The efficacy of interventions for low back pain in nurses: A systematic review

ObjectivesTo investigate the efficacy of interventions for the prevention and treatment of low back pain in nurses.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesThe review was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42015026941) and followed the PRISMA statement guidelines. A two phase approach was used. In phase one, all randomised controlled trials included in the systematic review of Dawson et al. (2007) which reviewed interventions for low back pain in nurses until 2004 were selected. In phase two, relevant randomised controlled trials and cluster randomised controlled trials published from 2004 until December 2015 were identified by an electronic search of nine databases (Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PsycARTICLES, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PEDro, Scopus and MEDLINE). To be eligible, trials had to examine the efficacy of interventions either for the prevention or treatment of low back pain in nurses. Primary outcomes of interest were any measure of pain and/or disability.Review methodsThree reviewers independently assessed eligibility and two reviewers independently conducted a risk of bias assessment (Cochrane Back and Neck Group).ResultsFour studies were retrieved from phase one. In phase two, 15,628 titles and abstracts were scanned. From these, 150 full-text studies were retrieved and ten were eligible. Fourteen studies (four from phase one, ten from phase two) were eligible for risk of bias assessment. The included trials were highly heterogeneous, differing in pain and disability outcome measures, types of intervention, types of control group and follow-up durations. Only four of the included studies ( n= 644 subjects) had a low risk of bias (≥6/12). Manual handling training and stress management in isolation were not effective in nurses with and without low back pain (risk of bias, 7/12, n = 210); the addition of a stretching exercise intervention was better than only performing usual activities (risk of bias, 6/12, n = 127); combining manual handling training and back school was better than passive physiotherapy (risk of bias, 7/12, n = 124); and a multidimensional intervention (risk of bias, 7/12, n = 183) was not superior to a general exercise program in reducing low back pain in nurses.ConclusionsOnly four relevant low risk of bias randomised controlled trials were found. At present there is no strong evidence of efficacy for any intervention in preventing or treating low back pain in nurses. Additional high quality randomised controlled trials are required. It may be worth exploring the efficacy of more individualised multidimensional interventions for low back pain in the nursing population.     

Effects on Spasticity and Neuropathic Pain of an Oral Formulation of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in Patients WithProgressive Multiple Sclerosis

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of an oral formulation of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (ECP002A) in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS).

Isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection in the emergency department: A rare cause of abdominal pain

Acute onset abdominal pain constitutes a significant proportion of emergency department visits, but only a small fraction of these cases are attributable to vascular pathologies (Bauersfeld, 1947 [1]). In this case, report, we present an incidental diagnosis of Spontaneous Isolated Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection (SISMAD). A 69-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department complaining of fever, loss of appetite, vague epigastric pain, dysuria, and a productive cough for several days. A lower extremity venous Doppler ultrasound was performed, and a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was identified in the left main femoral vein and in the proximal segment of the superficial vein. The patient also had no blood flow in the distal part of left external iliac vein. A contrast-enhanced computerized tomography angiography of the thorax and abdomen was performed to detect pulmonary embolism and the etiology of the abdominal pain. No pulmonary embolism was found; however, multiple metastatic nodules were identified in both lungs, as well as infiltration on the posterobasal field of the right lung, metastases on the liver, focal dilatation, and an intimal flap on the middle-distal part of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) at 2?cm, with a segment that was compatible with isolated dissection. There was a contrast passage on the distal part of SMA, and no sign of bowel ischemia.     

The HAS-Choice study: Utilizing the HEART score,an ADP,and shared decision-making to decrease admissions in chest pain patients

Objective

The HAS-Choice pathway utilizes the HEART Score, an accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP), and shared decision-making using a visual aid in the evaluation of chest pain patients. We seek to determine if our intervention can improve resource utilization in a community emergency department (ED) setting while maintaining safe patient care.

Timing of Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis

Background

Cholecystitis is an inflammation of the gallbladder that most commonly occurs as a result of obstruction of the cystic duct by gallstones. The current standard of treatment for acute cholecystitis is cholecystectomy.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Diagnosis of Proximal Hamstring Rupture

Background

Acute proximal hamstring ruptures can be a diagnostic challenge in the emergency department. The revealing sign of large posterior thigh ecchymosis is typically not yet present; the physical examination is limited due to pain, radiographs can be unremarkable, and definitive testing with magnetic resonance imaging is not practical. These avulsions are often misdiagnosed as hamstring strains and treated conservatively. The diagnosis is made after failed treatment, often months after the injury. Surgical repair at that time can be technically challenging and higher risk due to tendon retraction and adhesion of the tendon stump to the sciatic nerve.

The Treatment of Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: A White Paper Position Statement Prepared for the American Academy of Emergency Medicine

Background

Pain is one of the most common reasons patients present to the emergency department (ED). Emergency physicians should be aware of the numerous opioid and nonopioid alternatives available for the treatment of pain.