定胎儿娩出前、吸吮后和未吸吮时，母亲血清垂体催乳素（ＰＲＬ）值。结果表明：第二产程时两组血清ＰＲＬ值无显著差异。而产后半小时早吸吮的母亲体内血清中ＰＲＬ水平明显高于未吸吮的血清ＰＲＬ值。早吸吮的母亲泌乳早。     

生物医学核心期刊《中华医院感染学杂志》5年相关文献信息统计分析和质量评价

目的探索生物医学核心期刊《中华医院感染学杂志》5年相关文献信息质量本质。方法选择该杂志2000~2004年48期2 612篇论文作为调查统计源,分析评价相关文献信息质量。结果5年载文信息量平均指数为0.57;作者来源以医科大学和附属医院、省、地(市)和部队医疗卫生及科研单位为主;论文以研究类、论著类和经验总结类为主;5年基金课题共160项;5年平均每篇论文引文6.0条,中文占68.6%,外文占31.4%,期刊自引占34.2%;5年论文出版时滞平均为273.5 d。结论上述结果的6个方面在全国生物医学期刊中都具有相当的优势,凸显了该刊“核心期刊”的质量内涵。     

中国科技期刊如何进入国际信息检索系统

以被多种国际著名信息检索系统收录的World Journal of Gastroenterology（WJG）杂志的发展历程为样例。探讨如何提高中国出版的科技期刊被国际信息系统收录的命中率，提高期刊的国际地位和知名度，更好地促进与国际的学术交流。     

人文社科期刊国际化研究综述

【目的】 人文社科期刊国际化是全球人文思想传播和文化交流的重要方式,随着中国特色哲学社会科学“三大体系”工作的推进,人文社科期刊国际化成为新文科建设理念下一个紧迫的研究课题。【方法】 以CNKI、WoS、Google Scholar为文献来源,结合计量方法获取相关文献,通过文献阅读法,构建“抽象化—具体化—标准化”的研究思路。【结果】 对人文社科期刊国际化的基础研究、特征标准、评价指标“三方内容”进行综述,分析人文社科期刊国际化研究存在的“四个挑战”:发展进程缓慢、意识形态差异、评价体系构建难题、期刊自身制约。【结论】 对未来人文社科期刊研究提出了加强基础研究、解决国际本土之争、深化区域合作、推动数据驱动、创新评价方法的“五大展望”。     

“中国科技期刊登峰行动计划”入选期刊发展现状及建议

【目的】 通过统计分析“中国科技期刊登峰行动计划”入选期刊的发展现状,为优化资助机制、培育世界一流科技期刊提供参考。【方法】 基于Web of Science的JCR评价数据,运用文献计量法和深度访谈法对入选期刊发展现状和存在问题进行分析并提出建议。【结果】 入选期刊影响因子总体提升不明显,存在片面追求影响因子的倾向;资助的“解渴”“解困”作用明显,但由于期刊国际化办刊思路不清晰,谋划不足,撬动期刊实现世界一流建设目标的杠杆作用发挥得并不充分。【结论】 资助方应通过注重资助效果评估和反馈,清晰资助导向,促进资助效果形成良性循环。期刊方应深入理解“世界一流科技期刊”的建设内涵,把握规律,探索模式,积极进行国际化办刊实践,提升期刊国际影响力。     

Transparency and credibility of industry-sponsored clinical trial publications: a survey of journal editors

Objective: To examine how medical journal editors perceive changes in transparency and credibility of industry-sponsored clinical trial publications over a 5 year period (2010 to 2015).

Methods: From July to September 2015, a survey link was emailed to journal editors identified from the Thomson Reuters registry. Editors ranked their perception of: a) change in transparency and credibility of industry-sponsored clinical trial publications; b) 8 “Publication Best Practices” and the impact of each on transparency; and c) the importance and adoption of the previously published “10 Recommendations for Closing the Credibility Gap in Reporting Industry-Sponsored Clinical Research”.

Results: Of 510 editors who opened the survey, the analysis pool comprised a total of 293 editors. The majority of respondents reported their location as the US (46%) or EU (45%) and most commonly reported editorial titles were deputy/assistant editor (36%), editor-in-chief (35%) and section editor (24%). More editors reported improved versus worsened transparency (63.5% vs. 6.1%) and credibility (53.2% vs. 10.4%). Best practices that contributed most to improved transparency were “disclosure of the study sponsor” and “registration and posting of trial results”. Respondents ranked the importance of nine recommendations as moderate or extremely important, and adoption of all recommendations was ranked minimal to moderate.

Conclusions: The 293 editors who responded perceived an improvement in the transparency and credibility of industry-sponsored publications from 2010 to 2015. Confirmation of the importance of 9/10 recommendations by the respondents was encouraging. Yet, low adoption rates suggest that additional work is required by all stakeholders to improve best practices, transparency and credibility.     

Cultivating a culture of research in nursing through a journal club for leaders: A pilot study

Aim

To describe whether an action learning‐inspired journal club for nurse leaders can develop the leaders' self‐perceived competences to support a research culture in clinical nursing practice.

Background

Development of clinical research capacity and nurse leaders with the requisite competences are key factors in evidence‐based health care practice. This study describes how nurse leaders at a large regional hospital took part in a journal club for nurse leaders, with a view to developing their competences to support a nursing research culture in their departments.

Methods

A pilot study using a multimethod approach to evaluate the journal club for nurse leaders. Four nurse leaders participated in the journal club for nurse leaders. Content analysis on the data was performed.

Results

Data revealed that participation in journal club for nurse leaders gave the leaders a feeling of increased competences to support nursing research culture in their departments. They stated that the action learning approach and the competences of the facilitator were key factors in this outcome.

Conclusions

An action learning‐inspired journal club for nurse leaders can be useful and meaningful to nurse leaders in developing leadership competences.

Implications for nursing management

As an approach in journal club for nurse leaders, action learning can develop nurse leaders' competence to support a research culture, and thus ensure evidence‐based nursing is practised.