Vertebral bone quality score predicts fragility fractures independently of bone mineral density

BackgroundCurrent evidence suggests that dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, the conventional method defining osteoporosis, is underutilized and, when used, may underestimate patient risk for skeletal fragility. It has recently been suggested that other imaging modalities may better estimate bone quality, such as the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score which also may assess vertebral compression fracture risk in patients with spine metastases.PurposeTo evaluate whether VBQ score is predictive of fragility fractures in a population with pre-existing low bone density and at high-risk for fracture.Study Design/SettingRetrospective single-center cohort.Patient SamplePatients followed at a metabolic bone clinic for osteopenia and/or osteoporosis.Outcome MeasuresRadiographically-documented new-onset fragility fracture.MethodsPatients with a DXA and MRI scans at the time of consultation and ≥2-year follow-up were included. Details were gathered about patient demographics, health history, current medication use, and serological studies of kidney function and bone turnover. For each patient, VBQ score was calculated using T1-weighted lumbar MRI images. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify the independent predictors of a new fragility fracture. To support the construct validity of VBQ, patient VBQ scores were compared to those in a cohort of 45 healthy adults.ResultsSeventy-two (39.1%) study participants suffered fragility fractures, the occurrence of which was associated with higher VBQ score (3.50 vs. 3.01; p<.001), chronic glucocorticoid use (30.6% vs. 15.2%; p=.014), and a history of prior fragility fracture (36.1% vs. 21.4%; p=.030). Mean VBQ score across all patients in the study cohort was significantly higher than the mean VBQ score in the healthy controls (p<.001). In multivariable analysis, new-onset fracture was independently associated with history of prior fracture (OR=6.94; 95% confidence interval [2.48–19.40]; p<.001), higher VBQ score (OR=2.40 per point; [1.30–4.44]; p=.003), higher body mass index (OR=1.09 per kg/m²; [1.01–1.17]; p=.03), and chronic glucocorticoid use (OR=2.89; [1.03–8.17]; p=0.043). Notably, DXA bone mineral density (BMD) was not found to be significantly predictive of new-onset fractures in the multivariable analysis (p=.081).ConclusionsHere we demonstrate the novel, MRI-derived VBQ score is both an independent predictor of fragility fracture in at-risk patients and a superior predictor of fracture risk than DXA-measured BMD. Given the frequency with which MRIs are obtained by patients undergoing spine surgery consultation, we believe the VBQ score could be a valuable tool for estimating bone quality in order to optimize the management of these patients.     

Longitudinal associations between cancer history and cognitive functioning among older adults

ObjectivesThis study aimed to examine (1) whether cancer history accelerates older adults’ rates of cognitive decline over time and (2) whether chemotherapy increases older cancer patients’/ survivors’ rates of cognitive decline over time.MethodsThis longitudinal study drew a subsample of 8811 adults aged 65 or older from Wave 6 of the Health and Retirement Study in 2002 and followed biennually until Wave 13 in 2016. Linear mixed-effects models were performed to test whether cancer history and chemotherapy were associated with accelerated rates of cognitive decline over time among older adults in different age groups.ResultsMiddle-old adults (aged 75–84) with a cancer history had significantly reduced rates of cognitive decline over time, including the global measure of cognitive functioning (B = 0.16, p< .01), mental status (B = 0.08, p< .01), and episodic memory (B = 0.09, p< .05) compared to their counterparts without a cancer history. This effect was not significant for the youngest-old (aged 65–74) or oldest-old adults (aged 85 or older). Also, chemotherapy was not significantly associated with older cancer patients’/survivors’ cognitive functioning at baseline or over time in different age groups.ConclusionsThis study finds that cancer history and chemotherapy do not further exacerbate older adults’ cognitive functioning over time. On the contrary, cancer history shows a “protective” effect on middle-old adults’ cognitive functioning. This encouraging finding indicates that older adults can be more actively engaged in the decision-making of treatments and following care plans. Future mediation studies are needed to further investigate underlying mechanisms.     

Low Hounsfield units on computed tomography are associated with cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF)

BACKGROUND CONTEXTCage subsidence is one of the most common complications following lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Low bone mineral density (BMD) is an important risk factor that contributes to cage subsidence. Hounsfield units (HU) obtained from clinical computed tomography (CT) scans provided a reliable method for determining regional BMD. The association between HU and cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) remains unclear.PURPOSEThe objective of this study is to evaluate the association between vertebral HU value and cage subsidence following OLIF.STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGA retrospective study.PATIENT SAMPLEAdults with degenerative spinal conditions underwent single-level OLIF at our institution from October 2017 and August 2020OUTCOME MEASURESCage subsidence, disc height, vertebral body global HU value, upper and lower instrumented vertebrae HU value, endplate HU value, fusion rate.METHODSThis retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent single-level OLIF at one institution between October 2017 and August 2020. Cage subsidence was measured using the CT scan postoperatively based on the cage protrusion through the vertebral endplates. The HU values were measured from preoperative CT according to previously reported methods.RESULTSA total of 70 patients with a mean follow-up of 15.4 months were included in the analysis. The subsidence rate was 25.7% (n=18/70). The average cage subsidence was 2.2 mm, with a range of 0–7.7 mm. No significant difference was found in age, sex, or body mass index (BMI) between the two groups. The mean global HU value of the lumbar vertebral body (L1–5) was 142.7±30.1 in nonsubsidence and 103.7±11.5 in subsidence (p=.004). The upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) HU value was 141.4±29.7 in the nonsubsidence and 101.1±10.2 in subsidence, (p=.005). The lower instrumented vertebrae (LIV) HU value was 147.4±34.9 in nonsubsidence and 108.1±13.7 in subsidence, (p<.001). The AUC of the UIV HU value was 0.917 (95% CI: 0.853–0.981), and the most appropriate threshold of the HU value was 115 (sensitivity: 84.6%, specificity: 100%). The AUC of the LIV HU value was 0.893 (95%CI: 0.819–0.966), and the most appropriate threshold of the HU value was 125 (sensitivity: 76.9%, specificity: 100%). The mean upper endplate HU value was 235.4±50.9, and the mean lower endplate HU value was 193.4±40.3. No significant difference (upper endplate p=.314, lower endplate p=.189) was observed between the two groups.CONSLUSIONSLower preoperative vertebral body HU values were associated with cage subsidence after single-level OLIF. However, the endplate HU values were not associated with cage subsidence. Preoperative HU measurement is useful in the prediction of the cage subsidence.     

Comparison of differences and random errors in pedicle diameter measurements between MRI and CT: observational study of 315 pedicles in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXTPosterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws is commonly used for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). To reduce radiation exposure, methods other than computed tomography (CT) are desirable for preoperative determination of pedicle diameter.PURPOSEInvestigate the differences between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT measurements of pedicle diameter.STUDY DESIGNCross-sectional research.PATIENT SAMPLETwenty-one AIS Lenke type 1 patients (19 female and 2 males, mean age at surgery: 15.4 years) who underwent posterior spinal fusion between April 2009 and October 2019.OUTCOME MEASURESGap between CT and MRI pedicle diameters.METHODSThe inner and outer diameters of the right and left pedicles from T1 to L3 were measured separately by two spine surgeons for statistical comparisons.RESULTSThe respective minimum and maximum CT-MRI values were -3.7 mm and 4.7 mm for inner diameter and -4.6 mm and 5.3 mm for outer diameter. Regarding inter-examiner error, the probability of a 2 mm difference in measurement was less than 5% for both modalities. The probability of a 1 mm difference was also less than 5%, and that of a 3 mm or more difference was 2.1% for the inner diameter and 2.9% for the outer diameter. Whereas low body weight was significantly associated with measurement differences, pedicle laterality was not.CONCLUSIONSMRI does not have the reliability to measure pedicle size in AIS patients at present. However, with advancements in image processing technology, the accuracy of pedicle size measurement by MRI may soon improve.     

Prognostic effect of increased postoperative MRI T2WI high signal intensity in degenerative cervical myelopathy

BACKGROUND CONTEXTHigh cord signals (HCS) are common in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Few studies have investigated the prognostic effects of postoperative HCS changes.PURPOSETo investigate whether different changes in the postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2-weighted images (T2WIs) signal intensity ratio (SIR) is related to patient outcomes, predictors of unsatisfactory recovery, and the factors associated with changes in postoperative SIR.STUDY DESIGNA retrospective chart review at a single institution.PATIENT SAMPLEThe study population included all consecutive patients who showed HCS in preoperative MRI T2WIs and underwent double-door laminoplasty for DCM from December 2017 to December 2020.OUTCOME MEASURESPatient self-reported measures included the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) physical component score, and SF-36 mental component score. Imaging measures included SIR, length of HCS, and canal narrowing ratio (CNR).METHODSWe reviewed patient records and analyzed the statistical associations of MRI T2WI measures with the JOA score, SF-36 physical, and mental component scores.RESULTSFifty-three patients were categorized into three groups based on the postoperative HCS changes, identified from MRI T2WI before and after surgery: reduced (Group A, N=26); unchanged (Group B, N=12); and increased (Group C, N=15). The neurological recovery rates 12 months after surgery were 67.72%±17.45% in Group A, 51.53%±16.00% in Group B, and 13.35%±21.35% in Group C (p<.001). Significant differences across the three groups were found in symptom duration, postoperative SIR and length of HCS, pre- and postoperative CNR, recovery rate, JOA, SF-36 scores, with patients in Group C having the worst outcomes. Longer DCM symptom duration, greater preoperative CNR, and increased postoperative HCS were prognostic factors for a recovery rate<50%. Preoperative CNR, with an optimal threshold of 57.303%, was an independent risk factor for increased postoperative HCS.CONCLUSIONSLess than one-third of DCM patients with preoperative HCS exhibited an increase in HCS after double-door laminoplasty and reported worse outcomes at the 12-month follow-up when compared to patients with decreased or unchanged postoperative HCS.     

Outcomes of single-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Several studies have established the short-term safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) as compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, few single-center comparative trials have been performed, and current studies do not contain large numbers of patients. We retrospectively reviewed all patients from a single military tertiary medical center between August 2008 to August 2012 who underwent single-level CDA or single-level ACDF and compared their clinical outcomes and complications. A total of 259 consecutive patients were included in the study, 171 patients in the CDA group with an average follow-up of 9.8 (±9.9) months and 88 patients in the ACDF group with an average follow-up of 11.8 (±9.6) months. Relief of pre-operative symptoms was 90.1% in the CDA group and 86.4% in the ACDF group with rates of return to full pre-operative activity of 93.0% and 88.6%, respectively. Patients who underwent CDA had a higher rate of persistent posterior neck pain (15.8% versus 12.5%), and patients who underwent ACDF were at risk for symptomatic pseudarthrosis at a rate of 3.4%. Reoperation rates were higher in the ACDF group (5.7% versus 3.5%). To our knowledge, this review is the largest, non-funded, comparison study between single-level CDA and single-level ACDF. This study demonstrates that CDA is a safe and reliable alternative to ACDF in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy resulting from spondylosis and acute disc herniation.