Staphylococcus epidermidis as a cause of postoperative wound infection after cardiac surgery: assessment of pathogenicity by a wound-scoring method

Wound infection after clean surgery prolongs hospital stay but the organism most commonly isolated from wound discharge, Staphylococcus epidermidis, is often dismissed as a contaminant or commensal. The wounds of 517 patients were assessed, after cardiac surgery, by a wound-scoring method ('ASEPSIS') and a close comparison was made of the appearance and clinical outcome of 89 wounds, from which bacteria were isolated. There was no significant difference in the scores of 49 wounds, where S. epidermidis was the sole isolate (9.5 per cent of all wounds, 95 per cent CI 6.9-12.0 per cent), and 13 wounds infected with Staphylococcus aureus (2.5 per cent, 95 per cent CI 1.2-3.9 per cent). Repeat cultures were obtained from 21 of the 49 wounds and, in 16 of these, the second isolate showed the same biochemical reactions and antibiotic resistance pattern as the first. Infection of sternal wounds is commoner with coagulase-negative staphylococci than with S. aureus and, clinically, is just as severe.     

The Alcohol Beverage Warning Label: When Did Knowledge Increase?

This article presents data on the awareness of the alcohol beverage warning label among a sample of 5,169 inner city African-American gravidas seeking prenatal care. While the label law was implemented in November 1989, a significant increase in knowledge of the label did not occur until March 1990. Women who predominantly consumed wine coolers and beer, and those under age 30 were more likely to know about the label than their counterparts.     

Problems with a ‘target’ approach to access in primary care: a qualitative study

We report an analysis of the qualitative phase of a study of patients' and carers' views of primary care services, focusing on their experiences of access to face-to-face general practitioner (GP) consultations during the period when new access policies were being implemented. Practices interpreted the new policy in various ways; restricted interpretations, including restriction of access to telephone booking, could cause distress to patients. Patients and carers welcomed flexible interpretations of the policy that offered choice, such as a choice of GP, or of booking in advance.