阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗精神分裂症对照研究

目的：比较阿立哌唑与利培酮对精神分裂症的疗效及安全性。方法：选取70例精神分裂症患者,随机分为阿立哌唑组36例,利培酮组34例,分别给予阿立哌唑和利培酮治疗,疗程8周。在治疗前及治疗1、2、4、6、8周末分别采用阳性与阴性症状量表（PANSS）、治疗中出现的症状量表（TESS）对两组进行评定。并于治疗前、中、后检查催乳素水平。结果：两组治疗后PANSS评分均有显著下降。阿立哌唑组的锥体外系不良反应、体质量增加及月经失调均较利培酮组少而轻,对催乳素水平没有影响。结论：2药对精神分裂症均有较好的疗效,起效快,不良反应小。     

阿立哌唑与利培酮对女性精神分裂症患者催乳素水平及体质量的影响

目的：探讨阿立哌唑与利培酮对女性精神分裂症患者催乳素（PROL ）水平和体质量的影响及其与临床疗效的关系。方法选取120例女性精神分裂症患者,采用随机对照研究,随机分为阿立哌唑组60例,利培酮组60例,分别给予阿立哌唑和利培酮治疗6个月,在治疗前及治疗后1、3、6个月末采用阳性与阴性症状量表（PANSS）及治疗中出现的症状量表（T ESS ）对2组进行临床疗效和不良反应评定,采用贝克曼全自动微粒子化学发光分析仪进行血清催乳素水平测定。结果2组PANSS各项评分及临床有效率差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）;阿立哌唑组在PROL水平改变及体质量增加方面优于利培酮组（ P＜0.05或0.01）,泌乳、月经紊乱及闭经明显少于利培酮组。结论阿立哌唑与利培酮两药治疗女性精神分裂症均有较好疗效,阿立哌唑对女性内分泌影响较小,更适合于女性患者临床应用。     

阿立哌唑治疗老年精神分裂症的疗效对比观察

目的比较阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗老年精神分裂症的临床疗效和安全性。方法将50例住院的老年精神分裂症患者，随机分为阿立哌唑组25例和利培酮组25例，治疗8周。采用阳性与阴性症状量表（PANSS）评定疗效，用不良反应量表（TESS）及锥体外系不良反应量表（ESRS）评定不良反应。结果阿立哌唑组有效率为84％，显效率为60％；利培酮组有效率为88％，显效率为56％，两组无显著性差异。治疗8周后，两组PANSS总分及各因子分较治疗前均有显著性下降。两组TESS及ESRS评分比较，阿立哌唑组不良反应少而轻微。结论阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗老年精神分裂症疗效相当，但阿立哌唑不良反应更轻，安全性更高。     

阿立哌唑治疗首发精神分裂症的随访对照研究

目的：探讨阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗首发精神分裂症的疗效和安全性。方法：将148例首发精神分裂症患者随机分为阿立哌唑组75例和利培酮组73例。以阳性与阴性症状量表（PANSS）减分率评定疗效同时评定社会功能缺陷筛选表（SDSS）和治疗中出现的症状量表（TESS）,以SDSS评定社会功能,用TESS评定不良反应。结果：阿立哌唑组与利培酮组在痊愈率、显效率、PANSS评分与SDSS评分差异无统计学意义（P均〉0.05）。阿立哌唑组在体质量增加、内分泌失调与锥体外系方面少于利培酮组,而在兴奋激越与恶心呕吐多于利培酮组,差异均具有统计学意义（P均〈0.05）。结论：阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗首发精神分裂症长期疗效均好,阿立哌唑不良反应较少,依从性高。     

阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗精神分裂症的对照研究

目的 比较阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗精神分裂症的疗效和安全性。方法将68例精神分裂症患者随机分为两组，分别给予阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗，疗程8周，用阳性和阴性症状量表（PANSS）、临床总体印象量表（CGI）评定临床疗效，用副反应量表（TESS）、锥体外系副反应量表（RSESE）评定不良反应。结果阿立哌唑组与利培酮组从治疗第1周末起PANSS总分及阳性症状量表得分均明显下降，差异无显著性；阿立哌唑组从治疗第1周末起阴性症状量表得分明显下降，而利培酮组从治疗第2周末起阴性症状量表得分才开始下降，差异有显著性。阿立哌唑组的不良反应主要为头痛、恶心、呕吐，利培酮组的不良反应以锥体外系反应（EPS）占首位，其次为血浆催乳素（PRL）浓度升高，而阿立哌唑组的EPS发生少且轻，对血浆催乳素浓度几乎无影响，差异有非常显著性（P〈0．01）。结论阿立哌唑是一种安全、有效的抗精神病药。     

精神分裂症药物治疗对照研究（一）：阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗精神分裂症对照研究

目的：比较阿立哌唑和利培酮对精神分裂症的疗效和安全性。方法：将56例精神分裂症患者，随机分为阿立哌唑组（28例）和利培酮组（28例）。疗程8周。采用阳性与阴性症状量表（PANSS）、韦氏记忆量表修订版（WMS-RC）和副反应量表（TESS）进行评定。结果：阿立哌唑组显效率为67．9％，有效率为89．3％；利培酮组分别为64、3％和85．7％；两组差异无显著性。两组治疗后WMS的短时记忆、瞬时记忆、记忆商数（MQ）均明显高于治疗前，两组间比较差异均无显著性。结论：阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗精神分裂症患者疗效相当，不良反应较少，均能明显改善患者的认知功能。     

阿立哌唑与利培酮维持治疗精神分裂症的对照研究

目的探讨阿立哌唑对精神分裂症患者长期维持治疗的疗效、安全性。方法将84例精神分裂症患者随机分为阿立哌唑组及利培酮组维持治疗,观察12个月。采用阳性与阴性症状量表（PANSS）评定疗效,社会功能缺陷筛查量表（sDsS）评定社会功能,治疗中出现的症状量表（TESS）评定不良反应。结果治疗后3、6、12个月两组PANSS总分及各因子分、SDSS评分及各因子分与治疗前比较均明显下降（P〈0．01）,但两组间疗效差异无统计学意义。阿立哌唑无严重不良反应,服药依从性高,对血脂、月经及体质量的影响明显低于利培酮。对社会功能在某些方面的改善较利培酮更显著。结论阿立哌唑维持治疗疗效及安全性较好,适合精神分裂症患者长期服用。     

阿立哌唑治疗晚发性精神分裂症的疗效对照分析

目的探讨阿立哌唑治疗晚发性精神分裂症患者的疗效与安全性。方法将62例符合CCDM-3晚发性精神分裂症诊断标准的患者随机分为阿立哌唑组（30例）和利培酮组（32例）。治疗8周。使用PANSS和CGISI量表评定疗效以及TESS量表评定不良反应。结果两组PANSS量表总分，阳性、阴性症状分、一般精神病理分以及CGISI量表评分，在第2周末均有极明显改善（P均〈0．01），在第2、4及8周末两组比较无显著性差异。阿立哌唑组有效率为70％，利培酮组有效率为68．75％。阿立哌唑常见不良反应为失眠、焦虑、静坐不能、便秘及食欲下降等。结论阿立哌唑对晚发性精神分裂症的阳、阴性症状有效，其不良反应较轻微。     

阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗精神分裂症的疗效比较

目的比较阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗精神分裂症的疗效和安全性。方法将77例精神分裂症患者随机分为两组,阿立哌唑组40例,利培酮组37例,分别治疗6周;以阴性、阳性症状量表（PANSS）和治疗中出现的症状量表（TESS）分别评定疗效和不良反应。结果在治疗第6周末,两组的显效率分别为72．5％及70．2％（P〉0．05）;两组治疗前后的PANSS总分同组比较有显著性差异（P〈0．01）,两组间比较无显著性差异（P〉0．05）。结论阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗精神分裂症的疗效相当,阿立哌唑的不良反应轻于利培酮。     

阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗精神分裂症对照研究

目的:探讨阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗首发精神分裂症的临床疗效及安全性。方法:将首发精神分裂症患者100例随机分为阿立哌唑组与利培酮组,疗程8周。采用阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)及副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效与不良反应。结果:阿立哌唑组与利培酮组的有效率分别为84.1%和88.9%,两组间治疗前后PANSS评分差异均无显著性(P>0.05),而不良反应发生率阿立哌唑组显著低于利培酮组(P<0.05)。结论:阿立哌唑与利培酮对精神分裂症疗效相当,不良反应发生率低,是一种安全有效的抗精神病药物。     

A multicentre, randomized, naturalistic, open-label study between aripiprazole and standard of care in the management of community-treated schizophrenic patients Schizophrenia Trial of Aripiprazole: (STAR) study.

BACKGROUND: Naturalistic effectiveness trials of atypical antipsychotics are needed to provide broader information on efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients with schizophrenia treated in a community practice setting. METHOD: In this 26-week, open-label, multicentre study, patients with schizophrenia requiring a switch in antipsychotic medication because current medication was not well tolerated and/or clinical symptoms were not well controlled were randomized to receive aripiprazole or an atypical antipsychotic standard of care (SOC) treatment (i.e., olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone based on the investigator's judgment of the optimal treatment for the individual patient and the patient's prior response to antipsychotic medication). The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness of a 26-week treatment of aripiprazole versus SOC, as measured by the Investigator Assessment Questionnaire (IAQ) total score at Week 26 last observation carried forward (LOCF) (primary endpoint), a validated measure that monitors relief or worsening of 10 key symptoms associated with the psychopathology of schizophrenia and side effects of antipsychotic treatment. Secondary objectives were to further assess effectiveness using the Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) and Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness scale, to assess time to treatment discontinuation, patient preference of medication, quality of life, and the tolerability of aripiprazole compared with SOC. RESULTS: Aripiprazole treatment (n=268) resulted in significantly better effectiveness than SOC treatment (n=254; P<0.001; Week 26 LOCF) as evidenced by the IAQ total score beginning at Week 4 (the first assessment point) and sustained through Week 26. A similar relationship was demonstrated among patients who completed the study (observed cases analysis); aripiprazole was associated with significantly better effectiveness at all time points with a greater differential effect from SOC over time. Patients treated with aripiprazole also demonstrated significantly greater improvements on the CGI-I scale (responder rate, P=0.009 at Week 26 LOCF), as well as on quality of life (Quality of Life scale total score; P<0.001 at Week 26). Furthermore, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving aripiprazole rated their study medication as "much better" on the Preference of Medication Questionnaire (POM) scale than their pre-study medication compared with SOC patients (P<0.001; Week 26). Time to treatment discontinuation and rates of discontinuation due to adverse events were similar in both treatment groups. The incidence of patients with one or more extrapyramidal symptom (e.g., akathisia, dystonia, parkinsonian events, and residual events) was higher in patients receiving aripiprazole compared with patients treated with SOC (13.5% vs. 5.6%); however, a higher proportion of patients in the SOC-treated group had clinically significant weight gain (21.2% vs. 7.3% for aripiprazole) and potentially clinically relevant elevated fasting levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and serum prolactin compared with patients receiving aripiprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Aripiprazole is an effective atypical antipsychotic for the treatment of schizophrenia, demonstrating better effectiveness than SOC agents used in this study in patients for whom a switch in antipsychotic medication was warranted.     

阿立哌唑治疗伴激越的精神分裂症对照研究

目的:研究阿立哌唑治疗伴激越的精神分裂症患者疗效与不良反应。方法:75例伴激越的精神分裂症患者随机分为阿立哌唑组(40例)和奥氮平组(35例),治疗6周。应用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)、兴奋分量表(PEC)和治疗中出现的症状量表(TESS)评定疗效及不良反应。结果:两组治疗后PANSS总分和PEC分均显著低于治疗前(P<0.05或P<0.01)。两组疗效差异无显著统计意义,两组不良反应均轻微。结论:阿立哌唑能显著改善伴激越的精神分裂症患者的症状。     

阿立哌唑与氯丙嗪对精神分裂症患者认知功能的影响

目的 探讨阿立哌唑和氯丙嗪对首发精神分裂症患者认知功能的影响.方法 将56例首发精神分裂症患者随机分为阿立哌唑组(n=30)、氯丙嗪组(n=26),分别给予阿立哌唑和氯丙嗪治疗,疗程6周.在治疗前及治疗6周末进行阳性与阴性量表(PANSS)评分、威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)﹑连线测验(A和B)﹑韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS)中的数字符号和数字广度(顺﹑逆)测验等神经心理测验.结果 2组治疗6周后PANSS评分均有明显下降,差异无统计学意义.阿立哌唑组各项认知功能指标均有不同程度的改善,而氯丙嗪组只有两项(WCST中持续反应数和数字广度测验)较治疗前显著好转.阿立哌唑组除WCST中持续反应数、完成分类数和数字广度测验外,其余各指标均显著优于氯丙嗪组.结论 阿立哌唑对首发精神分裂症患者认知功能的改善明显,显著优于氯丙嗪.     

阿立哌唑与氟哌啶醇治疗儿童、青少年精神分裂症的对照研究

目的 探讨阿立哌唑治疗儿童、青少年精神分裂症的疗效及安全性.方法 将67例儿童、青少年精神分裂症患者随机分为阿立哌唑组(35例)和氟哌啶醇组(32例)进行对照研究,疗程8周.分别采用PANSS、BPRS、TESS及RSESE进行评定.结果 两组治疗后的PANSS、BPRS评分均较治疗前显著降低(P＜0.01),阿立哌唑...     

阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗精神分裂症临床研究

目的:评价阿立哌唑治疗精神分裂症的疗效。方法:选择病程≤3年的80例精神分裂症患者,按入院顺序随机分为阿立哌唑组(40例)和利培酮组(40例)进行6周观察。采用阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)评定疗效,用副反应量表(TESS)和锥体外系副反应量表(RSESE)评定不良反应。结果:两药治疗精神分裂症疗效相当。阿立哌唑组的锥体外系反应(EPS)发生率32.5%(13例)明显低于利培酮组55.0%(22例)(P<0.05)。结论:阿立哌唑为一种安全有效和耐受性较好的抗精神病药。     

阿立哌唑与奋乃静治疗女性精神分裂症对照性研究

目的比较阿立哌唑与奋乃静治疗女性精神分裂症疗效和安全性。方法将83例女性精神分裂症住院患者随机分为阿立哌唑组（研究组）41例和奋乃静组（对照组）42例。以阳性和阴性综合征量表（PANSS）评定疗效,治疗中需处理的不良反应症状量表（TESS）评定不良反应。结果治疗后第2、4、8周末两组PANSS总分及各因子分与治疗前比较均显著下降（P〈0．05,P〈0．01）。治疗后第8周末研究组PANSS量表阴性症状分显著低于对照组（P〈0．05）。两组不良反应均较轻微,不良反应发生率在两组之间无统计学差异（P〉0．05）。结论阿立哌唑治疗女性精神分裂症安全有效。     

Aripiprazole for the prevention of relapse in stabilized patients with chronic schizophrenia: a placebo-controlled 26-week study

BACKGROUND: Aripiprazole is a novel antipsychotic for the management of schizophrenia. This study investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aripiprazole in preventing relapse in adult chronic schizophrenia patients experiencing ongoing stable symptomatology. METHOD: In this 26-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study, 310 patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia (mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS] total score = 82) were randomly assigned to receive a once-daily fixed dose of aripiprazole, 15 mg, or placebo. The primary outcome measure was time to relapse following randomization. Secondary objectives were to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aripiprazole, 15 mg, compared with placebo, in the study population. The study was conducted between Dec. 21, 2000, and Aug. 20, 2001. RESULTS: The time to relapse following randomization was significantly (p < .001) longer for aripiprazole compared with placebo. More patients relapsed with placebo (N = 85; 57%) than aripiprazole (N = 50; 34%); the relative risk of relapse for the aripiprazole group was 0.59 (p < .001). Aripiprazole was significantly superior to placebo from baseline to endpoint in PANSS total, PANSS positive, PANSS-derived Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) scores and demonstrated significantly better mean Clinical Global Impressions-Global Improvement scale scores (p < or = .01 for all comparisons except CGI-S: .01 < p < or = .05). Aripiprazole was well tolerated, with no evidence of marked sedation and no evidence of hyperprolactinemia or prolonged heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc). Extrapyramidal symptoms were comparable in the aripiprazole and placebo groups. Modest mean weight loss at endpoint was evident in both groups. CONCLUSION: Aripiprazole, 15 mg once daily, is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for prevention of relapse in patients with chronic, stable schizophrenia.     

阿立哌唑与氯氮平治疗精神分裂症对照研究

目的：比较阿立哌唑与氯氮平治疗精神分裂症的临床疗效与安全性。方法：将精神分裂症患者100例随机分为阿立哌唑组与氯氮平组。疗程12周。采用阳性与阴性症状量表（PANSS）及治疗中出现的症状量表（TESS）、健康状况问卷（SF-36）评定疗效及不良反应。结果：两组治疗后PANSS评分均显著下降，两组问比较差异无显著性（P〉0．05）。不良反应发生率阿立哌唑组显著低于氯氮平组（P〈0．05）。结论：阿立哌唑治疗精神分裂症疗效与氯氮平相仿，不良反应少，是一种安全有效的抗精神病药。     

3种抗精神病药对精神分裂症认知功能的影响

目的:探讨阿立哌唑、利培酮和氯丙嗪对首发精神分裂症患者认知功能的影响。方法:56例首发精神分裂症患者分为阿立哌唑组(n=18)、利培酮组(n=24)和氯丙嗪组(n=14),在治疗前和治疗6周进行阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)评分,威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)、连线测验(A和B)、韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS)中的数字符号和数字广度(顺、逆)测验等神经心理测验。结果:治疗6周后,3组PANSS评分均明显下降,3组之间差异无显著性。阿立哌唑组和利培酮组各项认知功能指标均有不同程度的改善,而氯丙嗪组只有2项(WCST中持续反应数和数字广度测验)较治疗前显著好转。连线测验B阿立哌唑组显著优于利培酮组,其余各指标两组间差异无显著性。阿立哌唑组除WCST中持续反应数、完成分类数和数字广度测验外,其余各指标均显著优于氯丙嗪组;利培酮组除WCST中持续反应数外,其余各指标均显著优于氯丙嗪组。结论:阿立哌唑和利培酮对首发精神分裂症患者认知功能的改善作用相当,均显著优于氯丙嗪。