携载rhBMP-2微球的新型可注射自凝固复合人工骨的制备及特性研究

[目的]制备一种具有良好降解性和成骨活性、可注射的自凝固新型骨修复材料。[方法]制备携载rhBMP-2的聚乳酸与聚乙醇酸共聚物（PLGA）微球，并将其与rhBMP-2／磷酸钙骨水泥（CPC）复合，制备出rhBMP-2／PLGA微球／CPC复合人工骨。探讨了材料的特性，包括形貌、固化时间、抗压强度及反映材料体外降解速度的指标一体外降解液Ca、P浓度变化，测定复合材料rhBMP乏的释药速度及体外诱导MSCs细胞成骨分化的能力。[结果]与单纯CPC-rhBMP-2相比，复合材料的固化时间少量增加，抗压强度下降明显。体外降解速度及体外释药明显提高，释放的rhBMP-2具有骨诱导活性。[结论]rhBMP-2／PLGA微球／磷酸钙骨水泥新型复合人工骨是具有良好应用前景的骨修复材料。     

经肺动脉与支气管动脉血管造影的CTA观察原发肺癌的血供

目的用支气管动脉(BA)和肺动脉(PA)造影CTA观察肺癌血供情况。方法前瞻性观察6例支气管肺癌患者,分别行体循环动脉和肺动脉数字减影血管造影(DSA)后,留置BA导管与PA导管行CTBA与CTPA,观察BA与PA对肺癌的血供。结果CTPA上,无体动脉与左心强化的图像上肿瘤未见强化,有体动脉或左心强化的图像上见肿瘤边缘强化,CT强化值为10.0~45.6 Hu。CTBA上肿瘤部分明显强化,CT强化值为150.3~320.7 Hu,可见杂乱无章的肿瘤血管影,3例见纵隔淋巴结强化。结论本组病例观察表明原发性肺癌由BA为主的多发体循环动脉供血,未发现PA参与供血。     

64层螺旋CT在糖尿病下肢动脉硬化闭塞症中的诊断价值

目的评价64层螺旋CT下肢动脉成像在诊断糖尿病下肢动脉硬化闭塞症中的临床价值。方法对90例可疑下肢血管病变的Ⅱ型糖尿病患者进行64层螺旋CT血管造影检查,对所有扫描原始数据行容积再现(VR),最大密度投影(M IP),冠状、矢状面多平面重组(MPR)以及曲面重建(CPR)。结果64层螺旋CT下肢血管造影检查可以清晰显示自髂总至足背整个动脉系统病变的准确部位、范围及侧枝血管。90例患者中67例(77%)患者血管呈不同程度粥样硬化表现。其中轻或中度狭窄49例(56.3%),重度狭窄18例(20.7%),7例(8%)完全闭塞患者可见侧枝循环血管形成。结论64层螺旋CT下肢血管造影,对糖尿病下肢动脉硬化闭塞症的诊断和治疗具有重要价值。     

肝门胆管癌的动态增强CT诊断

目的评价螺旋CT对肝门胆管癌的诊断价值。方法13例肝门胆管癌行螺旋CT平扫及动态增强扫描,并与手术及病理对照分析。结果11例平扫表现为肝门区低密度软组织肿块;2例表现为肝门区胆管不规则增厚,管腔狭窄。增强扫描13例有延迟强化。结论螺旋CT扫描对肝门胆管癌的诊断具有重要意义。     

上肢骨肿瘤切除后的自体骨移植重建

目的探讨应用自体骨移植对上肢骨肿瘤切除后的骨缺损修复重建的效果。方法1998年8月～2004年3月，收治上肢骨肿瘤切除后的骨缺损16例。男8例，女8例。年龄7～45岁。经病理确诊，肱骨近端尤文肉瘤和骨肉瘤各1例；肱骨远端尤文肉瘤2例；桡骨远端骨巨细胞瘤8例，高分化软骨肉瘤2例，恶性纤维组织细胞瘤和骨肉瘤各1例。2例肱骨近端肿瘤行自体锁骨代肱骨；2例肱骨远端肿瘤行自体腓骨代肱骨；12例桡骨远端肿瘤中，1例行自体髂骨移植，11例行自体腓骨代桡骨进行重建。采用MSTS系统进行术后功能评价。结果2例肱骨近端自体锁骨移植患者分别随访36个月和12个月，术后保持部分肩关节前屈和后伸功能，但外展功能丧失；MSTS评分分别为23分和22分。2例肱骨远端自体腓骨移植患者分别随访4个月和6个月，肘关节功能良好，移植骨连接处已经出现骨愈合；MSTS功能评分分别为24分和19分。12例桡骨远端自体骨移植患者中11例随访6～75个月，功能良好，无明显并发症；1例髂骨植骨的桡骨远端骨巨细胞瘤术后3个月移植骨完全愈合，至今随访75个月，肿瘤无复发。MSTS功能评分18~27分，平均22．6分。结论自体骨移植在上肢骨肿瘤切除后骨缺损的重建，尤其是儿童的骨缺损重建中，是一种较好的方法。     

Smart Prep技术在肾动脉CTA中的临床应用

目的:探讨Smart Prep技术在肾动脉多层螺旋CT血管造影中的应用。方法:20例行同层动态增强扫描,通过时间-密度曲线获得肾动脉的有效浓度阈值。65例行肾动脉CTA造影,经肘静脉团注370mgI/ml优维显1.5ml/kg后,应用Smart Prep软件实时监控靶血管浓度,当感兴趣区对比剂浓度达有效浓度阈值时触发增强扫描完成数据采集,重组和重建图像显示肾动脉。结果:65例肾动脉CTA造影均获成功,58例(89.2%)增强时相处于最佳扫描时期。增强扫描的延迟时间15~38s不等,个体差异明显,而肾动脉CT值持续位于有效浓度阈值(100HU)以上。结论:Smart Prep技术实时监控肾动脉对比剂浓度变化并及时触发增强扫描,它不受个体差异影响即可确保增强扫描的实施,优于小剂量试验。     

多层螺旋CT灌注成像在胶质瘤术后随访中的应用价值初探

目的探讨多层螺旋CT灌注成像在胶质瘤术后随访中的应用价值。方法对23例胶质瘤术后患者进行CT灌注成像,测量术后复发残余病灶、术后未复发病变区、残腔病灶及脑组织正常区域的CT灌注参数值[包括脑血流量(CBF)、脑血容量(CBV)、脑血管表面通透性(PS),以及其各相对参数值(rCBF、rCBV、rPS)],应用SPSS11.0统计软件包,独立样本t检验进行显著性分析。结果复发残余组10例,CBF值、CBV值及PS值均升高,rCBF值为1.99±0.72,rCBV值为2.57±0.79,rPS值为10.79±5.85。未复发组11例,CBF值及CBV值均降低,rCBF为0.36±0.99,rCBV为0.76±0.41。8例PS值接近正常值,3例术后早期CT灌注检查PS值较明显升高,8～10个月再次复查PS值接近正常。术后残腔2例,CBF值略降低,CBV值略升高,PS值较明显升高。胶质瘤术后复发残余组与术后未复发组比较,二者的CT灌注参数值差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);与正常脑组织区域比较,二者的CT灌注参数值差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);与术后残腔组比较,CBF值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),CBV值及PS值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。未复发组与脑组织正常区域比较,CBF值差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),CBV值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),PS值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。未复发病例组与术后残腔组比较,CBF值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),CBV值及PS值差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论CT灌注成像能准确地反映脑肿瘤术后的血流动力学改变,在确定肿瘤术后是复发残余还是未复发上有重要价值;PS值大小能较准确反映血脑屏障的破坏程度,但在鉴别肿瘤术后为复发残余还是残腔上无特异性。     

结节病肺部改变的CT征象分析

目的探讨结节病肺部改变的CT表现及特征。方法回顾性分析90例经手术病理证实的结节病的临床资料及CT表现。结果结节69例（76．7％），主要沿支气管血管束分布37例（41．1％），团块影31例（34．4％），磨玻璃影39例（43．3％），支气管血管束增粗30例（33．3％），小叶间隔线58例（64．4％），纤维化17例（18．9％），包括支气管变形8例（8．9％）、条索影5例（5．6％）、蜂窝影4例（4．4％），空气潴留3例（3．3％），支气管狭窄8例（8．9％），胸膜改变42例（46．7％），肺门纵隔淋巴结增大76例（84．4％）。2种及2种以上肺部病变并存83例（92．2％），肺部病变合并肺门纵隔淋巴结增大76例（84．4％）。结节、团块、磨玻璃影、支气管血管束增粗治疗后随访吸收好转例数分别为25例（25／30）、9例（9／15）、11例（11／16），10例（10／12）；小叶间隔线、支气管变形、条索影、蜂窝影吸收好转例数分别为10例（10／22）、0例（0／4）、1例（1／3），0例（0／2）。结论结节病肺部CT表现形式多样，具有一定特征性，同时结合肺门纵隔淋巴结增大改变，有助于提高诊断正确率。     

原发性肾上腺皮质腺癌的CT诊断价值

目的分析原发性肾上腺皮质腺癌（ACC）的CT表现及其动态增强特征，以提高其诊断准确性。方法回顾性分析经手术病理证实的ACC11例，术前均经CT平扫、动脉期（30S）和门静脉期（70—80S）扫描，复习CT扫描表现并和手术病理作对照。结果11例ACC中，右侧5例，左侧6例。直径4．1—16．0cm，其中，〈5．0cm者2例，5．0—10．0cm者4例，〉10．0cm5例；肿瘤境界清楚3例，邻近脂肪间隙见条索状异常密度影3例，邻近实质脏器受侵犯5例。肿瘤实质成分平扫、动脉期和门静脉期CT值分别为21．9～46．7HU（平均35．3HU）、30．5～65．8HU（平均47．1HU）和52．6～97．0HU（平均74．2HU）。肿瘤中央坏死形成假囊肿4例，网络状改变6例，实质为主伴小囊变1例；6例网络状改变者动脉期可见显著强化的不规则肿瘤血管：结论ACC具有较明显的形态学和血液动力学特征，动态增强扫描尤其是动脉期扫描有明显的诊断价值。     

A review of the effectiveness of aspartame in helping with weight control

Summary Strategies to reverse the upward trend in obesity rates need to focus on both reducing energy intake and increasing energy expenditure. The provision of low‐ or reduced‐energy‐dense foods is one way of helping people to reduce their energy intake and so enable weight maintenance or weight loss to occur. The use of intense sweeteners as a substitute for sucrose potentially offers one way of helping people to reduce the energy density of their diet without any loss of palatability. This report reviews the evidence for the effect of aspartame on weight loss, weight maintenance and energy intakes in adults and addresses the question of how much energy is compensated for and whether the use of aspartame‐sweetened foods and drinks is an effective way to lose weight. All studies which examined the effect of substituting sugar with either aspartame alone or aspartame in combination with other intense sweeteners on energy intake or bodyweight were identified. Studies which were not randomised controlled trials in healthy adults and which did not measure energy intakes for at least 24 h (for those with energy intakes as an outcome measure) were excluded from the analysis. A minimum of 24‐h energy intake data was set as the cut‐off to ensure that the full extent of any compensatory effects was seen. A total of 16 studies were included in the analysis. Of these 16 studies, 15 had energy intake as an outcome measure. The studies which used soft drinks as the vehicle for aspartame used between 500 and about 2000 ml which is equivalent to about two to six cans or bottles of soft drinks every day. A significant reduction in energy intakes was seen with aspartame compared with all types of control except when aspartame was compared with non‐sucrose controls such as water. The most relevant comparisons are the parallel design studies which compare the effects of aspartame with sucrose. These had an overall effect size of 0.4 standardised difference (SD). This corresponds to a mean reduction of about 10% of energy intake. At an average energy intake of 9.3 MJ/day (average of adult men and women aged 19–50 years) this is a deficit of 0.93 MJ/day (222 kcal/day or 1560 kcal/week), which would be predicted (using an energy value for obese tissue of 7500 kcal/kg) to result in a weight loss of around 0.2 kg/week with a confidence interval 50% either side of this estimate. Information on the extent of compensation was available for 12 of the 15 studies. The weighted average of these figures was 32%. Compensation is likely to vary with a number of factors such as the size of the caloric deficit, the type of food or drink manipulated, and timescale. An estimate of the amount of compensation with soft drinks was calculated from the four studies which used soft drinks only as the vehicle. A weighted average of these figures was 15.5%. A significant reduction in weight was seen. The combined effect figure of 0.2 SD is a conservative figure as it excludes comparisons where the controls gained weight because of their high‐sucrose diet and the long‐term follow‐up data in which the aspartame groups regained less weight than the control group. An effect of 0.2 SD corresponds to about a 3% reduction in bodyweight (2.3 kg for an adult weighing 75 kg). Given the weighted average study length was 12 weeks, this gives an estimated rate of weight loss of around 0.2 kg/week for a 75‐kg adult. The meta‐analyses demonstrate that using foods and drinks sweetened with aspartame instead of sucrose results in a significant reduction in both energy intakes and bodyweight. Meta‐analyses both of energy intake and of weight loss produced an estimated rate of weight loss of about 0.2 kg/week. This close agreement between the figure calculated from reductions in energy intake and actual measures of weight loss gives confidence that this is a true effect. The two meta‐analyses used different sets of studies with widely differing designs and controls. Although this makes comparisons between them difficult, it suggests that the final figure of around 0.2 kg/week is robust and is applicable to the variety of ways aspartame‐containing foods are used by consumers. This review has shown that using foods and drinks sweetened with aspartame instead of those sweetened with sucrose is an effective way to maintain and lose weight without reducing the palatability of the diet. The decrease in energy intakes and the rate of weight loss that can reasonably be achieved is low but meaningful and, on a population basis, more than sufficient to counteract the current average rate of weight gain of around 0.007 kg/week. On an individual basis, it provides a useful adjunct to other weight loss regimes. Some compensation for the substituted energy does occur but this is only about one‐third of the energy replaced and is probably less when using soft drinks sweetened with aspartame. Nevertheless, these compensation values are derived from short‐term studies. More data are needed over the longer term to determine whether a tolerance to the effects is acquired. To achieve the average rate of weight loss seen in these studies of 0.2 kg/week will require around a 220‐kcal (0.93 MJ) deficit per day based on an energy value for obese tissue of 7500 kcal/kg. Assuming the higher rate of compensation (32%), this would require the substitution of around 330 kcal/day (1.4 MJ/day) from sucrose with aspartame (which is equivalent to around 88 g of sucrose). Using the lower estimated rate of compensation for soft drinks alone (15.5%) would require the substitution of about 260 kcal/day (1.1 MJ/day) from sucrose with aspartame. This is equivalent to 70 g of sucrose or about two cans of soft drinks every day.