Pain Assessment in the Patient Unable to Self-Report: Clinical Practice Recommendations in Support of the ASPMN 2019 Position Statement

Pain is a subjective experience, unfortunately, some patients cannot provide a self-report of pain verbally, in writing, or by other means. In patients who are unable to self-report pain, other strategies must be used to infer pain and evaluate interventions. In support of the ASPMN position statement “Pain Assessment in the Patient Unable to Self-Report”, this paper provides clinical practice recommendations for five populations in which difficulty communicating pain often exists: neonates, toddlers and young children, persons with intellectual disabilities, critically ill/unconscious patients, older adults with advanced dementia, and patients at the end of life. Nurses are integral to ensuring assessment and treatment of these vulnerable populations.     

Lack of Antinociceptive Cross-Tolerance With Co-Administration of Morphine and Fentanyl Into the Periaqueductal Gray of Male Sprague-Dawley Rats

Tolerance to the antinociceptive effect of mu-opioid receptor agonists, such as morphine and fentanyl, greatly limits their effectiveness for long-term use to treat pain. Clinical studies have shown that combination therapy and opioid rotation can be used to enhance opioid-induced antinociception once tolerance has developed. The mechanism and brain regions involved in these processes are unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contribution of the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) to antinociceptive tolerance and cross-tolerance between administration and co-administration of morphine and fentanyl. Tolerance was induced by pretreating rats with morphine or fentanyl or low-dose combination of morphine and fentanyl into the vlPAG followed by an assessment of the cross-tolerance to the other opioid. In addition, tolerance to the combined treatment was assessed. Cross-tolerance did not develop between repeated vlPAG microinjections of morphine and fentanyl. Likewise, there was no evidence of cross-tolerance from morphine or fentanyl to the co-administration of morphine and fentanyl. Co-administration did not cause cross-tolerance to fentanyl. Cross-tolerance was only evident to morphine or morphine and fentanyl combined in rats pretreated with co-administration of low doses of morphine and fentanyl. This finding is consistent with the functionally selective signaling that has been reported for antinociception and tolerance after morphine and fentanyl binding to the mu-opioid receptor. This research supports the notion that combination therapy and opioid rotation may be useful clinical practices to decrease opioid tolerance and other side effects.PerspectiveThis preclinical study shows that there is a decrease in cross-tolerance between morphine and fentanyl within the periaqueductal gray, which is a key brain region in opioid antinociception and tolerance.     

The best strategy for red blood cell transfusion in severe burn patients,restrictive or liberal: A randomized controlled trial

IntroductionAlthough blood transfusion is common in burns, data are lacking in appropriate transfusion thresholds. It has been reported that a restrictive blood transfusion policy decreases blood utilization and improves outcomes in critically ill adults, but the impact of a restrictive blood transfusion policy in burn patients is unclear. We decided to investigate the outcome of decreasing the blood transfusion threshold.Material and methodsEighty patients with TBSA > 20% who met our inclusion criteria were included. They were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. The intervention group received packed cells only when Hemoglobin declined to less than 8 g/dL at routine laboratory evaluations. While the control group received packed-cell when hemoglobin was declined to less than 10 g/dl. The total number of the received packed cell before, during and after any surgical procedure was recorded. The outcome was measured by the evaluation of the infection rate and other complications.ResultThe mean hemoglobin level before transfusion was 7.7 ± 0.4 g/dL in the restrictive group and 8.8 ± 0.7 g/dL in the liberal group. The mean number of RBC unit transfusion per patient in the restrictive group was significantly lower than the traditional group (3.28 ± 2.2 units vs. 5.9 ± 3.7 units) (p-value = 0.006). The total number of RBC transfused units varied significantly between the two groups (p-value = 0.014). The number of transfused RBC units outside the operation room showed a significant difference between groups (restrictive: 2.8 ± 1.4 units vs. liberal: 4.4 ± 2.6 units) (p = 0.004). We did not find any significant difference in mortality rate or other outcome measures between groups.ConclusionApplying the restrictive transfusion strategy in thermal burn patients who are highly prone to all kinds of infection, does not adversely impact the patient outcome, and results in significant cost savings to the institution and lower rate of infection. We conclude that the restrictive transfusion practice during burn excision and grafting is well tolerated and effective in reducing the number of transfusions without increasing complications.Clinical Trial Registration ReferenceIRCT20190209042660N1.     

Sensitivity and specificity of waveform analysis for assessing postoperative epidural function

Study objectivesTo characterize the accuracy of epidural waveform analysis (EWA) in assessing the functionality of thoracic epidural catheters in the immediate postoperative period (primary objective), and to determine the inter-rater reliability between EWA waveform observers (secondary outcome).DesignSingle center, prospective diagnostic accuracy cohort study.SettingPost-anesthetic care unit of a university teaching hospital.Patients84 adult patients undergoing elective thoracic, gynecologic, vascular, urologic, or general surgery with preoperative placement of a thoracic epidural catheter for perioperative analgesia.InterventionsEWA tracings were video recorded in the immediate postoperative period through the epidural catheter in the post-anesthetic care unit.MeasurementsPostoperative EWA tracings were compared with clinical assessments of the sensory block to ice produced by epidural local anesthetic in the immediate postoperative period. Additionally, intra-class correlation analysis of agreement between 3 independent (and blinded) EWA waveform observers was carried out.ResultsAmong 80 patients with thoracic epidurals who completed the study protocol, 73 demonstrated postoperative functional epidurals with sensory block to ice and 7 demonstrated non-functional epidurals. EWA yielded 65 true positives, 6 true negatives, 8 false negatives, and 1 false positive. Postoperative EWA sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value, along with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were 89% (79–95%), 86% (42–100%), 98% (92–100%), and 43% (18–71%) respectively. Intra-class correlation between waveform assessors was 0.870 (95% CI 0.818–0.910, p < 0.001).ConclusionsEWA is useful in assessing the position of thoracic epidural catheters in the immediate postoperative period, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity as well as robust inter-rater reliability. For patients in whom sensory block to ice cannot be reliably assessed postoperatively, EWA may provide a useful adjunct for assessing epidural functionality.