收费全文 | 287篇 |
免费 | 29篇 |
国内免费 | 5篇 |
耳鼻咽喉 | 8篇 |
儿科学 | 11篇 |
妇产科学 | 7篇 |
基础医学 | 34篇 |
口腔科学 | 18篇 |
临床医学 | 35篇 |
内科学 | 82篇 |
皮肤病学 | 17篇 |
神经病学 | 17篇 |
特种医学 | 4篇 |
外科学 | 32篇 |
综合类 | 6篇 |
预防医学 | 10篇 |
眼科学 | 2篇 |
药学 | 28篇 |
中国医学 | 2篇 |
肿瘤学 | 8篇 |
2024年 | 3篇 |
2023年 | 18篇 |
2022年 | 13篇 |
2021年 | 37篇 |
2020年 | 27篇 |
2019年 | 23篇 |
2018年 | 17篇 |
2017年 | 18篇 |
2016年 | 19篇 |
2015年 | 18篇 |
2014年 | 13篇 |
2013年 | 12篇 |
2012年 | 32篇 |
2011年 | 25篇 |
2010年 | 8篇 |
2009年 | 2篇 |
2008年 | 9篇 |
2007年 | 3篇 |
2006年 | 7篇 |
2005年 | 5篇 |
2004年 | 1篇 |
2003年 | 6篇 |
2002年 | 1篇 |
2000年 | 3篇 |
1997年 | 1篇 |
Objectives
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are particularly used in patients with bone fractures, but there are limited studies on whether one NSAID is superior to another. In this study, we used histopathological and biochemical parameters to determine whether there are differences between the effects of the administration of clinical doses of dexketoprofen trometamol (DEXT), meloxicam (MEL) and diclofenac sodium (DIC) on the healing of closed fibular fractures and the toxicity of both the liver and kidney.Methods
Twenty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups of seven each. Closed diaphyseal fractures were formed in the left fibulas of all of the rats. The NSAIDs dexketoprofen trometamol (DEXT) (Arveles®), meloxicam (MEL) (Melox®) and diclofenac sodium (DIC) (Voltaren®) were intramuscularly administered to Groups I, II, and III, respectively, for a period of 10 days after the fibular fractures were performed. No pharmacological agents were administered to Group IV (Control group). Blood samples were collected from all of the rats after the fractures were performed, and the rats were sacrificed on day 28. The histopathological findings were compared, and the blood samples were evaluated to determine any differences between the levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and malondialdehyde (MDA).Results
Our results suggest that DEXT and MEL impair the healing of bone fractures and that DIC does not histopathologically affect the healing process of bone fractures. We also found that DEXT, MEL, and DIC impaired the renal histopathology compared with the control group. However, the liver histopathological analysis showed that DEXT and MEL caused a higher degree of parenchymal necrosis compared with DIC.Conclusion
Based on our results, DIC can be considered a relatively safe medication in patients with fractures. 相似文献The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of taper (.08, .06, and .04) of separated K3XF instruments on duration taken for the secondary fracture formation during ultrasonic activation.
Materials and methodsTen 25/.08 K3XF (SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA), ten 25/.06 K3XF, and ten 25/.04 K3XF instruments were used for the study. The apical 5 mm of the instruments was cut to simulate the fragments in root canals. Fragments of the instruments were sandwiched between two straight dentin blocks. An ultrasonic tip was used to cause a secondary fracture of the fragment. The time needed for the secondary fracture was recorded for each instrument. The data were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis H test (alpha = 0.05).
ResultsSecondary fractures occurred in all instruments. In the .08 taper group, secondary fractures took longer than in the case of the .06 and the .04 taper groups (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the .06 and the .04 taper groups in terms of the time required for the occurrence of a secondary fracture (P > 0.05).
ConclusionsIn the .08 taper group, secondary fracture took longer time than in the case of the .06 and the .04 taper groups due to its larger cross-sectional area involved.
Clinical relevanceTypically, when removing separated instruments, a much lower power setting is chosen. The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine which tapered files were more resilient to secondary fracture, thus allowing a higher power setting to be chosen. Thus, the results of the present study cannot be used in clinical practice. If the clinician knows the taper of the broken file, the clinician should be very careful with regard to secondary fractures when using ultrasonics to remove the separated smaller tapered instruments.
相似文献