Effects of ω-3 Fatty Acids and Catechins on Fatty Acid Synthase in the Prostate: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Animal and human studies suggest fish oil and green tea may have protective effect on prostate cancer. Fatty acid synthase (FAS) has been hypothesized to be linked to chemoprotective effects of both compounds. This study evaluated the independent and joint effects of fish oil (FO) and green tea supplement (epigallocatechin-3-gallate, EGCG) on FAS and Ki-67 levels in prostate tissue. Through a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with 2 × 2 factorial design, 89 men scheduled for repeat prostate biopsy following an initial negative prostate biopsy were randomized into either FO alone (1.9 g DHA + EPA/day), EGCG alone (600 mg/day), a combination of FO and EGCG, or placebo. We used linear mixed-effects models to test the differences of prostate tissue FAS and Ki-67 by immunohistochemistry between pre- and post-intervention within each group, as well as between treatment groups. Results did not show significant difference among treatment groups in pre-to-post-intervention changes of FAS (P = 0.69) or Ki-67 (P = 0.26). Comparing placebo group with any of the treatment groups, we did not find significant difference in FAS or Ki-67 changes (all P > 0.05). Results indicate FO or EGCG supplementation for a short duration may not be sufficient to produce biologically meaningful changes in FAS or Ki-67 levels in prostate tissue.     

BCAN基因在肾透明细胞癌中的表达及临床意义

目的以基因表达数据集资料为研究对象,分析BCAN基因在肾透明细胞癌中的表达情况以及对患者预后的影响。方法在Oncomine数据库中挖掘BCAN在肾透明细胞癌(ccRCC)中的表达情况。从TCGA数据库中获取ccRCC患者临床资料和目的基因的表达信息并进行统计分析。利用GEO数据库中GSE73731数据集的ccRCC样本进行基因富集分析。利用String数据库分析与BCAN相关的蛋白。结果BCAN低表达组的ccRCC患者在病理分期及T分期方面低于高表达组(P<0.001;P=0.001);N分期及M分期差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。BCAN低表达组患者的总生存期优于高表达组(P=0.033)。BCAN基因高表达组的样本主要富集在KRAS信号通路。结论BCAN可以通过多种途径来促进肿瘤细胞的侵袭能力,有望成为ccRCC不良预后的重要生物标志物之一。     

Minimally invasive evaluation of the clinically negative inguinal node in penile cancer: Dynamic sentinel node biopsy

The presence of lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor in penile cancer (PeCa). Due to limited sensitivity of currently available imaging modalities, invasive staging approaches remain indispensable for adequate nodal staging. As an alternative to radical inguinal lymphadenectomy and with the aim to reduce morbidity, staging strategies such as modified lymphadenectomy and dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) have been introduced. Over the years, DSNB evolved into a safe and reliable staging technique when performed in high volume centers. Recent enhancements of the procedure such as Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) and the introduction of hybrid tracers have improved pre- and intraoperative sentinel node (SN) visualization. Other technologies such as superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles could have a potential future role to further refine DSNB. Future efforts should be aimed at optimizing diagnostic accuracy whilst minimizing perioperative morbidity.     

Evaluation of PD-L1 (E1L3N, 22C3) expression in venous tumor thrombus is superior to its assessment in renal tumor in predicting overall survival in renal cell carcinoma

BackroundRenal cell carcinoma (RCC) frequently invades renal vein forming neoplastic thrombus. The expression of immune checkpoint receptors in RCC was addressed in multiple studies, but little is known about the expression and prognostic significance of programmed death ligand-1 in tumor thrombus.Material and methodsThe study aimed to evaluate the expression of PD-L1 within venous tumor thrombus and primary tumor using 2 independent antibody clones (22c3 and E1L3N) and to assess its value in predicting overall survival (OS) in the subgroup of patients with RCC and renal vein thrombus.ResultsEighty-two patients with RCC and venous tumor thrombus that underwent nephrectomy were enrolled. The expression of PD-L1 was assessed utilizing tissue microarrays separately on tumor cells (TCs) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). The frequency of PD-L1 expression on TCs and TILs varied between tumor and thrombus compartments and was dependent on the antibody clone used. The expression of PD-L1 on TCs and/or TILs was associated with worse OS irrespectively of the antibody and the analyzed compartment. Nevertheless, the best prognostic performance was noted for the combined assessment of PD-L1 expression on TCs and TILs in venous tumor thrombus with the use of 22c3 antibody. The multivariable Cox regression model predicting OS incorporated PD-L1 22c3 in venous tumor thrombus (hazards ratio [HR] = 3.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.63–8.14, P = 0.002) and nodal status (HR = 2.88, 95% CI = 1.18–7.03, P = 0.02).ConclusionsPD-L1 may become a valuable tool for prognostic purposes in this specific subgroup of patients and be incorporated into the respective models qualifying for adjuvant treatment.     

¿Es el intervalo libre de docetaxel un factor predictivo para el cáncer de próstata resistente a la castración?

ObjectiveProstate cancer (PCa) is the second most common solid tumor in men and the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death. In advanced stage, palliative treatments are used instead of curative therapies. Therefore, finding predictive indicators seems crucial. Patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) that received Dx chemotherapy have been retrospectively reviewed. The aim of this study was to investigate whether docetaxel (Dx)-free interval could have a predictive value for PCa and influence other sequential therapies.Material and methodsThis clinical trial study was performed on 104 patients at Medeniyet University Oncology Clinic in 2018-2020. All CRPC patients had metastases, received Dx as first-line treatment and underwent androgen receptor axis targeted (ARAT) therapy after disease progression. We analyzed patients’ progression time after Dx therapy and the effects on sequential treatment.ResultsAfter Dx therapy, all patients received ARAT (abiraterone (ABI) n: 49 (47.1%) and enzalutamide (ENZ) n: 54 (51.9%)) as a second-line treatment, except for one patient who received cabazitaxel. There was a statistically significant relationship between the Dx-free interval and duration of response to ARAT (P<.001). The response time of ARAT treatment was <10.5 months in all patients whose Dx-free interval period was <9 months.ConclusionsOur findings support the theory that Dx-free interval can be a predictive factor for CRPC. CRPC disease can be classified as Dx-sensitive disease or Dx-resistance disease, based on the Dx-free interval. Decision on subsequent treatments could be made considering this information.     

Update on cardiovascular and metabolic risk profiles of hormonal agents used in managing advanced prostate cancer

PurposeAndrogen deprivation therapy (ADT), a mainstay of therapy for advanced prostate cancer (CaP), may raise patients’ risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and related adverse events. The new androgen receptor (AR)-targeted agents are associated with hypertension and cardiovascular events. The most common non-CaP cause of death in men with CaP is CVD. The purpose of this review is to raise awareness of the metabolic and CV risks of ADT and to encourage proper monitoring of patients treated with hormonal agents.Materials and MethodsTo review the cardiovascular and metabolic risk profiles of hormonal agents in managing patients with advanced CaP, the author searched PubMed, meeting abstracts, and clinicaltrials.gov from 1941 through early 2020 using search terms such as locally advanced CaP guidelines, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist/antagonist, ADT, CaP, CVD, abdominal obesity metabolic syndrome, and cerebrovascular disorder. The author ultimately selected 42 of the most relevant publications for inclusion in this paper.ResultsData regarding cardiovascular risk in patients with CaP on ADT are inconsistent, though there may be evidence of less risk in GnRH antagonists than GnRH agonists in men with pre-existing CVD. Observational post hoc studies generally show higher risks for GnRH agonists than GnRH antagonists. A review of 6 phase 3 trials found that patients treated with GnRH antagonists had lower cardiovascular risk than those treated with agonists during the first year of ADT, and these differences were especially significant among men with pre-existing CVD. Additionally, a small prospective randomized phase 2 study, as well as a large phase 3 trial, showed that there were significantly more major adverse cardiovascular events in patients treated with a GnRH agonist compared to a GnRH antagonist. In addition, the AR-targeted agents in conjunction with ADT have been shown to have more hypertension and/or cardiovascular risk than ADT plus placebo in numerous phase 3 trials.ConclusionsWhether there is a difference in CVD risk between GnRH agonists and antagonists is the subject of an ongoing phase 3 trial with cardiovascular endpoints. Addition of newer AR-targeted agents may confer additional risk over ADT alone. Clinicians treating advanced CaP should be aware of underlying comorbidities of their patients before choosing either conventional ADT or adding AR-targeted agents. Physicians should monitor patients for hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular side effects that may require intervention in order to minimize downstream adverse events and should communicate with other colleagues on the patient's health care team to ensure the best outcomes.