Shedding light on a potential hazard: Dental light-curing units

BackgroundDental light-curing units (LCUs) are powerful sources of blue light that can cause soft-tissue burns and ocular damage. Although most ophthalmic research on the hazards of blue light pertains to low levels from personal electronic devices, computer monitors, and light-emitting diode light sources, the amount of blue light emitted from dental LCUs is much greater and may pose a “blue light hazard.”MethodsThe authors explain the potential risks of using dental LCUs, identify the agencies that provide guidelines designed to protect all workers from excessive exposure to blue light, discuss the selection of appropriate eye protection, and provide clinical tips to ensure eye safety when using LCUs.ResultsWhile current literature and regulatory standards regarding the safety of blue light is primarily based on animal studies, sufficient evidence exists to suggest that appropriate precautions should be taken when using dental curing lights. The authors found it difficult to find on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration database which curing lights had been cleared for use in the United States or Europe and could find no database that listed which brands of eyewear designed to protect against the blue light has been cleared for use. The authors conclude that more research is needed on the cumulative exposure to blue light in humans. Manufacturers of curing lights, government and regulatory agencies, employers, and dental personnel should collaborate to determine ocular risks from blue light exist in the dental setting, and recommend appropriate eye protection. Guidance on selection and proper use of eye protection should be readily accessible.Conclusions and Practical ImplicationsThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines for Infection Control in the Dental Health-Care Setting–2003 and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration Bloodborne Pathogen Standard do not include safety recommendations or regulations that are directly related to blue light exposure. However, there are additional Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations that require employers to protect their employees from potentially injurious light radiation. Unfortunately, it is not readily evident that these regulations apply to the excessive exposure to blue light. Consequently employers and dental personnel may be unaware that these Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations exist.     

Assessing decision-making capacity at end of life

Objective

Patients with terminal illness often face important medical decisions that may carry ethical and legal implications, yet they may be at increased risk for impaired decisional capacity. This study examined the prevalence of impairment on the four domains of decisional capacity relevant to existing legal standards.

Method

Twenty-four adults diagnosed with a terminal illness completed the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment, a semi-structured measure of decision-making capacity and measures of cognitive functioning and psychological distress.

Results

Approximately one third of the sample demonstrated serious impairment on at least one domain of decisional capacity. The greatest proportion of impairment was found on subscales that rely heavily on verbal abilities. Decisional capacity was significantly associated with cognitive functioning and education, but not with symptoms of anxiety or depression.

Conclusions

This study is the first to examine decisional capacity in patients with terminal illness relative to legal standards of competence. Although not universal, decisional impairment was common. Clinicians working with terminally ill patients should frequently assess capacity as these individuals are called on to make important medical decisions. Comprehensive assessment will aid clinicians in their responsibility to balance respect for patient autonomy with their responsibility to protect patients from harm resulting from impaired decisional capacity.     

Consent in obstetric anaesthesia

Consent to medical treatment is a vital process that should occur prior to any procedure or intervention in a competent adult. There are ethical and legal reasons for doctors to ensure that valid, adequate consent has been obtained from a patient. It is generally accepted that written consent is acceptable, however, discussions regarding consent should be clearly documented, including specific risks discussed. Labouring women may have to consent for procedures when in severe pain, under the influence of strong analgesics, or in a time-pressured situation. However, the parturient is presumed to be competent. A competent pregnant woman may decline treatment for any reason, even if it puts her or her unborn child at risk of harm or death.     

Increasing research capacity and changing the culture of primary care towards reflective inquiring practice: the experience of the West London Research Network (WeLReN)

A number of primary care research networks were set up throughout England in 1998 in order to (1) improve the quality of primary care research (2) increase the research capacity of primary care, and (3) change the culture of primary care towards reflective inquiring practice (NHSE, 2000b). It is not clear how best to operate a network to achieve these diverse aims. This paper describes the first 30 months of a network that adopted a whole system approach in the belief that this would offer the best chance of simultaneously achieving the three aims. A cycle of activity was designed to facilitate the formation of multidisciplinary coalitions of interest for research with complementary 'top down' and 'bottom up' programmes of work co-existing. At least 330 people participated in the generation of research questions of whom one third (33%) were general practitioners, 16% community nurses, 6% practice managers and other primary care practitioners. Over two fifths (43%) were 'key allies' - academics, health authority staff, community workers and project workers. One fifth (110) of all practices (500) in the WeLReN area have collaborated in at least one research project. The ratio of doctor:nurse participation in the 24 research project teams was markedly different in the supported coalitions (2:1) compared to projects devised and led by more experienced researchers (6:1). The evidence suggests that it is possible to operate a primary care research network in a way that develops coalitions of interest from different parts of the health care system as well as both 'top down' and 'bottom up' led projects. It is too early to tell if the approach will be able to achieve its aims in the long-term but the activity data are encouraging. There is a need for more research on the theoretical basis of network operation.     

“Reader, I Detained Him Under the Mental Health Act”: A Literary Response to Professor Fennell’s Best Interests and Treatment for Mental Disorder

This is a response to Professor Fennell's paper on the recent influence and impact of the best interests test on the treatment of patients detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA) for mental disorder. I discuss two points of general ethical significance raised by Professor Fennell. Firstly, I consider his argument on the breadth of the best interests test, incorporating as it does factors considerably wider than those of medical justifications and the risk of harm. Secondly, I discuss his contention that the apparent permeability of the line between the interests of the patient and the interests of society is something to be concerned about in itself. Since the overarching theme of the paper is the proper place of social and cultural values, my reponse considers the implications of Fennell's arguments in the light of Charlotte Brontë's novel ‘Jane Eyre’, which, through the character of Bertha Mason (the infamous ‘mad woman in the attic’) provides a provocative study of the relationship between mental disorder and society.     

医疗设备发展与医院建筑空间变异关系探讨

随着医疗设备发展日新月异，医院相关建筑空间必须有对应的变异（变化），以适应新的需求。作者从医学模式演化、相应建筑空间需求特性、建筑空间变异及相关系统整合等方面，探讨了其与医疗设备发展的相互关系。     

Prospective assessment of recurrence risk in sudden infant death syndrome siblings

Knowledge of the likelihood of a repetition of sudden infant death syndrome within a sibship, particularly in the next sibling, is important to parents. Methodologic considerations with respect to the studies of recurrence risk already published indicate that the rates reported are overestimates. This suspicion is confirmed by our study based on 826,162 infants surviving the first week of life on file in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. A total of 1062 (1.3 per 1,000) infants died of SIDS; five deaths occurred as the second case in a family. The recurrence risk for the nextborn sibling was 5.6 per 1000, and for all subsequent siblings 4.8 per 1000, which would seem encouragingly low from a counseling point of view.