CARTO指导下三尖瓣环峡部解剖特征对线性消融的影响

目的探讨CARTO系统指导下三尖瓣环峡部(CTI)的解剖学特点及其对线性消融的影响。方法接受CTI线性消融的患者,其中典型心房扑动5例、阵发性心房颤动(简称房颤)10例及持续性房颤40例。利用CARTO系统对三尖瓣峡部长度、跨度及最深深度进行测量并根据深度分为囊袋型、凹陷型和平坦型。根据CTI长度将患者分为两组,长组≥35 mm,短组<35 mm。记录CTI消融成功所需时间,同时收集相关临床资料。结果不同类型峡部的长度、跨度、深度及消融所需时间分别为:囊袋型23例(45.5±7.5 mm,38.0±7.4 mm,-9.5±2.8 mm,1707±615 s),凹陷型10例(42.7±9.0 mm,37.2±6.7 mm,-4.2±0.8 mm,1 327±832 s),平坦型22例(36.1±8.9 mm,34.3±8.0 mm,-1.0±3.1 mm,927±404 s)。囊袋型CTI长度、消融时间长于平坦型,囊袋型CTI深度均较平坦型和囊袋型为深(P<0.05)。消融时间与深度正相关(r=0.505,P<0.001)。长组较短组所需消融时间长(1485±681 s vs 803±305 s,P<0.001)。长组以囊袋型为主(48.8%),短组以平坦型为主(78.6%)。结论 CTI线性消融时间与其最深深度相关,峡部越深则消融越费时,囊袋型消融所需时间最多。若CTI长度≥35 mm(更常见于囊袋型CTI),其消融时间则显著延长。     

心房颤动射频消融术后心包积液的处理及危险因素分析

目的 探讨心房颤动(房颤)患者导管射频消融术后发生心包积液的处理并分析其相关危险因素.方法 156例房颤患者[男108例,女48例,阵发性房颤114例,平均年龄(57.6±11.3)岁]在三维标测系统及环状标测电极导管指导下行射频消融治疗[包括环肺静脉电隔离、线性消融及(或)碎裂电位消融],记录消融过程、部位、时间等因素,对术后证实出现心包积液的患者根据不同情况(心脏压塞或单纯心包积液)进行不同处理,并门诊随访心脏超声等.对可能影响术后出现单纯心包积液的因素进行分析.结果 所有156例患者均完成肺静脉电隔离,共有16例(10.3%)出现心包积液,其中1例(0.6%)术后即刻出现心脏压塞,予心包穿刺后开胸探查抢救好转,随访18个月无特殊;另15例(9.6%)术后出现少量心包积液但无心脏压塞表现(单纯心包积液组),经保守治疗后好转,其中6例患者的心包积液在术后3个月消失,而另外9例则在术后6个月消失.单因素分析发现,单纯心包积液组与无心包积液组在性别组成(P<0.01)、有无行冠状静脉窦消融(P=0.026)、有无行碎裂电位消融(P=0.037)、有无行上腔静脉消融(P=0.041)等方面差异有统计学意义.Logistic多因素回归分析发现,女性[B=3.594,exp(b)=36.4,95%CI:4.2-312.1,P=0.001]、行冠状静脉窦消融[B=2.419,exp(b)=11.2,95%CI:1.0～124.6,P=0.049]是术后出现单纯心包积液的独立危险因素.结论 房颤射频消融术后心包积液的发生率较高,但绝大部分并不出现心脏压塞,可经保守治疗得到改善,而不需要进一步有创治疗.女性及行冠状静脉窦消融是术后出现单纯心包积液的独立危险因素,房颤射频消融时应谨慎对待该部位的消融,以减少术后心包积液的发生.     

持续性心房颤动射频消融术中不同抗凝方案与围术期血栓事件的关系

Objective The relationships between different anticoagulation methods during radiofre-quency catheter ablation(RFCA) of persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation (AF)and thromboembolic events in our center were evaluated. Methods From July 2004 to October 2007, RFCA was consecutively performed in 145 persistent/permanent AF patients. Anticoagulation with warfarin was administrated in all patients before op-eration for at least 1 month, with the international normalized ratio(INR) maintained between 2.0 and 3.0. Be-fore procedure,warfarin was discontinued and replaced by low molecular weight heparin(LMWH). After atrial septum puncture,a total of 5000 U tmfractioned heparin(UFH) were given to patients of group Ⅰ who under-went the ablation from July 2004 to January 2006,while patients of group Ⅱ who underwent the ablation from February 2006 to October 2007 were heparinized(100 U/Kg) according to their weights. During operation, 1000 U UFH was appended per hour. After procedure, LMWH was used for 3 days while warfarin was initiated at the same time and continued for at least 3 months. Results Four patients in group Ⅰ (64 patients ,51 men)experi-enced thrombosis or embolism during or after ablation. One female persistent AF patient in the group Ⅱ (81 pa-tients,67 men)who didn' t fulfill the anticoagulatian therapy experienced TIA after ablation. No thrombeembolic event was identified in other patients of group Ⅱ who fulfilled the anticoagulation therapy. The incidence of thromboembolic event of persistent/permanent AF patients who fulfilled the anticoagulation therapy in the group Ⅱwas lower than that of group Ⅰ (4/64 vs. 0/80, P = 0.037). Conclusions Strengthen the anticoagulation therapy according to patients' weights during radiofrequency ablation could significantly decrease the incidence of thromboembolic event in patients with persistent/permanent AF.     

右室流出道与右室心尖部起搏对心脏收缩功能和左室重构的影响

目的评价右室流出道(RVOT)和右室心尖部(RVA)起搏对心脏收缩同步性、收缩功能和左室重构的影响。方法82例高度或III度房室传导阻滞患者随机分为RVOT起搏组(A组,n=43)和RVA起搏组(B组,n=39),以术前左室12节段达峰时间标准差(Ts-SD)是否>32.6ms对两组患者进行亚组分组,Ts-SD>32.6ms者为A1亚组与B1亚组,Ts-SD≤32.6ms为A2亚组与B2亚组。于术前及术后6个月分别进行超声心动图检查,测量舒张末左室容积(LVEDV)、收缩末左室容积(LVESV)、左室射血分数(LVEF),并采集组织多普勒图像(TDI)进行脱机分析,测量主动脉瓣射血前时间(APET)、肺动脉瓣射血前时间(PPET)、左室12节段收缩达峰时间(Ts),计算室间电机械延迟(IVMD)和Ts-SD。结果术后6个月,两组的IVMD均较术前增加;两组Ts-SD与术前比无差异。亚组分析表明术前同步性好的A2、B2亚组术后Ts-SD升高;术前同步性差的A1亚组术后Ts-SD降低。术后6个月两组LVEDV、LVESV及LVEF与术前比较均无差异,组间比较亦无差异。结论RVOT和RVA起搏短期内对左室收缩功能及左室重构均无影响,术前收缩不同步者可从RVOT起搏中获益。     

持续性心房颤动射频消融术中不同抗凝方案与围术期血栓事件的关系

Objective The relationships between different anticoagulation methods during radiofre-quency catheter ablation(RFCA) of persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation (AF)and thromboembolic events in our center were evaluated. Methods From July 2004 to October 2007, RFCA was consecutively performed in 145 persistent/permanent AF patients. Anticoagulation with warfarin was administrated in all patients before op-eration for at least 1 month, with the international normalized ratio(INR) maintained between 2.0 and 3.0. Be-fore procedure,warfarin was discontinued and replaced by low molecular weight heparin(LMWH). After atrial septum puncture,a total of 5000 U tmfractioned heparin(UFH) were given to patients of group Ⅰ who under-went the ablation from July 2004 to January 2006,while patients of group Ⅱ who underwent the ablation from February 2006 to October 2007 were heparinized(100 U/Kg) according to their weights. During operation, 1000 U UFH was appended per hour. After procedure, LMWH was used for 3 days while warfarin was initiated at the same time and continued for at least 3 months. Results Four patients in group Ⅰ (64 patients ,51 men)experi-enced thrombosis or embolism during or after ablation. One female persistent AF patient in the group Ⅱ (81 pa-tients,67 men)who didn' t fulfill the anticoagulatian therapy experienced TIA after ablation. No thrombeembolic event was identified in other patients of group Ⅱ who fulfilled the anticoagulation therapy. The incidence of thromboembolic event of persistent/permanent AF patients who fulfilled the anticoagulation therapy in the group Ⅱwas lower than that of group Ⅰ (4/64 vs. 0/80, P = 0.037). Conclusions Strengthen the anticoagulation therapy according to patients' weights during radiofrequency ablation could significantly decrease the incidence of thromboembolic event in patients with persistent/permanent AF.     

误穿锁骨下动脉致纵膈血肿二例

2例误穿锁骨下动脉后及时退针并进行压迫止血,未进入导丝或扩张动脉,但仍导致纵膈血肿,分析其原因并根据患者具体情况进行不同处理。仅误穿锁骨下动脉致纵膈血肿的发生率较低,但需谨慎对待,并应综合考虑给予正确处理,以减少风险,同时不延误治疗。     

持续性心房颤动射频消融术中不同抗凝方案与围术期血栓事件的关系

Objective The relationships between different anticoagulation methods during radiofre-quency catheter ablation(RFCA) of persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation (AF)and thromboembolic events in our center were evaluated. Methods From July 2004 to October 2007, RFCA was consecutively performed in 145 persistent/permanent AF patients. Anticoagulation with warfarin was administrated in all patients before op-eration for at least 1 month, with the international normalized ratio(INR) maintained between 2.0 and 3.0. Be-fore procedure,warfarin was discontinued and replaced by low molecular weight heparin(LMWH). After atrial septum puncture,a total of 5000 U tmfractioned heparin(UFH) were given to patients of group Ⅰ who under-went the ablation from July 2004 to January 2006,while patients of group Ⅱ who underwent the ablation from February 2006 to October 2007 were heparinized(100 U/Kg) according to their weights. During operation, 1000 U UFH was appended per hour. After procedure, LMWH was used for 3 days while warfarin was initiated at the same time and continued for at least 3 months. Results Four patients in group Ⅰ (64 patients ,51 men)experi-enced thrombosis or embolism during or after ablation. One female persistent AF patient in the group Ⅱ (81 pa-tients,67 men)who didn' t fulfill the anticoagulatian therapy experienced TIA after ablation. No thrombeembolic event was identified in other patients of group Ⅱ who fulfilled the anticoagulation therapy. The incidence of thromboembolic event of persistent/permanent AF patients who fulfilled the anticoagulation therapy in the group Ⅱwas lower than that of group Ⅰ (4/64 vs. 0/80, P = 0.037). Conclusions Strengthen the anticoagulation therapy according to patients' weights during radiofrequency ablation could significantly decrease the incidence of thromboembolic event in patients with persistent/permanent AF.     

持续性心房颤动射频消融术中不同抗凝方案与围术期血栓事件的关系

Objective The relationships between different anticoagulation methods during radiofre-quency catheter ablation(RFCA) of persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation (AF)and thromboembolic events in our center were evaluated. Methods From July 2004 to October 2007, RFCA was consecutively performed in 145 persistent/permanent AF patients. Anticoagulation with warfarin was administrated in all patients before op-eration for at least 1 month, with the international normalized ratio(INR) maintained between 2.0 and 3.0. Be-fore procedure,warfarin was discontinued and replaced by low molecular weight heparin(LMWH). After atrial septum puncture,a total of 5000 U tmfractioned heparin(UFH) were given to patients of group Ⅰ who under-went the ablation from July 2004 to January 2006,while patients of group Ⅱ who underwent the ablation from February 2006 to October 2007 were heparinized(100 U/Kg) according to their weights. During operation, 1000 U UFH was appended per hour. After procedure, LMWH was used for 3 days while warfarin was initiated at the same time and continued for at least 3 months. Results Four patients in group Ⅰ (64 patients ,51 men)experi-enced thrombosis or embolism during or after ablation. One female persistent AF patient in the group Ⅱ (81 pa-tients,67 men)who didn' t fulfill the anticoagulatian therapy experienced TIA after ablation. No thrombeembolic event was identified in other patients of group Ⅱ who fulfilled the anticoagulation therapy. The incidence of thromboembolic event of persistent/permanent AF patients who fulfilled the anticoagulation therapy in the group Ⅱwas lower than that of group Ⅰ (4/64 vs. 0/80, P = 0.037). Conclusions Strengthen the anticoagulation therapy according to patients' weights during radiofrequency ablation could significantly decrease the incidence of thromboembolic event in patients with persistent/permanent AF.     

心脏介入专科护士核心能力自评问卷的编制及信效度检验

目的 构建心脏介入专科护士核心能力自评问卷并检验其信效度。方法 2022年11月，以通过Delphi法和层次分析法建立的心脏介入专科护士核心能力框架为依据，编制自评问卷，并在全国范围内开展心脏介入专科护士核心能力的调查，根据调查结果开展自评问卷的信效度检验。结果 心脏介入专科护士核心能力自评问卷包括5个维度、45个条目。探索性因子分析累计方差贡献率为71.447%，各条目在维度上的因子载荷为0.538~0.856。验证性因子分析，修正后卡方/自由度为2.683，比较拟合指数为0.901，非规准适配度指数为0.889。自评问卷的Cronbach’s α 系数为0.973，折半信度为0.922，各维度的Cronbach’s α系数为 0.844～0.964，折半信度为 0.780～0.946，14天重测信度为0.681~1.000。结论 心脏介入专科护士核心能力自评问卷具有较好的信效度，可用于心脏介入专科护士核心能力的自评；护理管理者可将其作为岗位调配的依据。     

心脏介入专科护士核心能力影响因素分析

目的 调查心脏介入专科护士核心能力现状并分析其影响因素，为相关部门制定和完善介入专科护士培养及认证标准提供参考。方法 采用目的抽样法，选取全国心血管病护理及技术培训基地和其辐射范围内医院的534名心脏介入专科护士，采用心脏介入专科护士核心能力自评问卷进行调查分析。结果 心脏介入专科护士核心能力总分为95.11(87.44,98.67)分；采用分类树模型及有序多分类logistic回归分析均显示，外出学习或进修经历、工作压力是心脏介入专科护士核心能力的影响因素(均P<0.05)。结论 心脏介入专科护士核心能力总体水平较高，护理管理者应关注并适度减轻护士工作压力，给予学习和进修机会，提升其核心能力。