Die zeitlich-räumliche Verteilung von COVID-19 in Köln und beeinflussende soziale Faktoren im Zeitraum Februar 2020 bis Oktober 2021

Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - Schon in der frühen Phase der global sehr verschieden verlaufenden COVID-19-Pandemie zeigten sich Hinweise auf den Einfluss...     

Evaluation of the ventriculocholecystic shunt—an overview of present practice in adult and pediatric hydrocephalus

Neurosurgical Review - In the context of hydrocephalus, there are a multitude of therapeutic options that can be explored in order to improve patient outcomes. Although the peritoneum is the...     

Clinical Phenotype and Relevance of LRP5 and LRP6 Variants in Patients With Early-Onset Osteoporosis (EOOP)

Reduced bone mineral density (BMD; ie, Z-score ≤−2.0) occurring at a young age (ie, premenopausal women and men <50 years) in the absence of secondary osteoporosis is considered early-onset osteoporosis (EOOP). Mutations affecting the WNT signaling pathway are of special interest because of their key role in bone mass regulation. Here, we analyzed the effects of relevant LRP5 and LRP6 variants on the clinical phenotype, bone turnover, BMD, and bone microarchitecture. After exclusion of secondary osteoporosis, EOOP patients (n = 372) were genotyped by gene panel sequencing, and segregation analysis of variants in LRP5/LRP6 was performed. The clinical assessment included the evaluation of bone turnover parameters, BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and microarchitecture via high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). In 50 individuals (31 EOOP index patients, 19 family members), relevant variants affecting LRP5 or LRP6 were detected (42 LRP5 and 8 LRP6 variants), including 10 novel variants. Seventeen variants were classified as disease causing, 14 were variants of unknown significance, and 19 were BMD-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). One patient harbored compound heterozygous LRP5 mutations causing osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome. Fractures were reported in 37 of 50 individuals, consisting of vertebral (18 of 50) and peripheral (29 of 50) fractures. Low bone formation was revealed in all individuals. A Z-score ≤−2.0 was detected in 31 of 50 individuals, and values at the spine were significantly lower than those at the hip (−2.1 ± 1.3 versus −1.6 ± 0.8; p = .003). HR-pQCT analysis (n = 34) showed impaired microarchitecture in trabecular and cortical compartments. Significant differences regarding the clinical phenotype were detectable between index patients and family members but not between different variant classes. Relevant variants in LRP5 and LRP6 contribute to EOOP in a substantial number of individuals, leading to a high number of fractures, low bone formation, reduced Z-scores, and impaired microarchitecture. This detailed skeletal characterization improves the interpretation of known and novel LRP5 and LRP6 variants. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).     

Elevated proBNP levels are associated with disease severity,cardiac dysfunction,and mortality in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

BackgroundCardiac dysfunction is a key determinant of outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Pro-b-type natriuretic peptide (proBNP) is used as a prognosticator in heart failure and cardiomyopathy. We hypothesized that proBNP levels would be associated with ventricular dysfunction and high-risk disease in CDH.MethodsPatients in the CDH Study Group (CDHSG) from 2015–2019 with at least one proBNP value were included. Ventricular function was determined using echocardiograms from the first 48 h of life.ResultsA total of 2,337 patients were identified, and 212 (9%) had at least one proBNP value. Of those, 3 (1.5%) patients had CDHSG stage A defects, 58 (29.6%) B, 111 (56.6%) C, and 24 (12.2%) D. Patients with high-risk defects (Stage C/D) had higher proBNP compared with low-risk defects (Stage A/B) (14,281 vs. 5,025, p = 0.007). ProBNP was significantly elevated in patients who died (median 14,100, IQR 4,377–22,900 vs 4,911, IQR 1,883–9,810) (p<0.001). Ventricular dysfunction was associated with higher proBNP than normal ventricular function (8,379 vs. 4,778, p = 0.005). No proBNP value was both sensitive and specific for ventricular dysfunction (AUC=0.61).ConclusionAmong CDH patients, elevated proBNP was associated with high-risk defects, ventricular dysfunction, and mortality. ProBNP shows promise as a biomarker in CDH-associated cardiac dysfunction.     

Outcomes Following Percutaneous Microwave and Cryoablation of Lung Metastases from Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Bi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study

Annals of Surgical Oncology - The aim of this study was to report outcomes following percutaneous microwave and cryoablation of lung metastases from adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the head and...     

Effect of age and care organization on sources of variation in kidney transplant waiting list registration

Despite national guidelines, medical practices and kidney transplant waiting list registration policies may differ from one dialysis/transplant unit to another. Benefit risk assessment variations, especially for elderly patients, have also been described. The aim of this study was to identify sources of variation in early kidney transplant waiting list registration in France. Among 16 842 incident patients during the period 2016–2017, 4386 were registered on the kidney transplant waiting list at the start of, or during the first year after starting, dialysis (26%). We developed various log-linear mixed effect regression models on three levels: patients, dialysis networks, and transplant centers. Variability was expressed as variance from the random intercepts (± standard error). Although patient characteristics have an important impact on the likelihood of registration, the overall magnitude of variability in registration was low and shared by dialysis networks and transplant centers. Between-transplant center variability (0.23 ± 0.08) was 1.8 higher than between-dialysis network variability (0.13 ± 0.004). Older age was associated with a lower probability of registration and greater variability between networks (0.04, 0.20, & 0.93 in the 18–64, 65–74, and 75–84 age groups). Targeted interventions should focus on elderly patients and/or certain regions with greater variability in waiting list access.