Treatment with telmisartan,a long-acting angiotensin II receptor blocker,prevents migraine attacks in Japanese non-responders to lomerizine

Lomerizine, calcium channel blocker, is the most used medication for migraine prophylaxis in Japan. The effectiveness of this drug is reported as 50–75%. Telmisartan is angiotensin II receptor blockers which plasma half-life is 24 h. We examined whether telmisartan has preventative benefits in lomerizine non-responsive migraineurs. Lomerizine non-responders received telmisartan (20 mg/day) for 3 months after the investigation period of 3 months. Blood pressure, frequency of headache days/month, headache severity, and doses of triptans and analgesics were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Thirty-three migraineurs (25 women and 8 men) participated in this study. Seven patients had migraine with aura and 26 patients had migraine without aura. Mean age (SD) was 46.6 (10.3) years. Mean duration (SD) of migraine was 20.4 (12.5) years. Headache severity exhibited mild degree in 5 patients, moderate degree in 9 patients and severe degree in 19 patients. Mean frequency (SD) of headache days was 10.9 (8.5) days/month. Mean usage (SD) of triptans was 4.8 (5.1) tablets/month and that of analgesics was 15.2 (22.2) tablets/month. Five patients (15%) had hypertension. Telmisartan administration had benefits in 30 patients (90%). This medication significantly decreased frequency of headache days (P < 0.01) and headache severity (P < 0.01). Doses of triptans were reduced at one-third (P < 0.05) and those of analgesia at one-fifth after telmisartan treatment (P < 0.01). After telmisartan, mean (SD) of systolic blood pressure was significantly decreased (P < 0.05). The present study supported that telmisartan treatment had preventive effects in 90% of lomerizine non-responders. Telmisartan non-responders (10%) exhibited chronic migraine and long migraine duration.     

Do bilateral and unilateral greater occipital nerve block effectiveness differ in chronic migraine patients?

We aimed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral and unilateral block application in chronic migraine patients and whether there were differences in their effectiveness retrospectively. In chronic migraine patients undergoing Greater occipital nerve (GON) block, mean number of days with pain per month before and after block, mean duration of pain in attacks (in hours), and mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in attack and pain severity were recorded from files. The patients underwent one block a week for the first 1 month, thereafter one block a month according to GON block protocol used by our institute. Of 41 patients included in the study, 23 underwent unilateral block (group 1) and 18 underwent bilateral block (group 2). In both groups, number of days with migraine decreased significantly in 2 and 3 months as compared to pre-block treatment (P < 0.001). Mean duration of headache decreased in group 2 during treatment (P < 0.001). In group 1, mean duration of headache also decreased but did not differ significantly (P = 0.051). Mean severity of migraine decreased significantly differ in group 1 in 2, 3 months as compared to pre-block treatment (P < 0.001). No differences were observed in frequency, severity and duration of headache between groups during 3-month treatment period. GON block is effective in chronic migraine and bilateral application is no superior over unilateral application.     

The efficacy of lymphatic drainage and traditional massage in the prophylaxis of migraine: a randomized,controlled parallel group study

This study aimed at examining the efficacy of lymphatic drainage (LD) and traditional massage (TM) in the prophylactic treatment of migraine using controlled prospective randomized clinical trial of 64 patients (57 women, 45 ± 10 years) with migraine with and without aura. Patients were randomized into three groups: LD (n = 21); TM (n = 21); waiting group (WG, n = 22). After a 4-week-baseline, a treatment period of 8 weeks was applied followed by a 4-week observation period. The patients filled in a headache diary continuously; every 4 weeks they filled in the German version of the CES-D and the German version of the Headache Disability Inventory. The main outcome measure was migraine frequency per month. At the end of the observation period, the number of migraine attacks and days decreased in the LD group by 1.8 and 3.1, respectively, in the TM group by 1.3 and 2.4, and in the WG by 0.4 and 0.2, respectively. The differences between LD and WG were significant (p = 0.006 and p = 0.015, respectively) as well as the differences between TM und WG (p = 0.042 and p = 0.016, respectively). There was a significant decrease in the amount of analgesic intake in the LD group compared to the two other groups (p = 0.004). TM and LD resulted in a reduction of migraine attack frequency. The analgesic intake only decreased significantly during LD intervention. Useful effects were identified for LD and TM as compared to WG for the prophylaxis of migraine. LD was more efficacious in some parameters than TM.     

Allergens might trigger migraine attacks

Migraine is a common primary headache disorder. The mechanisms underlying the onset of a migraine attack are not completely understood. Environmental changes and a number of other factors could induce migraine attacks. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the frequency of migraine attacks and allergens. Migraine patients without aura, and healthy individuals similar in age and gender without a history of headache and allergy were prospectively included in the study. The duration of migraine, the frequency of migraine attacks, the medication history, and the symptoms during attacks were questioned. Migraine disability assessment score (MIDAS) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were obtained. Allergen extracts including dust, fungi, insect, animal epithelium, pollens, and food allergens were applied for allergy tests. 49 migraine patients and 49 healthy individuals were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in terms of age and gender. The median migraine disease duration, the number of attacks in a month, and the duration of attacks were, respectively, 5.5 years (1–44), 4 (1–10) day/month, and 24 (4–72) h. The mean MIDAS grade was 2.45 ± 0.14 (1–4), and mean VAS score was 7.89 ± 0.27 (4–10). The positivity of allergy tests was 55.1 % (27/49) in the migraine group and 32.7 % (16/49) in the control group (p < 0.05). The allergy tests were positive for house dust, red birch, hazel tree, olive tree, nettle, and wheat. The frequency of migraine attacks was higher in allergy-test-positive patients than in negative ones in the migraine group (p = 0.001). The migraine patients who had frequent attacks should be examined for allergies.     

A double-blind, randomized trial of low-dose topiramate vs propranolol in migraine prophylaxis

Objective – To assess the efficacy and safety of low‐dose topiramate in migraine prophylaxis vs propranolol. Patients and methods – A randomized, double‐blind, clinical trial including 62 patients with frequent migraine headaches (≥ 3 attacks per month) was performed for a period of 8 weeks. The patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups – treated by topiramate 50 mg/day and propranolol 80 mg/day, respectively. The patients were assessed at 0, 4, and 8 weeks of the study. Results – The topiramate group showed a reduction in the mean (±SD) of monthly migraine frequency from 6.07 (±1.89) to 1.83 (±1.39) episodes per month, headache intensity from 7.1 (±1.45) to 3.67 (±2.1) based on the Visual Analog Scale, and headache duration from 16.37 (±7.26) to 6.23 (±5.22) hours (P < 0.001). In the patients treated with propranolol, the mean (±SD) of monthly headache frequency declined from 5.83 (±1.98) to 2.2 (±1.67) per month, headache intensity lessened from 6.43 (±1.6) to 4.13 (±1.94) and headache duration decreased from 15.10 (±6.84) to 7.27 (±6.46) h (P < 0.001). Conclusion – This study demonstrated that both low‐dose topiramate and propranolol could significantly reduce migraine headache frequency, intensity, and duration. However, compared with propranolol, low‐dose topiramate showed better results.     

Clinical characteristics of menstrually related and non-menstrual migraine

Migraine attacks increase during the perimenstrual period in approximately half of female migraineurs. There are differences in the pathogenesis and clinical features of menstrually related and non-menstrual migraine attacks. The objective of this study was to compare the characteristics of migraine in patients with menstrually related and non-menstrual migraine, and to investigate the differences between premenstrual, menstrual, and late-menstrual migraine attacks. Three-hundred and thirty-two women with migraine without aura were evaluated using questionnaires and diaries to determine the characteristics of headache, preceding and accompanying symptoms, and the relation of migraine attacks and menstruation. One-hundred and sixty-three women had menstrually related migraine without aura (49.1%). Duration of disease and duration of headache were longer (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively), and nausea, vomiting, phonophobia, and aggravation of headache with physical activity were more frequent in patients with menstrually related migraine (p = 0.005, p = 0.006, p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). Premonitory symptoms and allodynia were observed more frequently in the menstrually related migraine group (p = 0.012 and p = 0.004, respectively). Perimenstrual migraine attacks occurred premenstrually (days ?2 and ?1) in 46 patients (25.3%), menstrually (days 1 to 3) in 90 patients (49.4%), and late menstrually (days 4 to 7) in 19 patients (10.4%). Our results showed that the duration of headache was longer and accompanying symptoms were more frequent and diverse in patients with menstrually related migraine without aura, suggesting that these findings may reflect the increase in excitability or susceptibility of the brain in these patients.     

Single-blind,randomized, pilot study combining shiatsu and amitriptyline in refractory primary headaches

Complementary alternative medicine, such as shiatsu, can represent a suitable treatment for primary headaches. However, evidence-based data about the effect of combining shiatsu and pharmacological treatments are still not available. Therefore, we tested the efficacy and safety of combining shiatsu and amitriptyline to treat refractory primary headaches in a single-blind, randomized, pilot study. Subjects with a diagnosis of primary headache and who experienced lack of response to ≥2 different prophylactic drugs were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive shiatsu plus amitriptyline, shiatsu alone, or amitriptyline alone for 3 months. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing ≥50%-reduction in headache days. Secondary endpoints were days with headache per month, visual analogue scale, and number of pain killers taken per month. After randomization, 37 subjects were allocated to shiatsu plus amitriptyline (n = 11), shiatsu alone (n = 13), and amitriptyline alone (n = 13). Randomization ensured well-balanced demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline. Although all the three groups improved in terms of headache frequency, visual analogue scale score, and number of pain killers (p < 0.05), there was no between-group difference in primary endpoint (p = ns). Shiatsu (alone or in combination) was superior to amitriptyline in reducing the number of pain killers taken per month (p < 0.05). Seven (19%) subjects reported adverse events, all attributable to amitriptyline, while no side effects were related with shiatsu treatment. Shiatsu is a safe and potentially useful alternative approach for refractory headache. However, there is no evidence of an additive or synergistic effect of combining shiatsu and amitriptyline. These findings are only preliminary and should be interpreted cautiously due to the small sample size of the population included in our study. Trial registration 81/2010 (Ethical Committee, S. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy).     

Prevalence and indirect costs of headache in a Brazilian Company

Employees from a Brazilian oil company research centre (n = 993) were interviewed on the occurrence of headache during a 30 days period. Headache prevalence was 49.8%, with a mean frequency of 4.3 +/- 7.0 attacks per month, lasting 12.2 +/- 21.4 hours each. According to the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria, migraine (5.5%), episodic tension-type headache (26.4%), chronic tension-type headache (1.7%) and headaches not fulfilling the criteria for such disorders (16.2%) were observed. Women suffered comparatively more headache and specifically migraine than men. The pain interfered with work productivity in 10% of the subjects, corresponding to 538.75 hours off. According to an indirect costs estimation for each headache, the company may loose up to US$125.98 per employee annually. Since among headaches migraine has the highest indirect cost, migraine prevention and treatment is particularly important at the working environment. Migraine frequency may be prevented to a large extent, resulting on positive effects in both the quality of life and productivity. The cost-benefit ratio clearly favours therapeutic and preventive programs against chronic headaches.     

High-rate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an emerging treatment for pain but there is no class 1 study on its role in migraine prophylaxis. In this study we report the efficacy and safety of high-rate rTMS in migraine prophylaxis. Adult migraine patients having >4 attacks/month were randomized to high-rate rTMS or sham stimulation. Stimulation in the form of 10 Hz rTMS, 600 pulses in 10 trains were delivered to the hot spot of the right abductor digiti minimi in 412 s. Three sessions were delivered on alternate days. The outcome was defined at 1 month. The primary outcome measures were reduction in headache frequency and severity >50 % as assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The secondary outcome measures were functional disability, rescue medication and adverse events. Fifty patients each were randomized to rTMS or sham stimulation. The baseline characteristics of rTMS and sham stimulation groups were similar. At 1 month, headache frequency (78.7 vs. 33.3 %; P = 0.0001) and VAS score (76.6 vs. 27.1 %; P = 0.0001) improved significantly in the patients receiving rTMS compared to those in the sham stimulation group. Functional disability also improved significantly in rTMS group (P = 0.0001). Only one patient following rTMS developed transient drowsiness and was withdrawn from the study. This study provides evidence of the efficacy and safety of 10 Hz rTMS in migraine prophylaxis.     

Efficacy and safety of cinnarizine in the prophylaxis of migraine headaches in children: an open, randomized comparative trial with propranolol

Migraine headaches are common in children. Early diagnosis and appropriate interventions are mandatory to prevent decades of suffering and diminished quality of life. There is need for data regarding the efficacy and safety of prophylactic agents in children with migraine; therefore, we designed a randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of cinnarizine with that of a well-known prophylactic agent (propranolol) in the prophylaxis of pediatric migraine headache. A total of 120 patients aged between 6 and 17?years were recruited and 113 patients succeeded in completing all phases of the trial. Of them, 57 patients were given cinnarizine, and propranolol was administered in 56 patients. Reduction in headache frequency was the main response to treatment. Cinnarizine reduced the baseline headache frequency by more than 50% in 74.6% of patients and the mean headache frequency per month was reduced from 11.851?±?0.739 (mean?±?SEM) to 3.358?±?0.739 (mean?±?SEM) attacks per month (P?相似文献   

Approaches to treatments of chronic migraine associated with medication overuse: a comparison between different intensity regimens

Treatment of chronic migraine with medication overuse requires withdrawal from acute medications. However, guidelines and clear indications for different intensity regimens, i.e., day hospital (DH) vs. inpatient treatment, are not available. Patients completed disability, quality of life (QoL) and depression questionnaires; headaches frequency and overused medications category were collected. Mann–Whitney U test and Chi square were used to assess differences between inpatients and DH patients; Bonferroni correction was applied. 194 patients aged 43.9 ± 12 (160 females) were enrolled (100 from DH, 94 inpatients). Inpatients were older, less educated and with lower employment rates. Inpatients had higher MIDAS scores (P = 0.003) and headache frequency (P = 0.002). They had lower QoL for restrictive (P = 0.002) and preventive components; no difference was found for disability, mood state and QoL emotional component. Patients treated during hospitalization had higher disease severity and lower quality of life, but similar disability and mood state than those treated in DH.     

Migraine attacks in the pharmacy: a survey in Piedmont,Italy

Headache patients often consult a pharmacist in an attempt to obtain momentary pain relief without having been given any previous expert advice. A specific questionnaire was distributed to the pharmacies in order to assess the patterns of use and dispensing of analgesic medications to the headache patient who turns to the pharmacist for relief of a painful attack. This study aimed at identifying migraine patients who self-medicated, with further end points including whether these patients shared any particular clinical characteristics, the most common type of analgesic medications used, and what, if anything, was recommended by the pharmacist; lastly, which health care professional, if any, routinely managed the patient’s headaches. A total of 9,100 questionnaires were distributed to the pharmacies and the complete 3,065 were included in the database. The ID Migraine Screener Test was used to classify subjects into 4 groups: “Definite migraine” (3/3 positive answers: n = 1,042; 34 %), “Probable migraine” (2/3: n = 969; 31.6 %), “Unlikely migraine” (1/3: n = 630; 20.5 %), and “Other headaches” (0/3: n = 424; 13.8 %). Only Definite and Probable migraines (n = 2,011) are considered in this paper. Amongst the drugs usually taken by the patients, NSAIDs were more common in the Probable migraine group (60.7 %) than in the Definite migraine (44.7 %) group (p < 0.001). On the contrary, triptans were more commonly used by the Definite migraine group (42.9 %) than the Probable migraine (23.7 %) group (p < 0.001), and combination drugs were preferentially (p < 0.001) chosen by the Definite (13.8 %) rather than the Probable migraine group (8.7 %). A total of 29.2 % of respondents reported that for the management of their headaches, they did not avail themselves of any type of professional healthcare, such as their general practitioner, a headache specialist, or a Headache Center.     

Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale reduces the frequency of migraine attacks

Among 215 patients referred for percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) after presumed paradoxical embolism, we assessed the prevalence of migraine. In the year prior to PFO closure, 48 (22%) patients had migraine, twice the expected prevalence of 10 to 12% in the general European population. In patients with migraine with aura, percutaneous PFO closure reduced the frequency of migraine attacks by 54% (1.2 +/- 0.8 vs 0.6 +/- 0.8 per month; p = 0.001) and in patients with migraine without aura by 62% (1.2 +/- 0.7 vs 0.4 +/- 0.4 per month; p = 0.006). PFO closure did not have an effect on headache frequency in patients with nonmigraine headaches (1.4 +/- 0.9 vs 1.0 +/- 0.9 per month; p = NS).     

Preventive treatment of migraine

Migraine preventive therapy, even in the absence of a headache, is given in an attempt to reduce the frequency, duration, or severity of attacks. Circumstances that might warrant preventive treatment include disabling migraine attacks, the overuse of acute medications or failure of or contraindication to acute medications, troublesome side effects from medication, hemiplegic migraine, or very frequent headaches (more than 2 a week). The major medication groups for preventive treatment include anticonvulsants, antidepressants, b-adrenergic blockers, calcium channel antagonists, serotonin antagonists, neurotoxins, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and others. If preventive medication is indicated, the agent preferentially should be chosen from one of the first-line categories, based on the drug's side-effect profile and the patient's coexistent and comorbid conditions.     

Intranasal sumatriptan for acute migraine attacks: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of intranasal sumatriptan, a selective serotonin agonist, compared to placebo or other migraine therapeutics for the treatment of acute migraine attacks. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data were extracted from eligible studies and pooled as risk ratios (RR), using RevMan software. We performed subgroup and meta-regression analyses for different doses and treatment endpoints. Sixteen RCTs (n = 5925 patients) matched our inclusion criteria. The overall effect-estimate showed that intranasal sumatriptan was superior to placebo in terms of pain relief (RR = 1.70, 95% CI [1.31, 2.21], p < 0.0001) and headache relief (RR = 1.58, 95% CI [1.35, 1.84], p < 0.00001) at 2 h. Although sumatriptan was superior to placebo in terms of headache relief at 30 min (RR = 1.31, 95% CI [1.08, 1.59], p = 0.005), no significant difference was found between both groups in terms of the frequency of pain-free participants at 30 min (RR = 1.18, 95% CI [0.49, 2.88], p = 0.71). Subgroup analysis and meta-regression models showed that increasing the dose of sumatriptan reduced the time needed for headache relief; however, this clinical improvement with higher doses was associated with more frequent adverse events in comparison to smaller doses. In conclusion, intranasal sumatriptan is effective for the treatment of acute migraine attacks. However, it was associated with a six-fold increase in the risk of taste disturbance, compared to the placebo. Future RCTs are recommended to provide head-to-head comparison of different administration routes and drug formulations of sumatriptan.     

Understanding of headache patterns modification in an emergency department during the economic crisis of Greece

Very few neurological research is published regarding health effects of global economic crisis. Our aim was to assess the impact of economic recession on frequency and severity of headaches. We also tested if depression, anxiety and experiences associated with crisis, such as unemployment, were reflected in headaches. This is a retrospective observational study in the Emergency setting of tertiary Clinic from 1 January 2008 until 31 December 2009 and from 1 January 2010 until 31 December 2011. Demographic data were collected of 1094 consecutive adult patients with headache. Multinomial logistic regression performed to examine if hospital anxiety depression (HAD), HAD anxiety, experience of serious life events, year of survey had influence on type of headache. The total number of headache cases increased significantly from 2008 to 2011 (p < 0.001). Tension type and medication overuse headaches remained unchanged over time (p > 0.05), while migraines decreased. Secondary and not otherwise specified (NOS) increased significantly (p < 0.05). The most common, overtime, was Tension type headache, followed by migraines (in 2008, 2011) and NOS (2010). Chi square test showed significant correlation between type of headache and year, as well medication type and year (p < 0.05). Common analgesics, the most common medication, increased five times during survey period (77 % 2008 to 87.6 % 2011). Multivariate analysis revealed stronger association for experience serious events with NOS vs. tension type headache [odds ratio (OR) 0.13; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.03, 0.7]. This is the first study showing that the prolonged economic crisis affected headache frequency accompanied by a higher use of analgesics.     

Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer,ganglion cell layer and macular changes in patients with migraine

The aim of this study was to investigate retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness, macular changes (central subfield thickness (CST), cube average thickness (CAT), cube volume (CV) in patients with migraine using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and to assess if there was any correlation with white matter lesions (WML). In this prospective case–control study, RNFL, GCL thickness and macular changes of 19 migraine patients with aura (MA), 41 migraine without aura (MO) and 60 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects were measured using OCT device. OCT measurements were taken at the same time of the day to minimize the effects of diurnal variation. The average, inferior and superior quadrant RNFL thickness were significantly thinner in patients with migraine (p = 0.017, p = 0.010, p = 0.048). There was also a significant difference between patients with and without aura in the mean and superior quadrant RNFL thickness (p = 0.02, p = 0.043).While there was a significant thinning in CST and CAT in patients with migraine (p = 0.020), there were no significant difference in GCL measurements (p = 0.184). When the groups were compared to the control group, there were significant differences between MA and the control group regarding average, superior and inferior quadrant RNLF thickness (p < 0.001, p = 0.025, p < 0.001). On the other hand, there were significant differences between MO and the control group regarding average and inferior faces (p = 0.037, p = 0.04). When OCT measurements were evaluated according to the frequency of attacks, CST and GCL thickness were significantly thinner in patients who had more than four attacks a month (p = 0.024, p = 0.014). In patients with WML, only CV measurements were significantly thinner than migraine patients without WML (p = 0.014). The decreased RNFL, CST, CAT and CV of the migraine patients might be related to the vascular pathology of the disease. Because WML was not correlated with the same measurements except CV, we think that further studies are needed to evaluate the etiopathologic relationship between OCT measurements and WML in migraine patients.     

Migraine preventive therapy: selection of appropriate patients and general principles of management

The goal of this review is to communicate the rationale and the possible benefits of migraine preventive treatments to clinicians and patients, and to address the many problematic issues created by missed diagnosis or misdiagnoses and inadequate migraine management. Successful implementation of migraine preventive treatment requires appropriate patient selection based on several factors, including the frequency of migraine attacks (> or =2-3 attacks/month), the level of disability incurred and the frequency of acute medication usage. Unfortunately, several epidemiologic surveys indicate that preventive therapies are significantly underutilized, which supports the need for greater dialog concerning migraine prevention between consumers and physicians. Effective migraine preventive therapy should reduce the frequency, duration, and severity of migraine, and also improve function, reduce disability, and possibly reduce the risk of worsening the headache syndrome, through acute medication overuse.     

Effects of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment on efficacy,depression, anxiety,and disability in Turkish patients with chronic migraine

Chronic migraine causes a serious labour loss and disability in the society and increases the risk of depression and anxiety by negatively affecting the quality of life. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) treatment on efficacy before and after treatment in our cases with chronic migraine as well as on depression, anxiety and disability caused by migraine. According to the International Headache Classification (ICHD-III beta version), 60 adult patients who were diagnosed with chronic migraine were included in the study. A total of 155 IU BoNT-A treatment from 31 regions was administered in accordance with the protocol of PREEMPT study. Information about the characteristics of patients’ headaches, background and family history, drugs they used was recorded. At the baseline and in the first and third month after the BoNT-A injection, VAS scores, the number of both headache days and attacks, the headache duration, the frequency of application to emergency services and the intake of both analgesics and triptans during attacks were evaluated. MIDAS, BDI and BAI were evaluated at the baseline and in the third month after the BoNT-A injection. BoNT-A injection provided a significant decrease in the number of days and severity of headaches, MIDAS disability scores and psychiatric complaints in cases with chronic migraine who did not respond to prophylactic treatments in the third month of the treatment.     

Methylprednisolone plus diazepam i.v. as bridge therapy for medication overuse headache

Management of medication overuse headache (MOH) requires abrupt suspension of overused drugs either alone or in association with a detoxification protocol to prevent withdrawal. However, there is no consensus about which suspension strategy is the most effective. Moreover, reliable data about the possible mid-term effect of detoxification are not available. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a bridge therapy consisting of a 5-day i.v. infusion of methylprednisolone and diazepam determines a significant reduction in headache frequency and drug assumption during the detoxification protocol (day 5) and in the first 3 months in patients with MOH. We conducted a retrospective non-randomized before-and-after study comparing patients with MOH undergoing a bridge therapy protocol (5-day infusion of methylprednisolone, diazepam) with those who refused the treatment and were only recommended to suspend overused painkillers. Both groups started a prophylactic treatment and were followed-up for 3 months. At day 5, 82% of our patients were headache-free; moreover, 48% of the patients did not take any painkiller during the 5-day treatment. Three months after, the intervention group showed a greater reduction of monthly headache days (9.4 vs 3.0) and drugs (19.7 vs 6.5), a greater rate of patients with a ≥ 50% reduction of monthly headaches (p = 0.019) and symptomatic drug consumption (p = 0.000), than the control group. The methylprednisolone and diazepam detoxification protocol reduced headache attacks and drug assumption immediately and in the first 3 months after the intervention, concurring to improve the effect of a new prophylactic therapy.