No support for regional selectivity in clozapine-treated patients: a PET study with [(11)C]raclopride and [(11)C]FLB 457

OBJECTIVE: The authors' goal was to test the hypothesis of extrastriatal D(2) receptor selectivity as the mechanism of action of clozapine. METHOD: Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to examine extrastriatal as well as striatal dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy in four patients treated with clozapine and three patients treated with haloperidol. The reference radioligand [(11)C]raclopride was used for determination of D(2) receptor occupancy in the striatum. The radioligand [(11)C]FLB 457 was chosen for determination of D(2) receptor occupancy in the thalamus, the temporal cortex, and the frontal cortex. RESULTS: In patients treated with haloperidol the D(2) receptor occupancy was high in all examined brain regions. In clozapine-treated patients the D(2) receptor occupancy was relatively low in both the striatum and the extrastriatal regions. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the present study give no support for the hypothesis of regional selectivity as the mechanism of action for clozapine.     

Equivalent occupancy of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors with clozapine: differentiation from other atypical antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE: Clozapine, the prototype of atypical antipsychotics, remains unique in its efficacy in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia. Its affinity for dopamine D(4) receptors, serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonism, effects on the noradrenergic system, and its relatively moderate occupancy of D(2) receptors are unlikely to be the critical mechanism underlying its efficacy. In an attempt to elucidate the molecular/synaptic mechanism underlying clozapine's distinctiveness in refractory schizophrenia, the authors studied the in vivo D(1) and D(2) receptor profile of clozapine compared with other atypical antipsychotics. METHOD: Positron emission tomography with the radioligands [(11)C]SCH23390 and [(11)C]raclopride was used to investigate D(1) and D(2) receptor occupancy in vivo in 25 schizophrenia patients receiving atypical antipsychotic treatment with clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone. RESULTS: Mean striatal D(1) occupancies ranged from 55% with clozapine to 12% with quetiapine (rank order: clozapine > olanzapine > risperidone > quetiapine). The striatal D(2) occupancy ranged from 81% with risperidone to 30% with quetiapine (rank order: risperidone > olanzapine > clozapine > quetiapine). The ratio of striatal D(1)/D(2) occupancy was significantly higher for clozapine (0.88) relative to olanzapine (0.54), quetiapine (0.41), or risperidone (0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Among the atypical antipsychotics, clozapine appears to have a simultaneous and equivalent occupancy of dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors. Whether its effect on D(1) receptors represents agonism or antagonism is not yet clear, as this issue is still unresolved in the preclinical arena. This distinctive effect on D(1)/D(2) receptors may be responsible for clozapine's unique effectiveness in patients with schizophrenia refractory to other typical and atypical antipsychotics.     

A PET study of dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT2 receptor occupancy in patients with schizophrenia treated with therapeutic doses of ziprasidone

OBJECTIVE: Ziprasidone is an atypical antipsychotic drug that shows a higher affinity for serotonin 5-HT(2) receptors compared with dopamine D(2) receptors in vitro. The affinity of ziprasidone for these receptors in vivo in patients was examined in a positron emission tomography (PET) study. METHOD: The authors conducted a PET study to evaluate D(2) occupancy (using [(11)C]raclopride) and 5-HT(2) occupancy (using [(18)F]setoperone) in brain regions of interest in 16 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder randomly assigned to receive 40, 80, 120, or 160 mg/day of ziprasidone, which reflected the recommended dose range. PET scanning was done after 3 weeks of administration and at trough plasma levels, i.e., 12-16 hours after the last dose. RESULTS: The mean 5-HT(2) receptor occupancy was significantly higher than the mean D(2) receptor occupancy (mean=76%, SD=15%, and mean=56%, SD=18%, respectively). The estimated plasma ziprasidone concentration associated with 50% maximal 5-HT(2) receptor occupancy was almost four times lower than that for D(2) receptor occupancy. CONCLUSIONS: These data affirm that ziprasidone is similar to other novel antipsychotics in having greater 5-HT(2) than D(2) receptor occupancy at therapeutic doses and suggest that the optimal effective dose of ziprasidone is closer to 120 mg/day than to the lower doses suggested by previous PET studies. The relatively high D(2) receptor occupancy, even at trough plasma levels, suggests that ziprasidone is more similar to risperidone and olanzapine in receptor occupancy profile than to clozapine and quetiapine. Since ziprasidone plasma levels show significant (more than twofold) variation within a single dose cycle, studies that are aimed at peak plasma levels (6 hours after the last dose) and that examine extrastriatal regions are required to fully characterize the in vivo occupancy profile of ziprasidone.     

Adverse subjective experience with antipsychotics and its relationship to striatal and extrastriatal D2 receptors: a PET study in schizophrenia

OBJECTIVES: Antipsychotic medications improve psychosis but often induce a state of dysphoria in patients. Blockade of the dopamine D(2) receptors, which is thought to mediate their efficacy, has also been implicated in producing this adverse subjective experience. The authors present the first double-blind controlled study to examine the relationship between striatal and extrastriatal dopamine D(2) receptor binding potential and occupancy values and adverse subjective experience. METHOD: Patients with recent-onset psychosis (N=12) were randomly assigned to low or high doses of olanzapine or risperidone. Subjective experiences, motor side effects, and striatal and extrastriatal dopamine D(2) receptors (determined with [(11)C]raclopride and [(11)C]FLB 457 PET scans, respectively) were evaluated after 2 weeks of continuous antipsychotic treatment. RESULTS: Higher dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy and binding potentials in the striatal (dorsal and ventral), temporal, and insular regions were associated with subjective experience. The finding was confirmed with two convergent methods of analysis (region-of-interest and voxel-based statistics), and the same relationship was observed using two different dopamine receptor measures (observed binding potential values and age- and sex-corrected occupancy values). CONCLUSIONS: Higher D(2) receptor occupancy is associated with negative subjective experience in patients taking risperidone or olanzapine. These negative subjective effects may be related to the high discontinuation rates seen in usual practice. Understanding the neurobiological mechanism of these negative subjective experiences and developing antipsychotics with novel (i.e., non D(2)) mechanisms may be critical in improving the treatment of psychosis.     

Antipsychotic drugs,dopamine receptors,and schizophrenia

The clinical potencies of antipsychotic drugs are directly related to their affinities for the dopamine D2 receptor. In addition, the concentrations of antipsychotic drugs (given at therapeutic maintenance doses) in the plasma water or in the spinal fluid are almost identical to the antipsychotic dissociation constants at the dopamine D2 receptor. A consistent 70–75% of brain D2 receptors are occupied by antipsychotic drugs, as calculated from the therapeutic concentration and the antipsychotic dissociation constant. The D3 and D4 dopamine receptors, however, are not consistently occupied by antipsychotic drugs, the occupancies being 0–85% for D3, and 0–95% for D4. Human brain imaging also reveals that therapeutic doses of antipsychotic drugs occupy ∼70% of D2 receptors. Between 2 and 4 h after the daily oral dose, clozapine and quetiapine occupy high levels (∼70%) of the dopamine D2 receptors in schizophrenia patients, with lower occupancies at 6 and 12 h. Although clozapine and quetiapine occupy low levels of D2 receptors many hours after the oral dose, the observed fraction of D2 receptors occupied by these drugs, however, depends on the radioligand used, with high occupancy seen when using [¹¹C]raclopride, and low occupancy seen with [¹¹C]methylspiperone (which is tightly bound to D2). This dependence on the radioligand occurs because clozapine and quetiapine are loosely bound to D2. The loose binding of clozapine and quetiapine to D2 permits endogenous dopamine to displace these antipsychotic drugs much more quickly than haloperidol. In addition, the small dose of radioactive raclopride injected (in brain imaging) can displace a little of the D2-bound clozapine. Hence, the observed low level of D2 occupancy by clozapine in patients may arise from a combination of the above three factors – the ligand dependency, the endogenous dopamine, and the displacement by the imaging dose. Parkinsonism and extrapyramidal effects occur with antipsychotics which have a high affinity for D2 and which are, therefore, tightly bound to D2. Clozapine and quetiapine have a low affinity for D2, and, being readily displaced by endogenous dopamine, do not give rise to extrapyramidal effects. Because the loosely bound antipsychotics dissociate from D2 more rapidly, clinical relapse may occur earlier than that found with the tightly bound traditional antipsychotics. The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia is supported by the fact that D2 is the main target of antipsychotic action, that monomers of D2 appear elevated in schizophrenia, and that the synaptic levels of dopamine in schizophrenia are at least two-fold higher than in control subjects.     

Rapid release of antipsychotic drugs from dopamine D2 receptors: an explanation for low receptor occupancy and early clinical relapse upon withdrawal of clozapine or quetiapine.

OBJECTIVE: In an attempt to understand the basis of early relapse after antipsychotic withdrawal, the objective of this study was to determine whether the low occupancy of dopamine D2 receptors by clozapine and by quetiapine, as seen by brain imaging, could arise from a rapid release of some of the D2-bound clozapine or quetiapine by the brain imaging compounds and by the action of a physiological concentration of dopamine. METHOD: Human cloned D2 receptors were first pre-equilibrated with the [3H]antipsychotic drug, after which raclopride, iodobenzamide, or dopamine (at the physiological concentration in the synapse) was added, and the time course of release of the [3H]antipsychotic from the D2 receptor was measured. RESULTS: Within 5 minutes, low concentrations of raclopride and iodobenzamide displaced appreciable amounts of [3H]clozapine and [3H]quetiapine from the D2 receptors but, during the course of 1 hour, did not displace any of the other antipsychotic [[3H]ligands. [3H]Clozapine and [3H]quetiapine, moreover, were displaced by dopamine (100 nM) at least 100 times faster than the other antipsychotic [3H]ligands. CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine and quetiapine are loosely bound to the D2 receptor, and the injected radioactive ligand at its peak concentration may displace some of the D2-bound antipsychotic drug, resulting in apparently low D2 occupancies. Therefore, under clinical brain imaging conditions with [11C]raclopride, D2 occupancies by clozapine and by quetiapine may be higher than currently estimated. These considerations may result in high levels of the D2 receptors being occupied by therapeutic doses of clozapine or quetiapine. The rapid release of clozapine and quetiapine from D2 receptors by endogenous dopamine may contribute to low D2 receptor occupancy and to early clinical relapse upon withdrawal of these medications.     

Neuroleptics and animal models: feasibility of oral treatment monitored by plasma levels and receptor occupancy assays

The administration of neuroleptics in animal models has been extensively reported and plays an important role in the study of schizophrenia. Our study was designed to address the following questions: (1) Is it possible to achieve steady-state receptor occupancy levels administering neuroleptics in drinking water? (2) Is there an appropriate dose to obtain clinically comparable receptor occupancies? (3) Is there a correlation between plasma drug levels and receptor occupancy? Thus, we tested three neuroleptic drugs administered in drinking water for 7 days. Plasma drug levels were measured, and in vivo receptor occupancy assays were performed in order to determine peak and trough dopamine D₂ receptor occupancies in striatal brain samples. Overall, our study indicates that in rodents the administration of appropriate doses of haloperidol and olanzapine in drinking water achieves receptor occupancies comparable to the clinical occupancy levels, but this appears not to be the case for clozapine.     

Increased dopamine d(2) receptor occupancy and elevated prolactin level associated with addition of haloperidol to clozapine

OBJECTIVE: The authors added haloperidol, a potent D(2) blocker, to ongoing treatment with clozapine in patients with schizophrenia to determine the effects of this combination on dopamine D(2) receptor blockade, prolactin level, and extrapyramidal side effects. METHOD: At baseline and 4-8 weeks after the addition of haloperidol (4 mg/day) to ongoing clozapine treatment, five patients were examined for prolactin elevation, extrapyramidal side effects, drug plasma levels, and D(2) receptor occupancy measured with [(11)C]raclopride and positron emission tomography imaging. RESULTS: Adding haloperidol significantly increased D(2) receptor occupancy, from a mean of 55% to 79%, and significantly increased the prolactin level. One patient developed akathisia, and another manifested mild extrapyramidal side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Adding a modest dose of haloperidol to clozapine results in the high D(2) receptor occupancy and sustained prolactin elevation usually associated with typical antipsychotics. These findings suggest that the lack of prolactin elevation associated with clozapine derives mainly from low D(2) receptor occupancy and not from the medication's effects on other receptors.     

An animal model of extrapyramidal side effects induced by antipsychotic drugs: relationship with D2 dopamine receptor occupancy

1. Muscle rigidity was assessed quantitatively and objectively as increases in electromyographic (EMG) activity (muscle rigidity) in the hindlimb muscles of the rat following subcutaneous administration of haloperidol, fluphenazine and thioridazine. 2. Behavioural changes were assessed as increases in the catalepsy score, defined as the time taken for an animal to move off an inclined grid. 3. Increased tonic EMG activity, or the presence of catalepsy was related to the level of occupancy of dopamine D2 receptors in the striatum and substantia nigra of the brain, measured using ex vivo quantitative autoradiography. 4. Increases in tonic EMG activity and the induction of catalepsy were associated with >80% occupancy of striatal and nigral D2 receptors by fluphenazine, while haloperidol increased tonic EMG activity at D2 occupancies of >57%. 5. Thioridazine at doses ranging from 1-15 mg/kg failed to increase EMG activity and occupied <61% of striatal D2 receptors. 6. Overall the findings support the hypothesis that muscle rigidity is observed when a threshold level of D2 receptors in the striatum and substantia nigra are occupied by antipsychotic drugs. 7. This conclusion is consistent with the results of positron emission tomography (PET) studies in humans, and those from our past studies in rats using raclopride, chlorpromazine and clozapine, in which a threshold of approximately 70% striatal and nigral D2 receptor occupancy has been demonstrated.     

Increasing D2 affinity results in the loss of clozapine's atypical antipsychotic action

Typical antipsychotics (haloperidol) give rise to severe motor side-effects while atypical antipsychotics like clozapine do not. Action at several neurotransmitter receptors have been implicated. To identify the critical mechanisms involved we synthesized an 8-C1 isomer of clozapine which showed an equivalent affinity to clozapine on multiple receptors (5-HT1A, 5-HT2, D1, D4, M1) but differed in having a 10-fold higher affinity at the dopamine D2/3 receptor. When tested in a series of animal models indicative of the typical/atypical distinction (catalepsy, striatal gene-induction, prolactin elevation) isoclozapine lost atypical properties and behaved like a typical antipsychotic. Simultaneous in vivo receptor occupancy studies confirmed that alterations in D2 receptor occupancy were most closely related to loss of atypicality by clozapine's isomer isoclozapine. The implications for the design of future antipsychotics is discussed.     

Atypical antipsychotics: mechanism of action.

BACKGROUND: Although the principal brain target that all antipsychotic drugs attach to is the dopamine D2 receptor, traditional or typical antipsychotics, by attaching to it, induce extrapyramidal signs and symptoms (EPS). They also, by binding to the D2 receptor, elevate serum prolactin. Atypical antipsychotics given in dosages within the clinically effective range do not bring about these adverse clinical effects. To understand how these drugs work, it is important to examine the atypical antipsychotics' mechanism of action and how it differs from that of the more typical drugs. METHOD: This review analyzes the affinities, the occupancies, and the dissociation time-course of various antipsychotics at dopamine D2 receptors and at serotonin (5-HT) receptors, both in the test tube and in live patients. RESULTS: Of the 31 antipsychotics examined, the older traditional antipsychotics such as trifluperazine, pimozide, chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, haloperidol, and flupenthixol bind more tightly than dopamine itself to the dopamine D2 receptor, with dissociation constants that are lower than that for dopamine. The newer, atypical antipsychotics such as quetiapine, remoxipride, clozapine, olanzapine, sertindole, ziprasidone, and amisulpride all bind more loosely than dopamine to the dopamine D2 receptor and have dissociation constants higher than that for dopamine. These tight and loose binding data agree with the rates of antipsychotic dissociation from the human-cloned D2 receptor. For instance, radioactive haloperidol, chlorpromazine, and raclopride all dissociate very slowly over a 30-minute time span, while radioactive quetiapine, clozapine, remoxipride, and amisulpride dissociate rapidly, in less than 60 seconds. These data also match clinical brain-imaging findings that show haloperidol remaining constantly bound to D2 in humans undergoing 2 positron emission tomography (PET) scans 24 hours apart. Conversely, the occupation of D2 by clozapine or quetiapine has mostly disappeared after 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Atypicals clinically help patients by transiently occupying D2 receptors and then rapidly dissociating to allow normal dopamine neurotransmission. This keeps prolactin levels normal, spares cognition, and obviates EPS. One theory of atypicality is that the newer drugs block 5-HT2A receptors at the same time as they block dopamine receptors and that, somehow, this serotonin-dopamine balance confers atypicality. This, however, is not borne out by the results. While 5-HT2A receptors are readily blocked at low dosages of most atypical antipsychotic drugs (with the important exceptions of remoxipride and amisulpride, neither of which is available for use in Canada) the dosages at which this happens are below those needed to alleviate psychosis. In fact, the antipsychotic threshold occupancy of D2 for antipsychotic action remains at about 65% for both typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs, regardless of whether 5-HT2A receptors are blocked or not. At the same time, the antipsychotic threshold occupancy of D2 for eliciting EPS remains at about 80% for both typical and atypical antipsychotics, regardless of the occupancy of 5-HT2A receptors. RELEVANCE: The "fast-off-D2" theory, on the other hand, predicts which antipsychotic compounds will or will not produce EPS and hyperprolactinemia and which compounds present a relatively low risk for tardive dyskinesia. This theory also explains why L-dopa psychosis responds to low atypical antipsychotic dosages, and it suggests various individualized treatment strategies.     

Subjective experience and dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in patients treated with antipsychotics: clinical implications.

OBJECTIVES: This paper gives an overview of studies on the association between dopaminergic neurotransmission and the subjective experience of patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: We undertook a review of the literature. RESULTS: Dopaminergic neurotransmission may be relevant for subjective experience. Higher striatal D2 receptor occupancy by typical and atypical antipsychotics is related to worse subjective experience, more severe negative symptoms, and depression. Individuals with lower baseline dopamine function are at an increased risk for dysphoric responses during antipsychotic therapy with dopaminergic-blocking drugs. There is preliminary evidence that a window of striatal D2 receptor occupancy between 60% and 70% is optimal for the subjective experience of patients. These occupancies are often reached even with low dosages of antipsychotic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Reaching an optimal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy is clinically relevant, since subjective experience associated with antipsychotic medication is related to medication compliance. Antipsychotic drug dosages often need to be lower than levels in common use.     

Is amoxapine an atypical antipsychotic? Positron-emission tomography investigation of its dopamine2 and serotonin2 occupancy.

BACKGROUND: All currently available atypical antipsychotics have, at clinically relevant doses: i) high serotonin (5-HT)2 occupancy; ii) greater 5-HT2 than dopamine (D)2 occupancy; and iii) a higher incidence of extrapyramidal side effects when their D2 occupancy exceeds 80%. A review of pharmacologic and behavioral data suggested that amoxapine should also conform to this profile; therefore, we undertook a positron-emission tomography (PET) study of its 5-HT2 and D2 occupancy. METHODS: Seven healthy volunteers received 50-250 mg/day of amoxapine for 5 days and then had [11C]-raclopride and [18F]-setoperone PET scans. RESULTS: 5-HT2 receptors showed near saturation at doses of 100 mg/day and above. The D2 receptor occupancies showed a dose-dependent increase, never exceeding 80%; at all doses 5-HT2 occupancy exceeded D2 occupancy. CONCLUSIONS: PET data show that amoxapine's profile is very similar to that of the established atypical antipsychotics. These data, together with amoxapine's in vitro pharmacologic profile, effectiveness in animal models, and efficacy in psychotic depression raise the possibility of amoxapine as an "atypical" antipsychotic agent in the treatment of schizophrenia.     

Mechanism of new antipsychotic medications: occupancy is not just antagonism

Antagonism of D2-like dopamine receptors is the putative mechanism underlying the antipsychotic efficacy of psychotropic drugs. Positron emission tomographic studies suggest that the antipsychotic effect of dopamine receptor antagonists occurs within a therapeutic window between 60% and 80% (striatal) D2 receptor occupancy. The incidence of extrapyramidal side effects increases above the 80% threshold. However, the novel atypical antipsychotic drug, aripiprazole, occupies up to 95% of striatal D2-like dopamine receptors at clinical doses, and the incidence of extrapyramidal side effects with aripiprazole is no higher than with placebo. The most likely explanation for this finding is aripiprazole's weak partial agonism at D2-like dopamine receptors. This particular pharmacologic feature characterizes a new class of atypical antipsychotics that does not match the original concept of a therapeutic occupancy window for antagonist antipsychotics. When not involving pure antagonists, it implies a need to adjust the expected receptor occupancy (measured using positron emission tomography) for the therapeutic window.     

Significant dissociation of brain and plasma kinetics with antipsychotics

Current dosing regimens of psychotropic drugs are based on plasma kinetic considerations, although it is unclear whether plasma levels faithfully reflect brain kinetics of drugs.(1,2) To examine this, we compared the kinetics of plasma levels of two widely used antipsychotics, olanzapine and risperidone, vs the time course of their effects in the brain. We used positron emission tomography (PET) and [(11)C]-labeled ligands to quantify striatal and extra-striatal dopamine-2 (D(2)), and cortical serotonin-2A (5-HT(2A)) receptor occupancy in healthy subjects after a single dose, and in patients chronically treated for psychosis. We found a significant dissociation of brain and plasma kinetics. Mean plasma elimination half-lives of single doses of olanzapine and risperidone were 24.2 and 10.3 h, respectively, whereas it took on average 75.2 h with olanzapine, and 66.6 h with risperidone to decline to 50% of their peak striatal D(2) receptor occupancy. We found similar discrepancies between the time course of plasma levels and extra-striatal D(2) as well as 5-HT(2A) receptor occupancy. Our results question the current reliance on plasma kinetics as the main basis for dosing regimens of antipsychotics. Studies of brain kinetics may provide a sounder basis for determining dosing schedules of psychotropic medications.     

Treatment response to olanzapine and haloperidol and its association with dopamine D receptor occupancy in first-episode psychosis.

OBJECTIVE: Response to typical antipsychotic medication has been associated with achieving a level of striatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in the range of 65% to 70%. We undertook this study to determine whether response to the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine occurs at lower levels of D2 receptor occupancy. METHOD: Eighteen patients who presented with a first episode of psychosis were randomized to receive olanzapine 5 mg daily or haloperidol 2 mg daily in a double-blind design. We acquired positron emission tomography (PET) scans using the D2 ligand [11C]raclopride within the first 15 days of treatment to determine the percentage of D2 receptors occupied by the medication. According to response, dosage was then adjusted to a maximum dosage of 20 mg daily of either drug. PET scans were repeated after 10 to 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: At the first PET scan, the 8 olanzapine-treated patients had significantly lower D2 receptor occupancies (mean 63.4%, SD 7.3) than those observed in the 10 patients treated with haloperidol (mean 73.0%, SD 6.1). When patients were rescanned following dosage adjustment, mean D2 receptor occupancies were greater than 70% in both groups. D2 receptor occupancies did not differ significantly between the olanzapine-treated group (mean 72.0%, SD 5.7) and the haloperidol-treated group (mean 78.7%, SD 7.6). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, in patients being treated for a first episode of psychosis, olanzapine has its antipsychotic effect at approximately the same levels of D2 receptor occupancy as are achieved with low dosages of haloperidol.     

Receptor occupancy and antipsychotic drug action measured by PET and SPECT]

Positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies have demonstrated consistent findings of high dopamine D2 receptor occupancy (> 65-70%) in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs. Further, the risk of extrapyramidal side effects has been shown high in patients with occupancy above 80%. On the basis of these findings, an optimal interval for D2 receptor occupancy between 70% and 80% has been suggested. It has also been shown that several atypical antipsychotics induce marked occupancy of central 5-HT2 and D2 receptors in vivo. However, a low D2 occupancy has been observed in patients with clinical dose of clozapine or quetiapine. The antipsychotic effect of these atypical drugs with a low D2 receptor occupancy has been widely discussed with respect to actions on other receptor systems, limbic selectivity of antipsychotic action and episodic transient occupancy. The recent advances in PET/SPECT and developments of new radioligands have made it possible to evaluate antipsychotic drug actions directly in humans. The empirical data from occupancy measurements will enable us to open future directions of investigation of antipsychotic action and improvement of antipsychotic treatment.     

Cortical dopamine D2/D3 receptors are a common site of action for antipsychotic drugs--an original patient data meta-analysis of the SPECT and PET in vivo receptor imaging literature

Subject numbers in neuroreceptor imaging studies of antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia are generally insufficient to directly test the relationship of regional D(2)/D(3) and 5HT(2A) receptor binding to clinical efficacy. We selected positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies of antipsychotic dose vs occupancy at both temporal cortex and striatal D(2)/D(3) receptors. We selected corresponding SPECT and PET studies of 5HT(2A) receptor occupancy. We also selected randomized double-blind clinical trials of antipsychotics, where patients were treated with randomly assigned fixed doses. For each antipsychotic drug, we compared the optimum effective antipsychotic dose with the dose inducing maximal occupancy of D(2)/D(3) receptors in striatum and in temporal cortex as well as at 5HT(2A) receptors. Both first- and second-generation antipsychotic (FGA, SGA) drugs produced high temporal cortex D(2)/D(3) occupancy. Only FGA produced high striatal D(2)/D(3) receptor occupancy. The clinically effective dose showed correlation with doses inducing maximal dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor occupancy both in striatum and in temporal cortex, the strongest correlation being with temporal cortex binding. Extrapyramidal side effects (EPSE) were primarily related to striatal D(2)/D(3) receptor occupancy. There was no correlation between 5HT(2A) occupancy and clinically effective dose. We conclude that cortical dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor occupancy is involved in antipsychotic efficacy, with striatal D(2)/D(3) occupancy having a likely therapeutic role while also inducing EPSE. We found no evidence for 5HT(2A) blockade involvement in antipsychotic action, although we cannot exclude this possibility.     

Theory in antipsychotic drug therapy for schizophrenia]

In Japan, antipsychotic polypharmacy with high doses for schizophrenia has been traditionally used. However, antipsychotic polyphamacy with high doses provide disadvantages for patient. Recent PET studies show that dopamine D2 occupancy with antipsychotics is important for the treatment of schizophrenia. First, antipsychotics become effective only at which their D2 occupancy exceeds 65%. Second, antipsychotics with D2 occupancy below 90% rarely causes occupancy exceeds 65%. Second, antipsychotics with D2 occupancy below 90% rarely causes extrapyramidal side effect. These results suggest that monopharmacy which uses a single antipsychotic agent with appropriate dose is recommended for schizophrenia treatment.     

Positron emission tomography with (18F)methylspiperone demonstrates D2 dopamine receptor binding differences of clozapine and haloperidol

Summary Four schizophrenic patients were investigated with dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) using (¹⁸F)fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and (¹⁸F)methylspiperone (MSP) as tracers. Two schizophrenics were on haloperidol therapy at the time of MSP PET. The other two schizophrenics were treated with clozapine, in one of them MSP PET was carried out twice with different daily doses (100 mg and 450 mg respectively). Neuroleptic serum levels were measured in all patients. Results were compared with MSP PET of two drug-free male control subjects and with a previous fluoroethylspiperone (FESP) study of normals. Three hours after tracer injection specific binding of MSP was observed in the striatum in all cases. The striatum to cerebellum ratio was used to estimate the degree of neuroleptic-caused striatal D₂ dopamine receptor occupancy. In the haloperidol treated patients MSP binding was significantly decreased, whereas in the clozapine treated patients striatum to cerebellum ratio was normal. Even the increase of clozapine dose in the same patient had no influence on this ratio. Despite the smaller number of patients the study shows for the first time in humans that striatal MSP binding reflects the different D₂ dopamine receptor affinities of clozapine and haloperidol.