人文社科期刊国际化研究综述

【目的】 人文社科期刊国际化是全球人文思想传播和文化交流的重要方式,随着中国特色哲学社会科学“三大体系”工作的推进,人文社科期刊国际化成为新文科建设理念下一个紧迫的研究课题。【方法】 以CNKI、WoS、Google Scholar为文献来源,结合计量方法获取相关文献,通过文献阅读法,构建“抽象化—具体化—标准化”的研究思路。【结果】 对人文社科期刊国际化的基础研究、特征标准、评价指标“三方内容”进行综述,分析人文社科期刊国际化研究存在的“四个挑战”:发展进程缓慢、意识形态差异、评价体系构建难题、期刊自身制约。【结论】 对未来人文社科期刊研究提出了加强基础研究、解决国际本土之争、深化区域合作、推动数据驱动、创新评价方法的“五大展望”。     

“中国科技期刊登峰行动计划”入选期刊发展现状及建议

【目的】 通过统计分析“中国科技期刊登峰行动计划”入选期刊的发展现状,为优化资助机制、培育世界一流科技期刊提供参考。【方法】 基于Web of Science的JCR评价数据,运用文献计量法和深度访谈法对入选期刊发展现状和存在问题进行分析并提出建议。【结果】 入选期刊影响因子总体提升不明显,存在片面追求影响因子的倾向;资助的“解渴”“解困”作用明显,但由于期刊国际化办刊思路不清晰,谋划不足,撬动期刊实现世界一流建设目标的杠杆作用发挥得并不充分。【结论】 资助方应通过注重资助效果评估和反馈,清晰资助导向,促进资助效果形成良性循环。期刊方应深入理解“世界一流科技期刊”的建设内涵,把握规律,探索模式,积极进行国际化办刊实践,提升期刊国际影响力。     

Transparency and credibility of industry-sponsored clinical trial publications: a survey of journal editors

Objective: To examine how medical journal editors perceive changes in transparency and credibility of industry-sponsored clinical trial publications over a 5 year period (2010 to 2015).

Methods: From July to September 2015, a survey link was emailed to journal editors identified from the Thomson Reuters registry. Editors ranked their perception of: a) change in transparency and credibility of industry-sponsored clinical trial publications; b) 8 “Publication Best Practices” and the impact of each on transparency; and c) the importance and adoption of the previously published “10 Recommendations for Closing the Credibility Gap in Reporting Industry-Sponsored Clinical Research”.

Results: Of 510 editors who opened the survey, the analysis pool comprised a total of 293 editors. The majority of respondents reported their location as the US (46%) or EU (45%) and most commonly reported editorial titles were deputy/assistant editor (36%), editor-in-chief (35%) and section editor (24%). More editors reported improved versus worsened transparency (63.5% vs. 6.1%) and credibility (53.2% vs. 10.4%). Best practices that contributed most to improved transparency were “disclosure of the study sponsor” and “registration and posting of trial results”. Respondents ranked the importance of nine recommendations as moderate or extremely important, and adoption of all recommendations was ranked minimal to moderate.

Conclusions: The 293 editors who responded perceived an improvement in the transparency and credibility of industry-sponsored publications from 2010 to 2015. Confirmation of the importance of 9/10 recommendations by the respondents was encouraging. Yet, low adoption rates suggest that additional work is required by all stakeholders to improve best practices, transparency and credibility.     

Cultivating a culture of research in nursing through a journal club for leaders: A pilot study

Aim

To describe whether an action learning‐inspired journal club for nurse leaders can develop the leaders' self‐perceived competences to support a research culture in clinical nursing practice.

Background

Development of clinical research capacity and nurse leaders with the requisite competences are key factors in evidence‐based health care practice. This study describes how nurse leaders at a large regional hospital took part in a journal club for nurse leaders, with a view to developing their competences to support a nursing research culture in their departments.

Methods

A pilot study using a multimethod approach to evaluate the journal club for nurse leaders. Four nurse leaders participated in the journal club for nurse leaders. Content analysis on the data was performed.

Results

Data revealed that participation in journal club for nurse leaders gave the leaders a feeling of increased competences to support nursing research culture in their departments. They stated that the action learning approach and the competences of the facilitator were key factors in this outcome.

Conclusions

An action learning‐inspired journal club for nurse leaders can be useful and meaningful to nurse leaders in developing leadership competences.

Implications for nursing management

As an approach in journal club for nurse leaders, action learning can develop nurse leaders' competence to support a research culture, and thus ensure evidence‐based nursing is practised.     

对医学论著中实验动物种类与数量分布的探讨

目的:掌握论著研究对象中实验动物的种类及数量,为实验动物的数量提供和管理评价提供依据。方法:阅读武警医学院学报论著内容,记录研究对象中实验动物的种类和数量。结果:在刊载的791篇论著中,有183篇涉及动物实验,占23.14%。实验动物的总需求量为7 612只。结论:在实验动物的饲养和管理上要着眼于医学科学研究的需要,确保实验动物的种类、数量和质量。     

Trochanteric bursitis information on the internet; can we trust the information presented?

Trochanteric bursitis is one of the most common causes of lateral hip pain in adults. The prevalence of unilateral trochanteric bursitis is 15.0% in women and 8.5% in men. Access to internet based information has increased dramatically and health related information is now one of the most popular searches in online activity, despite this the quality of information can vary. The objective of this paper is to examine the quality and readability of internet based information of trochanteric bursitis. Overall, we have found a high variability among not only the quality but also the readability of information published. Websites that appeared first on each search engine for trochanteric bursitis did not necessarily score better, demonstrating the importance of providing patients with high quality resources. Future articles should use more critical appraisal tools in order to provide the reader with more high quality and readable information.