Therapeutic cooperation between auranofin,a thioredoxin reductase inhibitor and anti-PD-L1 antibody for treatment of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBCs) is a very aggressive and lethal form of breast cancer with no effective targeted therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapies and radiotherapy remains a mainstay of treatment with only 25–30% of TNBC patients responding. Thus, there is an unmet clinical need to develop novel therapeutic strategies for TNBCs. TNBC cells have increased intracellular oxidative stress and suppressed glutathione, a major antioxidant system, but still, are protected against higher oxidative stress. We screened a panel of antioxidant genes using the TCGA and METABRIC databases and found that expression of the thioredoxin pathway genes is significantly upregulated in TNBC patients compared to non-TNBC patients and is correlated with adverse survival outcomes. Treatment with auranofin (AF), an FDA-approved thioredoxin reductase inhibitor caused specific cell death and impaired the growth of TNBC cells grown as spheroids. Furthermore, AF treatment exerted a significant in vivo antitumor activity in multiple TNBC models including the syngeneic 4T1.2 model, MDA-MB-231 xenograft and patient-derived tumor xenograft by inhibiting thioredoxin redox activity. We, for the first time, showed that AF increased CD8^+Ve T-cell tumor infiltration in vivo and upregulated immune checkpoint PD-L1 expression in an ERK1/2-MYC-dependent manner. Moreover, combination of AF with anti-PD-L1 antibody synergistically impaired the growth of 4T1.2 primary tumors. Our data provide a novel therapeutic strategy using AF in combination with anti-PD-L1 antibody that warrants further clinical investigation for TNBC patients.     

Narrowing the focus: Therapeutic cell surface targets for refractory triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined as a type of breast cancer with lack of expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor 2 protein. In comparison to other types of breast cancer, TNBC characterizes for its aggressive behavior, more prone to early recurrence and a disease with poor response to molecular target therapy. Although TNBC is identified in only 25%-30% of American breast cancer cases annually, these tumors continue to be a therapeutic challenge for clinicians for several reasons: Tumor heterogeneity, limited and toxic systemic therapy options, and often resistance to current standard therapy, characterized by progressive disease on treatment, residual tumor after cytotoxic chemotherapy, and early recurrence after complete surgical excision. Cell-surface targeted therapies have been successful for breast cancer in general, however there are currently no approved cell-surface targeted therapies specifically indicated for TNBC. Recently, several cell-surface targets have been identified as candidates for treatment of TNBC and associated targeted therapies are in development. The purpose of this work is to review the current clinical challenges posed by TNBC, the therapeutic approaches currently in use, and provide an overview of developing cell surface targeting approaches to improve outcomes for treatment resistant TNBC.     

Basic fibroblast growth factor promotes doxorubicin resistance in chondrosarcoma cells by affecting XRCC5 expression

Chondrosarcoma is the second most common form of bone cancer and is characterized by its ability to produce an extracellular matrix of the cartilage. High-grade chondrosarcoma is highly aggressive and can metastasize to other parts of the body. Chondrosarcoma is resistant to both conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy; hence, the current main treatment is still surgical resection. Doxorubicin (Dox) has been shown to significantly improve patient survival compared with untreated chondrosarcoma. However, for patients with metastasis, surgical resection alone can hardly treat them. In addition, drug resistance is one of the leading causes of death in patients with chondrosarcoma. Secreted proteins can mediate cell-cell interactions in the cancer microenvironment, which may be associated with the development of drug resistance. In the present study, chondrosarcoma cells were treated with Dox, the conditioned medium was then collected and changes in secreted proteins were analyzed using the antibody array. Results showed that the Dox-treated group had the highest secretion of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), indicating the effect of bFGF on Dox sensitivity in chondrosarcoma. Furthermore, lentiviral-mediated knockdown and treatment of exogenous recombinant protein were employed to further investigate the effect of bFGF on Dox resistance. Results demonstrated that bFGF can promote the expression of X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 5 (XRCC5), leading to Dox resistance. Secreted bFGF is likely to be detected in serum, in addition to being a biomarker for predicting Dox resistance, the combination of Dox and bFGF/XRCC5 blockers may be a new therapeutic strategy to improve the efficacy of Dox in future.     

Non alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident diabetes in subjects who are not obese

Background and aims

It is not known whether non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a risk factor for diabetes in non obese, non centrally-obese subjects. Our aim was to investigate relationships between fatty liver, insulin resistance and a biomarker score for liver fibrosis with incident diabetes at follow up, in subjects who were neither obese nor centrally-obese.

INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:Functional redundancy of type I and type II receptors in the regulation of skeletal muscle growth by myostatin and activin A

Myostatin (MSTN) is a transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) family member that normally acts to limit muscle growth. The function of MSTN is partially redundant with that of another TGF-β family member, activin A. MSTN and activin A are capable of signaling through a complex of type II and type I receptors. Here, we investigated the roles of two type II receptors (ACVR2 and ACVR2B) and two type I receptors (ALK4 and ALK5) in the regulation of muscle mass by these ligands by genetically targeting these receptors either alone or in combination specifically in myofibers in mice. We show that targeting signaling in myofibers is sufficient to cause significant increases in muscle mass, showing that myofibers are the direct target for signaling by these ligands in the regulation of muscle growth. Moreover, we show that there is functional redundancy between the two type II receptors as well as between the two type I receptors and that all four type II/type I receptor combinations are utilized in vivo. Targeting signaling specifically in myofibers also led to reductions in overall body fat content and improved glucose metabolism in mice fed either regular chow or a high-fat diet, demonstrating that these metabolic effects are the result of enhanced muscling. We observed no effect, however, on either bone density or muscle regeneration in mice in which signaling was targeted in myofibers. The latter finding implies that MSTN likely signals to other cells, such as satellite cells, in addition to myofibers to regulate muscle homeostasis.

Myostatin (MSTN) is a secreted signaling molecule that normally acts to limit skeletal muscle growth (for review, see ref. 1). Mice lacking MSTN exhibit dramatic increases in muscle mass throughout the body, with individual muscles growing to about twice the normal size (2). MSTN appears to play two distinct roles in regulating muscle size, one to regulate the number of muscle fibers that are formed during development and a second to regulate the growth of those fibers postnatally. The sequence of MSTN has been highly conserved through evolution, with the mature MSTN peptide being identical in species as divergent as humans and turkeys (3). The function of MSTN has also been conserved, and targeted or naturally occurring mutations in MSTN have been shown to cause increased muscling in numerous species, including cattle (3–5), sheep (6), dogs (7), rabbits (8), rats (9), swine (10), goats (11), and humans (12). Numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies have developed biologic agents capable of blocking MSTN activity, and these have been tested in clinical trials for a wide range of indications, including Duchenne and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, inclusion body myositis, muscle atrophy following falls and hip fracture surgery, age-related sarcopenia, Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease, and cachexia due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end-stage kidney disease, and cancer.The finding that certain inhibitors of MSTN signaling can increase muscle mass even in Mstn^−/− mice revealed that the function of MSTN as a negative regulator of muscle mass is partially redundant with at least one other TGF-β family member (13, 14), and subsequent studies have identified activin A as one of these cooperating ligands (15, 16). MSTN and activin A share many key regulatory and signaling components. For example, the activities of both MSTN and activin A can be modulated extracellularly by naturally occurring inhibitory binding proteins, including follistatin (17, 18) and the follistatin-related protein, FSTL-3 or FLRG (19, 20). Moreover, MSTN and activin A also appear to share receptor components. Based on in vitro studies, MSTN is capable of binding initially to the activin type II receptors, ACVR2 and ACVR2B (also called ActRIIA and ActRIIB) (18) followed by engagement of the type I receptors, ALK4 and ALK5 (21). In previous studies, we presented genetic evidence supporting a role for both ACVR2 and ACVR2B in mediating MSTN signaling and regulating muscle mass in vivo. Specifically, we showed that mice expressing a truncated, dominant-negative form of ACVR2B in skeletal muscle (18) or carrying deletion mutations in Acvr2 and/or Acvr2b (13) have significantly increased muscle mass. One limitation of the latter study, however, was that we could not examine the consequence of complete loss of both receptors using the deletion alleles, as double homozygous mutants die early during embryogenesis (22). Moreover, the roles that the two type I receptors, ALK4 and ALK5, play in regulating MSTN and activin A signaling in muscle in vivo have not yet been documented using genetic approaches. Here, we present the results of studies in which we used floxed alleles for each of the type II and type I receptor genes in order to target these receptors alone and in combination in muscle fibers. We show that these receptors are functionally redundant and that signaling through each of these receptors contributes to the overall control of muscle mass.