Exposure to ambient air pollution and the incidence of lung cancer and breast cancer in the Ontario Population Health and Environment Cohort

Lung and female breast cancers are highly prevalent worldwide. Although the association between exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) and lung cancer has been recognized, there is less evidence for associations with other common air pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) and ozone (O₃). Even less is known about potential associations between these pollutants and breast cancer. We conducted a population-based cohort study to investigate the associations of chronic exposure to PM_2.5, NO₂, O₃ and redox-weighted average of NO₂ and O₃ (O_x) with incident lung and breast cancer, using the Ontario Population Health and Environment Cohort (ONPHEC), which includes all long-term residents aged 35–85 years who lived in Ontario, Canada, 2001–2015. Incident lung and breast cancers were ascertained using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Annual estimates of exposures were assigned to the residential postal codes of subjects for each year during follow-up. We used Cox proportional-hazards models adjusting for personal- and neighborhood-level covariates. Our cohorts for lung and breast cancer analyses included ~4.9 million individuals and ~2.5 million women, respectively. During follow-up, 100,146 incident cases of lung cancer and 91,146 incident cases of breast cancer were diagnosed. The fully adjusted analyses showed positive associations of lung cancer incidence with PM_2.5 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.02 [95% CI: 1.01–1.05] per 5.3 μg/m³) and NO₂ (HR = 1.05 [95% CI: 1.03–1.07] per 14 ppb). No associations with lung cancer were observed for O₃ or O_x. Relationships between PM_2.5 and NO₂ with lung cancer exhibited a sublinear shape. We did not find compelling evidence linking air pollution to breast cancer.     

IKZF1 Deletion Subtyping and Outcome Analysis in BCR–ABL1-Negative Pediatric B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Single-Institution Experience from North India

BackgroundIKZF1 deletions are associated with adverse outcomes in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We assessed the prevalence and clinical impact of functional subtypes of IKZF1 deletions in pediatric BCR–ABL1-negative B-ALL. Patients andMethodsThis retrospective study of IKZF1 deletions was done in cases of pediatric BCR–ABL1-negative B-ALL. The genomic DNA of cases, over a 53-month period, was analyzed using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and multiplex fluorescent polymerase chain reaction. The deletions were divided into functional subgroups: (1) loss-of-function/haploinsufficiency, (2) dominant-negative, and (3) a combination of both types of deletion. The post-induction remission status, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were noted.ResultsOut of 320 cases, 47 (14.7%) had IKZF1 deletions. Thirty-six of the 47 (77%) had loss-of-function deletions, 10 (21%) had dominant-negative deletions, and one (2%) had a combination of both types. The post-induction remission rates in cases with loss-of-function deletions (22/30, 73%; P = .060) and dominant-negative deletions (4/5, 80%; P = .517) were lower compared with those without deletions (215/248, 86.7%). These cases also had worse median EFS: 21.1 months (P = .006) for loss-of-function and 15.4 months (P = .156) for dominant-negative deletions, compared with 46.4 months in cases without IKZF1 deletions. They also had worse median OS: 23.4 months (P = .012) for loss-of-function deletions and 15.7 months (P = .233) for dominant-negative deletions, compared with median not reached in cases without IKZF1 deletions.ConclusionThe IKZF1 deletions were seen in 14.7% of BCR–ABL1-negative pediatric B-ALL. Most of these deletions (77%) were loss-of-function type. The cases with loss-of-function deletions had lower remission rates and poor EFS and OS compared with cases without IKZF1 deletions. A similar trend of poor outcome was seen in the few cases with dominant-negative IKZF1 deletions.     

International validation and update of the Amsterdam model for prediction of survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to validate and update the Amsterdam prediction model including tumor grade, lymph node ratio, margin status and adjuvant therapy, for prediction of overall survival (OS) after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.MethodsWe included consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer between 2000 and 2017 at 11 tertiary centers in 8 countries (USA, UK, Germany, Italy, Sweden, the Netherlands, Korea, Australia). Model performance for prediction of OS was evaluated by calibration statistics and Uno's C-statistic for discrimination. Validation followed the TRIPOD statement.ResultsOverall, 3081 patients (53% male, median age 66 years) were included with a median OS of 24 months, of whom 38% had N2 disease and 77% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Predictions of 3-year OS were fairly similar to observed OS with a calibration slope of 0.72. Statistical updating of the model resulted in an increase of the C-statistic from 0.63 to 0.65 (95% CI 0.64–0.65), ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 across different countries. The area under the curve for the prediction of 3-year OS was 0.71 after updating. Median OS was 36, 25 and 15 months for the low, intermediate and high risk group, respectively (P < 0.001).ConclusionsThis large international study validated and updated the Amsterdam model for survival prediction after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. The model incorporates readily available variables with a fairly accurate model performance and robustness across different countries, while novel markers may be added in the future. The risk groups and web-based calculator www.pancreascalculator.com may facilitate use in daily practice and future trials.     

Effects of synthetic and biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs on lipid and lipoprotein parameters in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BackgroundDyslipidemia in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is frequently observed, and treatment with anti-rheumatic drugs has an impact on lipid profiles. Pathophysiologically, inflammation leads to decreased blood lipids and lipoproteins; RA treatment reduces inflammation and therefore may increase lipids and lipoproteins. Whether the lipid changes with RA treatment confer an increased risk of cardiovascular disease or just reflect their potentially atheroprotective anti-inflammatory effect is currently unclear due to limited and conflicting data.ObjectiveThe aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on the effects of synthetic and biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs for the treatment of RA on lipid and lipoprotein parameters.ResultsRecent studies on methotrexate emphasize its anti-atherogenic effect. Golimumab combined with methotrexate revealed a trend towards an anti-atherogenic potential. The known pro-atherogenic lipid-spectrum alterations caused by tofacitinib can be effectively treated with atorvastatin. Tocilizumab signals a favorable impact on the extent of lipid modifications when combined with methotrexate. Abatacept indicated a trend towards an anti-atherogenic lipid profile demonstrated by favorable effects on HDL-C and on the TC/HDL-C ratio. Rituximab has beneficial effects on HDL-C and ApoA1, as well as on the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio.Clinical implicationsAnti-rheumatic drugs have various effects on lipid parameters, which in part appear pro-atherogenic. However, because many of these lipid changes may well reflect their potentially atheroprotective anti-inflammatory action the cardiovascular impact of these changes remains unclear. Whatsoever, cardiovascular safety trials for antirheumatic drugs would be valuable.     

Development of a postoperative delirium risk scoring tool using data from the Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry: an analysis of 6672 patients 2017-2018

Background and purposeThis study aimed to determine the incidence, predictors of postoperative delirium and develop a post-surgery delirium risk scoring tool.Patients and MethodsA total of 6672 hip fracture patients with documented assessment for delirium were analyzed from the Australia and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry between June 2017 and December 2018.Thirty-six variables for the prediction of delirium using univariate and multivariate logistic regression were assessed. The models were assessed for diagnostic accuracy using C-statistic and calibration using Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. A Delirium Risk Score was developed based on the regression coefficients.ResultsDelirium developed in 2599/6672 (39.0%) hip fracture patients. Seven independent predictors of delirium were identified; age above 80 years (OR=1.6 CI 1.4-1.9; p=0.001), male (OR=1.3 CI 1.1-1.5; p=0.007), absent pre-operative cognitive assessment (OR=1.5 CI 1.3-1.9; p=0.001), impaired pre-operative cognitive state (OR=1.7 CI 1.3 -2.1; p=0.001), surgery delay (OR=1.7 CI 1.2-2.5; p=0.002) and mobilisation day 1 post-surgery (OR=1.9 CI 1.4-2.6; p=0.001). The C-statistics for the training and validation datasets were 0.74 and 0.75, respectively. Calibration was good (χ2=35.72 (9); p<0.001). The Delirium Risk Score for patients ranged from 0 to 42 in the validation data and when used alone as a risk predictor, had similar levels of diagnostic accuracy (C-statistic=0.742) indicating its potential for use as a stand-alone risk scoring tool.ConclusionWe have designed and validated a delirium risk score for predicting delirium following surgery for a hip fracture using seven predicting factors. This could assist clinicians in identifying high risk patients requiring higher levels of observation and post-surgical care.     

Enhanced surveillance of tetanus toxoid,reduced diphtheria toxoid,and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines in pregnancy in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011–2015

BackgroundIn October 2011, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) issued updated recommendations that all pregnant women routinely receive a dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine.ObjectivesWe characterized reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in pregnant women who received Tdap after this updated recommendation (2011–2015) and compared the pattern of adverse events (AEs) with the period before the updated recommendation (2005–2010).MethodsWe searched the VAERS database for reports of AEs in pregnant women who received Tdap vaccine after the routine recommendation (11/01/2011–6/30/2015) and compared it to published data before the routine Tdap recommendation (01/01/2005–06/30/2010). We conducted clinical review of reports and available medical records. The clinical pattern of reports in the post-recommendation period was compared with the pattern before the routine Tdap recommendation.ResultsWe found 392 reports of Tdap vaccination after the routine recommendation. One neonatal death but no maternal deaths were reported. No maternal or neonatal deaths were reported before the recommendation. We observed an increase in proportion of reports for stillbirths (1.5–2.8%) and injection site reactions/arm pain (4.5–11.9%) after the recommendation compared to the period before the routine recommendation for Tdap during pregnancy. We noted a decrease in reports of spontaneous abortion (16.7–1%). After the 2011 Tdap recommendation, in most reports, vaccination (79%) occurred during the third trimester compared to 4% before the 2011 Tdap recommendation. Twenty-six reports of repeat Tdap were received in VAERS; 13 did not report an AE. One medical facility accounted for 27% of all submitted reports.ConclusionsNo new or unexpected vaccine AEs were noted among pregnant women who received Tdap after routine recommendations for maternal Tdap vaccination. Changes in reporting patterns would be expected, given the broader use of Tdap in pregnant women in the third trimester.     

The Impact of Job Conditions on Health-Related Quality of Life among Working Japanese Older Adults: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study Using J-MICC Okazaki Study Data

ObjectivesThe number of older adults who continue working after retirement is increasing in Japan. Little is known about how job conditions affect older adults’ health. We examined the association between job conditions and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during a five-year follow-up study.MethodsThis study included participants aged 65 years or older from the Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort Study in the Okazaki area recruited at baseline between 2007 and 2011 and followed up five years later. Participants completed a self-reported questionnaire on the physical and mental health aspects of HRQOL (SF-8™), employment status, and job conditions (job satisfaction, skill use, and job suitability).ResultsData of 1,146 men and 522 women were analyzed (mean age: 69.1 and 68.6 years, respectively). Generalized mixed linear regression analysis revealed that, compared to the not-working group, skill use was positively associated with mental health aspects among men (skill use × time: β = 0.16, SE = 0.08, p < 0.05), while poor job satisfaction and job suitability were negatively associated with mental health aspects among women (job satisfaction, not satisfied × time: β = -0.93, SE = 0.47, p < 0.05; job suitability, not suitable × time: β = -1.06, SE = 0.50, p < 0.05).ConclusionsRegarding job conditions among older adults, skill use in men was marginally associated with mental health, and poor job satisfaction and suitability in women were negatively associated with mental health. Considering the job conditions of older workers is necessary to protect their mental health.