Impacts of frailty on health care costs among community-dwelling older adults: A meta-analysis of cohort studies

BackgroundThe demands for health care services from the frail elderly individuals in the community continue to increase, which will exert a tremendous burden on health care costs. However, little is known regarding the magnitude of these impacts. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence to explore the impact of frailty on health care costs among community-dwelling older adults.Materials and methodsRelevant published articles were searched from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-text Database (VIP), Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and the reference lists of articles. Publishedcohort or cross-sectional studies assessing the impacts of frailty on health care costs among community-dwelling older adults were identified (to June 2020). The outcomes on health care costs before and after baseline were stratified by frailty status.ResultsA total of 7 cohort studies comprised of a total of 3,750,611 participants were included in our study. Our analyses showed that: (1) compared with the robust group, health care costs increased by $79–13,423.83 (standardized mean difference, SMD = 0.22, 95% Confidence interval, 95% CI, 0.22–0.22; P < 0.00001) in the pre-frail elderly and by $616–32,549.96 (SMD = 0.55, 95% CI, 0.44–0.67; P < 0.00001) in the frail elderly in the community. A significantly higher in the increase of health care costs was observed in the frail group compared with the pre-frail group(SMD = 0.35, 95% CI, 0.19–0.51; P < 0.0001); (2) the frailty phenotype components increased the health care costs of the elderly in community (weight loss: $1,630–6,209, SMD = 0.43, 95% CI, 0.17–0.69; P = 0.001; weakness: $275–7,586, SMD = 0.24, 95% CI, 0.08–0.40; P = 0.001; exhaustion: $1,545–10,559, SMD = 0.31, 95% CI, 0.13–0.49; P = 0.0006; slowness: $352–1,1891, SMD = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.14–0.65; P = 0.003; low physical activity: $512–3,459, SMD = 0.26, 95% CI, 0.16–0.36; P < 0.00001); (3) the increase in the frailty index was parallel with the increase in health care costs by $12,363–21,066 (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI, 0.29–0.53; P < 0.00001).Conclusions and ImplicationsThis study revealed the adverse economic impacts of frailty status, frailty phenotype components, and frailty index on health care costs in community-dwelling older adults. Future research is warranted to investigate costs incurred by interventions to improve frailty, which will provide further insights into additional health care costs due to frailty.     

Medicare's use of cost-effectiveness analysis for prevention (but not for treatment)

ContextMedicare currently pays for 23 preventive services in its benefits package, the majority of which were added since 2005. In the past decade, the program has transformed from one essentially administering treatment claims, to one increasingly focused on health promotion and maintenance. What is largely unappreciated is the role cost-effectiveness analysis has played in the coverage of preventive services.MethodsWe review the role of cost-effectiveness analysis in Medicare coverage of preventive services and contrast it to the lack of such consideration in the coverage of treatments.FindingsWhile not considered for coverage of treatment, cost-effectiveness analysis played a role in the coverage of nine preventive services, and was evaluated in a number of instances when the service was not added. Pneumococcal vaccine, the first preventive service added to the benefit (1981), followed a Congressionally requested cost-effectiveness analysis, which showed it to be cost-saving. More recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) reviewed cost-effectiveness evidence when covering preventive services such as HIV screening (2010) and screening and behavioral counseling for alcohol misuse (2011) (studies reported cost-effectiveness ratios of $55,440 per QALY, and $1755 per QALY, respectively).ConclusionsCost-effectiveness analysis has played a longstanding role in informing the addition of preventive services to Medicare. It offers Medicare officials information they can use to help ensure health gains are achieved at reasonable cost. However, limiting cost-effectiveness evidence to prevention and not treatment is inconsistent and potentially inefficient.     

Low GFR amplifies the association between coronary three-vessel disease and all-cause mortality

Background and aimThree vessels disease (3VD) has been associated with worse prognosis and higher mortality. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for premature death, mostly due to coronary artery disease (CAD).We aim to examine the prognostic impact of 3VD on all-cause mortality in a cohort of high cardiovascular risk subjects undergoing coronary angiography (CA) and to explore whether low eGFR (<60 ml/min/1.73 m²) modulates the risk of all-cause mortality associated to 3VD.Methods and resultsOne-thousand-seventeen subjects (759 M, mean age 68.4 ± 11 years) consecutive subjects undergoing CA from 2016 to 2018 were evaluated. Subjects were classified according to the severity of CAD as follows: group “three vessels disease” (3VD), and “no three vessels disease” (No 3VD). Serum creatinine was measured to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The whole population was divided into 4 groups (A, B, C, D), according to the presence/absence of low eGFR and/or 3VD. One-hundred-fourteen deaths occurred (median follow-up:44 months). The risk of death in subjects with 3VD was almost 2-time higher than subject without 3VD (adjusted HR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.094–2.373, p = 0.0157). Among 4 subgroups, subjects with low eGFR and 3VD (Group D) had the highest risk of death (adjusted HR = 3.881; 95% CI 2.256–6.676, p < 0.0001).ConclusionsLow eGFR significantly amplifies the risk of all-cause mortality associated to 3VD. Our results strengthen the role of kidney disease as a risk multiplier for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and highlight the need to prevent its onset and progression.     

Joint effect of physical activity and blood lipid levels on all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality: The Rural Chinese Cohort Study

Background and aimsWe aimed to evaluate the joint effect of physical activity (PA) and blood lipid levels on all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.Methods and resultsWe analyzed 17,236 participants from the Rural Chinese Cohort Study. Cox's proportional-hazards regression models were used to assess the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between the joint effect of PA and blood lipid levels and risk of all-cause and CVD mortality. Restricted cubic splines were used to estimate the dose–response relationship of PA with risk of all-cause and CVD mortality. During a median follow-up of 6.01 years there were 1106 deaths (484 from CVD) among participants. For all-cause mortality, compared with the group with dyslipidemia and extremely light PA (ELPA), the HRs with dyslipidemia and light PA (LPA), moderate PA (MPA), and heavy PA (HPA) were 0.56 (95% CI 0.45–0.70), 0.59 (0.46–0.75), and 0.59 (0.45–0.78), respectively, while the HRs of groups with normal lipid levels and ELPA, LPA, MPA, and HPA were 0.88 (0.72–1.04), 0.59 (0.48–0.73), 0.53 (0.41–0.67), and 0.38 (0.29–0.50), respectively. We observed similar effects on CVD mortality. Restricted cubic splines showed a curvilinear relationship between PA and risk of all-cause and CVD mortality with normal lipid levels and with dyslipidemia.ConclusionHigher PA reduces the risk of all-cause and CVD mortality. Higher levels of PA are needed in the population.     

Direct and indirect costs of heart failure in relation to diabetes status - A nationwide study

Background and aimHeart failure (HF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are burdensome chronic diseases with high lifetime risks and numerous studies indicate associations between HF and DM. The objective of this study was to investigate the direct and indirect costs of HF patients with and without DM.Methods and resultsPatients with a first-time diagnosis of HF from 1998 to 2016 were identified through nationwide Danish registries and stratified according to DM status into HF with or without DM. The economic healthcare cost analysis was based on both direct costs, including hospitalization, procedures, medication and indirect costs including social welfare and lost productivity. The economic burden was investigated prior to, at, and following diagnosis of HF. Patients with concomitant HF and DM were younger (median age 74 vs. 77), had more comorbidities and fewer were female as compared to patients with HF but without DM. The socioeconomic burden of concomitant HF and DM compared to HF alone was substantially higher; 45% in direct costs (€16,237 vs. €11,184), 35% in home care costs (€3123 vs. €2320), 8% in social transfer income (€17,257 vs. €15,994) and they had 27% lower income (€10,136 vs. €13,845). The economic burden peaked at year of diagnosis, but the difference became increasingly pronounced in the years following the HF diagnosis.ConclusionPatients with concomitant HF and DM had a significantly higher economic burden compared to patients with HF but without DM.     

Syncope in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: More Than Just an Obstruction Issue

BackgroundSevere aortic stenosis (AoS) is considered a primary cause of syncope. However, other mechanisms may be present in these patients and accurate diagnosis can have important clinical implications. The aim of this study is to assess the different etiologies of syncope in patients with severe AoS and the impact on prognosis of attaining a certain or highly probable diagnosis for the syncope.MethodsOut of a cohort of 331 patients with AoS and syncope, 61 had severe AoS and were included in the study. Main cause of syncope and adverse cardiac events were assessed.ResultsIn 40 patients (65.6%), we reached a certain or highly probable diagnosis of the main cause of the syncope. AoS was considered the primary cause of the syncope in only 7 patients (17.5% of the patients with known etiology). Atrioventricular block (14 patients, 35.0%) and vasovagal syncope (6 patients, 15.0%) were the most frequently diagnosed causes. The presence of a known cause for syncope during the admission was not associated with a lower incidence of recurrence during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-2.40). Syncope of unknown etiology was independently associated with greater mortality during 1-year follow-up (HR 5.4, 95% CI 1.3-21.6) and 3-year follow-up (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-10.3).ConclusionsIn a high proportion of patients with severe AoS admitted for syncope, the valvulopathy was not the main cause of the syncope. Syncope in two-thirds of this population was caused by either bradyarrhythmia or reflex causes. Syncope of unknown cause was associated with increased short- and medium-term mortality, independently from treatment of the valve disease. An exhaustive work-up should be conducted to determine the main cause for syncope.     

WHO HEARTS: A Global Program to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Burden: Experience Implementing in the Americas and Opportunities in Canada

Globally, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death. Viewed as a threat to the global economy, the United Nations included reducing noncommunicable diseases, including CVDs, in the 2030 sustainable development goals, and the World Health Assembly agreed to a target to reduce noncommunicable diseases 25% by the year 2025. In response, the World Health Organisation led the development of HEARTS, a technical package to guide governments in strengthening primary care to reduce CVDs. HEARTS recommends a public health and health system approach to introduce highly simplified interventions done systematically at a primary health care level and has a focus on hypertension as a clinical entry point. The HEARTS modules include healthy lifestyle counselling, evidence-based treatment protocols, access to essential medicines and technology, CVD risk-based management, team-based care, systems for monitoring, and an implementation guide. There are early positive global experiences in implementing HEARTS. Led by the Pan American Health Organisation, many national governments in the Americas are adopting HEARTS and have shown early success. Unfortunately, in Canada hypertension control is declining in women since 2010-2011 and the dramatic reductions in rates of CVD seen before 2010 have flattened when age adjusted and increased for rates that are not age adjusted, and there are marked increases in absolute numbers of Canadians with adverse CVD outcomes. Several steps that Canada could take to enhance hypertension control are outlined, the core of which is to implement a strong governmental nongovernmental collaborative strategy to prevent and control CVDs, focusing on HEARTS.     

Quantitative Metabolomics Reveals Heart Failure With Midrange Ejection Fraction as a Distinct Phenotype of Heart Failure

BackgroundHeart failure with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF) has been recently acknowledged as a separate phenotype, but metabolomics evaluation of this subtype remains largely unexamined.MethodsA quantitative metabolomics study on amino acids and acylcarnitines was performed to characterize different states of heart failure (HF) in 628 participants. Both multivariate orthogonal partial least squares- discriminant analysis and univariate Mann-Whitney U test were used to explore reliable metabolic profiles associated with different HF states. The resulting metabolites were further refined to obtain diagnostic metabolite scores (DMSs) with the use of ordinal logistic regression. Lasso-penalized regression was applied to produce a survival-associated prognostic metabolite score (PMS). The Cox proportional hazards model, Kaplan-Meier curves, and time-dependent receiver operating characteristics were used for a comprehensive assessment of prognostic value using PMS versus traditional clinical biomarkers.ResultsThe optimized models identified a panel of 15 differential metabolites that were shared across different HF states, whereas some metabolites were associated with a specific state. PMS consisting of 9 metabolites demonstrated an appreciably better prognostic value (hazard ratio [HR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-2.1) vs the natural logarithm of N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (Ln[NT-proBNP]; HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.94-1.61; P < 0.001). The overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of PMS was superior to that of Ln(NT-proBNP) in risk prediction for patients with HFmrEF and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) subtypes (P < 0.001).ConclusionsTargeted metabolomics has provided a novel understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying HF. Both DMS and PMS clearly demonstrated HFmrEF as a distinct phenotype between a mild HF with preserved ejection fraction state and a severe HFrEF state. PMS exhibited superior prognostic value than Ln(NT-proBNP). Further investigation is needed with independent large-scale validation.