An updated systematic review and meta-analysis investigating perihematomal edema and clinical outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage

ObjectivesThe relationship between perihematomal edema (PHE) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) outcomes is uncertain. Given newly published studies, we updated a previous systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the prognostic impact of PHE on ICH outcomes.Materials and methodsDatabases were searched through September 2022 using pre-defined keywords. Included studies used regression to examine the association between PHE and functional outcome (assessed by modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) and mortality. The study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The overall pooled effect, and secondary analyses exploring different subgroups were obtained by entering the log transformed odds ratios and their confidence intervals into a DerSimonian-Laird random effects meta-analysis.ResultsTwenty-eight studies (n=8655) were included. The pooled effect size for overall outcome (mRS and mortality) was 1.05 (95% CI 1.03, 1.07; p<0.00). In secondary analyses, PHE volume and growth effect sizes were 1.03 (CI 1.01, 1.05) and 1.12 (CI 1.06, 1.19), respectively. Results of subgroup analyses assessing absolute PHE volume and growth at different time points were: baseline volume 1.02 (CI 0.98, 1.06), 72-hour volume 1.07 (CI 0.99, 1.16), growth at 24 hours 1.30 (CI 0.96, 1.74) and growth at 72 hours 1.10 (CI 1.04, 1.17). Heterogeneity across studies was substantial.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis indicates that PHE growth, especially within the first 24 hours after ictus, has a stronger impact on functional outcome and mortality than PHE volume. Definitive conclusions are limited by the large variability of PHE measures, heterogeneity, and different evaluation time points between studies.     

Outcomes of heart transplant recipients with prior left ventricular assist device associated stroke

BackgroundLeft ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve survival in patients with end-stage heart failure but are associated with ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). The impact of LVAD-associated stroke on transplant candidacy and outcomes has not been characterized.MethodsAdult patients undergoing LVAD implantation at Cleveland Clinic between 2004 to 2021 were reviewed and patients who developed ischemic stroke or ICH were identified. Post-transplant survival analysis was performed between patients with LVAD-associated stroke vs. without.Results917 patients had an LVAD implantation of whom 244 (median age 57, 79% male) underwent subsequent transplant including 25 with prior LVAD-associated stroke. The 1- and 2-year survival after transplant in patients with LVAD-associated stroke were 100% and 95% respectively, compared with 92% and 90% in patients without stroke (p=0.156; p=0.323) Similarly, there was no difference in stroke incidence at 1- and 2 years after transplant between patients with LVAD-associated stroke (4% and 5%) and those without prior stroke (5% and 6%, p = 0.884; p=0.744).ConclusionsIn this single-center retrospective study, patients with LVAD-associated stroke were significantly less likely to undergo heart transplant, but those who underwent heart transplant had similar post-transplant outcomes as patients without history of LVAD-associated stroke. Given the similar outcomes seen in this population, history of LVAD-associated stroke should not be viewed as an absolute contraindication to subsequent heart transplant.