CD19 + CD21lo/neg cells are increased in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) represents a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic sclerosis (SSc). The purpose of this study was to examine recirculating lymphocytes from SSc patients for potential biomarkers of interstitial lung disease (ILD). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from patients with SSc and healthy controls enrolled in the Vanderbilt University Myositis and Scleroderma Treatment Initiative Center cohort between 9/2017–6/2019. Clinical phenotyping was performed by chart abstraction. Immunophenotyping was performed using both mass cytometry and fluorescence cytometry combined with t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding analysis and traditional biaxial gating. This study included 34 patients with SSc-ILD, 14 patients without SSc-ILD, and 25 healthy controls. CD21^lo/neg cells are significantly increased in SSc-ILD but not in SSc without ILD (15.4 ± 13.3% vs. 5.8 ± 0.9%, p = 0.002) or healthy controls (5.0 ± 0.5%, p < 0.0001). While CD21^lo/neg B cells can be identified from a single biaxial gate, tSNE analysis reveals that the biaxial gate is comprised of multiple distinct subsets, all of which are increased in SSc-ILD. CD21^lo/neg cells in both healthy controls and SSc-ILD are predominantly tBET positive and do not have intracellular CD21. Immunohistochemistry staining demonstrated that CD21^lo/neg B cells diffusely infiltrate the lung parenchyma of an SSc-ILD patient. Additional work is needed to validate this biomarker in larger cohorts and longitudinal studies and to understand the role of these cells in SSc-ILD.

     

Management of calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition disease: A systematic review

ObjectiveCalcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition disease (CPPD) is a common cause of acute and chronic arthritis, especially in the elderly population. There is a paucity of data regarding the management of CPPD disease, which is currently based on expert opinion and evidence derived from the treatment of gout. We conducted a systematic literature review in order to identify the available treatment options for CPPD, and describe their efficacy and safety.Material and methodsOnline databases were searched from inception to May of 2020 using the search terms: (CPPD [Title/Abstract] OR CPDD [Title/Abstract] OR calcium pyrophosphate [Title/Abstract] OR chondrocalcinosis [Title/Abstract]) AND (treatment [Title/Abstract] OR management [Title/Abstract] OR therapy [Title/Abstract]). Articles evaluating the use of specific treatment agents for CPPD were eligible for inclusion. Case reports were excluded.ResultsA total of 22 eligible studies and 403 unique patients were selected. We identified only 3 randomized, double-blind, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and magnesium carbonate in CPPD, and these therapeutic options, with the exception of methotrexate, have shown efficacy and reduction of pain intensity. Further, 10 case series and 9 cohort studies were included. Intramuscular and intra-articular glucocorticoids, ACTH, as well as the biologic agents anakinra and tocilizumab appear to be efficacious in CPPD. Intra-articular injections of glycosaminoglycan polysulphate, hyaluronic acid and yttrium, as well as synovial membrane destruction by laser irradiation were associated with symptomatic improvement. Due to significant study heterogenicity, direct comparison between studies was not possible.ConclusionThere are a limited number of studies evaluating the treatment of CPPD. High quality evidence is rather limited, while commonly administered agents such as NSAIDs, colchicine and corticosteroids have not been evaluated by RCTs. The need for high quality evidence supporting specific treatment modalities is urgent for this common yet neglected form of arthritis.     

Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Danish Cohort Study

ObjectivesClinical trials have shown a beneficial effect from biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) on hand or axial bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; however, it is unclear if this translates to a reduced fracture risk. We investigated the effect of bDMARDs on osteoporotic fracture risk compared to no biological treatment in rheumatoid arthritis.MethodsA cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged 18+ from DANBIO was linked to population-based health registries in Denmark (2006-2016). Adopting a prevalent new-user design, we matched bDMARD users to bDMARD-naïve patients using time-conditional propensity scores. The risk of incident osteoporotic fractures (including hip, vertebrae, humerus, and forearm) was estimated among the matched patients by Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsOut of 24,678 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 4265 bDMARD users were matched to the same number of bDMARD-naïve patients (mean age 56.2 years, 74% female). During follow-up, 229 osteoporotic fractures occurred among bDMARD users and 205 fractures among bDMARD-naïve patients (incidence rates 12.1 and 13.0 per 1000 person-years, respectively). The use of bDMARDs was not associated with a reduced risk of osteoporotic fractures among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (hazard ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.20), compared with no biological treatment. The risk estimates were similar for all osteoporotic fracture sites.ConclusionWe found no independent beneficial effect from using bDMARDs on reducing the risk of osteoporotic fractures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.