Antiestrogen chemoprevention of breast cancer: critical issues and research

Estrogenic hormones play critical roles in many aspects of women's health. Therefore, the impact of any hormonal manipulation must be carefully considered. While the evidence is good that chemoprevention, or more accurately chemosuppression, of breast cancer with tamoxifen is possible, further data are needed to support the case that hormone replacement with tamoxifen in healthy postmenopausal women would provide overall health benefits. Specifically, further data are needed regarding the biological effects of tamoxifen on risk factors for cardiovascular disease, on bone, on the liver, on the uterus, and on the coagulation system. Frequency, severity, and predictors for vasomotor, gynecologic, and depressant side effects also need to be well described. These data will allow rigorous cost-effectiveness analysis of hormone replacement therapies with tamoxifen and estrogen, as well as an analysis of the cost effectiveness of a clinical trial to prove definitively critical health benefits.     

Influences on Food Selection of Women on High- and Low-Fat Diets

There is evidence that long-term maintenance of a low-fat diet reduces preference for high-fat foods. Sensory evaluation of the taste of fat, and preference for high and low-fat foods were studied in a group of former participants in a randomized dietary intervention trial aimed at lowering fat consumption. Intervention subjects consuming less than 25% of daily calories as fat and control subjects consuming more than 35% of daily calories as fat agreed to be in a "taste perception" study. In Study 1, subjects tasted 20 dairy solutions containing different levels of fat and sugar. Subjects rated the perceived intensity of fat taste, and of liking, for each of the solutions. In Study 2, subjects were asked to taste and rate 4 high-fat and 4 low-fat snack foods, and were then allowed to freely consume these foods in a preference test. Intervention and control subjects were similar in their sensory evaluation of the taste of fat in Study 1. In Study 2, intervention subjects reported a reduced hedonic rating of the taste of high-fat snack foods compared to control subjects, yet intervention subjects consumed the same amount of high-fat snack foods as control subjects. We conclude that a successful outcome in a dietary intervention may be due to social and cognitive factors, in addition to potential changes in hedonic response to fat.     

The development of a comprehensive, institution-based patient risk evaluation program: II. Validity and reliability of questionnaire data

The accuracy of historical information derived from self-administered questionnaires must be confirmed. We report the results of studies conducted to assess the reliability and validity of data collected from a comprehensive cancer risk factor questionnaire developed at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. A comparison of the basic demographic data of a randomly selected sample of 80 respondents and 70 nonrespondents revealed no fundamental ethnic or socioeconomic differences. We verified self-reported past illnesses, surgical procedures, and cancers by reviewing 72 patient charts, using stringent diagnostic criteria for verification. We noted substantial agreement between self-reported and documented illnesses and operations. With the exception of nine patients who misclassified metastatic disease, the verification of primary cancers was excellent. We determined reliability by interviewing 50 of these patients by telephone. Questions with a dichotomous outcome (e.g., smoking status) were reliably answered; however, those requiring quantification (e.g., amount of alcohol consumed) were less accurately reported on interview. While we recognize the limitations of self-administered questionnaires, we believe this program will develop into a comprehensive, standardized, easily accessible patient risk factor data base.     

A Clinical and Economic Evaluation of Endoscopic Ultrasound for Patients at Risk for Familial Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Background and Aims: Approximately 10% of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is familial. Approximately 50% of Ist-degree relatives (FDRs) have endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) findings of chronic pancreatitis. We modeled the natural history of these patients to compare 4 management strategies. Methods: We performed a systematic review, and created a Markov model for 45-year-old male FDRs, with findings of chronic pancreatitis on screening EUS. We compared 4 strategies: doing nothing, prophylactic total pancreatectomy (PTP), annual surveillance by EUS, and annual surveillance with EUS and fine needle aspiration (EUS/FNA). Outcomes incorporated mortality, quality of life, procedural complications, and costs. Results: In the Do Nothing strategy, the lifetime risk of cancer was 20%. Doing nothing provided the greatest remaining years of life, the lowest cost, and the greatest remaining quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). PTP provided the fewest remaining years of life, and the fewest remaining QALYs. Screening with EUS provided nearly identical results to PTP, and screening with EUS/FNA provided intermediate results between PTP and doing nothing. PTP provided the longest life expectancy if the lifetime risk of pancreatic cancer was at least 46%, and provided the most QALYs if the risk was at least 68%. Conclusions: FDRs from familial pancreatic cancer kindreds, who have EUS findings of chronic pancreatitis, have increased risk for cancer, but their precise risk is unknown. Without the ability to further quantify that risk, the most effective strategy is to do nothing.