Recall of emotional and neutral words and paragraphs in traumatic brain injury

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in verbal recall deficits and impaired processing of emotion encoded in facial appearance, prosody and the linguistic content of messages. Emotion facilitates memory (emotional memory advantage) for non-brain injured (NBI) individuals but the impact of emotion on verbal recall for linguistically encoded stimuli in TBI has not been explored.

Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of stimulus emotional content on verbal recall of words and paragraphs in TBI compared to NBI individuals.

Methods and procedures: Six 10-item lists, each with five emotional and five neutral words, and six paragraphs (three emotional, three neutral) were counterbalanced and presented in random order to 20 individuals with TBI and 44 NBI. The number of words from lists and the number of content units from paragraphs were compared for the two groups.

Outcomes and results: The NBI participants recalled more words from the lists and content units from the paragraphs than the individuals with TBI. Both groups recalled significantly more emotional than neutral words. NBI but not TBI participants had significantly greater recall for information in paragraphs with emotional content.

Conclusions: Participants with TBI showed impaired recall of words and paragraph content. Emotion facilitated word and paragraph content recall for neurotypical individuals but emotional memory advantage was limited to words for the TBI participants.     

Bilateral field advantage in visual crowding

Thirty randomly oriented T’s were presented in a circle around fixation at an eccentricity of 11° such that each T was crowded by its neighbors. Two locations within the same hemifield (unilateral condition) or one location in each hemifield (bilateral condition) were precued for subsequent probing. Observers were then asked to report the orientation of a target T at one of these locations. A bilateral field advantage was found: target identification was better when the two precued targets were in different hemifields than when they were within the same hemifield. This bilateral advantage was absent when only targets were presented, without any distracters. Further controls showed that this advantage could not be attributed to differences between horizontal and vertical target alignments or to visual field anisotropies. A similar bilateral advantage has been reported for multiple object tracking (Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2005). Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual fields. Psychological Science 16(8), 637-643) and other attentional tasks. Our results suggest that crowding also demonstrates separate attentional resources in the left and right hemifields. There was a cost to attending to two targets presented unilaterally over attending to a single target. However, this cost was reduced when the two crowded targets were in separate hemifields.     

Rare-male mating advantage: An artifact caused by differential storage conditions?

Virgin males (or females) of some species ofDrosophila, when stored singly, are known to be superior in mating to males (or females) stored in groups. This may create a spurious rare-male effect on some occasions. When no account is taken of this storage effect in an experimental setup designed to show rare-male mating advantage, bias in favor of a raremale effect may result. It is shown that merely by storing the rare males singly and the common males in groups, with males not differing in any other respect, a very strong spurious rare-male effect can be produced. Similarly, it is shown that a spurious rare-female effect is possible too. It is proposed that the very strong rare-male effect for pepperment scent as found by Dal Molin [(1979).Am. Nat. 113:951–954] is merely a result of such a bias. The relevance for natural populations of the mating advantage associated with the single housing condition is discussed. In the experiments designed to show a spurious rare-male effect, mating chambers of two different sizes were used. It is shown that sexual selection is more severe in the small chambers, for both males and females.     

Minority mating advantage of certain eye color mutants ofDrosophila melanogaster. I. Multiple-choice and single-female tests

Alleles at the brown locus ofDrosophila melanogaster combined with homozygous scarlet provide a useful model to demonstrate minority advantage of males in mating. Heterozygotes with orange (O) eyes equal in numbers to homozygotes with red (R) eyes (1010 in both sexes) displayed no bias favoring either eye color, but each eye color was favored when males occurred in a minority ratio (218). In direct observation of single females with equal numbers of males (33) as controls,O males courted less and more slowly thanR males, but females mated with either type without bias. When unequal (41), the minority males were successful at more than twice the frequency expected. Whether successful or not, the minority males did not change their level of courtship, and thus cannot be said to compensate for their frequency in any way. The time between first courtship and mating was less for the minority males than for the majority males. We discard the hypothesis that the minority male will be accepted immediately or ahead of a majority male, because the opposite tended to occur: that if a minority male courted first he was less likely to be successful than if he waited until the majority courted. Our results then are in conformity with the hypothesis that a female samples males and their courtship cues, thus becoming habituated to the majority of the first courting male, but she accepts a male with a cue different from that which she originally detected but avoided. That male is most often the minority.This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grants GB-34206 to August 31, 1974, and BMS 72-02110 after that date.     

Minority mating advantage of certain eye color mutants ofDrosophila melanogaster. III. Female discrimination and genetic background

A repetition of certain experiments done 2 years previously with two eye color mutants,brown andscarlet, inDrosophila melanogaster was undertaken to reconfirm results; however, initial tests revealed that strains or conditions had changed so that females were less discriminating. Testing was undertaken with changes in genetic background and certain laboratory conditions, with single females courted by equal numbers of two eye color types of males (3 red,R: 3 orange,O). These eye colors were produced as (1) mutants off the shelf, (2) recombinants from an outcross to a wild-type strain (CS), (3) mutants as in Experiment 1 but with male types stored either together or separately, and (4) recombinants from a double outcross of flies from Experiment 2 to hybrids from two additional wild strains,LS andOR. Experiment 4 producedR andO males that courted nearly equally (as in previous experiments), in contrast with about 70% courtship byR males in the other experiments. Females discriminated in favor of those second to court in G₀, G₁, and a repeat of G₀; however, with two generations of inbreeding, discrimination by this criterion lessened to become nonsignificant. In Experiments 1 and 2,O females favored second-courting males, butR females in hose experiments and all females in Experiment 3 mated more randomly. Effects of storing males either together or separately were not significant. About 20–30% of the females (low threshold) were highly receptive immediately after first courtship. Those trials plus any in which only a single type of male courted were omitted from estimations of female discrimination; a possible bias incurred by such omission against females that might have initial preferences was found to be nonsignificant. Discriminating ability was discussed as a fitness property inDrosophila populations.This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant DEB 79-03259.     

A Family Study of Autism: Cognitive Patterns and Levels in Parents and Siblings

First-degree relatives of 99 autism probands and of 36 Down's syndrome controls were assessed with standardised tests of intellectual functioning, reading, and spelling. Higher mean verbal IQ scores, and discrepancies in favour of verbal scores, were characteristic of autism relatives. No consistent differences were found on performance scales, reading, and spelling tests. Among autism relatives, siblings affected with the broad phenotype of autism had significantly lower IQ scores and poorer reading and spelling performances than unaffected siblings. However, the small size of the cognitive difference and the lack of a distinctive cognitive profile indicates that standardised cognitive measures used in this study are unlikely to improve the operationalised definition of the broad phenotype of autism. The slightly superior verbal performance of relatives in the autism group might represent some form of heterozygote advantage.     

中医组建卒中单元优势的初步探讨

卒中单元是一种整合医疗,它的组建提高了卒中患者的疗效.笔者通过临床的实践发现中医学在治疗卒中方面与卒中单元有许多共同之处,且存在着一定的优势.笔者认为,应因势利导,在组建卒中单元基础上,发扬中医特色,进一步完善卒中单元.     

静脉药物配置中心的工作标准及优势

静脉药物配置中心的成立,彻底消除了传统静脉药物配置中存在的种种弊端,最大限度地保证了对人体的安全性,有利于推广合理用药,实施"药品共享",减轻临床护士工作量.     

软肝化纤丸治疗慢性乙型肝炎合并早期肝硬化40例临床分析

目的探讨软肝化纤丸治疗慢性乙型肝炎（CHB）合并早期肝硬化患者的临床疗效。方法将慢性乙型肝炎合并早期肝硬化患者81例随机分为治疗组（40例）与对照组（41例）。治疗组给予软肝化纤丸治疗；对照组用鳖甲软肝片、利加隆（水飞蓟素胶囊），疗程3个月。观察治疗前后肝功（ALT、AST、ALB、TBiL）和肝纤维化（HA、IV-C、LN）等指标的变化情况。结果疗程结束后，治疗组患脾大、门静脉增宽、肝纤维化指标明显好转，与对照组比较差异有显著性（P〈0．05或P〈0．01）。结论软肝化纤丸治疗慢性乙型肝炎合并早期肝硬化疗效优于鳖甲软肝片，利加隆。