Differential expression of connective tissue growth factor in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease consists of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). A major clinical problem in some patients is to differentiate clearly between these entities, which is important when planning appropriate medical and surgical treatment. Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), a novel peptide involved in fibrotic disorders, was analyzed in the present study in CD and UC patients to evaluate its possible role in these two disorders. Twenty-five normal human intestinal tissue samples were obtained through an organ donor program. CD tissues were obtained from 28 individuals undergoing partial intestinal resection (17 small bowel; 11 large bowel) due to complications of the disease. UC tissue samples were obtained from 16 patients undergoing colectomy due to complications of the disease. Expression of CTGF was studied by Northern blot analysis. In situ hybridization was used to localize mRNA moieties in the tissue samples. Northern blot analysis revealed an average 5-fold increase in CTGF mRNA expression in 89% (25/28) of CD tissue samples by comparison with normal controls (p < 0.0001). In contrast, in UC samples CTGF mRNA levels were comparable to those of normal controls. However, UC tissue samples exhibited enhanced TGF-beta1 mRNA levels (4-fold; p < 0.05). In situ hybridization in CD samples showed CTGF mRNA localized especially in fibroblasts within the submucosal layer, around lymph follicles and in some areas of intense damage in the proximity of the luminal surface, whereas inflammatory cells were devoid of any CTGF mRNA signal. The present data indicate that CTGF plays a different role in IBD and might be useful, especially in those cases with unusual disease presentation, to better differentiate UC and CD. In addition, our data indicate a crucial role for CTGF in CD, where fibrosis and stenosis are frequent complications that require surgery.     

The use of opioids for treatment of cancer pain

Introduction: Pain is commonly experienced by patients with cancer, particularly those with advanced disease. Alleviating pain is an important goal of cancer treatment. Opioids are the cornerstone of the analgesic treatment.

Areas covered: Pharmacology, characteristics, and use of opioids in clinical practice are presented.

Expert opinion: Although the use of opioids is largely accepted as a fundamental step for controlling cancer pain, existing data supporting this statement are poor. All opioids provide analgesia and are effective in controlling cancer pain. New drugs have been developed and experience is accumulating among clinicians. Despite these drugs having different pharmacokinetic and chemical properties, there is no proof that one opioid is better than another one. Thus, the optimum benefit depends on the experience of the users. Clinicians should weight evidence, clinical experience, patient preferences, and treatment costs when choosing the optimal treatment for an individual patient with cancer pain. New opioids with specific receptor activities are under investigation.     

Usefulness of the PARIS Score to Evaluate the Ischemic-hemorrhagic Net Benefit With Ticagrelor and Prasugrel After an Acute Coronary Syndrome

Introduction and objectives

The PARIS score allows combined stratification of ischemic and hemorrhagic risk in patients with ischemic heart disease treated with coronary stenting and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Its usefulness in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel is unknown. We investigated this issue in an international registry.

Real world experience with teriflunomide in multiple sclerosis: the TER-Italy study

Journal of Neurology - To identify baseline factors associated with disease activity in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) under teriflunomide treatment. This was an...     

The Love Addiction Inventory: Preliminary Findings of the Development Process and Psychometric Characteristics

International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction - Although the existence of dysfunctional love relationships is well known and the term “love addiction” dates back to the 1970s,...     

Methodological quality of studies evaluating the burden of drug-resistant infections in humans due to the WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System target bacteria

BackgroundThe health impact of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has not been included in the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) report, as reliable data have been lacking. AMR burden estimates have been derived from models combining incidence and/or prevalence data from national and/or international surveillance systems and mortality estimates from clinical studies. Depending on utilized empirical data, statistical methodology and applied endpoints, the validity and reliability of results can differ substantially.ObjectivesWe assessed comprehensiveness, and internal and external validity of studies estimating the clinical impact of infections caused by the priority antibiotic resistant pathogens monitored by the WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System.Data sourcesOvid MEDLINE, January 1950 to March 2019, In-Process and other non-indexed citations were searched.Study eligibility criteriaStudies reporting mortality, length of hospital stay, duration of the disease until remission and/or death, complications, hospital re-admissions, and follow-up beyond hospital discharge were eligible.MethodsThe literature was searched according to the Cochrane recommendations and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews.ResultsTwo-hundred and eighty-six studies out of 3529 were eligible. Studies derived mainly from high-income countries (215, 75%) and relied on data from retrospective (226, 79%), single-centre (201, 70%), cohort studies (243, 85%). The health impact was mostly limited to all-cause mortality (128, 45%) with heterogeneity in timing of assessment; attributable length of hospital stay was seldom adjusted for pre-infection admission time and a few studies had enough follow-up for assessing long-term sequelae. Overall, adjustment for confounding has shown a substantial improvement. Data on health state definitions and duration of diseases are generally lacking, precluding calculation of disability-adjusted life years, critical for application of the GBD study methodology.ConclusionEfforts to improve harmonization, representativeness, quality of AMR surveillance data and cohort studies to determine AMR attributable mortality and morbidity are urgently required. Policy makers need accurate and detailed burden estimates to inform prioritization of resource allocation, and to select the most effective intervention strategies to halt the AMR crisis.     

Kohlschütter–Tönz Syndrome: Mutations in ROGDI and Evidence of Genetic Heterogeneity

Kohlschütter–Tönz syndrome (KTS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by amelogenesis imperfecta, psychomotor delay or regression and seizures starting early in childhood. KTS was established as a distinct clinical entity after the first report by Kohlschütter in 1974, and to date, only a total of 20 pedigrees have been reported. The genetic etiology of KTS remained elusive until recently when mutations in ROGDI were independently identified in three unrelated families and in five likely related Druze families. Herein, we report a clinical and genetic study of 10 KTS families. By using a combination of whole exome sequencing, linkage analysis, and Sanger sequencing, we identify novel homozygous or compound heterozygous ROGDI mutations in five families, all presenting with a typical KTS phenotype. The other families, mostly presenting with additional atypical features, were negative for ROGDI mutations, suggesting genetic heterogeneity of atypical forms of the disease.