Differentiating Large-scale Surge versus Daily Surge

This breakout session at the Academic Emergency Medicine 2006 Consensus Conference examined how baseline overcrowding impedes the ability of emergency departments to respond to sudden, unexpected surges in demand for patient care. Differences between daily and catastrophic surge were discussed, and the need to invoke a hospital-wide response to surge was explored.     

Factors Affecting Cardiac Catheterization Rates in Elders with Acute Coronary Syndromes

Background: Elder patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are less likely to receive cardiac catheterization. The reasons for this are unclear.
Objectives: To assess whether elder patients who had a documented history of dementia, lived in extended care facilities, or had do not intubate–do not resuscitate (DNR-DNI) advance directives were less likely to receive cardiac catheterization, despite having ACS with high-risk features.
Methods: This was a medical record review conducted at an urban teaching hospital. DNR-DNI status before hospitalization, extended care facility (nursing home or assisted living) residence, and a previous diagnosis of dementia were obtained from the medical record. Patients 65 years and older who presented to the emergency department with acute myocardial infarction or with unstable angina with ST segment deviation were included. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed, and odds ratios (ORs) were reported with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Of the 201 eligible patients, 66 (32.8%) patients did not undergo cardiac catheterization. In the univariate analysis, patients who had dementia, resided in extended care facilities, or were DNR-DNI were less likely to receive cardiac catheterization. Only extended care facility residence (OR, 0.18; 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.83) and DNR-DNI status (OR, 0.19; 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.92) remained significantly associated with decreased cardiac catheterization in the multivariate analysis.
Conclusions: Elder patients with ACS residing in extended care facilities or who are DNR-DNI are less likely to receive cardiac catheterization. Future studies concerning the quality of ACS care for elders should take these variables into account.     

Enhanced dispersion of atrial refractoriness as an electrophysiological substrate for vulnerability to atrial fibrillation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Atrial electrical remodeling plays a part in recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). It has been related to an increase in heterogeneity of atrial refractoriness that facilitates the occurrence of multiple reentry wavelets and vulnerability to AF. AIM: To examine the relationship between dispersion of atrial refractoriness (Disp_A) and vulnerability to AF induction (A_Vuln) in patients with clinical paroxysmal AF (PAF). METHODS: Thirty-six patients (22 male; age 55+/-13 years) with > or =1 year of history of PAF (no underlying structural heart disease--n=20, systemic hypertension--n=14, mitral valve prolapse--n=1, surgically corrected pulmonary stenosis--n=1), underwent electrophysiological study (EPS) while off medication. The atrial effective refractory period (AERP) was assessed at five different sites--high (HRA) and low (LRA) lateral right atrium, high interatrial septum (IAS), proximal (pCS) and distal (dCS) coronary sinus--during a cycle length of 600 ms. AERP was taken as the longest S1-S2 interval that failed to initiate a propagation response. Disp_A was calculated as the difference between the longest and shortest AERP. A_Vuln was defined as the ability to induce AF with 1-2 extrastimuli or with incremental atrial pacing (600-300 ms) from the HRA or dCS. The EPS included analysis of focal electrical activity based on the presence of supraventricular ectopic beats (spontaneous or with provocative maneuvers). The patients were divided into group A--AF inducible (n=25) and group B--AF not inducible (n=11). Disp_A was analyzed to determine any association with A_Vuln. Disp_A and A_Vuln were also examined in those patients with documented repetitive focal activity. Logistic regression was used to determine any association of the following variables with A_Vuln: age, systemic hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, left atrial size, left ventricular function, duration of PAF, documented atrial flutter/tachycardia and Disp_A. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to clinical characteristics and echocardiographic data. AF was inducible in 71% of the patients and noninducible in 29%. Group A had greater Disp_A compared to group B (105+/-78 ms vs. 49+/-20 ms; p=0.01). Disp_A was >40 ms in 50% of the patients without A_Vuln and in 91% of those with A_Vuln (p=0.05). Focal activity was demonstrated in 14 cases (39%), 57% of them with A_Vuln. Disp_A was 56+/-23 ms in this group and 92+/-78 ms in the others (p=0.07). Using logistic regression, the only predictor of A_Vuln was Disp_A (p=0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with paroxysmal AF, Disp_A is a major determinant of A_Vuln. Nevertheless, the degree of nonuniformity of AERP appears to be less important as an electrophysiological substrate for AF due to focal activation.     

Percentile distributions of bone measurements in Iowa children: the Iowa Bone Development Study.

Four hundred twenty-eight white children (200 boys and 228 girls) ages 4.5-6.5 yr had spine, hip, and whole-body bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry(DXA) as part of the Iowa Bone Development Study. Anthropometric measurements, including height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were determined for each child at the time the bone measurements were made. The age- and gender-specific height percentile based on the 2000 CDC Growth Charts (www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/) was determined for each child. These percentiles were used to classify children into four groups as defined by the 25th, 50th,and 75th percentile cutpoints. Percentile distributions were determined within each height quartile group to delineate percentiles (5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th) for BMD and BMC. Gender differences in BMD and BMC were investigated before and after stratification into height groups. Boys had higher age-height-weight-adjusted means for most BMD and BMC measures except spine BMD. Bone measurements increased with height quartile, indicating that taller children have greater BMD and BMC compared to shorter children of the same age and gender. Within any given quartile,mean BMD and BMC measurements were similar for boys and girls, with the exception of hip BMD, for which values were consistently higher for boys (p < 0.05). In addition, whole-body BMC values were higher for boys in quartiles 1 and 3 (p < 0.05). These bone measures provide norms for young white children and serve as a reference for comparison with other racial and ethnic groups, as well as with childhood populations that are at risk for osteopenia because of chronic disease. Gender, age, and height are useful clinical predictors of BMD and BMC in young children.     

Challenges in accessing multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities in Canada

PURPOSE: The objective of this survey was to examine the services offered by multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities (MPTFs) across Canada and to compare access to care at these MPTFs. METHODS: A MPTF was defined as a clinic that advertised specialized multidisciplinary services for the diagnosis and management of patients with chronic pain, having a minimum of three different health care disciplines (including at least one medical speciality) available and integrated within the facility. The search method included approaching all hospital and rehabilitation centre administrators in Canada, the Insurance Bureau of Canada, the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board or similar body in each province. Designated investigators were responsible for confirming and supplementing MPTFs from the preliminary list for each province. Administrative leads at each eligible MPTF were asked to complete a detailed questionnaire regarding their MPTF infrastructure, clinical, research, teaching and administrative activities. RESULTS: Completed survey forms were received from 102 MPTFs (response rate 85%) with 80% concentrated in major cities, and none in Prince Edward Island and the Territories. The MPTFs offer a wide variety of treatments including non-pharmacological modalities such as interventional, physical and psychological therapy. The median wait time for a first appointment in public MPTFs is six months, which is approximately 12 times longer than non-public MPTFs. Eighteen pain fellowship programs exist in Canadian MPTFs and 64% engage in some form of research activities CONCLUSION: Canadian MPTFs are unable to meet clinical demands of patients suffering from chronic pain, both in terms of regional accessibility and reasonable wait time for patients' first appointment.     

Impact of a region-wide approach to improving systems for heart attack care: the West Midlands thrombolysis project.

OBJECTIVE: To describe changes in delay to administration of thrombolytic therapy associated with a region-wide audit. DESIGN: Observational study of patients admitted with suspected myocardial infarction (MI) based on continuous audit. SUBJECTS: 18877 patients admitted to 23 hospitals with suspected MI between April 1995 and March 1998. RESULTS: Of 11232 patients with a discharge diagnosis of definite MI, 8802 (46.6%) received thrombolytic therapy during hospitalisation, with 5155 patients eligible for treatment on admission to hospital on the basis of established indications. Call-to-needle time for those eligible for treatment on admission fell from median 105 min in the first year of the project to 85 min in year 3 (P<0.001), and door-to-needle time fell from 45 to 35 min (P<0.001). Forty percent of eligible patients were treated within the then current national standard of 90 min from time of call for help, with nearly 49% in the final year and 20% being treated within the new national standard of 60 min, by the third year. CONCLUSION: The proportion of eligible patients receiving thrombolysis within 1 h of the call for help doubled during the 3-year project but the majority of patients still wait longer than 60-min 'call-to-needle'. New systems to reduce delays to administration of thrombolysis to within 60 min of call for help are required, including consideration of pre-hospital treatment.