Assessing Antibiotic Adherence and Improving Antibiotic Stewardship in Common Interventional Radiology Procedures

PurposeIn 2018, The Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (JVIR) updated its guidelines regarding periprocedural antibiotics. However, some institutions are slower to adopt these new guidelines. Additionally, antibiotic-resistant bacteria and sepsis are serious concerns due in part to incorrect usage of antibiotics. The purpose of this study is to assess institutional adherence to 2018 JVIR guidelines for the purpose of improving antibiotic stewardship.Materials and methodsA total of 800 cases over a 10-month time period were retrospectively identified and charted following the release of guidelines. Inclusion criteria for the study were adults aged 21 years or older undergoing mediport placement, tunneled central line (TCL) placement, nephrostomy tube exchange, percutaneous biliary drain, or cholecystostomy tube exchange. Exclusion criteria included immunocompromised and pregnant individuals as 2018 guidelines may not fit these patient populations. Guideline adherence for each procedure was recorded as a percentage; the timing of the antibiotic usage was also recorded and compared to the guidelines (within 60 minutes before incision).ResultsIn total, 49 mediport placements, 118 tunneled central line placements – 44 hemodialysis (HD) catheters and 74 nonhemodialysis (non-HD) catheters, 100 nephrostomy exchanges, and 82 biliary tube exchanges were included. Antibiotics were used in 83.6% (41/49) of mediport patients, 11.3% (5/44) of non-HD TCL patients, 20.5% (15/74) of HD TCL patients, 55% (55/100) nephrostomy tube changes, and 65.4% (55/84) of biliary or cholecystostomy tube exchanges. Out of those given prophylaxis, guideline-recommended antibiotics were used in 100% (41/41) of mediport, 100% (20/20) of TCL (both HD and non-HD catheters), 9% (5/55) of nephrostomy tube exchanges, and 1.8% (1/55) of biliary tube exchanges. Guideline-recommended timing was followed in 75.3% across all cases (ranging from 72.2% in mediports to 79.3% in biliary exchanges).ConclusionThis study of antibiotic practices at a single university-based academic institution revealed that antibiotic usage is not fully up to date with 2018 guidelines. For mediports, non-HD TCL placements, and nephrostomy tube exchanges, institutional changes should be made to reduce periprocedural antibiotic use, as antibiotics are no longer recommended for these procedures. For HD TCL and biliary exchanges, proper adherence to recommended prophylactic antibiotics should be followed. In addition, education about the correct antibiotic timing should be emphasized to increase compliance with guidelines.     

某高校新生体检结果分析

目的 分析某高校入学新生的体检结果,为制定健康管理措施提供依据。方法 开展某高校入学新生体检(内科、外科、五官科、实验室检查),对血压、肝功与血脂、体质指数、视力、脊柱侧弯等结果进行分析。结果 共调查男生357人,女生641人。高血压患病率1.80%(男2.24%、女1.56%),血脂升高率14.83%(男15.97%、女14.20%),转氨酶升高率4.81%(男8.12%、女2.96%),超重率17.64%(男24.93%、女13.97%),肥胖率7.62%(男12.32%、女4.99%),视力不良率79.36%(男73.67%、女82.53%),脊柱侧弯率1.60%(男1.12%、女1.87%)。不同性别的体质量组构成、血压分型构成、视力不良率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);不同体质量组的收缩压升高率、血脂升高率、转氨酶升高率、脊柱侧弯率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);超重和肥胖组的收缩压升高率、血脂升高率高于其他组;肥胖组的转氨酶升高率高于其他组;轻体质量组的脊柱侧弯率高于其他组。结论 大学新生的视力不良率和非正常体质量率较高,高血压、血脂异常、肝功异常、脊柱侧弯检出率较低,女生的健康状况优于男生。应重视大学生的健康状况,制定综合干预措施,做好学生健康管理工作。     

CT与MRI对脑梗死后出血性转变的诊断价值

目的探讨CT与MRI在脑梗死后出血性转变(HT)中的诊断价值。方法对2011-01—2014-04我院收治的45例HT患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,对CT与MRI的检查结果进行对比。结果45例患者中,脑内血肿34例(75.6%),脑梗死病灶内片状、斑点状或条状出血11例(24.4%)。其中大面积脑梗死继发出血24例(53.3%),中等面积继发出血15例(33.3%),小面积脑梗死继发出血6例(13.3%);CT检出HT 10例(22.2%),MRI检出45例(100%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05);在对不同部位的HT检查中,CT检出幕上出血9例(20.0%),幕下出血1例(2.2%);MRI检出幕上出血39例(86.7%),幕下出血6例(13.3%)。MRI对幕上及幕下出血的检出率均优于CT(P0.05)。结论在HT的诊断中,MRI比CT更加准确和敏感,在判断出血时间、指导临床治疗以及预后判断中具有重要意义。     

学龄期近视进展儿童调节功能的客观检查和分析

目的　对学龄期近视进展儿童进行调节功能的客观检查与分析，观察调节功能与近视进展之间的相关性。方法　选取2017年至2018年在首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院视光学门诊定期就诊的71名学龄期儿童为研究对象，根据受试者近年的屈光度进展速度，按≤0.50 D·a^-1、>0.50~1.00 D·a^-1、>1.00~1.50 D·a^-1、>1.50 D·a^-1分为4组，使用人眼调节分析仪对受试者进行调节功能的客观测量与分析，记录不同调节刺激视标下4组的客观调节反应值和客观调节微波动值，并作对比。结果　在所有调节视标上，各组随着调节刺激幅度增加，客观调节反应值也逐渐增加，4组在不同调节刺激视标下的客观调节反应值及平均的客观调节反应值差异均无统计学意义（均为P＞0.05）。≤0.50 D·a^-1、>0.50~1.00 D·a^-1、>1.00~1.50 D·a^-1、>1.50 D·a^-1近视进展速度组调节微波动值分别为（62.2±5.6）D、（62.5±5.3）D、（66.5±6.0）D和（58.0±6.5）D，4组间差异有统计学意义（F=6.424，P=0.001），在+0.50~-0.50 D、-2.00 D调节刺激视标下，4组的客观调节微波动值比较差异均有统计学意义（均为P＜0.05），在其余调节刺激视标下差异均无统计学意义（均为P＞0.05）。结论　对于学龄期儿童的近视进展速度，客观调节微波动值相对于客观调节反应值可能是一个更为敏感的相关指标。