The role of lymphadenectomy in high risk prostate cancer

Historically, patients with high risk prostate cancer were considered poor candidates for radical prostatectomy (RP) due to the likelihood of positive pelvic lymph nodes and decreased long term survival. Although there is still no consensus on the optimal therapy for this group of patients, there is increasing evidence that surgery could play a role. Cancer specific survival (CSS) rates after RP for locally advanced disease at 10 year follow up range from 29 to 72%, depending on tumor differentiation. The role of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in prostate cancer remains a controversial topic. Nonetheless, in conjunction with RRP extended PLND (ePLND) should be performed as extended lymph node dissection in lieu of standard PLND may increase staging accuracy, influence decision making with respect to adjuvant therapy and possibly impact outcome. High risk patients with organ confined prostate cancer and low volume (micro)metastatic disease may be the ones to profit most from this approach.     

Adequate lymphadenectomy results in accurate nodal staging without an increase in morbidity in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: Proper resection in gastric cancer should include more than 15 lymph nodes for accurate staging. We sought to determine if adequate nodal dissection would result in more accurate N staging without an increase in mortality. METHODS: Data from a prospectively maintained (January 1996 to August 2006) foregut malignancy database were reviewed, and trends in treatment from 3 time periods (1996-1998, 1999-2001, and 2002-2006) were compared. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-three patients treated had an average number of nodes examined of 13.1, with a significant increase in the number of nodes from years 1996 to 1998 (9.2), 1999 to 2001(10.2), and 2002 to 2005 (15.9) (P = .001). There was a significant decrease in 30-day (11.9% to 11.8% to 3.5%, P = .001) and 60-day mortality (15.2% to 18.6% to 10.6%, P = .001) during those same time periods. CONCLUSIONS: Through an increase in multidisciplinary collaboration, the surgical standards in gastric cancers has improved, with greater lymph node evaluation, greater lymph node staging accuracy, and decreased overall mortality.     

Endoscopic fluorescent lymphography for gastric cancer

Lymphography by radioisotope or dye is a well-known technique for visualizing the lymphatic drainage pattern in a neoplastic lesion and it is in use in gastric cancer. Indocyanine green (ICG) more recently has been validated in fluorescent lymphography studies and is under evaluation as a novel tracer agent in gastric cancer. The amount and dilution of ICG injected as well as the site and the time of the injection are not standardized. In our unit, endoscopic submucosal injections of ICG are made as 0.5 mg in 0.5 mL at four peritumoral sites the day before surgery (for a total of 2.0 mg in 2.0 mL). Detection instruments for ICG fluorescence are evolving. Near-infrared systems integrated into laparoscopic or robotic instruments (near-infrared fluorescence imaging) have shown the most promising results. ICG fluorescence recognizes the node that receives lymphatic flow directly from a primary tumor. This is defined as the sentinel lymph node, and it has a high predictive negative value at the cT1 stage, able to reduce the extent of gastrectomy and lymph node dissection. ICG also enhances the number of lymph nodes detected during extended lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Nevertheless, the practical effects of ICG use in a single patient are not yet clear. Standardization of the technique and further studies are needed before fluorescent lymphography can be used extensively worldwide. Until then, current guidelines recommend an extensive lymphadenectomy as the standard approach for gastric cancer with suspected metastasis.     

Prognostic value of paraaortic lymph node metastases in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head

IntroductionThe role of paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cancer of the pancreatic head is controversial. The aim of this study is to analyze the prognostic role of paraaortic lymph node (PALN) metastases after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis of all patients, who underwent upfront resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head at the Frankfurt University Hospital from 2011 to 2020 was performed. The primary endpoint was survival, according to the presence of PALN metastases.ResultsOut of 468 patients with pancreatic resection, 148 had an upfront resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. Of those, in 125 (85%) a paraaortic lymphadenectomy was performed. In 19 (15.2%) PALN metastases were detected. The estimated overall median survival after resection was 21.7 months (95% CI 18.8 to 26.4), the disease free survival 16 months (95% CI 12 to 18). Among the patients with lymph node metastases, PALN metastases had no significant influence on overall (18.9 versus 19 months, HR = 1.3, 95% CI 0.7 to 2.6, p = 0.392) or disease free survival (14 versus 10.7 months, HR = 1.7, 95% CI 0.9 to 3.2, p = 0.076). After adjusting for T-stage, N-stage, grade, resection margin, PALN metastases, and adjuvant therapy, only adjuvant therapy had a prognostic significance for overall survival (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.85, p = 0.013).ConclusionPatients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head and PALN metastases do not have inferior outcomes than those with regional lymph node metastases. Thus, positive PALN should not be considered a contraindication for resection.     

Lobe-specific lymph node dissection in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: An overview

Lymph node dissection is a vital part of surgical treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lobectomy with systematic lymph node dissection (SLND) still remains the gold standard surgical treatment for early-stage NSCLC patients. However, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that lobe-specific lymph node dissection (L-SLND) can be used as an alternative therapy for SLND in carefully selected patients with early-stage NSCLC. However, there are no currently available evidences of review summarizing the role of L-SLDN in treating early-stage NSCLC. Therefore, we performed this literature review by summarizing the existing literatures on the lymph node drainage pattern, definition, scope and role of L-SLND in patients with early-stage NSCLC, aiming to provide evidence for the application of L-SLND in patients with early-stage NSCLC.