A case of acute hepatitis E associated with multidrug hypersensitivity and cytomegalovirus reactivation

A 65-year-old Japanese man was hospitalized because of acute hepatitis and severe cholestasis due to hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection combined with a drug reaction to a cold preparation. He died of disseminated intravascular coagulation and severe intestinal bleeding due to systemic cytomegalovirus reactivation following the development of severe eruptions with marked eosinophilia due to drug hypersensitivity to taurine and ursodeoxycholate preparations. The close interaction between viral infection or reactivation and drug hypersensitivity was considered as a pathophysiology in this case, which emphasizes the need for further study of the immunological mechanism of the interaction.     

久泻宁动物毒性试验研究

目的 （1）观察久泻宁一日内小鼠灌胃1～3次后的毒性反应和死亡情况，测定最大耐受量；（2）观察久泻宁给大鼠连续灌胃3个月，对机体产生的毒性反应、严重程度及可逆性，确定无毒剂量。为人拟用量提供参考。方法 （1）久泻宁小鼠灌胃，一日2～3次，观察急性毒性反应．测定最大耐受量；（2）久泻宁高、中、低三个剂量组和一个对照组，大鼠连续灌胃3个月，观察外观行为和体质量变化。试验期结束。每组取1/2动物活杀。检测血常规、血液生化、病理组织；1／2动物停药进行3周的恢复期观察后。同法检测上述指标。结果 久泻宁小鼠灌胃给药的最大耐受药量为750g／kg（含生药）。相当临床日拟用量（2．5g／kg）的300倍；大鼠连续3个月灌胃给药的无毒剂量为125g／kg（含生药）．相当临床拟用量50倍。结论 久泻宁无明显毒性，安全范围大。临床日拟用量2.5g／kg、疗程1个月是安全的。     

运用市场手段实现医药自然分开的理论探讨

回顾了韩国、我国台湾和大陆实行医药分开改革的过程,认为我国以往的相关改革陷入了“管制”的思维误区。认为通过制度设计,创造医疗机构门诊处方自由流动的环境,依靠市场竞争形成处方流向结构多元化,可以实现医药自然分开状态。提出了“医药自然分开”、“处方流向结构”和“处方分散度”等新概念。     

介入化疗结合立体适形放射治疗晚期胰腺癌的临床观察

探讨晚期胰腺癌的介入化疗加立体适形放射治疗的临床疗效。先选择性胰腺动脉化疗,药物:CF 300 mg、5-FU 1 000~1 500 mg、DDP 60~80 mg和健择1.2~2.0 g,共4次。介入化疗后或两次介入之间行立体定向放射治疗,放疗采用4~6个适形野,总剂量为35~45 Gy,4~8 Gy/次,每周3次,21例患者CR率42.85%(9/21),PR率42.85%(9/21),SD 4.76%(1/21),PD 9.52%(2/21),总有效率(CR PR)85.70%(18/21)。初步研究结果提示,主观指标评估,2例临床症状完全消失,17例主观症状有所改善。介入化疗结合立体放射治疗晚期胰腺癌不失为临床选用的治疗手段。     

载氧血红蛋白纯化工艺研究

目的改善心脑血管缺氧载氧药物是一种创新药物。由于它半径比红细胞小400~1 000倍,易于通过毛细血管,给缺血组织及时供氧,迅速缓解或纠正缺氧状态,达到治疗抢救目的。血红蛋白的纯化工艺是载氧药物研制的重要工艺步骤。方法本研究建立了一套通过热敏法分离纯化人脐带血血红蛋白的工艺以及较为完善的纯化血红蛋白质量检测指标。结果与现有的纯化方式相比,热敏法操作简便,仪器设备造价低廉,纯化与病毒灭活同时进行,得到的纯化产品损失少,纯度高,各项理化指标达到国际水平。结论本工艺适用于规模制备纯化血红蛋白,为进一步研制治疗心脑血管缺氧载氧药物创造了有利条件。     

三联药物治疗未破裂异位妊娠的临床研究

目的 :观察甲氨蝶呤(Methotrexate,MTX)、米非司酮(Mifepristron,Ru486)及中药三联用药治疗未破裂型异位妊娠的临床疗效。方法 :对171例未破裂型异位妊娠病人 ,按药物治疗方法不同分为两组进行对照研究 :A组使用MTX注射 +Ru486口服 +中药联合治疗。B组单独使用MTX注射治疗。测定法定期测定两组病人血HCG值以监测血HCG下降情况 ,测量异位妊娠包块三径线值以监测病灶包块缩小情况 ,同时观察临床症状持续时间、副反应发生率及总有效率。结果 :血HCG下降及病灶包块缩小A组较B组明显 ,差异有显著性(p<0 05,p<0 01);临床症状持续时间A组较B组短 ,差异有显著性(p<0 05);副反应发生率两组间无显著差异(p>0 05);A、B两组的总有效率分别为 :95 74%和71 43% ,A组较B组高 ,差异有显著性(p<0 05)。结论 :三联使用甲氨蝶呤、米非司酮及活血化瘀消包块杀胚的中药既有很强的杀胚功能 ,又能消除病灶包块 ,保留生育功能。三联药物联合治疗未破裂异位妊娠具有疗效肯定、安全     

腺性膀胱炎三种治疗方法治疗效果的随访观察

目的　比较腺性膀胱炎三种治疗方法的效果。方法　 86例腺性膀胱炎患者分别行膀胱药物灌注、经尿道电切、经尿道电切加膀胱药物灌注治疗。随访观察症状缓解程度和膀胱镜病检结果 1年。结果　 73例完成了随访调查 ,占 84.9%。三种方法治疗后症状缓解程度 ,差异无显著性意义 (P >0 .0 5 ) ;膀胱镜病检复查 ,灌注治疗效果好于电切治疗效果 ,综合治疗效果好于电切治疗效果 ,差异具有显著性意义 ;比较灌注治疗后膀胱镜病检阴性例数 ( 2 2 /2 8)与综合治疗后膀胱镜病检阴性例数 ( 3 0 /3 4) ,差异无显著性意义 ( χ2 =1.0 60 ,P =0 .3 0 3 )。结论　膀胱药物灌注和经尿道电切加膀胱药物灌注的膀胱镜病检复查 ,效果好于电切治疗的效果。     

Intravenous drug abuse and Type 1 diabetes: financial and healthcare implications.

AIMS: To determine the morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs of intravenous drug-abusing patients with Type 1 diabetes (IVDA-DM), who are admitted to hospital. METHODS: Retrospective case note analysis of admissions, complications and cost estimation over a 6-year period. Each drug-abusing patient (IVDA-DM) (n = 9) was compared with two controls (n = 18) with Type 1 diabetes but without a history of intravenous drug abuse (DM-controls). Admissions were also analysed for patients with intravenous drug abuse, but without Type 1 diabetes (IVDA-controls) (n = 198). Admissions were at a University teaching hospital in Liverpool, UK. DM-controls were drawn from a population attending diabetes outpatient clinics between 1997 and 2002 at the same hospital. The main outcome measures were: the duration and healthcare costs of hospital admissions per year, outpatient attendances per year, glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), weight, micro- and macrovascular complications and mortality. RESULTS: Multiple admissions, mainly related to ketoacidosis, led to marked differences in mean (95% CI) inpatient days per year per patient [IVDA-DM 28.1 (13.6-42.7) vs. DM-control 1.1 (0.2-1.9); P < 0.0001], mean inpatient days per year per patient in critical care bed (IVDA-DM 1.7 (-0.7-4.2) vs. DM-control 0; P < 0.02) and mean costs of admission, per patient per year (pound sterling 7320 vs. pound sterling 230). The IVDA-DM group frequently omitted insulin, were underweight, failed to attend as outpatients and five had died by the end of 2002. The IVDA-controls spent considerably less time in hospital [3.4 (2.8-3.9) days per patient per year]. CONCLUSION: IVDA-DM patients have higher rates of diabetes complications, are admitted more frequently and have a high mortality compared with DM and IVDA-controls. The cost of inpatient care of this small group of patients was considerable.