Fibrinogen concentrate and maternal outcomes in severe postpartum hemorrhage: A population-based cohort study with a propensity score-matched analysis

Study objectiveFibrinogen concentrate is used to treat severe postpartum hemorrhage despite limited evidence of its effectiveness in obstetric settings. We aimed to explore the association between its administration and maternal outcomes in women with severe postpartum hemorrhage.Design, setting and patientsThis secondary analysis of the EPIMOMS prospective population-based study, exploring severe maternal morbidity, as defined by national expert consensus (2012–2013, 182,309 deliveries, France), included all women with severe postpartum hemorrhage and transfused with red blood cells during active bleeding.MeasurementsThe primary endpoint was maternal near-miss or death, and the secondary endpoint the total number of red blood cells units transfused.InterventionsWe studied fibrinogen concentrate administration as a binary variable and then by the timing of its administration. We used multivariable analysis and propensity score matching to account for potential indication bias.Main resultsAmong the 730 women with severe postpartum hemorrhage and transfused, 313 (42.9%) received fibrinogen concentrate, and 142 (19.5%) met near-miss criteria or died. The risk of near-miss or death was not significantly lower among the women treated with fibrinogen concentrate than among those not treated, in either the multivariable analysis (adjusted RR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.72–1.49; P = 0.855) or the propensity score analysis (RR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55–1.32; P = 0.477). Among women treated with fibrinogen concentrate, administration more than three hours after red blood cell transfusion started was associated with a higher risk of near-miss or death than administration before or within 30 min after the transfusion began (adjusted RR = 2.07; 95% CI, 1.10–3.89; P = 0.024). Results were similar for the secondary endpoint.ConclusionsThe use of fibrinogen concentrate in severe postpartum hemorrhage needing red blood cell transfusion during active bleeding is not associated with improved maternal outcomes.     

Beyond intraocular pressure: Optimizing patient-reported outcomes in glaucoma

Glaucoma, an irreversible blinding condition affecting 3–4% adults aged above 40 years worldwide, is set to increase with a rapidly aging global population. Raised intraocular pressure (IOP) is a major risk factor for glaucoma where the treatment paradigm is focused on managing IOP using medications, laser, or surgery regimens. However, notwithstanding IOP and other clinical parameters, patient-reported outcomes, including daily functioning, emotional well-being, symptoms, mobility, and social life, remain the foremost concerns for people being treated for glaucoma. These outcomes are measured using objective patient-centered outcome measures (PCOMs) and subjective patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Studies using PCOMs have shown that people with glaucoma have several mobility, navigational and coordination challenges; reading and face recognition deficits; and are slower in adapting to multiple real-world situations when compared to healthy controls. Similarly, studies have consistently demonstrated, using PROMs, that glaucoma substantially and negatively impacts on peoples’ self-reported visual functioning, mobility, independence, emotional well-being, self-image, and confidence in healthcare, compared to healthy individuals, particularly in those with late-stage disease undergoing a heavy treatment regimen. The patient-centred effectiveness of current glaucoma treatment paradigms is equivocal due to a lack of well-designed randomized controlled trials; short post-treatment follow-up periods; an inappropriate selection or availability of PROMs; and/or an insensitivity of currently available PROMs to monitor changes especially in patients with newly diagnosed early-stage glaucoma. We provide a comprehensive, albeit non-systematic, critique of the psychometric properties, limitations, and recent advances of currently available glaucoma-specific PCOMs and PROMs. Finally, we propose that item banking and computerized adaptive testing methods can address the multiple limitations of paper-pencil PROMs; customize their administration; and have the potential to improve healthcare outcomes for people with glaucoma.     

What do I do? Developing a competency inventory for postgraduate (residency) program directors

Background: Few new Residency Program Directors (PD) are formally trained for the demands and responsibilities of the leadership aspect of their role. Currently, there are no comprehensive frameworks that describe specific leadership competencies that can inform PD self-reflection or faculty development.

Methods: The authors developed a Postgraduate Program Director Competency Inventory (PPDCI) in order to frame the performance of PDs for a multisource feedback (MSF) program. The development of the PPDCI occurred in five phases which involved: development of an initial inventory, implementation of a key informant survey of national opinion leaders, execution of a validity survey with postgraduate education leaders and committee members and implementation of a further refined inventory with 17 PD and 147 raters as part of a pilot MSF program.

Outcomes: Five distinct domains of leadership competence were identified which included: Communication and relationship management, leadership, professionalism and self-management, environmental engagement, and management skills and knowledge. The content validity of the PPDCI was endorsed by 85% of the key informants. The validity survey indicated strong endorsement of the PPDCI domains and recognition of its utility for both orientation of new PD as well as a frame for self-assessment. The pilot MSF program yielded a further refined and reduced inventory of 26 items of competence as well as recommendations for its utility.

Conclusions: Use of this leadership inventory has the potential to ensure effective leadership of postgraduate programs.     

Symptoms During or Shortly After Isolated Carpal Tunnel Release and Problems Within 24?hours After Surgery

This study used the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery (NSAS) database to measure the incidence of and risk factors for symptoms in the ambulatory surgery center and problems within 24 h after isolated carpal tunnel release (CTR). The NSAS contained records on 400,000 adult patients with carpal tunnel syndrome who were treated with CTR in 2006, based on ICD-9 codes. The type of anesthesia used and factors associated with symptoms and problems were sought in bivariate and multivariable statistical analyses. The mean duration of the procedure was 16 ± 8.8 min. Only 5 % were performed under local anesthesia without sedation, 45 % with IV sedation, 28 % regional anesthesia, and 19 % general anesthesia. Symptoms in the ambulatory surgery center or a problem within 24 h after discharge were recorded in 10 % of patients, all of them minor and transient, including difficulties with pain and its treatment. The strongest risk factors were male sex, age of 45 years and older, and participation of an anesthesiologist. Local anesthesia and regional anesthesia were associated with more perioperative symptoms and postoperative problems. Most CTR are performed with some sedation in the United States. CTR is a safe procedure: one in 10 patients will experience a minor issue in the perioperative or immediate postoperative period.