排序方式: 共有31条查询结果,搜索用时 312 毫秒
1.
2.
Jorge E. Esteves Marianne Bennison Oliver P. Thomson 《International journal of osteopathic medicine : IJOM》2013,16(4):231-239
Osteopathic pre-registration education aims to produce competent autonomous practitioners who are capable of dealing with and mastering the uncertainty of clinical practice. The students' preparedness for clinical practice is typically assessed using high fidelity long case exams, i.e., clinical competence assessments using real patients in a real clinical setting. In this paper, we critically review relevant literature concerning the validity, reliability and underpinning educational theory of the Script Concordance Test (SCT), and describe the development, implementation and initial critical evaluation of this assessment tool in the osteopathy programme at Oxford Brookes University. The SCT is an assessment tool aimed at assessing clinical reasoning in the context of uncertainty, which is being increasingly used as an assessment strategy in the field of medical education. Despite its limitations, we believe that the SCT is a useful addition to assessing clinical reasoning in osteopathy, particularly in situations of clinical uncertainty. It has the potential to effectively assess the students' diagnostic reasoning, evaluation of risk and patient safety, and ethical aspects of osteopathic care. Critically, it provides an important vehicle to assess the students' preparedness for autonomous clinical practice using a standardised format. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
《俄藏黑水城文献》第10册所载编号为ИHB.NO.4384的医方计9页,其中第7页和第4页缀合后为一完整医方.此医方原无方名,其药物组成为川乌头、苍术、茴香.经核查汉文医籍,此医方应定名“三仙丹”,其来源可上溯至《陈氏经验方》.《陈氏经验方》已佚,但从其他医籍引文来看,其行文平铺直叙,与这则西夏文医方所用的歌诀形式不同.故,这则西夏文医方所依据的文本,很有可能为“淳祐”之后的某种汉文医籍. 相似文献
7.
8.
F. Cohen Aubart T. Papo A. Hertig M.-C. Renaud O. Steichen Z. Amoura M. Braun O. Palombi A. Duguet D. Roux 《La Revue de médecine interne / fondée ... par la Société nationale francaise de médecine interne》2021,42(4):243-250
IntroductionScript concordance tests (SCTs) have been developed to assess clinical reasoning in uncertain situations. Their reliability for the evaluation of undergraduate medical students has not been evaluated.MethodsTwenty internal medicine SCT cases were implemented in undergraduate students of two programs. The results obtained on the SCTs were compared to those obtained by the same students on clinical-based classical multiple-choice questions (MCQs).ResultsA total of 551/883 students (62%) answered the SCTs. The mean aggregate score (based on a total 20 points) was 11.54 (3.29). The success rate and mean score for each question did not differ depending on the modal response but the discrimination rate did. The results obtained by the students on the SCT test correlated with their scores on the MCQ tests. Among students, 446/517 (86%) considered the SCTs to be more difficult than classical MCQs, although the mean score did not differ between the SCT and MCQ tests.ConclusionThe use of SCTs is a feasible option for the evaluation of undergraduate students. The SCT scores correlated with those obtained on classical MCQ tests. 相似文献
9.
10.