Dysregulated Stem Cell Markers Musashi-1 and Musashi-2 are Associated with Therapy Resistance in Inflammatory Breast Cancer

1. Download : Download high-res image (234KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Transvaginal Ultrasound Can Accurately Predict the American Society of Reproductive Medicine Stage of Endometriosis Assigned at Laparoscopy

Study ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in predicting a laparoscopic, surgically assigned, revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) endometriosis stage.DesignA multicenter, retrospective, diagnostic accuracy study.SettingThe patients visited 1 of 2 academic gynecologic ultrasound units and underwent laparoscopy led by 1 of 6 surgeons in metropolitan Sydney, Australia, between 2016 and 2018.PatientsPatients with suspected endometriosis (n = 204).InterventionsUltrasound followed by laparoscopy.Measurements and Main ResultsSurgical cases were identified. The preoperative ultrasound report and surgical operative notes were each used to retrospectively assign an ASRM score and stage. The breakdown of surgical findings was as follows: ASRM 0 (i.e., no endometriosis), 24/204 (11.8%); ASRM 1, 110/204 (53.9%); ASRM 2, 22/204 (10.8%); ASRM 3, 16/204 (7.8%); ASRM 4, 32 204 (15.7%). The overall accuracy of ultrasound in predicting the surgical ASRM stage was as follows: ASRM 1, 53.4%; ASRM 2, 93.8%; ASRM 3, 89.7%; ASRM 4, 93.1%; grouped ASRM 0, 1, and 2, 94.6%; and grouped ASRM 3 and 4 of 94.6%. Ultrasound had better test performance in higher disease stages. When the ASRM stages were dichotomized, ultrasound had sensitivity and specificity of 94.9% and 93.8%, respectively, for ASRM 0, 1, and 2 and of 93.8% and 94.9%, respectively, for ASRM 3 and 4.ConclusionUltrasound has high accuracy in predicting the mild, moderate, and severe ASRM stages of endometriosis and can accurately differentiate between stages when ASRM stages are dichotomized (nil/minimal/mild vs moderate/severe). This can have major positive implications on patient triaging at centers of excellence in minimally invasive gynecology for advanced-stage endometriosis.     

Advanced fibroid study: paying homage to John Sampson

A recent article supports our longstanding view that all intramural fibroids can cause disturbance of uterine function. This may be reflected in the symptom of menorrhagia or fertility-related issues, as well as pregnancy losses at all gestational stages. However, it was disappointing that there was no reference to either the mechanism by which fibroids disturb uterine function nor to the gynaecologist who described this more than 100 years ago, namely John Sampson. In fact, Sampson's findings about the unique venous drainage mechanism from the endometrium explains how menstrual loss is contained in normal physiology, but which can be excessive when the protective ‘anaemic’ zone is disturbed. Two more recent and pertinent observations include the hysteroscopic findings of Osamu Sugimoto, who showed in the 1970s that the endometrium overlying submucous fibroids is actually atrophic, hence the oft-cited reason of hyperplastic or excessive endometrium cannot be the cause of the associated menorrhagia. Furthermore, recent imaging techniques describe an additional ‘junctional zone’ adjacent to the endometrium in cases of fibroids and adenomyosis. We believe this all adds up to disturbed venous drainage as described by Sampson and needs to immediately enter the educational training of medical students, doctors and gynaecologists worldwide.     

In Vivo Comparison of MONOFIX,A Novel Barbed Suture with a Triangular Stopper,with Pre-existing Products in a Porcine Model

Study ObjectiveMONOFIX, a new absorbable barbed suture device, has a triangular stopper at the end to hold the suture to the tissue without hooking the looped end or knotting. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical strength and histologic features of MONOFIX with other barbed suture devices using a porcine model.DesignWell-designed, controlled trial without randomization.SettingAnimal laboratory in university hospital.SubjectsSixteen, 60-kg, mature female domestic pigs (skin closure group) and 5, 60-kg, mature female domestic pigs (fascial closure group).InterventionsIn the skin closure group, 3-0 MONOFIX versus 2 widely used 3-0 absorbable barbed sutures (3-0 V-Loc 180 or Stratafix). In the fascial closure group, 2-0 MONOFIX versus 1 widely used 2-0 absorbable barbed sutures (2-0 Stratafix).Measurements and Main ResultsIn the skin closure group, the biomechanical wound strength of skin sutured with size 3-0 MONOFIX, V-Loc 180, or Stratafix was evaluated by postoperative day assessment (days 0, 3, 7, 14, and 28). In the fascial closure group, pigs underwent 2 paramedian incisions and were sutured with 2-0 MONOFIX or with 2-0 Stratafix to evaluate histologic reaction. At 6 weeks the tissues around the suture line were excised and microscopically evaluated. The biomechanical strength of the MONOFIX had similar tissue tensile strength compared with the control, regardless of postoperative day. In the fascial closure model, there was no significant difference in the average tissue reaction score between MONOFIX and Stratafix (1.2 ± .3 vs 1.3 ± .3, p = .478).ConclusionThis study demonstrated that MONOFIX has equivalent tensile strength and histologic reaction when compared with commonly used barbed suture devices. Accordingly, this preclinical study suggests that the use of MONOFIX is a safe alternative to other barbed suture devices.