基于预防接种异常反应补偿的山东省卡介苗淋巴结炎经济负担测算

目的了解山东省卡介苗(BCG)淋巴结炎经济负担情况。方法以2011年5月至2019年12月山东省304例申请省级补偿的BCG淋巴结炎病例为对象,收集患者基本情况、预防接种相关情况、门诊(住院)病历和收费票据等相关资料,对其直接经济负担(包括直接医疗费用和直接非医疗费用)、间接经济负担和总经济负担进行测算,比较不同特征病例经济负担的差异。结果304例BCG淋巴结炎患者月龄的M(Q1,Q3)为3(2,4)月,其中男性239例(78.6%),淋巴结破溃71例(23.4%),手术227例(74.7%)。单纯门诊、单纯住院和门诊后住院病例分别占25.7%(78例)、7.2%(22例)和67.1%(204例)。贴现后单例直接、间接和总经济负担的M(Q1,Q3)分别为9910(5713,16074)、2081(1547,3122)和12262(7694,18571)元。直接医疗费用占直接经济负担的89.4%,直接经济负担占总经济负担的84.9%,80.0%病例的总经济负担仅占其补偿金额的20.0%左右,只有2.3%的病例总经济负担占补偿金额的60.0%以上。单纯住院和门诊后住院病例的直接、间接和总经济负担高于单纯门诊病例,手术病例的直接、间接和总经济负担高于非手术病例,淋巴结未破溃病例的直接和总经济负担高于破溃病例(均P<0.05)。结论山东省BCG淋巴结炎病例经济负担受诊疗方式的影响,且以直接医疗费用为主。     

Efficacy of m-Health for the detection of adverse events following immunization – The stimulated telephone assisted rapid safety surveillance (STARSS) randomised control trial

IntroductionPassive surveillance is recommended globally for the detection of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) but this has significant challenges. Use of Mobile health for vaccine safety surveillance enables a consumer-centred approach to reporting. The Stimulated Telephone Assisted Rapid Safety Surveillance (STARSS) a randomised control trial (RCT) sought to evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of SMS for AEFI surveillance.MethodsMulti-centre RCT, participants were adult vaccinees or parents of children receiving any vaccine at a trial site. At enrolment randomisation occurred to one of two SMS groups or a control group. Prompts on days 2, 7 and 14 post-immunisation, were sent to the SMS group, to ascertain if a medical event following immunisation (MEFI) had occurred. No SMS’s were sent to the control participants. Those in the SMS who notified an MEFI were pre-randomised to complete a computer assisted telephone interview or a web based report to determine if an AEFI had occurred whilst an AEFI in the controls was determined by a search for passive reports. The primary outcome was the AEFI detection rate in the SMS group compared to controls.ResultsWe enrolled 6,338 participants, who were equally distributed across groups and who received 11,675 vaccines. The SMS group (4,225) received 12,675 surveillance prompts with 9.8% being non-compliant and not responding. In those that responded 90% indicated that no MEFI had been experienced and 184 had a verified AEFI. 6 control subjects had a reported AEFI. The AEFI detection rate was 13 fold greater in the SMS group when compared with controls (4.3 vs 0.3%).ConclusionWe have demonstrated that the STARSS methodology improves AEFI detection. Our findings should inform the wider use of SMS-based surveillance which is particularly relevant since establishing robust and novel pharmacovigilance systems is critical to monitoring novel vaccines which includes potential COVID vaccines.     

The safety of BCG revaccination: A systematic review

IntroductionRevaccination with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine is not generally recommended due to a lack of proven efficacy of repeat doses for protection against tuberculosis. However, there is a growing interest in the use of BCG vaccine for its ‘off-target’ effects which might involve revaccination. We did a systematic review of the safety of BCG revaccination.MethodsMEDLINE (1946 to March 2020) and the BCG World Atlas (updated 2017) were searched, limiting to studies of BCG administration by the intradermal or percutaneous route. Adverse events as well as patient and vaccine characteristics were reviewed.ResultsThe search identified 388 articles, of which 24 met the inclusion criteria. These reported 22 studies comprising eight randomised trials, four case-control studies, four observational studies and six case series or reports. Overall, there was evidence for a small increase in the rate of mild local and systemic reactions. No serious adverse events were reported in immunocompetent individuals.ConclusionsEvidence to date suggests that revaccination with BCG vaccine carries minimal risk. Future studies of BCG vaccine for novel applications should report adverse event data stratified by prior BCG vaccination status.     

Enhanced safety surveillance study of ACAM2000 smallpox vaccine among US military service members

ObjectivesTo evaluate the rates of myopericarditis (primary objective) and rates of cardiovascular and neurological adverse events (secondary objectives) in temporal association with ACAM2000® smallpox vaccine.MethodsObservational cohort study conducted through monthly surveillance from 2009 to 2017 of electronic medical records of military service members (SM) for pre-specified cardiac and neurological International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes reported in the 30 days following smallpox vaccination. ICD codes potentially predictive of myopericarditis and codes for encephalitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and sudden death were classified into Group 1. All other cardiovascular and neurological ICD codes were classified into Group 2. Medical records containing Group 1 codes were individually reviewed to confirm coding accuracy and to seek additional data in support of myopericarditis adjudication, which was performed by an independent clinical panel. Chart reviews were not performed for Group 2 codes, which were reported in aggregate only.Results897,227 SM who received ACAM2000 smallpox vaccine and 450,000 SM who received Dryvax smallpox vaccine were included in the surveillance population. The rate of adjudicated myopericarditis among ACAM2000 smallpox vaccine recipients was 20.06/100,000 and was significantly higher for males (21.8/100,000) than females (8.5/100,000) and for those < 40 years of age (21.1/100,000) than for those 40 years or older (6.3/100,000). Overall rates for any cardiovascular event (Group 1 plus Group 2) were 113.5/100,000 for ACAM2000 vaccine and 439.3/100,000 for Dryvax vaccine; rate ratio, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.24–0.28). The rates of subjects with one or more defined neurological events were 2.12/100,000 and 1.11/100,000 for ACAM2000 and Dryvax vaccines respectively; rate ratio, 1.91 (95% CI, 0.71–5.10).ConclusionsElectronic records surveillance of the entire vaccinated SM population over a ten-year period found rates of myopericarditis, of defined neurological events, and of overall cardiac events that were consistent with those of prior passive surveillance studies involving Dryvax or ACAM2000 smallpox vaccines.Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00927719.     

Pre-vaccination vulnerability and suspected adverse events following HPV vaccination. A case-control study nested in the Danish national birth cohort

Previous studies have indicated that girls experiencing suspected adverse events (AE) following HPV vaccination were more vulnerable prior to vaccination. However, no study has previously investigated differences in vulnerability using prospectively collected self-reported measures of vulnerability. The objective of this study therefore was to describe the distribution of biological and psychosocial indicators of vulnerability in girls referred to a hospital setting due to suspected adverse events and compare it with a sample of non-referred HPV vaccinated girls.The study was conducted as a case control study based within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Cases were defined as HPV vaccinated girls referred to a hospital setting between 2015 and 2017 due to suspected adverse events (n = 80), and 5 controls were randomly selected from the remaining source population, matched to cases on age at vaccination, region of residence and year of vaccination. The final study population consisted of 480 girls. Prior exposures were based on information gathered from an 11 year follow up of the DNBC and included information on self-rated health, frequent health complaints, medication use, bullying, stressful life events and physical activity. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association between each exposure and referral.The percentage of individuals in the exposed category of each exposure was generally higher for cases than controls. Particularly, the odds of being referred were higher for those with low self-rated health compared to high (OR [95%-CI] 2.43 [1.07–5.5]1), those being bullied (OR 3.19 [1.17–8.73]), and those who had taken medication (OR 2.22 [1.32–3.67]).Overall, these results indicated that girls experiencing suspected AE following HPV vaccination were more vulnerable prior to vaccination.     

不良妊娠结局与夫妻MTHFR基因多态性的相关性及叶酸代谢风险评估策略的研究

目的 探讨夫妻亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶（methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, MTHFR)基因C677T和A1298C多态性与不良妊娠结局的相关性及现有叶酸代谢风险等级评估策略的可行性。方法 选取145对曾有不良妊娠结局的夫妻和110对正常对照,应用Sanger测序检测MTHFR 677、1298位点多态性,分别比较病例组与对照组间女性、男性各基因型分布是否存在显著差异;据现有叶酸代谢风险等级评估策略对研究对象进行分级,比较两组中不同风险等级病例的分布是否存在显著差异。结果 病例组男性和女性MTHFR 677 位点C/C基因型频率均低于对照组,C/T、T/T基因型频率均高于对照组,两组中男性和女性的MTHFR 677位点3种基因型分布差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）;病例组男性和女性MTHFR 1298位点A/C基因型频率均高于对照组,A/A、C/C基因型频率均低于对照组,两组男性和女性MTHFR 1298位点3种基因型分布差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）;两组间男性和女性的叶酸代谢风险级别分布差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 女性MTHFR C677T多态性变异与不良妊娠结果有明显相关性,不能排除男性MTHFR C677T多态性改变与不良妊娠结局无关,建议孕前夫妻双方同时进行MTHFR基因多态性检测。可根据叶酸代谢风险分级策略,为夫妻双方制定合理的个体化叶酸增补方案。     

A retrospective analysis of social media posts pertaining to COVID-19 vaccination side effects

ObjectivesWith an uprising influence of social media platforms like Twitter and Instagram a multitude of worldwide accessible information is available. Since the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic the exchange of medical information about several topics related to this infectious disease and its vaccination has increased rapidly. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the content associated with COVID-19 vaccination and its side effects and evaluate its educational quality.MethodsWe conducted this retrospective study to investigate 600 Twitter and Instagram posts by #covidvaccinesideeffects due to number of ‘likes’, comments, type of post, language, its purpose and source. In addition, posts were evaluated due to educational quality by three examiners of different educational levels.ResultsThe majority of posts showed 0 to 50 “likes” and 0 to 5 comments in English language. A comparison between Twitter and Instagram by the influence of application showed significant differences in number of posts and “likes” or comments (p < 0.05). The major post type were texts for Twitter (251; 83.7%) and videos for Instagram (104; 34.7%). While a majority of posts by #covidvaccinesideeffects report about the occurrence of side effects, the majority of them were mild and general COVID-19 vaccination feedback during the first 4 months was positive. But, only 3 to 7% were rated by “excellent” educational and validatable content. Interrater reliability between all three examiners presented a high concordance with 89% (p = 0.001).ConclusionsThis study presents an analysis of quantity and quality of social media content according to COVID-19 vaccinations and its side effects. It supports the deduction that most of the content on Twitter and Instagram is shared by patients and unclear sources and thus is limited informative. Nevertheless, influence of social media on medical information especially during COVID-19 pandemic is increasing and practitioners have to face its effect on their patients.     

Acute unsolicited adverse events following BNT162b2 vaccine in Saudi Arabia,a real-world data

BackgroundAcute adverse events and anaphylaxis were reported after the administration of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines. We aim to explore the nature and outcome of adverse events following BNT162B2 vaccine in a community vaccination center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.MethodWithin 30 min post vaccination, all acute adverse events (AAEs) that occurred before March 31st, 2021, and in people older than 16 years were reviewed (AAE group). We used the case definition of Brighton collaboration on vaccine safety to define anaphylaxis. Patients’ demographics, comorbidities, allergy history, and outcome at disposition were collected. Observation duration after vaccination was short (<15 min) or extended (<3 h). Statistical analysis was performed to study AAEs association with the study variables and outcomes.ResultsOut of 71,221 vaccine recipients, 144 (0.002%) had developed 345 AAEs, at a rate of 48.4 events per 10,000 dose administered. The majority of cases in AAE group were first dose recipients (93.8%) and previously healthy (59%), while the minority had a previous history of allergy (6.3%) or a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 (4.2%). We found a significant association between female gender and the occurrence of any AAE (p-value = 0.002). Per every 10,000 doses administered, non-anaphylactic AAEs were dizziness (17.8), headache (9.7), nausea (7.1), or syncope (3.2). Only one in every ten AAEs was considered serious and resulted in an extended observation (4.8 per 10,000 doses), but only 1/144 required hospitalization for non-anaphylaxis reasons (0.1 per 10,000 doses). According to the Brighton collaboration definition of anaphylaxis, no single case of high certainty anaphylaxis was recorded. No death was documented in this cohort.ConclusionAcute adverse events due to BNT162b2 vaccine were rare and mostly non-serious with a tendency to occur more in women. Further prospective studies on larger vaccine recipients to evaluate the incidence of anaphylaxis in the Saudi population are warranted.     

铁路运输业职工心理紧张特点

采用紧张性生活事件量表及症状自评量表（ＳＣＬ－９０），对铁路运输职业中火车司机２１３名、列车员２０５名及调度员１３８名职工进行了调查。结果提示火车司机的环境噪音污染问题、列车员的学习问题，调度员的人际关系、家庭、婚恋问题的年心理紧张均值，显著高于中国常模。发现家庭主要成员患急重病是火车司机和列车员的高强高频事件；本人生活习惯改变是三组共有的中强高频事件；不安心本职工作，工作中遇到困难是火车司机、列车员的中强高频事件。结果还发现调度员所承受的年心理压力最高为２１．０１５，火车司机次之为１９．０４２，两组显著高于中国常模，列车员最低，为１１．９０２．同时还发现火车司机心理健康调查表中总苦恼水平最高，与另两组差异非常显著。     

123例清开灵注射液不良反应分析

对123个清开灵注射液所致不良反应病例进行分析,结果显示,使用该药时不良反应的出现与患者的性别、年龄以及使用剂量（在注明使用范围内）无关。在不良反应出现时间上,有53.7%病人在滴注期间1h内发生,有36.5%病人在用药24h后出现（均为再次或反复用药）。在类型上,41例皮肤反应（占33.3%）,26例药物热（占21.1%）,19例血液系统不良反应（占15.4%）,16例过敏性休克（占13%）,15例呼吸系统不良反应（占12.2）,3例惊厥（占2.4%）,其它3例（占2.4%）。不良反应出现的时间越早其危害性较大。浅析了不良反应发生的机理及防治方法。