Subchondroplasty of the Foot: Two Case Reports

Early avascular necrosis of metatarsal heads and cuboid injuries are uncommon conditions encountered by foot and ankle specialists. Treatment options are limited and typically include long periods of offloading or non-weightbearing. There is limited published information on alternative treatment approaches for such pathologies when conservative therapies fail. Presented are 2 patient cases treated with a percutaneous calcium phosphate injection after failure of standard therapy, persistent pain, and bone marrow edema in the foot.     

Effect of Dexmedetomidine infusion during hip fracture surgery on hemodynamic parameters and blood loss: A triple-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

Introduction In this study, we aim to assess the intra-operative effect of dexmedetomidine administration on the hemodynamic parameters and bleeding volume during hip fracture surgery.Patients and methods we designed and implemented a triple-blinded randomized clinical trial to objectively compare the effects of 0.5 µg/kg/h infusion of dexmedetomidine with placebo (equal amount of normal saline) during hip fracture surgery. All included cases were between 30 and 70 years old and underwent surgery for fixation of a proximal femur fracture from September 26, 2020 until February 15, 2021. They were all ASA class I or II with preoperative hemoglobin levels of 10 mg/dL or higher. Surgical blood loss and hemodynamic parameters were documented.Results 76 patients were enrolled. There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics. The bleeding rate was 620 ± 190.0 mL for the normal saline group and 476 ± 177.98 mL in the dexmedetomidine group (P = 0.04). No significant effect on hemodynamic parameters was observed.Conclusion Based on the current study, intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during hip fracture surgery under general anesthesia reduced the amount of intraoperative bleeding without causing any significant hemodynamic disturbances.Registration number IRCT20191222045857N1 (Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials)     

A finite element study of a fractured tibia treated with a unilateral external fixator: The effects of the number of pins and cortical thickness

IntroductionIn the early stage of fracture fixation, the aim of a unilateral external fixator (UEF) to stimulate healing and maintain stability may be suppressed by using inadequate number of pins. Cortical thinning due to age or osteoporosis endangers a successful fracture fixation.Materials and methodsThis study evaluates the initial strength and stability of the fracture fixation and tissue differentiation under the influences of variable cortical thickness (5 mm to 1 mm) and variable number of pins (1 to 4 in each bone fragment). A finite element program was utilised to develop 20 three-dimensional models of simplified diaphyseal tibia with fracture callus fixed with UEF. A mechano-regulation code based on the deviatoric strain theory was written and applied to simulate tissue differentiation. The values of von Mises stress, interfragmentary strain (IFS), and fibrocartilage index (FCI) were evaluated.ResultsCortical thinning from 5 mm to 1 mm increased IFS and FCI by an average of 30.3% and 18.7%, respectively, and resulted in higher stresses in the UEF and bone. Using 1 pin in each bone fragment produced excessive IFS in the models with 1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm cortical thickness. Inserting the second pin into the bone fragment could considerably reduce the IFS and fibrocartilaginous tissue formation in the fracture site and improve load transmission to the fixator. Whereas inserting the fourth pin could minimally affect the mechano-biological environment of healing.ConclusionsThis study suggests that initial instability due to cortical thinning can be efficiently alleviated by adding the number of pins up to 3 in a UEF; additionally, it may improve the knowledge about applying UEFs adequately stable, whilst promoting inclination toward endochondral ossification, simultaneously.     

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: single institutional review of complications and associated variables

BACKGROUND CONTEXTAs more patients undergo anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedures and more devices are created for that purpose, it is important to understand the complications that can arise and the variables that mitigate risk for major and minor complications.PURPOSETo assess complication rates after ALIF with or without posterior instrumentation and variables associated with increased likelihood of postoperative complications. We aim to provide this data as benchmarking to improve patient safety and surgical care.STUDY DESIGNA single-center retrospective cohort study.PATIENT SAMPLEAll adult patients who underwent ALIF between 2017 and 2019 was performedOUTCOME MEASURESPost-operative major and minor complications were evaluated.METHODSComplications were recorded and presented as percentages. Patient demographics, perioperative, and postoperative data were also collected and analyzed between patients who had no complications and those that had any complication. Subgroup analysis of surgical complications were performed by nonparametric Chi-square tests. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests.RESULTSNinty-five of three hundred sixty-two (26.2%) of patients experienced a minor or major complication. Among the most common complications found were surgical site infections (5.8%), neurological complications (4.1%), vascular complications (3.6%), and urinary tract infections (3.3%). Patients undergoing ALIF alone with post-operative complications had higher mean age, higher BMI, higher ASA status, and experienced higher estimated blood loss. Patients undergoing ALIF and posterior instrumentation with post-operative complications were more likely to have diabetes and had a higher ASA status. Patients with any complications from both groups had longer length of stay, discharge to a non-home setting and were more likely to be readmitted or return to the operating room.CONCLUSIONOur study reveals variables associated with complications at our institution, including age of the patient, BMI, and ASA status leading to higher complications and greater LOS, higher readmission rates, and disposition to skilled facilities.