The influence of environmental and health indicators on premature mortality: An empirical analysis of the City of Toronto's 140 neighborhoods

The objective of this paper was to assess the link between premature mortality and a combination of neighbourhood contextual (environmental and health) and compositional (socioeconomic and demographic) characteristics. We statistically and spatially examined six environmental variables (ultrafine particles, carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic pollutants, pollution released to air, tree cover, and walkability index), six health service indicators (number health providers, breast, colorectal and cervical cancer screening uptake rates, student nutrition program uptake rates, and healthy food index), and eight socioeconomic indicators (total income, Gini coefficient, two age categories – below and above 40 years, proportion of females to males, visible minorities, Indigenous peoples, education, less than grade 9) among 140 neighbourhoods of the City of Toronto in Ontario (Canada). We applied principal component analysis to identify patterns and to reduce the number of explanatory variables into combined component axes that represent unique variation in these confounded and overlapping factors. We then applied regression analysis to model the relationship between the indices of enviro-health and socioeconomics and their potential relationship with premature mortality. Residual spatial analysis was used to investigate any remaining spatial structure (such as neighbourhoods with higher residual premature mortality rates). Neighbourhood Equity Index was correlated with our enviro-health and socioeconomic indices. Premature mortality within neighbourhoods was predicted by poor cancer screenings, pollution, lack of tree canopy, increased uptake of student nutrition programs and high walkability index. A negative association between premature mortality and pollution was associated low walkability index and presence of visible minorities within neighbourhoods. There was some unexplained residual spatial variation in our model of premature mortality - especially along the shores of Lake Ontario and in neighbourhoods with major highways or road corridors: premature mortality in Toronto neighbourhoods was higher than expected along highway-corridor neighbourhoods and shorelines. Our analysis revealed a significant relationship between neighbourhood contextual features – both environmental and health – and premature mortality, suggesting that these contextual components of neighbourhoods can predict rates of urban premature mortality in Toronto.     

Tailored Intervention for Smoking Reduction and Cessation for Young and Socially Disadvantaged Women During Pregnancy

Rates of smoking during pregnancy remain high in Canada, and cessation rates are low among women who are younger than 24 years and who are socially disadvantaged, that is, have few social and economic resources because of poverty, violence, or mental health issues. On the basis of findings from literature reviews and consultation with policy makers, we developed and operationalized four approaches that can be used by health care providers to tailor interventions for tobacco use in pregnancy. These four approaches are woman centered, trauma informed, harm reducing, and equitable. Public health initiatives that address smoking in young and socially disadvantaged women could be more sharply focused by shifting to such tailored approaches that are grounded in social justice aims, span pre- and postpregnancy periods, and can be used to address women’s social contexts and concerns.     

The poor pay more: Health-related inequality in Thailand

This paper examines the equality of utilization for equal need and equity of out-of-pocket expenditure for health services in a large urban area in Thailand. Data from a household health interview survey were used to explore patterns of perceived morbidity, utilization of various treatment sources, and out-of-pocket payment. Financial access to health care, as reflected in medical benefit/insurance cover, appeared to influence reported illness and hospitalization rates. Gross lack of access to health care amongst lower socio-economic groups was not the main problem in this densely populated urban area because people could choose and use alternative health services according to their ability and willingness to pay. The corollary, however, was an inequitable pattern of out-of-pocket health expenditure by income quintile and per capita. The underprivileged were more likely to pay out of their own pocket for their health problems, and to pay out of proportion to their household income when compared with more privileged groups. Furthermore, the underprivileged were least likely to be covered by government health benefit schemes, in contrast in particular to civil servants, who paid less out of pocket and did not contribute to their medical benefit fund. The private health sector (private clinics and private hospitals) was the major provider of health care to urban dwellers for both outpatient and inpatient services. Policy options for the short and long term to improve the equity of payment systems for health care are discussed.     

Adult Liver Transplant Candidate Attitudes Toward Graft Sharing Are Not Obstacles to Split Liver Transplantation

Split liver transplantation (SLT) benefits society by increasing the total number of transplants that can be performed, but it is yet unknown if a decreased post-transplant survival (in comparison to whole liver transplantation) would make participation in SLT less appealing to adult liver transplant candidates. A 20-item questionnaire was administered to 50 adult candidates to assess attitudes toward SLT and organ sharing. The overall attitudes of 60% of participants were classified as utilitarian (maximizing benefit to greatest number of candidates), while 26% were classified as self-preserving (maximizing individual benefit) and 14% were undecided. Ninety percent of participants would be willing to share even if expected survival was less than that of whole liver transplantation, and 69% felt that pediatric candidates should have priority over adult candidates. In conclusion, attitudes toward graft sharing and the possibility of compromised survival benefit are not barriers to SLT for most adult liver transplant candidates.     

Development and evaluation of an allocation committee to distribute community placements on an equitable basis between universities: Our experience with the University Placement Allocation Committee

The present paper outlines the development and evaluation of an allocation committee to distribute community placements on an equitable basis between universities. Although based on our experience in South Australia with the University Placement Allocation Committee (UPAC), the primary goal is to outline the steps that would be useful if placement coordinators at other universities in Australia decided to establish and maintain an allocation committee. A survey of field supervisors was also conducted and field supervisors endorsed UPAC as a constructive mechanism for allocating community placements.     

区域性卫生规划及卫生资源配置标准的比较分析

目的：比较分析各地区域性卫生规划和卫生资源配置标准，为制定下阶段的区域卫生规划和资源配置标准提供科学依据。方法：采用文献定性和定量的分析方法，比较不同地区区域性卫生规划文献发表的数量、文献的主题和卫生资源配置标准等。结果：东部地区所发表的论文数量多于西部地区，但各地区发表文献的主题无显著差异；每千人口床位数、每千人口执业医师数、每千人口的执业护士数、每百万人口的CT和MRI数东部地区均高于西部地区；四川省各项指标低于西部地区。结论：区域性卫生规划和卫生资源的配置是改善和提高区域内的卫生综合服务能力以及卫生资源利用效率的重要措施，各地区的资源配置应与社会经济的发展相一致，要充分体现公平和效率、合理和实用的原则。     

Regional Variations in Peer Reviewed Liver Allocation Under the MELD System

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) is used to assign priority for liver transplantation candidates. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) approved recognized exceptional diagnoses (RED's) for which MELD fails to accurately measure priority. Centers can request increased MELD points in cases not recognized by this policy (non-RED's). Our aim was to compare regional practices to justify non-RED requests for MELD adjustments. The UNOS/OPTN database was queried to extract all adult cases for which a non-RED MELD adjustment was requested from 2/27/02 until 8/27/03. The data were stratified by region and justification. Data for 29,510 listings were available. 26,947 had complete diagnosis information. There were 827 non-RED requests of which 477 (57.7%) petitions were approved by the regional review boards (RRBs). The approval rate varied significantly among regions (range: 28-75%, p<0.0001). The most common non-RED's were complications of portal hypertension (48%). The percentage of patients listed with non-RED's varied significantly among regions (0.7-8.3 %, p<0.0001), as did the proportion of patients transplanted with non-RED's (2.1-31.9%, p<0.0001). Demographics did not differ among regions requesting non-REDs.Widespread regional variations exist in the handling of requests for non-REDs. These variations point to the need for reform to standard exception criteria.     

Should equity in health be target number 1?

Policy measures to reduce socioeconomic health differences (SEHD)must be preceded by an analysis of the possibilities and desirabilityof a reduction. This paper argues that it is necessary to pursueequality in health, conceived as equal opportunities to achievehealth. This principle is justified as part of the principleof maximizing individual freedom of choice, and requires thateveryone has the opportunity to be as healthy as possible. Bymeans of this principle a distinction can be made between unjust,unavoidable, and acceptable health inequalities. The determinantsof SEHD which lead to inequalities considered unjust must besubject to policy. These are living conditions (physical andsocial environment and health care) and conditions of choice(e.g. the knowledge of an individual about the health risksof a certain behaviour). Even if SEHD are considered inequities,sometimes conflicting interests will make it difficult to proposea health policy to redress these inequities. These are partlythe consequence of the intersectoral character of a policy aimedat equality of opportunities to attain health, in which theimportance of health has to be weighed against other goals.Moreover the impact of such a policy on the individual freechoice has to be critically weighed. Finally in the contextof health care policy, conflicts between the principle of equalityand maximizing health can be expected.