Cetuximab enhances the efficiency of irinotecan through simultaneously inhibiting the MAPK signaling and ABCG2 in colorectal cancer cells

BackgroundThe present study sought to investigate the combined effects of cetuximab and irinotecan on colorectal cancer cells as well as the mechanisms underlying their anti-cancer effects.Material and methodsHigh performance liquid chromatography, Hoechst staining assay, and western blotting analysis were used to detect intracellular drug concentrations, cell apoptosis, and protein expression in the presence of cetuximab, irinotecan, and the combination of both.ResultsCetuximab was found to increase intracellular concentrations of irinotecan as well as cytotoxicity by inhibiting the epidermal growth factor receptor and, by extension, the downstream RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK signaling pathway. Cetuximab therefore induced apoptosis and improved the effect of irinotecan in colorectal cancer cells. It was also shown that cetuximab inhibited the drug efflux activity of ABCG2. In combination with irinotecan, cetuximab can both significantly induce cell apoptosis by inhibiting the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK signaling pathway and improve the effects of irinotecan by decreasing drug efflux through the inhibition of ABCG2.ConclusionThese features contribute to its anti-cancer potential.     

Afatinib and Cetuximab in Four Patients With EGFR Exon 20 Insertion–Positive Advanced NSCLC

Introduction

EGFR exon 20 insertions comprise 4% to 9% of EGFR mutated NSCLC. Despite being an oncogenic driver, they are associated with primary resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We hypothesized that dual EGFR blockade with afatinib, an irreversible EGFR TKI, and cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody against EGFR, could induce tumor responses.

Intra-tumor AvidinOX allows efficacy of low dose systemic biotinylated Cetuximab in a model of head and neck cancer

For locally advanced and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the current clinical use of Cetuximab in chemo/radiotherapy protocols is often associated to severe systemic toxicity. Here we report in vitro data in human FaDu pharynx SCC cells, showing that inactive concentrations of biotinylated Cetuximab (bCet) become active upon anchorage to AvidinOX on the surface of tumor cells. AvidinOX-anchored bCet induces apoptosis and DNA damage as well as specific inhibition of signaling, degradation and abrogation of nuclear translocation of EGFR. In the mouse model of FaDu cancer, we show that intra-tumor injection of AvidinOX allows anti-tumor activity of an otherwise inactive, intraperitoneally delivered, low dose bCet. Consistently with in vitro data, in vivo tumor inhibition is associated to induction of apoptosis, DNA damage and reduced angiogenesis. AvidinOX is under clinical investigation for delivering radioactive biotin to inoperable tumors (ClinicalTrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02053324","term_id":"NCT02053324"}}NCT02053324) and present data support its use for the local treatment of HNSCC in combination with systemic administration of low dose bCet.     

Cetuximab delivery and antitumor effects are enhanced by mild hyperthermia in a xenograft mouse model of pancreatic cancer

Even with current promising antitumor antibodies, their antitumor effects on stroma‐rich solid cancers have been insufficient. We used mild hyperthermia with the intent of improving drug delivery by breaking the stromal barrier. Here, we provide preclinical evidence of cetuximab + mild hyperthermia therapy. We used four in vivo pancreatic cancer xenograft mouse models with different stroma amounts (scarce, MIAPaCa‐2; moderate, BxPC‐3; and abundant, Capan‐1 and Ope‐xeno). Cetuximab (1 mg/kg) was given systemically, and the mouse leg tumors were concurrently heated using a water bath method for 30 min at three different temperatures, 25°C (control), 37°C (intra‐abdominal organ level), or 41°C (mild hyperthermia) (n = 4, each group). The evaluated variables were the antitumor effects, represented by tumor volume, and in vivo cetuximab accumulation, indirectly quantified by the immunohistochemical fluorescence intensity value/cell using antibodies against human IgG Fc. At 25°C, the antitumor effects were sufficient, with a cetuximab accumulation value (florescence intensity/cell) of 1632, in the MIAPaCa‐2 model, moderate (1063) in the BxPC‐3 model, and negative in the Capan‐1 and Ope‐xeno models (760, 461). By applying 37°C or 41°C heat, antitumor effects were enhanced shown in decreased tumor volumes. These enhanced effects were accompanied by boosted cetuximab accumulation, which increased by 2.8‐fold (2980, 3015) in the BxPC‐3 model, 2.5‐ or 4.8‐fold (1881, 3615) in the Capan‐1 model, and 3.2‐ or 4.2‐fold (1469, 1922) in the Ope‐xeno model, respectively. Cetuximab was effective in treating even stroma‐rich and k‐ras mutant pancreatic cancer mouse models when the drug delivery was improved by combination with mild hyperthermia.     

Is EGFR really a therapeutic target in head and neck cancers?

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in 90% to 100% of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The overexpression of EGFR and its ligand transforming growth factor is associated with poorer survival. EGFR inhibitors such as Cetuximab (Erbitux) have shown a significant antitumoral effect in SCCHN and has improved locoregional control and as well as survival. Even though there was some success with Cetuximab, work with other EGFR inhibition has not been very fruitful and not really shown any promise. Mechanism of action of Cetuximab could be immune-mediated rather than EGFR inhibition and EGFR may not necessarily be a therapeutic target in SCCHN.     

Cetuximab and panitumumab in a patient with colon cancer and concomitant chronic skin disease:A potential beneficial effect on psoriasis vulgaris

Monoclonal antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) are used in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. However, these agents can induce severe dermatological side effects that discourage their administration in patients with chronic dermatological disease. EGFR plays a key role in normal skin development and immunological function, and is expressed in various tissues and organs, although contrarily, it is overexpressed in psoriasis-related skin lesions. Thus, discussion is ongoing regarding the putative pathological role and therapeutic potential of this protein. We herein report on a patient with advanced colon cancer and concomitant long-standing psoriasis vulgaris who received antiEGFR antibody monotherapy as a third-line treatment for metastatic disease. One week after the initiation of treatment, the patient’s skin lesions dramatically subsided and the improvement was sustained during therapy. Based on this case, we propose that anti-EGFR antibody therapy is not necessarily contraindicated in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Moreover, the findings reaffirmed that EGFR is an important molecule in the pathology of psoriasis.     

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

AIM: To investigate the correlation between Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog(KRAS) status and the therapeutic effects of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) monoclonal antibodies(Mo Abs) in metastatic colorectal cancer(m CRC).METHODS: Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) were identified and the association between KRAS mutation and clinical outcome in m CRC patients treated with anti-EGFR Mo Abs was investigated. Ten RCTs wereincluded in this meta-analysis. Progression-free survival and overall survival were used to assess the strength of the relationship between KRAS mutation and clinical outcome.RESULTS: In first-line treatment, survival benefit was confined to patients with wild-type KRAS. Chemotherapy regimens and angiogenesis inhibitor treatment influenced the results of the analysis. Wildtype KRAS m CRC patients did not seem to benefit from oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy(PFS: HR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.70-1.10; OS: HR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.82-1.04). Clinical benefit in m CRC patients was limited to therapeutic regimens which included anti-EGFR Mo Abs and fluorouracil-based therapy(PFS: HR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.69-0.86; OS: HR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.75-0.95). When anti-EGFR Mo Abs were used as second- or further-line treatment, clinical benefit was still confined to patients with wild-type KRAS. CONCLUSION: KRAS status is a potential predictive marker of clinical benefit due to anti-EGFR Mo Ab therapy in m CRC patients.