Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Lamotrigine in Treatment-Resistant Generalised Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose : Lamotrigine (LTG) is recognised as effective add-on therapy for focal epilepsies, but this is the first double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in treatmentresistant generalised epilepsy.
Methods: The study consisted of 2 × 8-week treatment periods followed by a 4-week washout period. Patients received doses of either 75 or 150 mg daily, depending on their concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Long-term continuation was offered at the end of the study with open-label LTG.
Results: Five centres in Australia recruited 26 patients who were having absence, myoclonic, or generalized tonic-clonic seizures or a combination of these. Twenty-two patients completed the study. There was a significant reduction in frequency of both tonic-clonic and absence seizure types with LTG. A 250% decrease in seizures was observed for tonic-clonic seizures in 50% of cases and for absence seizures in 33% of evaluable cases. Rash was the only adverse effect causing discontinuation. Twenty-three of 26 opted for open-label LTG, with 20 still receiving LTG for a mean of 26 months. In these 20, 80% had 250% seizure reduction and five (25%) were seizure free.
Conclusions: This study shows that LTG is effective add-on therapy in patients with refractory generalised epilepsies. Statistically significant reduction in seizures in both absence and tonic-clonic seizure types was seen even with low doses of LTG.     

Clinical efficacy of zonisamide in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Korean multicentric experience

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of zonisamide (ZNS) as long-term adjunctive therapy in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). METHOD: We evaluated the seizure frequency, cognitive outcomes, and side effects of 62 LGS patients maintained on ZNS for at least 12 months in three tertiary centers. RESULTS: Of the 62 LGS patients maintained on ZNS, 3 (4.8%) had 100% seizure control; 14 (22.6%) had >75% to <100% reduction in seizure frequency; 15 (24.2%) had >50% to <75% reduction in seizure frequency; 6 (9.7%) had >0% to <50% reduction in seizure frequency, and 24 (38.7%) had no seizure reduction. Seizure outcomes were not related to seizure types or etiologies. Adverse events included somnolence and anorexia, but all were transient and successfully managed by careful follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that adjunctive treatment with ZNS is safe and effective in pediatric LGS patients.     

Lamotrigine–valproic acid combination therapy for medically refractory epilepsy

Purpose:   A retrospective study of lamotrigine (LTG)–valproic acid (VPA) combination therapy in medically refractory epilepsy.
Methods:   Patients were identified with an adult epilepsy clinic database and were included if they had been on LTG–VPA combination therapy for at least 6 months. Patient demographics and information about epilepsy type, severity, and degree of medical intractability were obtained by retrospective chart review. The primary outcome measure was change in baseline seizure frequency, and patients were stratified into three groups: (i) seizure-free, (ii) improved (at least 50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency), and (iii) not improved.
Results:   Thirty-five patients met all inclusion–exclusion criteria. Epilepsy type was generalized in 25 patients (71%) and partial in 10 patients (29%). Before LTG–VPA treatment, 27 of 35 (77%) experienced disabling seizures on a monthly basis, and 17 of 35 (49%) of patients had at least one disabling seizure per week. Patients had previously failed treatment with a median of five antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), alone or in combination. With LTG–VPA therapy, 18 (51.4%) remained completely seizure-free, four (11.4%) were improved, and 13 (37.1%) were unimproved. Median follow-up was 42 months. Of the 22 patients who improved, 11 had previously failed LTG and VPA monotherapy. There was no significant difference between improved and unimproved patients with respect to demographics, epilepsy type or severity, or number of previously failed AEDs.
Discussion:   The combination of LTG and VPA should be considered in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. The effectiveness of this combination appears to be independent of epilepsy type or patient demographics.     

Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy in children: More to VNS than seizure frequency reduction

Purpose :  Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is used increasingly as adjunctive therapy for refractory epilepsy. Studies of VNS in children report mainly seizure frequency reduction as a measure of efficacy and clinical details are often scanty. We report our experience with VNS in children with refractory epilepsy and emphasize the positive effects of VNS in terms of seizure severity.
Methods :  We reviewed 26 consecutive children who had VNS with a minimum follow-up period of 18 months. We examined their clinical characteristics, seizure types, seizure frequency, epilepsy syndrome diagnosis, and response to VNS in terms of seizure frequency and seizure severity.
Results :  Fifty-four percent of patients responded to VNS with ≥50% seizure frequency reduction. Patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and tonic seizures had a higher responder rate; 78% (seven of nine patients) (p < 0.01). Status epilepticus (SE) episodes were reduced or ceased in the four patients with recurrent SE. Seizure severity, duration, and recovery time decreased in all responders. Increased alertness was reported in all responders and three nonresponders.
Conclusion :  Decreased seizure severity, recovery time, abolition of daytime drop attacks, and reduced hospitalization due to SE improved patients' lives over and above the benefit from seizure frequency reduction.     

Epilepsy and antiepileptic drug therapy in juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

PURPOSE: To survey the characteristics of epilepsy in patients with juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (JNCL) and determine the antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment most suitable for these patients. METHODS: The study included 60 patients with JNCL; their mean age was 16.5 years (range 5-33). The age at onset of epilepsy, type of seizures, effect of the first AED on seizures, and the current seizure frequency and AED therapy were studied. The side effects of the AEDs were also clarified. RESULTS: Fifty of the 60 patients had epilepsy. Patients' first epileptic seizure occurred at a mean age of 10.0 years (range 5-16), the most common type being generalized seizures. As the first AED tried, valproate (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) appeared equally effective, with 80% of the patients responding to these AEDs. During the study year, the median seizure frequency was four seizures a year (range 0-120), and 72% of the patients had good or satisfactory seizure control (0-6 seizures a year). In the different AED therapy groups, the proportion of patients with good or satisfactory seizure control ranged from 25% to 100%. LTG in monotherapy or in combination with clonazepam (CZP) was superior to other AEDs or combinations, but VPA also seemed effective. Adverse effects leading to the discontinuation of an AED were observed in 25% of the patients, most frequently in patients receiving phenobarbital (PB). No patient receiving LTG had to discontinue the drug due to adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Epilepsy in JNCL can usually be successfully treated with the current AEDs. In Finnish patients with JNCL, treatment is based on LTG, or, secondarily, VPA. In combination therapy, CZP seems a valuable add-on AED.     

Lamotrigine in Treatment of 120 Children with Epilepsy

Summary: One hundred twenty children aged 10 months to 16 years 9 months were included in three studies with lamotrigine (LTG): a single-blind study (n = 60), a pharmacokinetic study (n = 23), and a compassionate group (n = 37). At 3 months, 11 patients had become seizure-free and 34 had >50% decrease in seizure frequency. The best results involved absence epilepsy, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), and other symptomatic generalized epilepsy. Forty-two patients were followed > 1 year, 22 for a mean of 2.2 years, and there was no significant increase in seizure frequency as compared with 3-month follow-up. Fourteen patients became seizure-free for >6 months; all except 1 had generalized epilepsy. For 12 patients, treatment could be reduced to monotherapy, but for those with valproate (VPA) comedication LTG dosage had to be increased; 25% of patients with VPA monotherapy exhibited skin rash, appearing 3–18 days after starting LTG. For 4 patients, LTG could be reintroduced after VPA was withdrawn. Ten patients had ataxia and/or drowsiness and 2 had vomiting. For all other patients, tolerance was excellent.     

Clobazam in the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

Purpose:   This randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study evaluated safety and efficacy of clobazam (CLB) as adjunctive therapy for drop seizures in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS).
Methods:   Sixty-eight patients with LGS aged 2–26 years were administered CLB (low dose = target 0.25 mg/kg/day; high dose = target 1.0 mg/kg/day). The study consisted of 4-week baseline, 3-week titration, and 4-week maintenance periods, followed by a 3-week taper or continuation in an open-label study. Seizure frequency was recorded in a diary by the parent/caregiver throughout the study.
Results:   Weekly drop seizure rates were significantly reduced from baseline in both the high-dose and low-dose groups; the reduction was significantly greater in the high-dose group. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the high-dose group experienced reductions in drop seizures of ≥25%, ≥50%, and ≥75% compared to the low-dose group; more patients in the high-dose group experienced a 100% reduction, but the difference was not significant. Nondrop seizures were also reduced in a dose-dependent manner. In both investigator and parent/caregiver global evaluations, patients in the high-dose group showed significantly greater improvements in overall symptoms compared to low-dose CLB. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate, and were similar between dose groups. Five serious adverse events were reported in four patients, but in no case was CLB discontinued.
Conclusions:   Clobazam was well tolerated and reduced drop seizure rates; high-dose CLB was more effective than low-dose CLB. Other seizure types were also reduced.     

Aggressive Behaviour in Intellectually Challenged Patients with Epilepsy Treated with Lamotrigine

Summary: Purpose: Lamotrigine (LTG) is a valuable addition to the medical management of epilepsy with wide spectrum of efficacy and good outcomes for quality of life. We report the emergence of a syndrome of aggressive behavior provoked by LTG in patients with epilepsy and intellectual challenge.
Methods: On recognition of a tendency to aggression in intellectually challenged patients whose epilepsy was treated with LTG, a survey was conducted of those from centers specializing in management of patients with intellectual disability who were treated with LTG. Responses to LTG were sought and patient's behavioral profiles were determined.
Results: Nineteen patients were identified (16 men, 3 women, aged 17–54 years). Five patients discontinued LTG due to unprovoked aggressive behavior subsequent to its use; 2 had aggressive behavior sufficient to justify discontinuation of LTG but required reintroduction to control the epilepsy; 1 required reduction in LTG dosage; 1 had aggression that responded to psychiatric intervention; and I had aggression unrelated to LTG. Four patients had behavioral problems other than aggression, 4 had no change in behavior, and the behavior of 1 was improved by LTG treatment.     

Adding Lamotrigine to Valproate: Incidence of Rash and Other Adverse Effects

PURPOSE: Valproate (VPA) triples the half-life of lamotrigine (LTG), and combined use may be difficult. The adverse effect (AE) profile of this combination needs clarification. METHODS: We prospectively recorded our experience in adding LTG to VPA-containing regimens in 108 patients. Data collected included medications, seizure types and syndromes, and AEs. Patients were followed up to 27 months, until a stable dose was reached, or until LTG was discontinued. Patient management was not altered by this study. There were 60 patients with partial-onset seizures, 30 with generalized onset, and 12 with the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. In 37, LTG was added to VPA monotherapy, and in 71, to VPA and other drugs. The median starting dose of LTG in our adult patients was 20.8 mg/day. RESULTS: LTG was added successfully in 86 (80%) patients. It was discontinued in 22 (20%): seven because of rash, seven for other AEs, and nine for other reasons. Rash occurred in 14 (13%) but caused discontinuation of LTG in only seven. We found a rash rate of 14.2% and a discontinuation rate because of rash of 8.7% among 310 patients in whom LTG was added to drug regimens not including VPA. Other AEs included fatigue (12%), gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (9%), dizziness, headache, and insomnia (3% each). Serious AEs were hallucinations (two patients), hepatic enzyme elevations (two patients), irritability (one patient), and low white blood cell count (one patient). Whether LTG was added to VPA monotherapy or polytherapy made no difference in overall AE rate. CONCLUSIONS: LTG can be added to VPA with an acceptable incidence of side effects. LTG-induced rashes are no more common with VPA than with other drugs when LTG is added at very low initial dosages. Rashes are potentially serious and should be evaluated promptly.     

Lamotrigine add-on therapy for childhood-onset refractory epilepsy: comparison of the efficacy between 3 months and 6 months after initiation

We investigated the effect of lamotrigine (LTG) add-on therapy in 50 patients with childhood-onset refractory epilepsy (25 males and 25 females): 15 with localization-related epilepsy, 33 with generalized epilepsy, and 2 with undetermined epilepsy. Twenty-four patients had experienced a period of West syndrome during their clinical course. Age at the start of LTG therapy ranged from 2 years 6 months to 41 years 2 months: <16 years in 43 and > or = 16 years in 7. Seizure frequency was > or = 1 per day in 36 patients (72%) and > or = 1 per week in 14 (28%). We increased the LTG dosage every two weeks in accordance with usage recommendations. We evaluated efficacy at two points: 3 and 6 months after the start of LTG. At the 6-month point, seizure freedom was achieved in 2 patients (4%), > or = 50% seizure reduction in 14 (28%), 25 to 50% seizure reduction in 20 (40%), no effect in 6 (12%), and aggravation in 4 (8%). Only 4 patients (8%) stopped LTG therapy within 6 months due to LTG-related mild skin rash in 2 and suspicion of seizure aggravation in the other 2. In terms of seizure types, seizure freedom or > or = 50% seizure reduction was achieved in 29% for epileptic spasms, 32% for tonic seizures, and 29% for partial seizures. A comparison between the 3- and 6-month points revealed that the efficacy level was increased or maintained in 77% of the patients and decreased in 23%. In most cases, the highest level of efficacy appeared within 3 months with doses that were smaller than maintenance doses. Observed CNS-related adverse effects included somnolence in 16 patients, irritability in 14, and sleep disturbance in 11. Positive psychotropic effects in daily activities were seen in 28 patients (56%). These effects appeared regardless of the change in seizure frequency with doses that were smaller than maintenance doses.